本研究的目的在瞭解人的左右手補償追蹤行為的差異。針對當人使用搖桿來進行補償追蹤時，左右手操控特性的差異進行研究。本研究隨機選取十五位成大學生，透過手控搖桿來進行補償追蹤實驗，本研究經由實驗結果求得補償追蹤行為之傳遞函數。並定義出二個參數：精確度與敏捷度來描述人的補償追蹤行為之能力。進一步探討人的左右手補償追蹤行為之差異。初步結果顯示，反應延遲時間隨著頻寬增加而縮短，其中右手的反應延遲時間普遍較左手為短。增益值隨著頻寬增加而減少，其中左右手之間的差距隨著目標訊號頻寬增加而減少。增益跨越頻率在低頻時隨著頻寬的增加而增加，此時右手的增益跨越頻率高於左手，表示右手有較好的快速反應能力。但是當頻寬增加到某個程度，會有明顯的退化現象產生，此時左右手的增益跨越頻率便趨向一致，表示在退化現象產生後，左右手的快速反應能力並無明顯差異。在精確度與敏捷度方面，隨著頻寬變化的左右手之增益值與增益跨越頻率經F檢定為顯著差異，在精確度方面，經由t檢定為顯著差異，在敏捷度方面，t檢定為不顯著差異，表示人的左右手補償追蹤行為是有其差異性存在的。

The objective of this research is to understand the difference in human compensatory tracking behavior between the right and left hands. This research is aimed at the difference in control performance about hands of human when using sidestick. Fifteen students are randomly chosen to run the tests. The performance together with the transfer functions of the compensatory tracking behavior are evaluated for both hands. Two parameters: precision and agility are defined to describe the overall ability of human compensatory tracking behavior. It was found that the reaction time delay shortened with the bandwidth increased. The reaction time delay of right hand is generally better than the left hand. The gain value decayed exponentially with the bandwidth increased. The difference of the hands decreases as the target signals bandwidth increase. The gain crossover frequency rose with the increasing bandwidth and the gain crossover frequency of right hand is better than the left hand. But when the bandwidth increased over certain value, the gain crossover frequency decreased quickly and the difference of the hands become smaller. The gain value and the gain crossover frequency of hands as the bandwidth increased are significantly different by F test. As for the precision, the right and left hands are different significantly by t test. For the agility, the right and left hands are not significantly different by t test. It means that actually there is difference compensatory tracking between the right and left hands.

[1] 中華民國飛行安全基金會(2000). 1990’s航空飛安回顧. 飛航安全季刊, 22, 15-20.
[2] Statistical Summary of Commercial Jet Airplane Accident-Worldwide Operation 1959-1993(1994). Airplane Safety Engineering. Boeing Commercial Airplane Group.
[3] Michael, A. D.(1995). Dramatic Incidents Highlight Mode Problem in Cockpits. Aviation Week & Space Technology, 57-62.
[4] Koivo, A. T., Repperger, D. W., Kovio, A. J.(1999). Detection of Aircraft Pilot Coupling Caused Oscillation. Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation. 1999. CIRA’99. Proceedings. 1999 IEEE International Symposium on. 1999, 220-225.
[5] Hirsch, D. L., McCormick, R. L.(1965). Experimental Investigation of Pilot Dynamics in a Pilot-Induced Oscillation Situation. Washington, DC. AIAA.
[6] Tustin, A.(1947). The Nature of the Operator’s Response in Manual Control and Its Implications for Controller Design. J. IEEE, Vol. 94, Part IIA, No. 2.
[7] Goodyear Aircraft Corporation Rept(1952). GER-4750. Human Dynamic Study.
[8] Elkind, J. I.(1956). Characteristics of Simple Manual Control Systems. TR-111. MIT. Lincoln Laboratory.
[9] McRuer, D., Graham, D., Krendel, E., and Reisener, E.Jr.(1965). Human Pilot Dynamics in Compensatory Systems. AFFDL-TR-65-15. Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory.
[10] McRuer, D.T., and Krendel, E. S.(1957). Dynamic Response of Human Operators. WADC-TR-56-524.
[11] McRuer, D., Krendel, E.(1974). Mathematical Models of Human Pilot Behavior. (AGARDograph NO. 188). NATO Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development.
[12] Hess, R.(1996). Feedback Control Models—Manual Control and Tracking. Chapter 38, Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics. In G.Salvendy, N.T., John Wiley and Sons(Eds). New York.
[13] Magdaleno, R.E. and McRuer, D.T.(1971). Experimental Validation and Analytical Elaboration for Models of the Pilots’s Neuromuscular Subsystem in Tracking Tasks, (NASA CR-1757). Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
[14] McRuer, D.(1980). Human Dynamics in Man-Machine Systems. Automatic, Elsevier, vol. 16, 237-253.
[15] 景鴻鑫, 盧郁文(2002). 人之基本追蹤行為的異向性. 民航季刊,第四卷,第一期, 75-88.
[16] 景鴻鑫, 鄭振輝, 盧郁文(2002). 人的補償追蹤行為之異向性. 民航季刊,第四卷,第二期, 117-133.
[17] Slack, M.(1945). The Probability Distribution of Sinusoidal Oscillations Combined in Random Noise. Jour. IEE (London), 93, Pt. III.
[18] Holland, J. H.(1962). Concerning Efficient Adaptive Systems. In M. C. Yovits, G. T. Jacobi, and G. D. Goldstein (Eds.), Self-Organizing System. Washington: Spartan Books, 215-230.
[19] Gen, M. and Cheng, R.(1997). Genetic Algorithms and Engineering Design. New York: John Wiley.
[20] 謝昇蓉(2000).基因演算法於亂流中飛行軌跡重建之應用.國立成功大學航空太空工程研究所碩士論文.
[21] 林惠玲,陳正倉(2000).統計學方法與應用.雙葉書廊.
[22] 景鴻鑫,鄭振輝,梁永欣(2002). 人的補償追蹤行為之退化現象. 民航學會航太學會/燃燒學會學術聯合會議. 國立高雄餐旅學院.
[23] 景鴻鑫,鄭振輝,梁永欣(2002). 飛行員甄選之動作技能測試的新建議.第九屆三軍官校基礎學術研討會. 空軍軍官學校. 2002.
[24] 景鴻鑫,梁永欣,鄭振輝(2002). 人的補償追蹤行為之極限探討. 民航季刊,第四卷,第四期,125-137.