簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 許瀞尹
Xu, Jing-Yin
論文名稱: 制定公股銀行之可持續性數位轉型機制-以合作金庫為例
Enacting sustainable digital transformation mechanisms in public bank: A Case Study of TCB Bank
指導教授: 黃振皓
Huang, Chen-Hao
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理學系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2025
畢業學年度: 113
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 67
中文關鍵詞: 數位轉型制定理論控制理論金融科技質性研究
外文關鍵詞: Digital Transformation, Enactment Theory, Control Theory, Fintech, Qualitative Research
相關次數: 點閱:17下載:3
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 在全球各行各業數位化浪潮的推動之下,金融業也面臨著數位技術改變原有運營模式的挑戰之中。然而,金融業不僅受到高度監管,再加上組織結構之複雜性,導致金融業的數位轉型過程尤其艱難。 比起一般銀行, 公股銀行更因為內部文化穩定性及法規約束,進行數位轉型的過程猶如「大象跳舞」,所有的變革都涉及多重挑戰,使得其轉型歷程特別不易。
    公股銀行之數位轉型通常有以下挑戰:法規限制、組織文化的凝聚、資訊系統整合、數位人才缺乏等等。為此,本研究認為公股銀行如何發展可持續轉型以利其公司進行數位轉型將成為當代的發展重點。本研究採用質性研究的個案研究,並且採用合作金庫作為個案 ,合作金庫為台灣歷史悠久且規模最大的公股銀行之一,組織體系複雜、員工眾多,具高度代表性。在數位轉型過程中不僅需面對來自外部環境(如法規限制、數位技術演進)的壓力,也需處理內部文化穩定性高、跨部門協作與資訊系統汰換等挑戰。本篇研究將以制定理論 (Enactment Theory)與控制理論 (Control Theory)為核心理論框架, 選擇合作金庫商業銀行為本篇研究對象 ,並使用個案研究方法了解其實踐的經驗及成果。
    研究過程根據合作金庫轉型的方針以及組織變革的狀態分為三階段:探索期(2008-2017年) 、導入期 (2017–2022年)及應用期 (2022年-2024年) 。探索期聚焦於系統升級與員工素養提升 ; 導入期強調跨部門協作與實驗專案 ; 應用期則集中於數位化成果擴展及應用。制定理論展現企業對外部環境變化的感知及內部認知的調整, 透過認知與行動的反覆調整實現創新 (Weick, 1979; Weick, 1995)。控制理論補充執行機制,包括正式控制及非正式控制 (Snell, 1992; Tannenbaum, 1962)。另外,在研究過程中進一步發現校準理論可在業務 、人力及基礎設施間的協調 , 確保各項策略相互對齊並提升轉型效能 (Chanias et al., 2019; Henderson & Venkatraman, 1993),三者需要交互應用,以實現策略與執行的高度協調。
    研究結果顯示,金融業數位轉型的成功因素,包含強化領導力與組織協作機制、深化技術應用與文化融合、 建立績效管理與回饋機制、推進系統整合與資訊架構優化以及培養創新與學習文化。 研究亦揭示了金融業面臨的挑戰,如舊有系統的兼容性問題、法規限制對創新進程的影響,以及組織內員工心態轉變的難度。
    本研究對金融業數位轉型的理論與實務具有貢獻 ,不僅深化制定、控制與校準理論的應用,亦為公股銀行、大規模企業或受高度監管的產業環境提供策略參考,強調理論與實踐相結合的重要性。

    Amid the sweeping wave of global digitalization, the financial sector—especially public banks—faces intricate challenges stemming from regulatory constraints, legacy systems, and complex organizational structures. Compared with private institutions, public banks face unique hurdles in digital transformation due to their bureaucratic rigidity and cultural conservatism, often likened to "making elephants dance." This research investigates how public banks may realize sustainable digital transformation, focusing on the case of Taiwan Cooperative Bank (TCB), the largest and most historically significant public bank in Taiwan.
    This study adopts a qualitative case study approach, drawing on data from two waves of semi-structured interviews and secondary data including internal reports and strategic documents. Guided by Enactment Theory, Control Theory, and Alignment Theory, the analysis traces TCB’s transformation journey across three stages: the Exploration Phase (2008–2017), emphasizing foundational infrastructure and digital literacy building; the Implementation Phase (2017–2022), focusing on cross-functional collaboration and experimental projects; and the Application Phase (2022–2024), which stresses enterprise-wide digital culture and institutional alignment.
    The findings reveal that digital transformation in public banks must integrate continuous cognitive reconfiguration with robust governance mechanisms. Enactment Theory illustrates how organizational actors respond to dynamic environments through iterative interpretation and experimentation. Control Theory explains how formal and informal mechanisms—ranging from behavioral norms to performance evaluation—shape digital execution. Alignment Theory further emphasizes the systemic coordination between business strategies, digital talent, and IT infrastructure, necessary for transformation scalability and sustainability.
