簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 蔡婉莉
Ursula
論文名稱: Hidden Figures: A Q Method Study of IT Women's Career Development
Hidden Figures: A Q Method Study of IT Women's Career Development
指導教授: 林彣珊
Lin, Wen-Shan
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 國際經營管理研究所
Institute of International Management
論文出版年: 2023
畢業學年度: 111
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 86
中文關鍵詞:
外文關鍵詞: Women Managers, IT-Related Industry, Women in Tech, Gender, Career Development, Q-Methodology
相關次數: 點閱:77下載:6
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • The advancement of technology has opened many job opportunities for people
    worldwide, including for women. Many studies have researched how women break
    the glass ceiling and provide different suggestions on how women obtain their
    managerial roles. This study set out to examine the career development of women
    managers working in the IT industry. Internal and external factors from past studies
    and past research respondents’ responses regarding the factors that have helped
    women become managers and/or helped them advance in their careers were first
    gathered. Then a Q-method study was conducted on 22 women managers working in IT-related industries, regardless of their department. They shared their experiences and perspective through card sorting and open-ended questions. The result deciphers different groups of sociological viewpoints, and through their dissimilarities of card placement and distinguishing factors, five groupings – 'The Super Mom', 'The Fatalist', 'The Cognizant', 'The Social Butterfly', and 'The Adventurer' – have emerged, providing different type of ways these factors have influence women in obtaining their managerial position.

    ABSTRACT I ACKNOWLEDGMENTS II TABLE OF CONTENTS III LIST OF TABLES VI LIST OF FIGURES VII CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 4 2.1 Gender Issues at Workplace. 4 2.2 Gender Issues in the IT Industry. 7 2.3 Factors Influencing Attainment of Women’s Managerial Position. 13 CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY 18 3.1 Q-Methodology. 18 3.2 Stages of Q-Methodology. 19 3.2.1 Establishing the Concourse. 19 3.2.2 Developing the Q Set. 20 3.2.3 Selection of P Set. 23 3.2.4 Conducting the Q Sorting. 24 3.2.5 Post Q Interview. 25 3.2.6 Analysis. 26 3.2.7 Interpretation. 27 CHAPTER FOUR RESEARCH RESULTS 28 4.1 Profile of Interview Respondents. 28 4.2 Analysis of the Data. 29 4.3 Grouping Interpretation. 30 4.3.1 Group 1 (The Super Mom). 32 4.3.2 Group 2 (The Fatalist). 35 4.3.3 Group 3 (The Cognizant). 38 4.3.4 Group 4 (The Social Butterfly). 39 4.3.5 Group 5 (The Adventurer). 41 CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS 44 5.1 Research Discussion & Conclusion. 44 5.2 Implications. 46 5.3 Limitation & Future Studies. 47 5.3.1 Respondent. 47 5.3.2 Interview Process. 48 REFERENCES 49 APPENDICES 54 Appendix 1: Consent Message. 54 Appendix 2: Instruction Message. 54 Appendix 3: Survey Questions. 55 Appendix 4: Data Run Result. 56 Appendix 5: Interview Transcript. 59 Appendix 5.1 Interview Transcript of Respondent 1. 59 Appendix 5.2 Interview Transcript of Respondent 2. 60 Appendix 5.3 Interview Transcript of Respondent 3. 61 Appendix 5.4 Interview Transcript of Respondent 4. 62 Appendix 5.5 Interview Transcript of Respondent 5. 63 Appendix 5.6 Interview Transcript of Respondent 6. 64 Appendix 5.7 Interview Transcript of Respondent 7. 66 Appendix 5.8 Interview Transcript of Respondent 8. 67 Appendix 5.9 Interview Transcript of Respondent 9. 68 Appendix 5.10 Interview Transcript of Respondent 10. 69 Appendix 5.11 Interview Transcript of Respondent 11. 70 Appendix 5.12 Interview Transcript of Respondent 12. 71 Appendix 5.13 Interview Transcript of Respondent 13. 73 Appendix 5.14 Interview Transcript of Respondent 14. 74 Appendix 5.15 Interview Transcript of Respondent 15. 75 Appendix 5.16 Interview Transcript of Respondent 16. 76 Appendix 5.17 Interview Transcript of Respondent 17. 77 Appendix 5.18 Interview Transcript of Respondent 18. 79 Appendix 5.19 Interview Transcript of Respondent 19. 81 Appendix 5.20 Interview Transcript of Respondent 20. 82 Appendix 5.21 Interview Transcript of Respondent 21. 84 Appendix 5.22 Interview Transcript of Respondent 22. 85

    Adams, R. B., & Funk, P. (2012). Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter?
    Management Science, 58(2), 219-235.
    Almeida, F., Santos, J. D., & Monteiro, J. A. (2020). The challenges and opportunities
    in the digitalization of companies in a post-COVID-19 World. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 48(3), 97-103.
    Alon, T., Doepke, M., Olmstead-Rumsey, J., & Tertilt, M. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on gender equality. Retrieved from
    Andersen, S., Mintz-Binder, R., Sweatt, L., & Song, H. (2021). Building nurse
    resilience in the workplace. Applied Nursing Research, 59(0), 151433.
    Bahn, K., Cohen, J., & Rodgers, Y. (2020). van der, M.(2020). A feminist perspective
    on COVID-19 and the value of care work globally. Gender, Work & Organization, 27(5), 695-699.
    Balaoing, G. (2023). Nursing Burnout and Preventative Measures.
    Bapna, S., & Funk, R. (2020). Interventions for improving professional networking for women: Experimental evidence from the IT sector. Available at SSRN 3157260.
    Beckhusen, J. (2016). Occupations in information technology: US Department of
    Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, US Census Bureau.
    Bertrand, M., Cortes, P., Olivetti, C., & Pan, J. (2021). Social norms, labour market
    opportunities, and the marriage gap between skilled and unskilled women. The
    Review of Economic Studies, 88(4), 1936-1978.
    Boeije, H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality and quantity, 36(0), 391-409.
    Boncori, I. (2020). The never‐ending shift: A feminist reflection on living and
    organizing academic lives during the coronavirus pandemic. Gender, Work &
    Organization, 27(5), 677-682.
    Brinton, M. C., & Oh, E. (2019). Babies, work, or both? Highly educated women’s
    employment and fertility in East Asia. American Journal of Sociology, 125(1), 105-140.
    Brown, S. R. (1993). A primer on Q methodology. Operant subjectivity, 16(3/4), 91-
    138.
    Brown, S. R. (1996). Q methodology and qualitative research. Qualitative health
    research, 6(4), 561-567.
    Brown, S. R. (2003). Empowerment as subjective operant. Paper presented at the
    Workshop on “Measuring Empowerement: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives”
    held at the World Bank in Washington, DC on February.
    Cheung, F. M., & Halpern, D. F. (2010). Women at the top: Powerful leaders define
    success as work+ family in a culture of gender. American psychologist, 65(3),
    182.
    Cho, Y., McLean, G. N., Amornpipat, I., Chang, W.-W., Hewapathirana, G. I.,
    Horimoto, M., . . . Othman, J. (2015). Asian women in top management: Eight
    country cases. Human Resource Development International, 18(4), 407-428.
    Chou, W.-C. G., Fosh, P., & Foster, D. (2005). Female managers in Taiwan:
    opportunities and barriers in changing times. Asia Pacific Business Review,
    11(2), 251-266.
    Christman, D. E., & McClellan, R. L. (2012). Discovering middle space: Distinctions
    of sex and gender in resilient leadership. The Journal of Higher Education, 83(5), 648-670.
    Ciminelli, G., Schwellnus, C., & Stadler, B. (2021). Sticky floors or glass ceilings?
    The role of human capital, working time flexibility and discrimination in the
    gender wage gap.
    Dahlander, L., & McFarland, D. A. (2013). Ties that last: Tie formation and persistence in research collaborations over time. Administrative science quarterly, 58(1), 69-110.
    Damio, S. M. (2016). Q Methodology: An Overview and Steps to Implementation.
    Asian Journal of University Education, 12(1), 105.
    Davis-Ali, S. (2017). Advancing Women Technologists Into Positions of Leadership.
    Eagly, A. H. (2007). Female leadership advantage and disadvantage: Resolving the
    contradictions. Psychology of women quarterly, 31(1), 1-12.
    Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female
    leaders. Psychological review, 109(3), 573.
    Foerster, C., & Duchek, S. (2017). What makes leaders resilient? An exploratory
    interview study. German Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(4), 281-306.
    Förster, C., Duchek, S., Geithner, S., & Krägler, M. (2022). Developing an integrated
    framework of healthcare leaders’ resilience. Review of Managerial Science, 0(0), 1-24.
