簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳美樺
Chen, Mei-hua
論文名稱: 網路推薦訊息類型對消費者信任、知覺風險、知覺品質以及對購買意願之影響
The influence of different online recommendations to comsumers' trust, perceived risk and perceived quality and purchasing intention
指導教授: 蔡東峻
Tsai, Dung-Chun
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 電信管理研究所
Institute of Telecommunications Management
論文出版年: 2007
畢業學年度: 95
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 66
中文關鍵詞: 網路購物個人化推薦系統知覺風險知覺品質購買意願
外文關鍵詞: e-commerce, personalized recommendation system, perceived quality, purchase intention, perceived risk
相關次數: 點閱:133下載:11
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著電子商務的興盛,網路商店的競爭激烈,各家廠商為了增加消費者在網站的停留時間,增加各式各樣的推薦訊息和商品資訊來吸引消費者目光。其中「個人化推薦系統」為專門提供為消費者量身訂做推薦訊息的資訊系統,由於針對消費者個人的偏好和過去購物資料來推薦適合的商品,可有效簡短消費者在網路上尋找商品的時間,在國外許多知名網路商店使用後都有相當不錯的績效。在台灣,網路商店上常用的推薦資訊為「銷售排行榜」、「專家推薦」以及「其他消費者推薦」,其中以銷售排行榜最為常見,甚至連以往堅持不公佈書籍銷售排行的誠品書局也在2005年三月開始提供各類暢銷書排行榜的訊息。究竟這些推薦訊息對於消費者造成何種影響,改變消費者購物的抉擇呢?推薦效果是否因產品類別而不同呢?
    為了探討上述問題,本研究設計一虛擬之購物網頁與網路問卷的方式,來分析不同推薦訊息來源對消費者的影響。本研究目的如下:(1)以能力、正直、善意信任為構面探討消費者對不同推薦方式的信任程度;(2)分析不同推薦訊息是否影響消費者知覺商品品質與知覺風險;(3)探討消費者對推薦訊息的信任、知覺商品品質及知覺風險,如何影響消費者之購買意願;(4)分析產品類別對推薦訊息效果之影響。(5)提供廠商如何適當使用推薦訊息之建議。
    本研究所得之重要結論分述如下:
    (1)不同推薦訊息的確影響消費者購買意願,其中以接收到「其他消費者推薦」的訊息,所產生的購買意願最高。(2)搜尋性商品而言,消費者對「其他消費者推薦」的信任程度最高;經驗性商品方面,消費者對「個人化推薦系統」及「排行榜」的信任程度較高。(3)提供推薦訊息並無法降低消費者知覺風險,尤其以收到「專家推薦」訊息的消費者,其知覺風險為最高。(4)不同產品類型下,推薦訊息對於消費者知覺商品品質會產生不同的影響。(5)消費者知覺風險、知覺商品品質以及對於推薦訊息來源的信任都對購買意願有顯著影響。

    Due to the rapidly rising of electronic commerce e-shops are competing hotly today. For attracting the attention of consumers and urging them to stay at homepages as long as possible, all the vendors are trying hard to offer various selling and recommendation information abundantly. So the “personalized recommendation system” is the typical way of offering recommendation information for the consumers personally.
    Because this system can recommend suitable products for the consumers according to their hobby and consuming experiences and saving their time in Internet searching effectively, it earns quite positive evaluation from many famous e-shops in the world.
    In Taiwan, the frequently recommended information offered by e-shops are: (1) list of best-selling, (2) expert recommendation and (3) other consumer’s recommendation. Among which, the first one is the most frequently used in business. Even the Eslitebooks, a famous chain bookstore in Taiwan, that insisted on not releasing the best selling list before had changed their policy in March, 2005.
    What’s the influence of the recommendation information on the consumers? How can it change the shopping decision of them? Is there any different recommendation effect on different products?
    In order to answer the above questions, I setup a virtual homepage and a questionnaire for the research.
