簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 王鼎峻
Wang, Ding-Jyun
論文名稱: 臺鐵局之效率績效評估
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE TAIWAN RAILWAY ADMINISTRATION
指導教授: 徐立群
Shu, Lih-Chyun
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 會計學系
Department of Accountancy
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 103
中文關鍵詞: 集中式資料包絡分析法鐵路效率資源重分配
外文關鍵詞: Centralized data envelopment analysis, Railway efficiency, Resource reallocation
相關次數: 點閱:64下載:3
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究採用兩階段的集中式資源分配和資源重分配概念,探討臺灣鐵路在各車站資源 (人員和設備) 集中配置和最佳化後,對臺灣鐵路業者整體營運效率所產生的影響。其結果顯示,雖然在良好的資源配置下其整體產出所增加的比例越高,但也勢必會造成臺灣鐵路業者大規模的組織變動和調整 (如人員的減少),進而產生較大的組織抗拒。因此,本研究根據資源分配範圍和方式的不同,依序區分為三種計畫 (長、中和短期) 以及三種方案 (根據人員調整方式分為方案一、方案二和方案三),希望透過較為緩慢的方式,讓臺灣鐵路業者在不同的環境下,對產出和組織抗拒間作一有效權衡。

    This study aims to investigate the effects of the centralized allocation and optimization of Taiwan’s railway resources (personnel and equipment) on the overall operational efficiency of its railway industry, based on the concept of two-phase centralized allocation and reallocation of resources. A Taiwan railway data analysis conducted in 2011 showed that the high overall output due to the efficient allocation of resources has led to large-scale organizational changes and adjustments (such as staff reduction) in Taiwan’s railway industry, resulting in widespread organization resistance. Therefore, this study divides resource allocation into long-term, middle-term, and short-term allocation, with three resource adjustment programs (programs I, programs II, and programs III) according to different ranges and ways of resource allocation. This process can enable Taiwan’s railway industry to achieve balance between output and organization resistance under different environments in a more efficient manner.

    第一章、緒論 1 1.1研究背景 1 1.2研究動機 3 1.3問題描述 5 1.4研究目的 6 1.5研究貢獻 7 1.6章節架構 7 第二章、文獻探討 8 2.1研究變數 8 2.2大眾運輸的效率評估 10 2.3 DEA vs. CDEA 11 2.4 DEA評估鐵路效率績效 16 2.5小結 16 第三章、研究方法 18 3.1變數採用和相關假設 18 3.2模型架構 18 3.3長期計畫 21 3.3.1長期計畫下之方案一 22 3.3.2長期計畫下之方案二 26 3.3.3長期計畫下之方案三 29 3.4中期計畫 31 3.4.1中期計畫下之方案一 32 3.4.2中期計畫下之方案二 34 3.4.3中期計畫下之方案三 37 3.5短期計畫 40 3.5.1短期計畫下之方案一 40 3.5.2短期計畫下之方案二 43 3.5.3短期計畫下之方案三 46 第四章、實證結果與分析 49 4.1臺鐵資料 49 4.2長期計畫結果分析 51 4.2.1長期計畫下之方案一 51 4.2.2長期計畫下之方案二 52 4.2.3長期計畫下之方案三 52 4.2.4長期計畫下投入之比較 53 4.3中期計畫結果分析 54 4.3.1中期計畫下之方案一 54 4.3.2中期計畫下之方案二 54 4.3.3中期計畫下之方案三 55 4.3.4中期計畫下投入之比較 55 4.4短期計畫結果分析 56 4.4.1短期計畫下之方案一 56 4.4.2短期計畫下之方案二 57 4.4.3短期計畫下之方案三 57 4.4.4短期計畫下投入之比較 58 4.5產出增加比例 (θ*) 之比較 59 第五章、討論 62 第六章、結論 64 參考文獻 66 附錄一、長期計畫之分析結果 68 附錄二、中期計畫之分析結果 80 附錄三、短期計畫之分析結果 92

    1.Azadeh, A., Ghaderi, S.F. & Izadbakhsh, H. (2008), “Integration of DEA and AHP with computer simulation for railway system improvement and optimization”, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 195, 775-785
    2.Asmild, M., Paradi, J.C. & Pastor, J.T. (2009), “Centralized resource allocation BCC models”, Omega, 37, 40–49.
    3.Bañon-Pino, J., Fernández-Blanco, V. & Rodríguez-Álvarez, A. (2002), “The allocative efficiency measure by means of a distance function: The case of Spanish public railways”, European Journal of Operational Research, 137, 191-205
    4.Coelli, T. & Perelman, S. (1999), “A comparison of parametric and non-parametric distance functions” With application to European railways”, European Journal of Operational Research, 117, 326-339
    5.Cantos, P. & Maudos, J. (2001), “Regulation and efficiency: the case of European railways”, Transportation Research Part A, 35, 459-472
    6.Cook, W.D. & Seiford, L.M. (2009), “Data envelopment analysisDEA) – Thirty years on”, European Journal of Operational Research, 192, 1-17
    7.Fu, P., Zhan, Z. & Wu, C. (2013), “Efficiency analysis of Chinese Road Systems with DEA and order relation analysis method: Externality concerned”, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 96, 1227-1238
    8.Fang, L. (2013), “A generalized DEA model for centralized resource allocation”, European Journal of Operational Research, 228, 405-412
    9.Gathon, H.J. & Pestieau, P. (1995), “Decomposing efficiency into its managerial and its regulatory components: The case of European railways”, European Journal of Operational Research, 80, 500-507
    10.Giménez-García, V.M., Martínez-Parra, J.L. & Buffa, F.P. (2007), “Improving resource utilization in multi-unit networked organizations: The case of a Spanish restaurant chain”, Tourism Management, 28, 262-270
    11.Yu, M.M. & Lin, E.T.J. (2008), “Efficiency and effectiveness in railway performance using a multi-activity network DEA model”, Omega, 36, 1005-1017
    12.Yu, M.M, Chern, C.C. & Hsiao, B. (2013), “Human resource rightsizing using centralized data envelopment analysis: Evidence from Taiwan’s Airports”, Omega, 41, 119-130
    13.Jitsuzumi, T. & Nakamura, A. (2010), “Causes of inefficiency in Japanese railways: Application of DEA managers and policy makers”, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 44, 161-173
    14.Lozano, S. & Villa, G. (2004), “Centralized Resource Allocation Using Data Envelopment Analysis”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, 22, 143-161
    15.Lozano, S., Villa, G. & Adenso-Díaz, B. (2004), “Centralised target setting for regional recycling operations using DEA”, Omega, 32, 101-110
    16.Lozano, S., Villa, G. & Brännlund, R. (2009), “Centralised reallocation of emission permits using DEA”, European Journal of Operational Research, 193, 752-760
    17.Lao, Y. & Liu, L. (2009), “Performance evaluation of bus lines with data envelopment analysis and geographic information systems”, Computers, Environment and Urban System, 33, 247-255
    18.Lotfi, F.H., Noora, A.A., Jahanshahloo, G.R., Gerami, J. & Mozaffari, M.R. (2010), “Centralized resource allocation for enhanced Russell models”, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 235, 1-10
    19.Lozano, S., Villa, G. & Canca, D. (2011), “Application of centralised DEA approach to capital budgeting in Spanish ports”, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 60, 455-465
    20.Mar-Molinero, C., Prior, D., Segovia, M.M. & Portillo, F. (2012), “On centralized resource utilization and its reallocation by using DEA”, Annals of Operations Research, DOI, 10.1007/s10479-012-1083-8
    21.Mallikarju, S., Lewis, H.F., & Sexton, T.R. (2013), “Operational performance of U.S. public rail transit and implications for public policy”, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 1-15

    下載圖示 校內:2019-04-07公開
    校外:2019-04-07公開
    QR CODE