    Funk, C., & Parker, K. (2018). Women and men in STEM often at odds over workplace equity.
    Furst, S. A., & Reeves, M. (2008). Queens of the hill: Creative destruction and the
    emergence of executive leadership of women. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(3), 372-384.
    Gallivan, M., Adya, M., Ahuja, M., Hoonakker, P., & Woszczynski, A. (2006). Workforce diversity in the IT profession: Recognizing and resolving the shortage of women and minority employees. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMIS CPR conference on computer personnel research: Forty four years of computer personnel research: achievements, challenges & the future.
    Gao, J., & Soranzo, A. (2020). Applying Q-methodology to investigate people’preferences for multivariate stimuli. Frontiers in psychology, 11(0),556509.
    Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies
    for qualitative research: Routledge.
    Glass, C., & Cook, A. (2016). Leading at the top: Understanding women's challenges
    above the glass ceiling. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 51-63.
    Gomez, M. J., Fassinger, R. E., Prosser, J., Cooke, K., Mejia, B., & Luna, J. (2001). Voces abriendo caminos (voices foraging paths): A qualitative study of the career development of notable Latinas. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(3), 286.
    Greguletz, E., Diehl, M.-R., & Kreutzer, K. (2019). Why women build less effective
    networks than men: The role of structural exclusion and personal hesitation.
    Human relations, 72(7), 1234-1261.
    Hao, S., Hong, W., Xu, H., Zhou, L., & Xie, Z. (2015). Relationship between resilience, stress and burnout among civil servants in Beijing, China: Mediating and moderating effect analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 65-71.
    Hayes, B. K., Heit, E., & Swendsen, H. (2010). Inductive reasoning. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: Cognitive science, 1(2), 278-292.
    He, W., Zhang, Z. J., & Li, W. (2021). Information technology solutions, challenges,
    and suggestions for tackling the COVID-19 pandemic. International journal of
    information management, 57(0), 102287.
    Holtzblatt, K., & Marsden, N. (2018). Retaining women in technology. Paper
    presented at the 2018 IEEE international conference on engineering, technology and innovation (ICE/ITMC).
    Jogulu, U., & Franken, E. (2022). The career resilience of senior women managers: A
    cross‐cultural perspective. Gender, Work & Organization.
    Kossek, E. E., & Perrigino, M. B. (2016). Resilience: A review using a grounded
    integrated occupational approach. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 00-
    00.
    Kovaleva, Y., Hyrynsalmi, S., Saltan, A., Happonen, A., & Kasurinen, J. (2023). Becoming an entrepreneur: A study of factors with women from the tech
    sector. Information and Software Technology, 155(0), 107110.
    Kuntz, J. R., Malinen, S., & Näswall, K. (2017). Employee resilience: Directions for
    resilience development. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 69(3), 223.
    Langer, N., Gopal, R. D., & Bapna, R. (2020). Onward and upward? An empirical
    investigation of gender and promotions in Information Technology Services.
    Information Systems Research, 31(2), 383-398.
    Ledesma, J. (2014). Conceptual frameworks and research models on resilience in
    leadership. Sage Open, 4(3), 2158244014545464.
    Lewin, T. (1989). Mommy career track sets off a furor. The New York Times, 8(0), 18.
    Liu, H. Y. (2023). “When nobody listens, go online”: The “807” labor movement
    against workplace sexism in China's tech industry. Gender, Work & Organization, 30(1), 312-328.
    MacMillan, D. (2012). The rise of the ‘brogrammer’. Bloomberg Businessweek, 1.
    Madsen, S. R. (2017). Handbook of research on gender and leadership: Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Maheshwari, M., & Lenka, U. (2022). An integrated conceptual framework of the
    glass ceiling effect. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance.
    Makarem, Y., & Wang, J. (2020). Career experiences of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields: A systematic literature review. Human resource development quarterly, 31(1), 91-111.
    McKeown, B., & Thomas, D. B. (2013). Q methodology (Vol. 66): Sage publications.
    McLaughlin, H., Silvester, J., Bilimoria, D., Jané, S., Sealy, R., Peters, K., . . . Goke,
    J. (2017). Women in power: Contributing factors that impact on women in
    organizations and politics; psychological research and bets practice.