    The purposes of the research are: (1) to find out consumer’s reliability on different recommendation via the measurements of ability, candor and trust; (2) to analyze whether the different recommendation information will show its influence on the product-quality/risk-cognition of the consumers or not; (3) to know how the consumer’s purchasing intention will be influenced by the reliability and cognition of product quality and its risk; (4) to analyze the influence of the recommendation information of the product category; (5) to suggest ways of taking advantages of the appropriate recommendation information for the vendors.
    The major conclusions of the research are as follows: (1) different recommendation information, especially the information shared by other consumers, does have influence on the consumer’s intention of purchasing; (2) while shopping by searching on Internet, the “other consumer’s recommendation” is the most appreciated idea of purchasing accepted by the consumers, but if the purchasing behavior is depended on the experiences then the “personalized recommendation system” and the “list of best-selling” will be utilized mostly; (3) recommendation information is not certainly reduce the product risk cognition of consumers, especially when they received the recommendation information from experts; (4) recommendation information certainly has its influence on the consumer’s cognition of product quality in the different product categories; (5) the product risk cognition, the product quality cognition and the resource of the recommendation information are all have obvious influence on the purchasing intention of the consumers.

    第一章 緒論............................................1 第一節 研究背景與動機.......................................................................................1 第二節 研究目的...................................................................................................4 第三節 研究流程...................................................................................................5 第二章 文獻回顧.........................................6 第一節 消費者信任及推薦訊息來源對於信任的影響.......................................6 第二節 知覺風險以及推薦訊息來源對於知覺風險的影響.............................11 第三節 推薦訊息來源對於知覺品質的影響.....................................................12 第四節 消費者信任、知覺風險與知覺品質對於購買意願的影響.................13 第三章 研究方法........................................16 第一節 研究架構.................................................................................................16 第二節 研究範圍與對象.....................................................................................17 第三節 研究變數的操弄及衡量方法.................................................................17 第四節 實驗設計與實驗流程.............................................................................19 第五節 資料分析方法.........................................................................................20 第四章 結果分析與討論...................................22 第一節 問卷回收與整理.....................................................................................22 第二節 不同推薦方式對能力、正直及善意信任之影響.................................26 第三節 不同推薦方式對消費者知覺風險與知覺品質之影響.........................31 第四節 信任、知覺風險、知覺品質對購買意願之影響.................................36 第五節 假設驗證整理與討論.............................................................................39 第五章 結論與建議......................................42 第一節 研究結論.................................................................................................42 第二節 理論上之意涵.........................................................................................43 第三節 管理實務之建議.....................................................................................44 第四節 研究限制與未來研究建議.....................................................................46 參考文獻.............................................49 附錄一 實驗前測問卷....................................56 附錄二 網路實驗流程....................................58

    Aaker, D. A. (1996). Measuring Brand Equity Across Products and Markets. California Management Review, 38(3), 102-125.
    Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. Social Psychology, Springer series, 11-39.
    Ansari, A., Essegaier, S., & Kohli, R. (2000). Internet Recommendation Systems. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(3), 363-375.
    Ba, S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2002). Evidence of the Effect of Trust Building Technology in Electronic Markets: Price Premiums and Buyer Behavior. MIS Quarterly, 26(3), 243-268.
    Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer Behavior as Risk Taking Dynamic Marketing for a Changing World, Proceedings of the 43rd Conference of the AmericanMarketing Association, 389-398.
    Brown, J. J., & Reingen, P. H. (1987). Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 350-362.
    Bunduchi, R. (2005). Business relationships in internet-based electronic markets: the role of goodwill trust and transaction costs. Information Systems Journal 15(4), 321-341.
    Chang, T.-Z., & Wildt, A. R. (1994). Price, Product Information, and Purchase Intention: An Empirical Study. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22(1), 16-27.
    Chien, Y.-H., & George, E. I. (1999). A Bayesian Model for Collaborative Filtering. Proceedings of the 7th International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics.
