簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 董芝邑
TUNG, ZHI-YI
論文名稱: 同儕是否影響公司財務政策? 韓國上市公司為例
Peer Effects in Corporate Financial Policy: Evidence from Korean Listed Firms
指導教授: 黃炳勳
Huang, Ping-Hsun
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所
Graduate Institute of Finance
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 36
中文關鍵詞: 同儕效應資本結構韓國
外文關鍵詞: Peer Effects, Capital Structure, South Korea
相關次數: 點閱:12下載:2
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本文以韓國市場為研究對象,探討在大型企業與中小企業差距顯著的市場環境下,同儕效果是否存在並對企業資本結構決策造成影響。本文以 2020 年至 2024 年間韓國 KOSPI 上市之非金融與非公用事業公司為樣本,並使用同儕公司之特質性股權報酬衝擊作為主要解釋變數,以辨識同儕效果並降低反映問題所造成之內生性疑慮。
    實證結果顯示,同儕公司平均股權報酬衝擊與市場槓桿、帳面槓桿及市場槓桿變動皆呈正向關係,表示韓國企業會依據同儕公司所釋放之財務訊號調整其資本結構,且主要透過債務發行而非股權發行回應同儕訊號。此外,在大型企業主導程度較高之產業中,同儕效果更為明顯。本研究顯示,儘管是在企業差距顯著的市場,其資本結構決策仍會受到同儕公司行為與產業結構影響。

    This study uses the South Korean market as its empirical setting to examine whether peer effects exist and influence corporate capital structure decisions in a market environment characterized by substantial disparities between large enterprises and small and medium-sized firms. Using nonfinancial and nonutility firms listed on the KOSPI from 2020 to 2024 as the sample, this study employs peer firms’ idiosyncratic equity return shocks as the main explanatory variable to identify peer effects and mitigate endogeneity concerns arising from the reflection problem.
    The empirical results show that peer firm average equity shocks are positively associated with market leverage, book leverage, and changes in market leverage. These findings indicate that Korean firms adjust their capital structures in response to financial signals released by their peer firms, primarily through debt issuance rather than equity issuance. In addition, peer effects are more pronounced in industries dominated by large firms. Overall, this study shows that even in a market characterized by substantial firm disparities, capital structure decisions are still influenced by peer firm behavior and industry structure.

    Abstract i 摘要 ii 誌謝 iii Contents iv Table Contents v 1.Introduction 1 2.Literature Review 6 2.1 Determinants of Corporate Capital Structure 6 2.2 Peer Effects 8 2.3 Peer Effects and Corporate Financial Policy 9 3.Research and Methodology 11 3.1 Data and Sample collection 11 3.2 The Empirical Model 11 3.3 Definition of Variable 13 4.Empirical Results 16 4.1 Descriptive Statistics 16 4.2 Construction and Properties of Return Shocks 18 4.3 Peer Effects in Financial Policy 19 4.4 Robustness Tests 23 5.Conclusion 25 6.References 27

    Almeida, H., Kim, C.-S., & Kim, H. B. (2015). Internal capital markets in business groups: Evidence from the Asian financial crisis. The Journal of Finance, 70(6), 2539–2586.
    Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2002). Market timing and capital structure. The Journal of Finance, 57(1), 1–32.
    Banerjee, A. V. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), 797–817.
    Bizjak, J. M., Lemmon, M. L., & Naveen, L. (2008). Does the use of peer groups contribute to higher pay and less efficient compensation? Journal of Financial Economics, 90(2), 152–168.
    Bolton, P., & Scharfstein, D. S. (1990). A theory of predation based on agency problems in financial contracting. American Economic Review, 80(1), 93–106.
    Bradley, M., Jarrell, G. A., & Kim, E. H. (1984). On the existence of an optimal capital structure: Theory and evidence. The Journal of Finance, 39(3), 857–878.
    Chevalier, J. A., & Scharfstein, D. S. (1996). Capital-market imperfections and countercyclical markups: Theory and evidence. American Economic Review, 86(4), 703–725.
    Duflo, E., & Saez, E. (2002). Participation and investment decisions in a retirement plan: The influence of colleagues’ choices. Journal of Public Economics, 85(1), 121–148.
    Frank, M. Z., & Goyal, V. K. (2009). Capital structure decisions: Which factors are reliably important? Financial Management, 38(1), 1–37.
    Graham, J. R., & Harvey, C. R. (2001). The theory and practice of corporate finance: Evidence from the field. Journal of Financial Economics, 60(2-3), 187–243.
    He, W., & Wang, Q. (2020). The peer effect of corporate financial decisions around split share structure reform in China. Review of Financial Economics, 38(3), 474–493.
    Leary, M. T., & Roberts, M. R. (2014). Do peer firms affect corporate financial policy? The Journal of Finance, 69(1), 139–178.
    Lemmon, M. L., Roberts, M. R., & Zender, J. F. (2008). Back to the beginning: Persistence and the cross-section of corporate capital structures. The Journal of Finance, 63(4), 1575–1608.
    Manski, C. F. (1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. The Review of Economic Studies, 60(3), 531–542.
    Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1963). Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: A correction. The American Economic Review, 53(3), 433–443.
    Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221.
    Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. (1995). What do we know about capital structure: Some evidence from international data. The Journal of Finance, 50(5), 1421–1460.
    Scharfstein, D. S., & Stein, J. C. (1990). Herd behavior and investment. The American Economic Review, 80(3), 465–479.
    Welch, I. (2004). Capital structure and stock returns. Journal of Political Economy, 112(1), 106–131.
    Whited, T. M., & Wu, G. (2006). Financial constraint risk. The Review of Financial Studies, 19(2), 531–559.
    Zwiebel, J. (1995). Corporate conservatism and relative compensation. Journal of Political Economy, 103(1), 1–25.
    Cheng, A.-C. (2019). Is the peer effect present in Taiwan’s firms? [Master’s thesis, National Cheng Kung University]. doi:10.6844/NCKU201900353. (In Chinese)

    下載圖示
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE