簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 楊雯婷
Yang, Wen-Ting
論文名稱: 股票市場對於廠商策略性行為之反應探討
Stock Market Reactions to Firms' Strategic Behaviors
指導教授: 張紹基
Chang, Shao-Chi
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 國際企業研究所
Institute of International Business
論文出版年: 2009
畢業學年度: 97
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 46
中文關鍵詞: 競爭者分析動態競爭航空業競爭
外文關鍵詞: Dynamic competition, Competitor analysis, Airline competition
相關次數: 點閱:143下載:8
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 儘管過去有許多文獻在探討策略競爭的主題,但仍多半建立在一個較簡單、靜態的模型上進行研究,與市場上廠商實際的競爭行為無直接關連。因此,不同於傳統的研究方式,本研究利用動態競爭理論的模型架構,從市場反應來探討廠商在面對策略性競爭下所採取的作為,對公司本身績效產生之影響為何。

    本研究有兩個主要假設,分別從行動發起者及同產業中競爭者的角度來探討美國國內航空業的產業競爭。透過事件研究法,從《航空日報》蒐集1997年至2007年之競爭行動。由實證結果發現,對於同產業的競爭者來說,市場反應對於其回應好的行動(Value-Enhancing action)具有正向影響,並且愈早回應愈好。而行動發起者在面對競爭對手的回應之下,在我們導入競爭者分析之後,發現當行動發起者與回應者之間非主要競爭對手時,發起者在面對對手的回應之下,市場反應反而對其具有正向影響。由此推測,當兩家廠商主要營運市場不同時,競爭者採取回應的行為反而進一步驗證行動發起者所發起的行動是好的、有利整個產業的,因而市場對其反應為正向。

    Even though there are so many strategic articles focus on the subject of competition, most of them have been done from a simple and static framework, which is not directly related to firm’s competition in reality. Therefore, our research exploits dynamic competition model to discuss firm’s competition, and examines market reaction on firm’s strategic behavior under this model to test firm’s performance.

    In this research, we have two major hypotheses, which are used to analyze the competition in U.S. domestic airlines industry from initiator and rival firms’ perspective respectively. We collect data from Aviation Daily through 1997 to 2007, use event study and cross-sectional regression to test our hypotheses.

    From the empirical results, we suggest that market reaction is positive to the type of action for rival firms. When rivals face a Value-Enhancing action, it is benefic for them to take response, and market reaction is significant negative to the response delay. Back to see the initiator, as we introducing competitor analysis, we find that market reaction is significant positive for initiator even though it encounters rival’s response when they are not main competitors with each other. Accordingly, we infer that when firms are not direct or primary competitors in the market, rival’s reaction supports initiator’s action is benefic for the whole industry, thus market reaction is positive for initiator.

    Chapter 1 Introduction .................................. 1 Chapter 2 Literature Review and Hypothesis .............. 4 2.1 Dynamic Competition Theory .......................... 4 2.2 Response Delay ...................................... 6 2.3 Competitor Analysis ................................. 7 2.3.1 Market commonality ................................ 8 2.3.2 Resource similarity ............................... 9 2.4 Competitor Analysis and Interfirm Rivalry ...........10 Chapter 3 Methodology .................................. 13 3.1 Data ............................................... 13 3.2 Identification of Actions and Responses ............ 14 3.3 Measurement ........................................ 15 3.3.1 Dependent Variable – Event Study ................ 15 3.3.2 Type of Action ................................... 16 3.3.2 Response Delay ................................... 17 3.3.3 Market Commonality ............................... 17 3.3.4 Resource similarity .............................. 19 3.3.5 Control Variables ................................ 20 3.4 Methodology ........................................ 21 3.4.1 Cross-Sectional Regression – Model 1 ............ 21 3.4.2 Cross-Sectional Regression – Model 2 ............ 22 Chapter 4 Empirical Results ............................ 24 4.1 Statistical Analysis ............................... 24 4.1.1 Event data ....................................... 24 4.1.2 Initiator ........................................ 25 4.1.3 Responder ........................................ 26 4.2 Cross-Sectional Analysis ........................... 27 4.2.1 Market Reaction on Responding Firm ............... 27 4.2.2 Market Reaction on Initiator ..................... 31 Chapter 5 Conclusion ................................... 41 5.1 Discussion ......................................... 41 5.2 Limitations and Future Directions .................. 42 References.............................................. 44