    Childers, T. L., & Rao, R. (1992). The influence of familial and peer-based rederence groups. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(2), 198-212.
    Chong, B., Yang, Z., & Wong, M. (2003). Asymmetrical impact of trustworthiness attributes on trust, perceived value and purchase intention: a conceptual framework for cross-cultural study on consumer perception of online auction. ACM Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Electronic commerce, 50, 213-219.
    Claxton, J. D., Fry, J. N., & Portis, B. (1974). A Taxonomy of Prepurchase Information Gathering Patterns. Journal of Consumer Research, 1, 35-43.
    Claxton, J. D., Fry, J. N., & Portis, B. (1974). A Taxonomy of Prepurchase Information Gathering Patterns. Journal of Consumer Research, 1(3), 35-42.
    Cole, S. J. (1998). Testimony Befor the Consumer Protection Committee on Commerce, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington D.C. Better Business Bureau.
    Cox, D. F. (1967). Risk taking and informationd handling in consumer behavior. Harvard University Press.
    Dean, D. H. (1999). Brand Endorsement , Popularity, and Event Sponsorship as Advertising Cues Affecting Consumer Pre-Purchase Attitudes. Journal of Advertising, 28(3), 1-12.
    Dean, D. H., & Biswas, A. (2001). Third-Party Organization Endorsement of Products: An Advertising Cue Affecting Consumer Prepurchase Evaluation of Goods and Services. Journal of Advertising, 30(4), 41-57.
    Dialogue, C. (2001). The personalization consortium's online consumer personalization survey.
    Dorlin, D. (1985). Although U.S. Cars Are improved, Imports still win quality survey. The Wall Street Journal, December 16, 27.
    Duhan, D. F., Johnson, S. D., Wilcox, J. B., & Harrell, G. D. (1997). Influences on Consumer Use of Word-of-Mouth Recommendation Source. Academy of Marketing Science, 25(4), 283-295.
    Eggert, A., & Ulaga, W. (2002). Customer perceives value: a substitude for satisfaction in business markets? The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 17(2), 107-118.
    Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior.
    Friedman, H. H., & Friedman, L. (1979). Endorser Effectiveness by Product Type. Journal of Advertising Research, 19, 63-71.
    Garbarino, E., & Strahilevitz, M. (2004). Gender differences in the perceived risk of buying online and theeffects of receiving a site recommendation. Journal of Business Research, 57, 768-775.
    Gefen, D. (2002). Reflections on the dimensions of trust and trustworthiness among online consumers. ACM SIGMIS Database 33(3), 38-53.
    Goldberg, D., Nichols, D., Oki, B. M., & Terry, D. (1992). Using Collaborations Filtering to weave an Information Tapestry. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 35(12), 61-70.
    Hanson, W. (2000). Internet Marketing.
    Herr, P. M., Kardes, F. R., & Kim, J. (1991). Effect of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility diagnostic perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 454-462.
    Huang, Z., Chung, W., & Chen, H. (2003). A graph model for E-commerce recommender systems. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(3), 259 - 274.
    Huang, Z., Chung, W., & Chen, H. (2003). A graph model for E-commerce recommender systems. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(3), 259-274.
    Jones, S., Wilkens, M., Morris, P., & Masera, M. (2000). Trust Requirements in E-Business. Communications of the ACM, 43(12), 81-87.
    Kelley, H. H. (1973). The Processes of Causal Attribution. American Psychologist, 28(2), 107-128.
    Kelly, H. H. (1973). The Process of Causal Attributions. American Psychologist, 28, 107-128.
    King, M. F., & Balasubramanian, S. K. (1994). The effects of expertise, end goal, and product type on adoption of preference formation strategy. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 22(2), 146-159.
    Leavitt, H. J. (954). A Note on Some Experimental Findings About the Meaning of Price. Journal of Business, 27, 205-210.