    Miles-Cohen, S. E., Brown, K. S., Shullman, S. L., & Coons, H. L. (2020). American
    Psychological Association (APA) Leadership Institute for Women in Psychology: Herstory, impacts, and next steps. The Psychologist-Manager Journal, 23(3-4), 139.
    Militello, M., & Benham, M. K. (2010). “Sorting Out” collective leadership: How Qmethodology can be used to evaluate leadership development. The Leadership
    Quarterly, 21(4), 620-632.
    Mundy, L. (2017). Why Is Silicon Valley So Awful to Women? The Atlantic. (April
    2017). In.
    Oladipo, O., Platt, K., & Shim, H. S. (2023). Female entrepreneurs managing from
    home. Small Business Economics, 1-18.
    Omair, K. (2010). Typology of career development for Arab women managers in the
    United Arab Emirates. Career Development International, 15(2), 121-143.
    Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., Walker, L. S., & Woehr, D. J. (2014). Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: A meta-analysis of contextual
    moderators. Journal of applied psychology, 99(6), 1129.
    Pillay, D. (2020). Positive affect and mindfulness as predictors of resilience amongst
    women leaders in higher education institutions. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(1), 1-10.
    Prasad, D. K., Mangipudi, D. M. R., Vaidya, D. R., & Muralidhar, B. (2020). Organizational climate, opportunities, challenges and psychological wellbeing
    of the remote working employees during COVID-19 pandemic: A general linear model approach with reference to information technology industry in Hyderabad. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), 11(4).
    Raile, A. N., Raile, E. D., Parker, D. C., Shanahan, E. A., & Haines, P. (2021). Women and the weight of a pandemic: A survey of four Western US states early in the Coronavirus outbreak. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(0), 554-565.
    Ramos, A., Latorre, F., Tomas, I., & Ramos, J. (2022). TOP WOMAN: Identifying
    barriers to women's access to management. European Management Journal,
    40(1), 45-55.
    Reber, B. H., Kaufman, S. E., & Cropp, F. (2000). Assessing Q-assessor: a validation
    study of computer-based Q sorts versus paper sorts. Operant subjectivity,
    23(4).
    Schultheiss, D. E. (2021). Shining the light on women's work, this time brighter: Let's
    start at the top. Journal of vocational behavior, 126(0), 103558.
    Schultheiss, D. E. P. (2009). To mother or matter: Can women do both? Journal of
    Career Development, 36(1), 25-48.
    Scott, A. (2017). Tech Leavers Study: A First-of-its-kind Analysis of why People
    Volunarily Left Jobs in Tech: Kapor Center for Social Impact.
    Smith, N. W. (2001). Current systems in psychology: History, theory, research, and
    applications: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
    Tabassum, N., Shafique, S., Konstantopoulou, A., & Arslan, A. (2019). Antecedents
    of women managers’ resilience: Conceptual discussion and implications for
    HRM. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 27(2), 241-268.
    Tang, M. T. (1992). A survey of women managers in Taiwan: Perceptions and perspectives. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 9(1), 95-105.
    Trauth, E. M., Quesenberry, J. L., & Huang, H. (2009). Retaining women in the US IT
    workforce: theorizing the influence of organizational factors. European Journal of Information Systems, 18(5), 476-497.
    Tubergen, N. V., & Olins, R. A. (1978). Mail vs. personal interview administration for
    Q sorts: A comparative study. Operant subjectivity.
    Van Exel, J., & De Graaf, G. (2005). Q methodology: A sneak preview.
    Watts, S., & Stenner, P. (2005). Doing Q methodology: theory, method and
    interpretation. Qualitative research in psychology, 2(1), 67-91.
    Webler, T., Danielson, S., & Tuler, S. (2007). Guidance on the use of Q method for
    evaluation of public involvement programs at contaminated sites. Greenfield,
    MA: Social and Environmental Research Institute.
    Wenham, C., Smith, J., & Morgan, R. (2020). Covid-19 is an opportunity for gender
    equality within the workplace and at home. Bmj, 369.
    Worley, L. L., & Stonnington, C. M. (2017). Self-care, resilience, and work-life balance. In Physician Mental Health and Well-Being (pp. 237-263): Springer.
    Yavorsky, J. E., Qian, Y., & Sargent, A. C. (2021). The gendered pandemic: The
    implications of COVID‐19 for work and family. Sociology Compass, 15(6), e12881.
    Yost, P. R. (2016). Resilience practices. Industrial and Organizational Psychology,
    9(2), 475-479.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE