研究型公有建築物其室內環境品質較之一般型建築要求標準為高，一方面因其室內實驗研究性質複雜，再方面其內部研究人員所創造知識經濟產值亦較高。惟目前政府仍依循制式建築工程經費標準編列此等建築物預算，此舉造成日後建築在設計規劃階段受限，又將與價值工程評估的推動等交互制肘，待工程完工驗收使用後勢必影響室內環境品質與工作使用效率。
本研究針對特定研究型公有建築物進行使用後環境品質診斷，發現確實存在室內環境品質產生人員「病態建築症狀」之現象等問題，並從使用者滿意度調查亦反應潛在的健康影響。為量化環境健康因子的重要性，本研究導入經濟效益評估模式，將環境改善前後模擬之效益比對，以突顯從預算編列到設計管理，在健康建築的重要性。在建設效益評估部分，本研究計畫結合「國際永續建築發展趨勢」WBCSD之「環境效率」、ISO 21930「永續指標」、ISO 15686「建築生命週期成本 (LCC)」及「經濟效益評估」等最新方法，透過建築物環境的生命週期，結合永續、健康、效率及經濟等面向，擬議出「綜合環境效率評估方法」，提供未來政府執行效益評估之參考。

The public buildings for scientific and technological research purposes require higher environmental standards than other types of public buildings for the reason of the complexity of research processes and high economic value of creative productions (research productions). However, Taiwanese government has not yet established a flexible budget plan that fit to public research buildings. Inefficient budget causes limitation in phase of schematic design and interference with assessment of value engineering. After buildings approval and active, limited budget effect indoor environmental qualities and work efficiency.
This study specifically evaluates the environmental quality of in-use public researching buildings. Due to poor indoor environmental qualities, sick building syndrome (SBS) indeed exist among the occupants, on top of that, the occupants show concerning toward potential health problems through the satisfaction questionnaires. This study use economic benefit to quantify the importance of environmental factors affecting health, where we compare the economic benefit before and after environment improvement. The model concludes not only design, but also budget planning is crucial for health architecture. In the aspect of evaluation, this study combines several newest method, include, “International Sustainable Building Development Trends”, “Eco-Efficiency” from World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), “Sustainable Index” from ISO 21930, “Life Cycle Cost” from ISO 15686 and “Economic Benefit Evaluation”. With consideration regarding building’s environmental life cycle, sustainability, efficiency, economic benefit and occupant’s health, we plan to develop a “total environmental evaluation”, and future government can use this evaluation as a helpful tool to plan budget for public research buildings.

一、中文部份
1.王秀芳，永續都市建築物理環境因子之研究—以亞熱帶氣候台灣地區為例，碩士論文—國立成功大學/建築研究所，1998
2.江季揚，台灣產業文化資產再利用實質與非實質經濟效益評估整合模式之應用-以宜蘭酒廠為例，碩士論文，朝陽科技大學建築及都市設計研究所，2008
3.江哲銘，永續建築導論，建築情報出版社，2004
4.江哲銘、李俊璋，〝建材有機逸散物資料庫之建立-地板類建材〞，內政部建築研究所，2003.
5.江哲銘、邵文政、陳逸青、陳振誠，〝建材揮發性有機物質逸散行為預測模式之研究〞，建築學報，2005.
6.江哲銘、張桂鳳、廖惠燕、楊逸詠、周伯丞, 2006 , 設計品質指標運用於新建住宅室內環境空間性能評價之案例研究,《建築學報》Vol.57, pp.1-23，中華民國建築學會，台北。（TSSCI）
7.江哲銘、張桂鳳等人，GB-Tool整體建築環境評估工具本土化應用之初探-以2002永續建築國際會議之案例分析，中華民國建築學會第十六屆建築研究成果發表會論文集，2004
8.李嬿雯，臺南航空站使用效益評估，碩士論文，國立成功大學工學院工程管理專班，2006
9.沈大白，經濟效益評估，東吳大學，2007
10.周榮章，層級分析法與模糊評估法之比較，碩士論文，國立成功大學機械工程研究所，1992
11.林政賢，綠建築評估指標適用性之研究，成功大學建築研究所碩士論文，2004
12.林隆全，全民健保實施前後健康效益評估之比較，碩士論文—國立中央大學/產業經濟研究所，2004
13.林敬哲，智慧建築節能量測與經濟效益評估-以MEGA House為例，碩士論文，國立臺灣科技大學營建工程系，2010
14.邵文政、江哲銘、陳丁于、陳逸青，〝台灣地區室內環境因子對溶劑型塗料中揮發性有機物質逸散行為影響之研究〞，建築學報，2005.