    Lee, M. K. O., & Turban, E. (2001). A trust model for consumer Internet shopping. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(1), 75-91.
    Linden, G., Smith, B., & York, J. (2003). Amazon.com Recommendations. IEEE Internet Computing, 76-80.
    Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integration model of organizational trust. Academy of Marketing Science, 20(3), 709-734.
    McCracken, G. (1989). Who Is The Celebrity Endorser? Cultural Foundations Of The Endorsement Process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(9), 310-342.
    Monroe, K., & Krishnan, R. (1985). The Effect of Price on Subjective Product Evaluation. Perceived Quality: How Consumers View Stores and Merchandise, Eds. Jacob and Jerry C. Olson. Lextinton. , 209-232.
    Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The Commitment-trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58, 20-38.
    Morris, M., & Organ, C. (1996). The internet as mass medium. Journal of Communication, 46(1), 39-50.
    Murray, K. B., & Schlacter, J. L. (1990). The Impact of Services Versus Goods on Consumers' Assessment of Perceived Risk and Variability. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 18(1), 51-65.
    Nelson, P. (1974). Advertising as information. Journal of Political Economy, 78(2), 311-329.
    Park, C. W., & Lessig, V. P. (1981). Familiarity and Its Impact on Consumer Decision Biases and Heuristics. Journal of Consumer Research, 8(2), 223-231
    Postma, O. J., & Brokke, M. (2002). Personalisation in practice: The proven effects of personalisation. Journal of Database Marketing, 9(2), 137-142.
    Rao, A. R., & Monroe, K. B. (1988). The Moderating Effect of Prior Knowledge on Cue Utilization in Product Evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 253-264.
    Reichheld, F. F., & Schefter, P. (2000). E-Loyalty: Your Secret Weapon on the Web. Harvard Business Review, 78(4), 105-113.
    Roselius, T. (1971). Consumer Rankings of Risk Reductions Methods. Journal of Marketing, 35(1), 56-61.
    Rosenberg, M. (1989). Society and the Adolescent Self-Image.
    Rossi, P. E., & Allenby, G. M. (2003). Bayesian Statistics and Marketing. Marketing Science, 22(3), 304-328.
    Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393-404.
    Sarwar, B. M., A., J., Konstan, A. B., Herlocker, J., Miller, B., & Riedl, J. (1998). Term Weighting Approches in Automatic Text Retrieval. Information Processing and Management, 24(5), 513-523.
    Schafer, J. B., Konstan, J. A., & Riedl, J. (2001). E-commerce recommendation applications. Data Minning and Knowledge Discovery, 5(1), 115-153.
    Schiffman, L. G. (2000). Consumer Behavior. 229.
    Smith, R. E. (1993). Integrating information from advertising and trial: Processes and effects on consumer response to product information. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(2), 204-220.
    Srinivasan, S. S., Anderson, R., & K., P. (2002). Customer loyalty in E-commerce: An exploration of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Retailing, 78(1), 41-50.
    Sultan, F., Urban, G., Shankar, V., & Bart, I. (2004). Determinants and role of trust in e-business: A large scale empirical study. MIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper 4282-02.
    Sylvain Senecal, & Nantel, J. (2004). The influence of online product recommendations on consumers' online choices. Journal of Retailing, 80, 159-169.
    Taylor, J. W. (1974). The Role of Risk in Consumer Behavior. Journal of Marketing, 38(2), 54-60.
    Wayment, H. A., & Taylor, S. E. (1995). Self-Evaluation Process: Motives, Information Use, and Self-Esteem. Journal of Personality, 63(4), 729-757.
    West, P. M., Ariely, D., Bellman, S., Bradlow, B., Huber, J., & Johnson, E. (1999). Agents to the rescue? Marketing Letters, 10(3), 285-300.
    Wind, J., & Rangaswamy, A. (2001). Customerization: The next revolution in mass customization. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(1), 13-32.
    Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52, 2-22.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:2007-04-30公開
    QR CODE