能替代振動台實驗且具有經濟性之方法其一為傳統結合油壓制動器與反力牆之擬動態實驗，而為了使傳統擬動態實驗之加載速率更接近真實結構系統之反應，本文提出與振動台結合之即時複合實驗技術。即時複合實驗係將次結構置於振動台台上，並回授次結構系統之層間總剪力進行數值運算，同時以振動台呈現主結構系統之反應，為一種實現次結構與主結構互制之即時實驗技術。然而即時複合實驗的可信度受到振動台本身的效能影響，如振動台油壓系統的複雜程度以及振動台對於致動器的控制性能等，都有可能影響即時複合實驗的精度。因此本文採用半主動壓電式摩擦機構作為次結構系統，於本文中利用振動台即時複合實驗誤差指標，套用在進行過振動台實驗的即時複合實驗。其中，該即時複合實驗在兩種振動台上進行，因此藉由即時複合實驗誤差指標來分析振動台對於進行即時複合實驗與振動台實驗的擬合程度，以比較兩種振動台對於執行即時複合實驗的好壞。同時，針對不具有振動台實驗的多自由度複合實驗，藉由在不同振動台上重複相同的即時複合實驗架構，套用經由振動台即時複合實驗誤差指標改良的多自由度複合實驗誤差指標來加以說明兩個振動台的特性。

The pseudo-dynamic test is a combination of numerical analysis and experimental test that can emulate the dynamic behavior of structure under environmental loading such as seismic event. In order to make the loading rate of traditional pseudo-dynamic tests more similar to the reaction of the real structure system, this paper presents a real-time hybrid testing (RTHT) technique combining with a shaking table. The key interface of RTHT is the feedback inter-story shear force between the experimentally physical substructure that directly installed on a shaking table and the main structure, where the main structure is numerically simulated by a shaking table. This essay evaluates the applicability of RTHT of a semi-active piezoelectric friction mechanism by comparing its performance with shaking table test. Because the reliability of the RTHT is affected by the performance of the vibrator itself due to the complexity of the oil pressure system and the control performance of the shaking table to actuators, etc, the real-time hybrid testing with shaking table (RTHT-ST) error index of the vibration table is used to apply to the real-time composite experiment of the shaking table test, conducted on two shaking platforms. RTHT-ST error indicators to analyze the shaking table for the fitting degree between the RTHT and the shaking table test. For the multi-degree of freedom (MDOF) structures tested through RTHT without shaking table test, by repeating the same RTHT testing structure on different vibration platforms, to paraphrase via MDOF-RTHT error index improved by RTHT-ST error index to explain the characteristics of the two shaking table.

[1] Hakuno, M., Shidawara, M. and Hara, T., “Dynamic destructive test of a cantileverbeam controlled by an analog-computer” Transactions Japan Society of Engineers, 1-9 (1969)
[2] Takanashi, K. et al., “Nonlinear earthquake response analysis of structures by a computer actuator online system” Transactions Architectural Instruction Japan, 229,77-83 (1975)
[3] Nakashima et al., “Development of real-time pseudo-dynamic testing” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 21(1):79-92 (1992)
[4] Chung, W. J., Yun, C. B., Kim, N. S. and Seo., J. W. “Shaking table and pseudodynamic tests for the evaluation of the seismic performance of base-isolated structures” Engineering Structures, Vol:21, Issue:4, 365-379 (1999)
[5] Horiuchi, T., M. Inoue, T. Konno and W. Yamagishi., “Development of a real-time hybrid experimental system using a shaking table - (Proposal of experiment concept and feasibility study with rigid secondary system)” JSME International Journal Series C-Mechanical Systems Machine Elements and Manufacturing 42: 255-264, (1999)
[6] Wang, Y. P., Lee, C. L., Yo, T. H., “Modified state space procedures for pseudodynamic testing” Earthquake Engineering and Structure Dynamics, 30, 59-80(2001)
[7] Reinhorn, A.M., Sivaselvan M.V., Liang Z., Shao X., “Real-time dynamic hybrid testing of structural systems” World Conference on Earthquake Engineering,No:1644, (2004)
[8] Juan, E. Billie, F., ”Model-based strategies for real-time hybrid testing” University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, (2007)
[9] T.Y. Yang, G. Mosqueda and B. Stojadinovic., “Evaluating the quality of hybrid simulation test using an energy based approach” World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, (2008)
[10] Wang T., Cheng C., “A Model-based Predictor-Corrector Algorithm for Substructure Hybrid Test System” Proceeding of the Ninth Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering, No:152, (2011)
[11] Jin-Ting Wang, Fei Zhu, Feng Zhu “Real-time hybrid simulation of multi-story stuctures installed with tuned liquid damper” Structure Control and Health Monitoring, 23, 1015-1031, (2016)
[12] Ruiyang Zhang, Paige V. Lauenstein, Brian M. Phillips “Real-time hybrid simulation of a shear building with a uni-axial shake table” Engineering Structures, 119, 217-229, (2016)
[13] Lu, L. Y., C. C. Lin, G. L. Lin, C. Y. Lin (2010) ”Experimental and analysis of a fuzzy-controlled piezoelectric seismic isolation system” Journal of sound and Vibration, Vol. 329,No. 11, 1992-2017.
