簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林郁峰
Lin, Yu-Feng
論文名稱: 民居類型與空心村
Residential Type and Hollow village
指導教授: 王明蘅
Wang, Ming-Hung
共同指導教授: 蔡元良
Tsai, Yuan-Liang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 規劃與設計學院 - 建築學系
Department of Architecture
論文出版年: 2015
畢業學年度: 103
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 88
中文關鍵詞: 類型管制民居類型空心村
外文關鍵詞: Type Control, Residential type, Hollowed Village, Form-Based Code
相關次數: 點閱:133下載:6
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 空心村是中國大陸近三十年社會經濟發展過程中形成的特殊鄉村現象。村落居民經濟條件提升將新建民居時,因原民居基地存在多種因素,造成新建民居大部分都集中在村莊週邊,而村莊內卻存在大量的空閒民居和閒置土地,形成了內空外延的用地狀況,即所謂的「空心村」。空心村由於無人居住,使房子年久失修塌毀,基本設施不足造成環境品質差。而外移至村落周圍的新村由於缺少周全規劃,品質難控制。

    本研究以民居類型為對象,以類型管制角度重新檢討形式,並試圖以週全的規劃,延續強化原有形式語言與特色。本研究方法操作依序為:類型研究、類型設定、外部性、置入四大部分,其結果為環境規範。

    類型管制是以形式為基礎的管制方式,其意義在於制訂群體合理且公平的規範;可形成共通的風格特色;維持此集體特色的品質。類型管制的成效可產生環境的認同與歸屬感,對於空間及社會文化層面皆有正面的影響。故以中國大陸福建省漳州市轄下「舊村-寨里村」、「新村-歧下村」兩空心村為例,舊村以保留村落紋理並原地改建為目的,新村則依據原村落形式構成原則於周邊適當之地重新規劃,兩者皆訂定完整且易懂之類型管制規範。

    Hollowed village is the special phenomenon in rural residential land, which was formed by past three decades’ booming economy in People’s Republic of China. With numbers of issues at the original locations of residential house, the village residents, who had improved his/ her economy condition, tended to relocate new dwelling around village perimeter. However, idle houses and lands cover up center of village, which formed an inner-hollowed, outer-expanded land used condition, known as “hollowed village”. With lack of care, houses inside hollowed village became dilapidated and inadequate infrastructure lead to poor environment quality. And yet, with the lack of comprehensive planning, new dwelling that relocated around hollowed village induce chaos of new village which reduced quality of resident’s daily life.

    The main subject of this study is residential type. We reviewed its type control and come up with a comprehensive planning that could reinforce the local form language and feature. To generate an norms of environment, there are four procedures in this research: 1) Typological analysis, 2) typological set up, 3) externality, and 4) infill.

    Type control is Form-Based Code. Its purpose is to formulate a reasonable and fair norms for groups, which could create a common style that maintain the quality of its feature in a group. As the matter of fact, type control could bring in identity of group and sense of belonging in to village, as the result, it could generate positive impact in both in space level and social cultural level. We used Zhai Li village (old village) and Qi Xia (new village) as example of Hollowed village in this research. For the old village, the study aimed for preserve its village texture and rebuild at its current location. In contrast, the new village would re-plan, based on the original form of village, the use of land around perimeter of village. Both type control norms should be integrated and understandable.

    中文摘要 Ⅰ 英文摘要 Ⅲ 誌謝 Ⅴ 目錄 Ⅶ 圖目錄 Ⅸ 第一章 論述 01 1-1 問題背景 1-2 文獻討論及案例研究 1-3 課題與方法 第二章 寨里村 09 2-1 現況環境解析 2-2 類型研究 2-3 類型設定 2-4 外部性 2-5 類型置入 2-6 規範 2-7 模擬 第三章 歧下村 39 3-1 現況環境解析 3-2 類型研究 3-3 類型設定 3-4 外部性 3-5 規劃網格 3-6 類型置入 3-7 規範 3-8 模擬 第四章 結論 57 4-1 意義與限制 4-2 後續研究 參考文獻 61 附錄 65

    中文參考文獻

    王明蘅
    1994,《宜蘭縣區域建築及都市景觀問題與對策之研究》,宜蘭縣政府。
    1995,〈類型設定:一種住宅設計方法〉,《住宅學報》,第三期。
    2010,《類型研究:空間物種及其衍異》,行政院國家科學委員會專題
    研究(NSC 97-2420-H-006-034-MY2),臺北。
    2012,《閩粵古村落之類型學研究》,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究
    (NSC 101-2410-H006-116),臺北。

    王明蘅(編譯)(2008),《衍異:開放住宅的系統設計》,建築與文化出版社, 臺北。(譯自J. T. Boekholt, A. P. Thijssen, P. J. M. Dinjens, N. J. Habraken, Variation:The Systematic Design of Supports(1976))

    王明蘅、羅時瑋、郭奇正、鄭晃二(2000),《名勝造街:日月潭名勝街地區建築物造型規劃案》,交通部觀光局。

    王韡儒(2007),《閩臺漢民居類型譜系試探》,博士論文,成功大學建築研究所。

    陳耀如(2008),《馬來半島民居類型之衍生分析》,博士論文,成功大學建築研究所。

    沈元琪(1990),《建城地區之類型管制:以台南市大天后宮周邊地區為例》,碩士論文,成功大學建築研究所。

    郭書勝(1990),《處境 一種設計的問題與方法》,碩士論文,成功大學建築研究所。

    張示霖(2001),《類型管制之兩種形式:以馬祖地區為例》,碩士論文,成功大學建築研究所。

    王旭斌(2001),《類型管制之都市設計方法》,碩士論文,成功大學建築研究所。

    彭若涵(2010),《土地的使用管制與形式管制比較研究》,碩士論文,成功大學建築研究所。

    羅兆棋(2013),《農作都市》,碩士論文,成功大學建築研究所。

    李祖翊(2013),《配置計劃之系統方法》,碩士論文,成功大學建築研究所。

    費孝通
    1949,《鄉土中國》,上海視察社,上海。
    1987,《江村經濟》,戴可景譯,中華學術系列,香港。
    1997,《走出江村》,人民日報出版社,北京。

    陳書毅、李秀秀(2013),《金門閩南傳統建築圖鑑:合院》,金門縣文化局,金門。

    陳志華、李秋香(2008),《村落》,「鄉土瑰寶」系列,生活、讀書、新知三聯書店,北京。

    劉彥隨(2013),《中國鄉村發展研究報告:農村空心化及其整治策略》,中科院地理科學與資源研究所,北京。

    雷振東(2009),《整合與重構:關中鄉村聚落轉型研究》,新農村建設叢書,東南大學出版社,南京。

    吳松弟、劉杰(2009),《走入中國的傳統農村:浙江泰順歷史文化的國際考察與研究》,齊魯出版社,濟南。

    英文參考文獻

    Habraken, N. J.
    1972, Supports: an alternative to mass housing,
    London,The Architectural Press.
    1981, The Grunsfeld Variations, MA: MIT Laboratory for
    Architecture and Planning.
    1982, Transformations of the Site,Cambridge, MIT Press.
    1998, The Structure of the Ordinary, Cambridge, MIT
    Press.

    Peter Katz (1994), The New Urbanism-Toward an Architecture of Community, McGraw-Hill,Inc.

    David Mohney, Keller Easterling (1991), Seaside, Princeton Architectural Press.

    Parolek, Daniel G., Parolek, Karen, Crawford, Paul C. (2008), Form-Based Codes: A Guide for Planners,Urban Designers,Municipalities, and Developers, John Wiley & Sons.

    Alex Krieger, William R Lennertz, Gund Hall Gallery (1991), Andres Duany and Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk : towns and town-making principles, Harvard University Graduate School of Design, New York : Rizzoli.

    Richard Tseng-yu. Lai (1988), Law in Urban Design and Planning,New York :Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Yurui Li , Yansui Liu , Hualou Long , Weiguo Cui (2014). “Community-based rural residential land consolidation and allocationcan help to revitalize hollowed villages in traditional agriculturalareas of China: Evidence from Dancheng County, Henan Province”, Land Use Policy, 39, 188–198.

    Hualou Longa, Yurui Li , Yansui Liu, Michael Woodsd, Jian Zou (2012). “Accelerated restructuring in rural China fueled by increasing vs. decreasing balance land-use policy for dealing with hollowed villages”, Land Use Policy, 29(1), 11–22.

    Nick R. Smith (2014). “Beyond top-down/bottom-up:Village transformation on China's urban edge”, Cities, 41, 209-220.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE