簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示
| 研究生： |
江錦船 CHIANG, CHING-CHUAN |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱： |
密級配瀝青混凝土之品質控制和品質保證分析 Analysis of Quality Control and Quality Assurance of Dense Graded Asphalt Concrete |
| 指導教授： |
陳建旭
Jian-shiuh, Chen, |
| 學位類別： |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱： |
工學院 - 土木工程學系碩士在職專班 Department of Civil Engineering (on the job class) |
| 論文出版年： | 2008 |
| 畢業學年度： | 96 |
| 語文別： | 中文 |
| 論文頁數： | 140 |
| 中文關鍵詞： | 品質控制(Quality Contral) 、密級配瀝青混凝土(Dense-Graded Asphalt Concrete DGAC) 、品質保證(Quality Assurane) |
| 外文關鍵詞： | Quality Assurane, Quality Contral, Dense-Grade Asphalt Concrete |
| 相關次數： | 點閱：99 下載：1 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
承包商自主品管的目的是為了品質控制(QC)，品質控制數據的準確性應有客觀及公正的驗證方法加以檢視，以確定工程品質符合規範要求及設計標準。近年來由於政府部門之預算不若以往寛裕，公共工程建設預算緊縮，工程機關已不再設立檢驗單位；有關材料檢(試)驗工作，均改由民間獨立設置之驗證機構試驗辦理。
國內實施品質保證及品質查核三級制度面，與美國執行品質管制及品質保證的做法有所差異；本研究探討同步辦理品質管制及品質保證試驗所得之資料，以客觀之統計方法進行分析、比對數據資料之差異性，藉以檢視國內熱拌合瀝青混凝土施工材料之品質控制和品質保證成效。並探討實施品質保證試驗之必要性。
在品質管理制度中，承包商辦理品質控制與工程主辦機關辦理品質保證存有不同之必然性。其差異性來自於樣品無法完全一樣，試驗儀器和操作人員不同，都可能產生變異。惟大致而言，QA變異性普遍較QC大；不同拌合廠之配合設計及料源，都存在QC與QA差異現象；從QC與QA以一對一分析數據比對驗證，皆呈現有明顯差異存在，應進一步探討影響QC與QA之主要原因。
Purpose that the contractor manages independent product is for the quality control (QC)﹒There should be objective and just verification methods to look over in the accuracy of controlling the data of the quality﹒To confirm that the quality of the project accords with the demand and the standard of the designation﹒Because of the budget of the government department is no longer as good as in the last few years，the budget of the public engineering construction was tightened﹒The engineering organization has no longer set up the examination units；The work about the material examination is changed and verified by the organizations that are set up independently.
The implementation of the quality guarantee and quality check in Taiwan are different from the methods that carried out in U.S.A.; This research probes into the data from the experiments of quality control and quality guarantee in step﹒To analyze it with objective statistical method, than the difference of the data between the materials to look over the effect made by the bituminous concrete from it’s quality control and quality guarantee﹒And to probe into the necessity of implementing the quality guaranteeing﹒
In the system of quality control﹐There is no doubt that the quality control handled by the contractors and the government are different﹒The difference is because of the sample of the material are impossible to be totally the same﹐and the equipments and the operators in the experiment are different﹒Generally speaking, QA variability is bigger than QC﹔There exist difference between QC and QA because of the design and material source in different factories﹒It proves from the one-to-one comparing data that there exist an apparently difference between QC and QA﹒And that is why we need to probe into the main factors that affect QC and QA further
陳建豐 (2007) 承包商與公路機關對瀝青混凝土施工品質之比較，國立成功大學土木工程研究所碩士論文，台南。
公共工程施工品質管理制度，http://www.pcc.gov.tw/，行政院公共工程委員會，2008年1月18日瀏覽。
交通部臺灣區國道高速公路局施工技術規範(一般工程)，(94年11月修訂) http://www.freeway.gov.tw/，交通部臺灣區國道高速公路局，2008年2月18日瀏覽。
American Assoiation of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Quality Assurance Guide Specification. (2007). “Standard Practice for Developing a Quality Assurance Plan for Hot-Mix Asphalt (HMA),” Designation: R 42-06, Washington, D.C.
Burati, J. L., Weed, R. M., Hughes, C. S., and Hill, H. S. (2003). Optimal Procedures for Quality Assurance Specifications, Federal Highway Administration, FHWA-RD-02-095, Washington, D.C.
Burati, J. L., Weed, R. M., Hughes, C. S., and Hill, H. S. (2004). Evaluation of Procedures for Quality Assurance Specifications, Federal Highway Administration, FHWA-HRT-04-046, Washington, D.C.
Burati, J. L., and Weed, R. M. (2006). “ Accuracy and Precision of Typical Quality Measures. ” Transportation Research Record 1946, pp.82-91.
Dobrowolski, Joe., and B, Terrie. (1998). ” Development of Quality Control/Quality Assurance Specifications by Using Statistical Quality Assurance for Asphalt Concrete Pavements in California, ” Transportation Research Record 1632, pp.13-21
Hughes, C. S. (2006). “What in the World is PWL?, ” Journal of Asphalt Association of Paving Technologists, Vol.75, pp.853-866.
Hand, A. J. T. (2006). “ A Contractor’s Perspective on the PWL Challenge, ” Journal of Asphalt Association of Paving Technologists, Vol.75, pp.955-984.
Hand, A. J. T., and Epps, J. A. (2005). “ Fundamentals of Percent Within Limits and QC/QA Compaction Specifications, ” Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C. (on CD-ROM)
Mahboub, K. C., Hancher, D. E., and Wang, Y. (2004). “ Contractor-Performed Quality Control: Is the Fox Guarding the Henhouse? ” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, Vol.130, No. 4, pp.255-258.
McCabe, B., AbouRizk, S., and Gavin, J. (1999). “ Sample Size Analysis for Asphalt Pavement Quality Control, ” Journal of Infrastructure Systems, Vol. 5, pp.118-123
McCabe, B., AbouRizk, S., and Gavin, J. (2002). “ Time of Sampling Strategies for Asphalt Pavement Quality Assurance, “ Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 128, pp.85-89
Parker, F., and Hossain, M. S. (1994). “ Hot-Mix Asphalt Mix Properties Measured for Construction Quality Control and Assurance, ” Transportation Research Record 1469, pp.9-17.
Parker, F., and Hossain, M. S. (2002). “ Statistics for Superpave HMA Construction QC/QA Data, ” Transportation Research Record 1813, pp.151-156.
Turochy, R. E., Willis, J. R., and Parker, F. (2006). “ Comparison of Constractor Quality Control and Georgia Department of Transportation Data for Quality Assurance of Hot-mix Asphalt, ” Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C. (on CD-ROM)
校內：2013-07-29公開校外：2018-07-29公開