    This research contributes to theory by integrating enactment, control, and alignment perspectives to construct a holistic framework for digital transformation in regulated industries. Practically, the study provides actionable insights for public banks navigating digital reinvention. Key enablers include executive leadership, cross-departmental alignment, continuous employee empowerment, and the institutionalization of digital governance. TCB’s experience offers a strategic blueprint for legacy-bound financial institutions pursuing resilient and scalable digital change.
    TCB’s case illustrates that even in rigid bureaucratic contexts, it is possible to engineer systemic transformation through a combination of strategic foresight, organizational learning, and collaborative governance. The study thus offers a strategic blueprint for legacy-bound financial institutions seeking to pursue long-term, adaptable, and institutionally anchored digital change.

    摘要 iii 致謝 vii 表目錄 x 圖目錄 xi 第一章、緒論 12 第一節 研究背景與介紹 13 第二節 研究目的與問題 13 第三節 研究範圍與流程 15 第四節 論文架構 17 第二章、文獻回顧 19 第一節 數位轉型 (Digital Transformation) 19 一、 金融業數位轉型的挑戰 19 二、 金融業數位轉型的必要性 19 第二節 制定理論 (Enactment Theory) 21 一、 制定的過程 21 二、 制定理論與數位轉型的關聯性 22 第三節 控制理論 (Control Theory) 23 一、 控制類型及方式 23 二、 控制理論與數位轉型的關聯性 26 第三章、研究方法 26 第一節 質性研究方法 (Qualitative Research) 26 第二節 個案研究架構 28 第三節 觀察重點 30 第四節 研究對象 31 第五節 資料蒐集與分析 32 一、初級資料 32 二、次級資料 33 三、資料分析 34 第四章、研究發現 34 第一節 產業背景介紹 34 第二節 個案簡介 37 一、公司介紹 37 二、數位服務發展 40 第三節 數位轉型過程 44 一、 第一階段 探索期 (2008 年-2017 年) 44 二、 第二階段 導入期 (2017 年-2022 年) 48 三、 第三階段 應用期 (2022 年-2024 年) 52 四、 觀察彙整 55 第五章、討論與結論 56 第一節 討論 56 第二節 研究結論 58 第三節 理論意涵 59 第四節 實務意涵 59 第五節 研究限制與未來研究方向 60 中文文獻 61 英文文獻 62 網頁部分 65 附錄 66

    林金定, 嚴嘉楓, & 陳美花. (2005). 質性研究方法: 訪談模式與實施步驟分析. 身心障礙研究季刊 , 3(2), 122-136.
    Al-Okaily, M., Al-Qudah, A. A., Alkhwaldi, A. F., Alkhatib, A. W., Al-Okaily, A., &Abu-Salih, B. (2025). Exploring FinTech trends in Jordan: insights from the post-COVID-19 era. foresight.
    Arner, D. W., Barberis, J., & Buckley, R. P. (2015). The evolution of Fintech: A new post-crisis paradigm. Geo. J. Int'l L., 47, 1271.
    Beese, J., Haki, K., Schilling, R., Kraus, M., Aier, S., & Winter, R. (2023). Strategicalignment of enterprise architecture management–how portfolios of controlmechanisms track a decade of enterprise transformation at Commerzbank.European journal of information systems, 32(1), 92-105.
    Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. v. (2013). Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights. MIS quarterly, 471-482.
    Chanias, S., Myers, M. D., & Hess, T. (2019). Digital transformation strategy making in pre-digital organizations: The case of a financial services provider. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(1), 17-33.
    Chau, P. Y., & Lai, V. S. (2003). An empirical investigation of the determinants of user acceptance of internet banking. Journal of organizational computing and electronic commerce, 13(2), 123-145.
    Chintalapati, S., & Pandey, S. K. (2025). Factors driving the adoption of AI-powered marketing in financial services: a practitioner field study. DECISION, 1-20.
    Choudhry, M. (2022). The principles of banking. John Wiley & Sons.
    Choudhury, V., & Sabherwal, R. (2003). Portfolios of control in outsourced software development projects. Information systems research, 14(3), 291-314.
    Constantiou, I., Joshi, M., & Stelmaszak, M. (2023). Organizations as digital enactment systems: A theory of replacement of humans by digital technologies in organizational scanning, interpretation, and learning. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 24(6), 1770-1798.
    Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications.
    Coyne, I. T. (1997). Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? Journal of advanced nursing, 26(3), 623-630.
    Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
    Deloitte. (2020). The Future of Digital Transformation in Financial Services. Deloitte Insights.
    Gephart Jr, R. P. (2004). Qualitative research and the Academy of Management Journal. In (Vol. 47, pp. 454-462): Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510.
    Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968). The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. Nursing research, 17(4), 364.
    Henderson, J., & Venkatraman, N. (1993). Strategic Alignment Model. IBM Systems Journal, March.
    Henfridsson, O., & Yoo, Y. (2014). The liminality of trajectory shifts in institutional entrepreneurship. Organization Science, 25(3), 932-950.
    Hoblos, N., Sandeep, M., & Pan, S. (2023). Smart City Digital Transformation Across Organisational Boundaries: A Resource Orchestration perspective.
    IMF. (2022). FinTech and Financial Inclusion: The Future of Banking. International Monetary Fund.