15.施柏宇，應用AHP法探討GBTool於台灣地區適用性之研究，成功大學建築研究所碩士論文，2004
16.胡憲倫，鍾啟賢，「生態效益指標之評論」，企業永續發展簡訊，第64期，2002年10月
17.徐仁輝，公共財務管理，智勝文化事業
18.國科會研究計畫：環亞熱帶地區生態建築系統評估架構之研究(Ⅰ)( Ⅱ)，編號NSC93-2218-E-366-001
19.張桂鳳，永續環境評估系統運用於台灣地區建築物性能評價之研究，博士論文，國立成功大學建築研究所，2005。
20.張桂鳳、江哲銘等人，國外永續建築評估系統GBTOOL 與CASBEE的比較，中華民國建築學會第十六屆建築研究成果發表會論文集，2004
21.曹孟睿，文物館使用效益之研究，碩士論文，國立成功大學建築學系，2007
22.陳虹遐，應用分析網路程序法於液晶電視之生態效益評估，碩士論文，國立成功大學工業設計研究所，2004年
23.陳振誠，〝台灣本土氣候下換氣率影響建材有機物質逸散特性之研究-以合板及清漆為例〞，成大建研所碩論.2004.
24.陳振誠、江哲銘、陳家鋒、邵文政，〝複層建材揮發性有機物質逸散特性之研究-以塑膠地磚及溶劑型接著劑為例〞，建築學報，2005.
25.郭道林，震災建築物拆除重建與修復補強之經濟效益評估，碩士論文，國立中興大學土木工程學系，2001。
26.黃永泰，一位新科學堡壘背面的建築師介紹，現代營建，320，民95.08，頁67-71。
27.黃永泰，政府採購制度改造之研究，審計季刊，民88.04，頁46-59。
28.黃永泰，臺灣現階段生物科技產業中建築師應扮演的角色，現代營建，321，民95.09，頁61-63。
29.黃永泰、陳耀光，運用室內環境品質診斷方法於台灣實驗研究類建築之健康影響評估，建築學報，2010.
30.黃鐛渠，既有辦公建築物門窗與外遮陽節能策略與經濟效益分析，碩士論文，國立成功大學土木工程學系，2010
31.經濟部工業局，「生態效益-主導21世紀的經營理念」，2001年12月
32.綠建築解說與評估手冊，內政部建築研究所，2005年更新版
33.劉安平譯（Dianna Lopez Barnett and William D. Browning），永續建築入門（A Primer on Sustainable Building），2004
34.劉勝傑，運用層級分析法之產品生態效益評估，國立成功大學工業設計研究所碩士論文，2002
35.蕭文魁，科學園區興建防護牆之研究，碩士論文，私立中華大學營建管理研究所，2002年
36.賴志暉，腋下柺杖評估模式之建立與應用，碩士論文，國立成功大學工業設計研究所，1997
37.賴啟銘，建築物理環境DSR指標之研究，博士論文-國立成功大學建築研究所，1999
38.羅燦宏，學校視聽教室光環境最佳化設計之研究，碩士論文，私立樹德科技大學應用設計研究所，2004年

二、外文文獻
1.Air Quality Annual Report of R.O.C., 2006
2.ASTM D6670-01〝Standard Practice for Full-Scale Chamber Determinations of Volatile Organic Emissions From Indoor Materials/Products〞. 2001.
3.Chou, P.C.; Lee, C.Y.; Chang, K.F & Chiang, C.M.*, 2007, An Evaluation Index for Assessing the Indoor Environment of Sustainable Buildings in Taiwan, can be accepted by 《Indoor and Built Environment》.（SCI）
4.CM Chiang, CM Lai, 2001, A Study on the Comprehensive Indicator of Indoor Environment Assessment for Occupants’ Health in Taiwan, Building and Environment Vol. 37 No.4（SCI, EI）
5.David M. Gann, Building Research & Information, 2003
6.Directory of Tools by Country and Type, IEA Annex 31 Energy-Related Environmental Impact of Buildings, Page 130, October 2001.
7.Environmental effects of ozone depletion and its interactions with climate change:2006 assessment
8.IbSteen Olsen. Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs，“Green Building and Life-Cycle Economy”，GBC98
9.ISO 15686-1:2000 Buildings and constructed assets -- Service life planning -- Part 1: General principles
10.ISO/DIS 15686-5.2 Buildings and constructed assets -- Service life planning -- Part 5: Life cycle costing
11.ISO/TS 21931-1:2006 Sustainability in building construction -- Framework for methods of assessment for environmental performance of construction works -- Part 1: Buildings
12.K.F. Chang, C.M. Chiang, P.C. Chou*, 2007, Adapting aspects of GBTool 2005 - searching for suitability in Taiwan,《Building and Environment》 Vol.42, No.1, pp.310-316,（SCI）
13.Keffer, C. and Shimp, R., “Eco-Efficiency Indicators & Reporting: Report on the Status of the Project Work in Progress and Guideline for Pilot Application” Draft 8, London, 1999
14.L. Jansen. The challenge of sustainable development, Journal of Cleaner Production(11)2003 231-245
15.Low-Emission Floor Covering Adhesives and other Installation Materials RAL-UZ113，Basic Criteria for Award of the Environmental Lable，(Edition November 2003)
16.Matthews,T.G., Wilson D.L., Thompson, A.J., Mason, M.A., Bailey, S.N., and Nelms, L.H., terlaboratory Comparison of Formaldehyde Emission from Particle Board Underlayment in Small Scale Environment Chambers, Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, Vol. 37, p1320, 1987.
17.Nils K. Larsson and Raymond Cole, Green Building Challenge: the development of an idea, Building Research & Information (2001) 29(5), 336-345, 2001
18.Ott, Wayne R, Environment Indices: Theory and Practice, Ann Arbor, Mich. Ann Arbor Sciences, 1978
19.Pei-Chih Wu, Yen-Yi Li, Ching-Chang Lee, Che-Ming Chiang, Huey-Jen Jenny Su，2003， Indoor Air Vol.13,No.4, pp.359-363.
20.Raymond J. Cole, 1998, Emerging trends in building environmental assessment methods, BUILDING RESEARCH & INFORMATION(1998) 26(1), 3-16, 1998
21.Raymond J. Cole, Building environment assessment methods: clarifying intentions, BUILDING RESEARCH & INFORMATION(1999) 27(4/5), 230-246, 1999
22.Schaltegger, S. Corporate Environmental Auditing, John Wiley, New York, 1997
23.Shuzo Murakami, Kazuo Iwamura, Masaaki Sato, Toshiharu Ikaga, and Junko Endo, Comprehensive Assessment System for Building Environmental Efficiency (CASBEE)
24.Spengler, J.D., and K.Sexton. 1983. Indoor Air Pollution: A public health perspective. Science Vol. 121:pp.9-17
25.Swiss Bank Corporation, Eco-efficiency Indicators Portfolios: The Global Feature Ⅲ, Geneva
26.US Green Building Council (2000) Leadership in Energy and Environment Design (LEED)TM Rating System Version 2.0, March, San Francisco, CA, 2000
27.WBCSD, Changing course: a global business perspective on development and the environment, Geneva, Switzerland, 1992
28.WBCSD, Eco-Efficient Leadership, Geneva, Switzerland, 1996
29.Weschler, C.J., 2000 “Ozone in indoor environments concentration and chemistry.” Indoor Air 10: 269-288.
30.Wilke, O. Jann and Brödner, VOC- AND SVOC-EMISSIONS FROM ADHESIVES, FLOOR COVERINGS AND COMPLETE FLOOR STRUCTURES. Indoor Air, 2002.
31.Wu, P.-C., Y.-Y. Li, C.-M. Chiang, C.-Y. Huang, C.-C. Lee, F.-C. Li, H.-J. Su ，Changing microbial concentrations are associated with ventilation performance in Taiwan's air-conditioned office buildings ，Indoor Air -，Volume 15 Issue 1， Page 19-26，January,2005.
32.Yung-Tai Huang , Yaw-Kuang Chen , Che-Ming Chiang, 2009, An Evaluation for the Impact of Indoor Environment Quality on Health in the experimental building type of Taiwan, 《Roomvent 2009》.
33.Yung-Tai Huang, Yaw-Kuang Chen, Cheng-Chen Chen, Che-Ming Chiang and Chia-Yen Lee, 2011, 《Building and Environment》 Vol.50, pp. 135-140,（SCI）
34.Zhihua Fan, Paul Lioy, Charles Weschler et al., Ozone-Initiated Reactions with Mixtures of Volatile Organic Compounds under Simulated Indoor Conditions, Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 1811-1821
35.Zhu, J.P., R.J. Magee, J.S. Zhang and C.Y. Shaw, “A Small Scale Chamber Test Method for Measuring Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Wet Building Materials” CMEIAQ Final report 1.3, 1999