[14] Lu, L. Y., G. L. Lin, C. Y. Lin “Experimental verification of a piezoelectric smart isolation system” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, Vol. 18, No. 8, 869-889. (2011)
[15] Lu, L. Y., G. L. Lin, C. Y. Lin “Experiment of an ABS-type control strategy for semi-active friction isolation systems.” Smart Structures and Systems, Vol.8, No.5, 501-524. (2011)
[16] Lin, G. L., C.C. Lin, L. Y. Lu, Y. B. Ho(2012) ”Experimental verification of seismic vibration control using semi-active friction tuned mass damper.” Earthquake Engineering ans structural Dynamics, Vol. 41, No.4,813-830
[17] Warburton G.B., “Optimum Absorber Parameters for Various Combinations of Response and Excitation Parameters”, Earthquake and Structure Dynamics, Vol. 10,No. 3, pp.381-401, (1982)
[18] Chu, S. Y., Lu, L. Y., Yeh, S. W “Real‐time hybrid testing of a structure with a piezoelectric friction controllable mass damper by using a shake table” Structural Control Health Monitoring, Volume 25, Issue 3 (2018)
[19] Chu SY, Lo SC and Li MH. “Application of SCRAMNet System in Real-time Pseudodynamic Test and Simulation.” Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Earthquake Engineering (4ICEE). Taipei, Taiwan. (2006b)
[20] Chu SY and Lo SC. “Pseudo dynamic testing of subassemblage based on discrete-time state-space integration through SCRAM-Net configuration.” Proceedings of the International Symposium on Experimental Vibration Analysis for Civil Engineering Structures (EVACES 2005). Bordeaux, France. (2005)
[21] 許敬昀，「摩擦型調諧質量阻尼器系統之混合實驗驗證」，國立成功大學研究所，碩士論文，(2017)
[22] 何玉泊，「半主動摩擦調諧質量阻尼器之振動台試驗與減振分析」，國立中興大學土木研究所，碩士論文，(2010)
[23] 甯威鈞，「半主動壓電式摩擦型調諧質量阻尼器系統混合實驗驗證」，國立成功大學土木研究所，碩士論文，(2015)
[24] 賈博宇，「振動台效能對於PFCMD即時複合實驗之影響探討」，國立成功大學土木研究所，碩士論文，(2016)
[25] 羅仕杰，「記憶體共享光纖網路設備於即時擬動態實驗之初步研究」，國立暨南國際大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文，(2005)
[26] 李明鴻，「應用快速擬動態試驗技術於非線性含斜撐框架動態反應之模擬與試驗」，國立成功大學土木研究所，碩士論文，(2006)
[27] 顏呈璁，「多重取樣量測對擬動態實驗誤差之影響」，國立成功大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文，(2009)
[28] 吳依寰，「摩擦型阻尼器之擬動態實驗與震動台驗證」，國立成功大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文，(2011)
[29] 朱凱業，「多項式變曲率滑動支承之混合實驗」，國立成功大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文，(2013)
[30] 林錦隆，「半主動隔震系統之抗震應用研究」，國立高雄第一科技大學工程科技研究所，碩士論文，(2008)
[31] 葉士瑋，「具摩擦特性振動控制系統即時複合實驗之振動台實驗驗證」，國立成功大學土木工程研究所，博士論文(2017)
[32] 呂仲岳，「應用及時複合實驗進行配置PFCMD多自由度系統控制參數之最佳化探討」國立成功大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文，(2017)
[33] 洪俊宏，「設備於建物中之耐震策略分析與實驗」國立高雄第一科技大學，營建工程研究所，碩士論文，(2011)