    King, B. (2018). Bank 4.0: Banking everywhere, never at a bank. John Wiley & Sons.
    Kirsch, L. J., Ko, D.-G., & Haney, M. H. (2010). Investigating the antecedents of team-based clan control: Adding social capital as a predictor. Organization Science, 21(2), 469-489.
    Kirsch, L. S. (1997). Portfolios of control modes and IS project management. Information systems research, 8(3), 215-239.
    Liu, J., Wang, S., Xu, Y., & Cheng, L. (2024). Digital economy development and corporate bankruptcy risk: Based on the perspective of institutional isomorphism. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 60(4), 793-807.
    Malesu, M. L., & Syrovátka, P. (2025). Critical success factors for small and medium sized businesses: a PRISMA-based systematic review. Future Business Journal, 11(1), 32.
    McKinsey. (2021). The State of AI in Financial Services. McKinsey Insights.
    Mooney, A., & Ozgen, S. (2024). Executive digital savviness. In Handbook of Research on Strategic Leadership in the Fourth Industrial Revolution (pp. 457-474). Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Naimi-Sadigh, A., Asgari, T., & Rabiei, M. (2022). Digital transformation in the value chain disruption of banking services. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(2), 1212-1242.
    Okunlola, J. O., Naicker, S. R., & Uleanya, C. (2024). Digital leadership in the fourth industrial revolution enacted during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2317258.
    PwC. (2021). Digital Banking 2025: The Future of Financial Services. PricewaterhouseCoopers.
    Snell, S. A. (1992). Control theory in strategic human resource management: The mediating effect of administrative information. Academy of management Journal,35(2), 292-327.
    Snell, S. A., & Youndt, M. A. (1995). Human resource management and firm performance: Testing a contingency model of executive controls. Journal of management, 21(4), 711-737.
    Sonenshein, S. (2010). We're changing—Or are we? Untangling the role of progressive, regressive, and stability narratives during strategic change implementation. Academy of management Journal, 53(3), 477-512.
    Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview.
    Tannenbaum, A. S. (1962). Control in organizations: Individual adjustment and organizational performance. Administrative science quarterly, 236-257.
    UNDP. (2021). Digital Finance for Sustainable Development. United Nations Development Programme.
    Vial, G. (2021). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Managing digital transformation, 13-66.
    Weick, K. (1979). The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd edn McGraw-Hill. New York.
    Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations (Vol. 3). Sage publications Thousand Oaks, CA.
    Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. (2014). Leading digital: Turning technology into business transformation. Harvard Business Press.
    Westerman, G., Tannou, M., Bonnet, D., Ferraris, P., & McAfee, A. (2012). The Digital Advantage: How digital leaders outperform their peers in every industry. MITSloan Management and Capgemini Consulting, MA, 2, 2-23.
    Wiener, M., Mähring, M., Remus, U., & Saunders, C. (2016). Control configuration and control enactment in information systems projects. MIS quarterly, 40(3), 741-774.
    Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). sage.
    Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.
    Young, A., Selander, L., & Vaast, E. (2019). Digital organizing for social impact: Current insights and future research avenues on collective action, social movements, and digital technologies. Information and Organization, 29(3), 100257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2019.100257
    FinTechSpace,(2024),金融科技國際座談:AI 金融未來式 (一)台灣篇,https://www.fintechspace.com.tw/en/activity/金融科技國際座談:ai 金融未來式/
    iThome,(2022),合庫靠數據驅動數位轉型,要讓資料變成關鍵戰略資產,https://www.ithome.com.tw/people/140102
    Spotify,(2023),KPMG 知識音浪,數位長會客室特輯 ft.合庫資安長 張孝維,https://open.spotify.com/episode/01trn5HyEvOc6JUQZvtsje
    今週刊,(2021),合庫「主動、靈活、創新」打造新世代財管服務,https://www.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/183012/post/202105260033/
    合作金庫,官方網站, https://www.tcb-bank.com.tw
    合作金庫, Facebook, https://www.facebook.com/TCBebank/?locale=zh_TW
    合作金庫,Youtube 頻道,https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0XmCKUMgtnCOouUEh61ODQ
    合庫金控,官方網站, https://www.tcfhc.com.tw
    國立中央大學企業管理學系,(2023),林衍茂董事長專訪:面對挑戰,莫忘初心,持續創新, https://ba.mgt.ncu.edu.tw/news_txt.php?id=4620
    奇摩新聞,(2023),數位轉型合庫培訓金融科技人才https://tw.stock.yahoo.com/news/
    數位轉型-合庫培訓金融科技人才-201000163.html
    工商時報,(2021),合庫 CoLab 12 件產出專利申請。https://www.ctee.com.tw/news/20210117700199-430301
    工商時報,(2023),合庫銀厚植員工金融科技意識 注入數位轉型新動能,https://www.ctee.com.tw/news/20231118700826-430304
    經濟日報,(2024),合庫推動數位營運 開啟全員 AI 之路。https://money.udn.com/money/story/5636/8321947
    中時新聞網,(2021),合庫大數據攬客 六面向報捷,https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20211015000185-260205?chdtv

    無法下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:2026-06-30公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE