能替代振動台實驗且具有經濟性之方法其一為傳統結合油壓制動器與反力牆之擬動態實驗，但對於摩擦型且與速度相依隔震元件之效能測試尚有許多瓶頸需要克服，為使傳統擬動態實驗之加載速率更接近真實結構系統之反應，本文提出與振動台結合之即時複合實驗技術。即時複合實驗係將次結構置於振動台台上，並回授次結構系統之層間總剪力進行數值運算，同時以振動台呈現主結構系統之反應，為一種實現次結構與主結構互制之即時實驗技術。為了驗證即時複合實驗技術之可行性，本文採用半主動壓電式摩擦型質量阻尼器為次結構系統，以即時複合實驗與振動台實驗做比對，而實驗結果顯示即時複合實驗能夠完整重現振動台實驗之結果。因此，本文進一步將即時複合實驗技術推廣至應用階段，以即時複合實驗探討次結構半主動控制參數對其減振效果之影響。此外，本文首度開發主結構多模態行為應用於即時複合實驗技術，將實驗控制端之主結構推廣至多自由度系統，並配置半主動壓電式摩擦型質量阻尼器於多自由度主結構頂層，探討其可行性與控制參數對於減振成效之影響。

The pseudo dynamic test is a combination of numerical analysis and experimental test that can emulate the dynamic behavior of structure under environmental loading such as seismic event. However, the behavior of the isolator which is depending on velocity or friction is hard to replace by the pseudo dynamic test. The first purpose of this thesis is to evaluate the applicability of real time hybrid test (RTHT) of a piezoelectric friction controllable mass damper system (PFCMD) by comparing its performance with shaking table test. The key interface of RTHT is the feedback inter-story shear force between the PFCMD and the main structure, where the PFCMD is an experimentally physical substructure that directly installed on a shaking table and the main structure is numerically simulated by a shaking table. The result of testing shows that the responses of main structure and PFCMD during RTHT are similar to the shaking table test. Therefore, the design of PFCMD for reuction of seismic vibrations in multiple degree of freedom stuctures are tested through RTHT. The optimization of the control parameters on PFCMD-structure system is also investigated.

[1] Hakuno, M., Shidawara, M. and Hara, T., “Dynamic destructive test of a cantileverbeam controlled by an analog-computer” Transactions Japan Society of Engineers, 1-9 (1969)
[2] Takanashi, K. et al., “Nonlinear earthquake response analysis of structures by a computer actuator online system” Transactions Architectural Instruction Japan, 229,77-83 (1975)
[3] Nakashima et al., “Development of real-time pseudo-dynamic testing” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 21(1):79-92 (1992)
[4] Chung, W. J., Yun, C. B., Kim, N. S. and Seo., J. W. “Shaking table and pseudodynamic tests for the evaluation of the seismic performance of base-isolated structures” Engineering Structures, Vol:21, Issue:4, 365-379 (1999)
[5] Horiuchi, T., M. Inoue, T. Konno and W. Yamagishi., “Development of a real-time hybrid experimental system using a shaking table - (Proposal of experiment concept and feasibility study with rigid secondary system)” JSME International Journal Series C-Mechanical Systems Machine Elements and Manufacturing 42: 255-264, (1999)
[6] Wang, Y. P., Lee, C. L., Yo, T. H., “Modified state space procedures for pseudodynamic testing” Earthquake Engineering and Structure Dynamics, 30, 59-80(2001)
[7] Reinhorn, A.M., Sivaselvan M.V., Liang Z., Shao X., “Real-time dynamic hybrid testing of structural systems” World Conference on Earthquake Engineering,No:1644, (2004)
[8] Juan, E. Billie, F., ”Model-based strategies for real-time hybrid testing” University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, (2007)
[9] T.Y. Yang, G. Mosqueda and B. Stojadinovic., “Evaluating the quality of hybrid simulation test using an energy based approach” World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, (2008)
[10] Wang T., Cheng C., “A Model-based Predictor-Corrector Algorithm for Substructure Hybrid Test System” Proceeding of the Ninth Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering, No:152, (2011)
[11] Jin-Ting Wang, Fei Zhu, Feng Zhu “Real-time hybrid simulation of multi-story stuctures installed with tuned liquid damper” Structure Control and Health Monitoring, 23, 1015-1031, (2016)
[12] Ruiyang Zhang, Paige V. Lauenstein, Brian M. Phillips “Real-time hybrid simulation of a shear building with a uni-axial shake table” Engineering Structures, 119, 217-229, (2016)
[13] Lu, L. Y., C. C. Lin, G. L. Lin, C. Y. Lin (2010) ”Experimental and analysis of a fuzzy-controlled piezoelectric seismic isolation system” Journal of sound and Vibration, Vol. 329,No. 11, 1992-2014.
[14] Lu, L. Y., G. L. Lin, C. Y. Lin “Experimental verification of a piezoelectric smart isolation system” Structural Control and Health Monitoring, Vol. 18, No. 8, 869-889. (2011)
[15] Lu, L. Y., G. L. Lin, C. Y. Lin “Experiment of an ABS-type control strategy for semi-active friction isolation systems.” Smart Structures and Systems, Vol.8, No.5, 501-524. (2011)
[16] Lin, G. L., C.C. Lin, L. Y. Lu, Y. B. Ho(2012) ”Experimental verification of seismic vibration control using semi-active friction tuned mass damper.” Earthquake Engineering ans structural Dynamics, Vol. 41, No.4,813-830
[17] Warburton G.B., “Optimum Absorber Parameters for Various Combinations of Response and Excitation Parameters”, Earthquake and Structure Dynamics, Vol. 10,No. 3, pp.381-401, (1982)
[18] 許敬昀，「摩擦型調諧質量阻尼器系統之混合實驗驗證」，國立成功大學研究所，碩士論文，(2014)
[19] 何玉泊，「半主動摩擦調諧質量阻尼器之振動台試驗與減振分析」，國立中興大學土木研究所，碩士論文，(2010)
[20] 甯威鈞，「半主動壓電式摩擦型調諧質量阻尼器系統混合實驗驗證」，國立成功大學土木研究所，碩士論文，(2015)
[21] 賈博宇，「振動台效能對於PFCMD即時複合實驗之影響探討」，國立成功大學土木研究所，碩士論文，(2016)
[22] 羅仕杰，「記憶體共享光纖網路設備於即時擬動態實驗之初步研究」，國立暨南國際大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文，(2005)
[23] 李明鴻，「應用快速擬動態試驗技術於非線性含斜撐框架動態反應之模擬與試驗」，國立成功大學土木研究所，碩士論文，(2006)
[24] 顏呈璁，「多重取樣量測對擬動態實驗誤差之影響」，國立成功大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文，(2009)
[25] 吳依寰，「摩擦型阻尼器之擬動態實驗與震動台驗證」，國立成功大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文，(2011)
[26] 朱凱業，「多項式變曲率滑動支承之混合實驗」，國立成功大學土木工程研究所，碩士論文，(2013)
[27] 林錦隆，「半主動隔震系統之抗震應用研究」，國立高雄第一科技大學工程科技研究所，碩士論文，(2008)
[28] 葉士瑋，「即時振動台複合實驗之應用與研究、即時振動台複合實驗與含摩擦元件子結構之驗證與研究、即時振動台複合實驗應用於含摩擦元件子結構之研究」，國立成功大學土木工程研究所，博士論文(2017)
[29] 呂仲岳，「國立成功大學土木工程系振動台操作手冊」(2017)