參與式設計為展現使用者之主體性，發展至今已過半世紀，但目前大部分使用者因專業知識不足，只能與建築師討論到設計階段而無法達到土地空間規劃及其後續分配的高強度參與。因此本研究目的在於：如何讓一般民眾也能進行更高強度的參與。

研究方法為先擬定規則，透過多次實驗後，檢討並修改規則，產生讓使用者從頭到尾都能參與的遊戲規則，其規則依參與程度分兩種：規劃遊戲與分配遊戲，實驗結果得出後再進行設計演示來確立規則可行性。

本論文讓一般大眾的使用者根據規則進行集體遊戲，就能產生不同於以往、但也接近目前都市土地細分之佈局，同時盡可能展現使用者之主體性，達到參與的最終目的。

Participatory design is an approach to present the subjectivity of user; it has been developed for more than half-century. However, due to the lack of professional knowledge, most users can only discuss with architect on design stage, and cannot highly participate in land spatial planning and its subsequent allocation stage. The purpose of this study is how to make the general public can be highly participation, to present their subjectivity in the dwellings.

Participatory process is the game. There are strict rules in the game in order to ensure fairness and feasibility. Therefore, this design game study follows method: at first, to establish the rules, and after several examinations, review and correct the rules. Final the game rule was developed, which can let users be highly participation. Depend on the degree of participation; there have two games, which are planning game and allocation game. From the exam result, it was further design demonstration to check the feasibility of rules.

In this thesis, the general public can play the collective game according to the rules. Presentation of the result is different from the past and also similar to the layout of urban land subdivision, meanwhile, demonstrating the subjectivity of the user as much as possible, to achieve the ultimate purpose of participation.

王明蘅（譯）(1976)，大眾參與之住宅設計，《房屋市場》，40，p35-42。

王明蘅 (1991)，〈空間的協議與分享〉課程資料，國立成功大學建築系。

王明蘅（編譯）(2008)，《衍異：開放住宅的系統設計》，建築與文化出版社，臺北。
（譯自 J. T. Boekholt, A. P. Thijssen, P. J. M. Dinjens, & N. J. Habraken, Variation: The Systematic Design of Supports (1976)）

祁明真（譯）(2008)，《社區發展與公民參與－俄勒岡實驗的啟示》，商務印書館。
（譯自 Alexander, C., The oregon experiment, vol.3. Oxford University Press, USA.(1975)）

高靈英、李靜斌、葛素娟（譯）(2002)，《住宅制造》，北京市：知識產權。
（譯自 Alexander, C., Davis, H., Martinez, J., & Corner, D., The production of houses, vol.4. Oxford University Press on Demand.(1985)）

Friedman, Y. (1971). “The flatwriter: choice by computer”. Progressive Architecture, vol.3, p98-101.

Friedman, Y. (1980), Toward a Scientific Architecture (C. Lang, Trans.), The MIT Press.

Habraken, N. J., & Gross, M. D. (1988). “Concept design games”. Design Studies, vol.9(No.3), p150-158.

Habraken, N. J. (1970). Three R's for Housing. Amsterdam: Scheltema & Holkema.

Rapoport, A. (1973). “The ecology of housing”. Ekistics, p145-151.

Summers, L. H. (1979). “Operational Games in Architecture and Design”. Journal of Architectural Education, vol.33(No.1), p2-7.

Summers, L. H. (1972). “The House Design Game”. Environmental Design: Research and Practice, Mitchell, W. J. (Ed.), vol.2.