| 研究生: |
蘇姮之 Su, Heng-Chih |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
我國公費揭露對審計服務價格之影響 Impact of Fee Disclosure on the Pricing of Audit Services: Evidence from Taiwan |
| 指導教授: |
林囿成
Lin, Yu-Chen |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 會計學系 Department of Accountancy |
| 論文出版年: | 2011 |
| 畢業學年度: | 99 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 88 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | (審計)公費揭露 、價格競爭 、審計服務價格 、審計公費 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | (Audit) Fee Disclosure, price war, audit prices, audit fees |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:114 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
近年來我國審計市場趨近飽和,削價競爭的情況時有所聞,會計師公會擔憂若全面公開審計公費資訊,會導致價格競爭的白熱化,使得審計品質更加不易維持。因此,本研究的主要目的係利用已揭露的審計公費資訊,觀察公費揭露對審計服務價格的影響情形,以探討會計師公會的擔憂是否必要。
本研究的研究期間為我國審計公費開始揭露的2002年至2009年為止,實證結果顯示,2002至2003年整體審計公費的變異程度降低且達顯著,亦即會計師與客戶可能根據揭露初年的公費資訊,往中間修正其審計公費的定價,然而,在以後年度審計公費的變異數則時大時小,看不出有往某一個方向趨近的情形。此外,整體審計公費向上修正的強度較向下修正的強度為大,近一步觀察各年度審計公費的變化情形後發現,2003年、2004與2006年公費略微上升但較不明顯,2005及2007年顯示平均審計公費分別較前一年度顯著的增加,2008與2009年則均較2007年為低,推測係受2008年的金融海嘯影響所致。
根據上述實證結果,本研究認為會計師與客戶在獲得公費資訊而重新協商價格的過程中,由於二者對於審計品質的認知或價格的接受程度不同,導致公費定價呈現差異。另外,審計服務價格在公費揭露之後,並沒有顯著降低的趨勢,本研究推測會計師公會所擔心公費揭露之後的削價競爭問題,可能沒有如同想像中的嚴重。
In recent years, the audit market has been tending toward saturation in Taiwan. CPAs worry about that the price war may occur after public fee disclosure, and then make audit quality more difficult to maintain. Therefore, this research is to investigate the impact of fee disclosure on subsequent period audit pricing based on available fee information, and discuss whether the worry by CPAs is necessary or not.
The period of this research is from 2002(the first year of fee disclosure in Taiwan)to 2009. The evidence indicates that the variance was significantly decreased in 2002 and 2003, however, the variances change up and down in other years. It means that fee disclosure has improved the precision of audit pricing in 2002 and 2003 but hasn’t in other years. In addition, there is greater upward fee adjustment than downward adjustment as a whole. We further find out that the average audit fee has been increased a little bit in 2003, 2004, and 2006, and has been significantly increased in 2005 and 2007. Besides, we also find out that the average audit fee is lower in 2008 and 2009 than in 2007. We conjecture that the lower audit fee may result from financial crisis in 2008.
According to the evidence, we document that CPAs and auditees have revised audit prices by using the fee disclosures. However, because of different view on audit quality and acceptance of price, the audit prices show more dispersed. Moreover, after fee disclosure, the audit price hasn’t been reduced significantly. We conjecture that the price war is not severe as expected, therefore, the worry by institute of certified public accountants is not necessary.
中文部分
經濟日報,2003.04.13,「會計師業快打消不合理的要求」,第2版。
經濟日報,2008.05.06,「會計師收費標準,金管會不買單」,第A13版。
經濟日報,2009.11.05,「會計師大拼價,公會道德勸說」,第A19版。
經濟日報,2011.02.23,「台灣會計師公費亞太吊車尾」,第A19版。
余淑芳,1988,「影響台灣地區會計師事務所決定專業服務費用因素之研究」,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
李建然、廖秀梅、黃雨頎,2005,「審計公費與非審計公費之決定因素及其交互影響」,2005當前會計理論與實務研討會,雲林縣雲林科技大學。
馬秀如,2003,「會計師的最低酬金標準」,會計研究月刊,第211期,頁73-82。
張文瀞、吳幸螢,2005,「品牌聲譽、產業專業化與審計人員市場佔有率關連性:取消審計公費下限分析」,會計評論,第四十期,頁91-118。
雷秀英,1990,「影響會計師財務簽證公費決定因素之研究」,東吳大學會計研究所碩士論文。
陳耀宗、劉若蘭、林坤霖,2003,「產業專家、客戶滿意度與審計公費之關聯性研究」,會計評論,第三十七期,頁31-52。
馬君梅、蘇裕惠、李佩佩,2003,「臺灣地區上櫃公司審計公費決定因素之研究」,東吳經濟商學學報,第四十一期,頁25-50。
張仲岳、曹美娟,2005,「臺灣上市公司審計公費之決定因素」,當代會計,第六卷第二期,頁1-28。
鄭惠之,2003,「專訪證期會新任主委丁克華」,會計研究月刊,第209期,頁55-58。
薛敏正、張瑀珊、高君慈,2008,「公司自我選擇聘任會計師與審計公費」,當代會計,第九卷第二期,頁167-200。
蔡玉琴、倪伯煌、黃美珠、廖麗敏,2008,「中國大陸審計收費定價-深圳交易所上市公司之實證研究」,東吳經濟商學學報,第六十三期,頁1-28。
英文部分
Anderson, T. and D. Zeghal.1994. The Pricing of Audit Services: Further Evidence from the Canadian Market. Accounting and Business Research 24 (Summer): 195-207.
Ashbaugh, H., R. LaFond, and B. W. Mayhew. 2003. Do Nonaudit Services Compromise Auditor Independence? Further evidence. The Accounting Review 78 (July): 611–639.
Asthana, S. and J. Krishnan. 2006. Factors Associated with the Early Adoption of the SEC’s Revised Auditor Fee Disclosure Rules. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 25 (2): 41-51.
Chaney, P. and K. Philipich. 2002. Shredded Reputation: the Cost of Audit Failure.”Journal of Accounting Research 40 (4): 1221-1245.
Cohen, J., G. Krishnamoorthy, and A. M. Wright. 2002. Corporate Governance and the Audit Process. Contemporary Accounting Research 19 (4): 573-594.
Craswell, A. T., J. R. Francis, and S. L. Taylor. 1995. Auditor Brand Name Reputations and Industry Specializations. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20 (3): 297-322.
Craswell, A. T. and J. R. Francis. 1999. Pricing Initial Audit Engagement: A test of Competing Theories. The Accounting Review 74 (2): 201-216.
DeAngelo, L. 1981. Auditor Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3 (1): 183-199.
DeFond, M. L., K. Raghunandan, and K. R. Subramanyam. 2002. Do Non-Audit Service Fees Impair Auditor Independence? Evidence from Going Concern Audit Opinions. Journal of Accounting Research 40 (September): 1247–1274.
Dickins, D. and J. Higgs. 2005. Interpretation and Use of Auditor Fee Disclosures. Financial Analyst Journal 61 (3): 96-102.
Dye, R. A. 1991. Informationally Motivated Auditor Replacement. Journal of Accounting and Economics 14 (December): 347–374.
Ettredge, M. and R. Greenberg. 1990. Determinants of Fee Cutting on Initial Audit Engagements. Journal of Accounting Research 28 (1): 198-210.
Firth, M. 1985. An Analysis of Audit Fees and their Determinants in New Zealand. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 4 (2): 23-37.
Francis, J. R. 1984. The Effect of Audit Firm Size on Audit Prices: A Study of the Australian Market. Journal of Accounting and Economics 6: 133-151.
Francis, J. R., and D. Wang. 2005. Impact of the SEC’s Public Fee Disclosure Requirement on Subsequent Period Fees and Implications for Market Efficiency. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 24 (Supplement): 145-160.
Francis, J. R. and D. T. Simon. 1987. A Test of Audit Pricing in the Small-Client Segment of the U.S. Audit Market. The Accounting review 62 (1): 145-157.
Gul, F. and J. Tusi. 1998. A Test of the Free Cash Flow and Debt Monitoring Hypotheses: Evidence from Audit Pricing. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24 (2): 219-237.
Krishnan, J., H. Sami, and Y. Zhang. 2005. Does the Provision of Nonaudit Services Affect Investor Perceptions of Auditor Independence? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 24 (November): 111–135.
Low, L. C., P. H. N. Tan, and H.C. Koh. 1990. The Determination of Audit Fees: An Analysis in the Singapore Context. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 17 (2): 285-295.
Palmrose. 1986a. Audit Fees and Auditor Size: Further Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 24 (1): 97-110.
Simon, D. T., and J. R. Francis. 1988. The Effects of Auditor Change on Audit Fees: Tests of Price Cutting and Price recovery. The Accounting Review 63 (2): 255-269.
Simunic, D. 1980. The pricing of audit services: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 18 (1): 161-190.
Simunic. D. and M. Stein, 1987. Product Differentiation in Auditing: A Study of Audit Choice in the Market of New Issue. Canadian Certified General Accountants’ Research Foundation, Vancouver.
Su, Y. H. 2000. Audit Fees and Auditor Size: A Study of Audit Market in Taiwan. Taiwan Accounting Review 1: 59-78.
Verrecchia, R. E. 2001. Essays on Disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics 32 (December): 97-180.
校內:2021-12-31公開