    Baum, J. A. and H. J. Korn (1996). "Competitive dynamics of interfirm rivalry: Linking structural conditions of competition to patterns of market entry and exit." Academy of Management Journal 39: 255-291.
    Chaney, P. K., T. M. Devinney, et al. (1991). "The impact of new product introductions on the market value of firms." Journal of Business 64: 573-610.
    Chen, M. J. (1996). "Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration." The Academy of Management Review 21: 100-134.
    Chen, M. J. (2008). "Competitive Dynamic:A Research Odyssey."
    Chen, M. J. and D. C. Hambrick (1995). "Speed, stealth, and selective attack: how small firms differ from large firms in competitive behavior." Academy of Management Journal 38: 453-482.
    Chen, M. J. and I. C. MacMillan (1992). "Nonreponse and delayed response to competitive moves: the roles of competitor dependence and action irreversibility." Academy of Management Journal 35: 539-570.
    Chen, M. J. and D. Miller (1994). "Competitive attack, retaliation and performance: An expectancy-valence framework." Strategic Management Journal 15: 85-102.
    Chen, M. J., K. G. Smith, et al. (1992). "Action characteristics as predictors of competitive responses." Management Science 38: 439-455.
    Chen, M. J., K. H. Su, et al. (2007). "Competitive tension: the awareness-motivation-capability perspective." Academy of Management Journal 50: 101-118.
    Damanpour, F. and W. M. Evan (1984). "Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of organizational lag." Administrative Science Quarterly 29: 392-409.
    Hambrick, D. C., T. S. Cho, et al. (1996). "The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms' competitive moves." Administrative Science Quarterly 41: 659-684.
    Jacobson, R. (1992). "The "Austrian" school of strategy." The Academy of Management Review 17: 782-807.
    Kim, E. H. and V. Singal (1993). "Mergers and market power: Evidence from the airline industry." American Economic Review 83: 549-569.
    Lee, H., K. G. Smith, et al. (2000). "Timing, order and durability of new product advantages with imitation." Strategic Management Journal 21: 23-30.
    Mansfield, E. (1968). "Industrial research and technical innovation." New York: Norton
    Meyer, A. D. (1982). "Adapting to environmental jolts." Administrative Science Quarterly 27: 515-537.
    Meyer, A. D. and L. G. Zucker (1989). "Permanently failing orgnizations." Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
    Miller, D. (1994). "What happens after success: The perils of excellence." Journal of Management Studies 31: 325-358.
    Miller, D. and M. J. Chen (1994). "Sources and consequences of competitive inertia: A study of the U.S. airline industry." Administrative Science Quarterly 39: 1-23.
    Miller, D. and M. J. Chen (1996). "Nonconformity in competitive repertoires: A sociological view of markets." Social Forces 74: 1209-1234.
    Nelson, R. and S. G. Winter (1982). "An evolutionary theory of economic change." Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
    Park, J. H., P. N. K., et al. (2003). "The impact of international alliances on rival firm value: a study of the British Airways/USAir Alliance." Transportation Research Part E 39: 1-18.
    Schumpeter, J. A. (1950). "Capitalism, socialism, and democracy (3rd. Ed.)." Harper, New York
    Smith, K. G., W. J. Ferrier, et al. (2001). "Competitive dynamcis research: Critique and future directions. In: M. A. Baker, E. R. Freeman and J. S. Harrison (eds)." The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers: 315-361.
    Smith, K. G., C. M. Grimm, et al. (1991). "Organizational information processing, competitive responses and performance in the U.S. domestic airline industry." Academy of Management Journal 34: 60-85.
    Sundaram, A. K., T. A. John, et al. (1996). "An empirical analysis of strategic competition and firm values the case of R&D competition." Journal of Financial Economics 40: 459-486.
    Tversky, A. (1977). "Features of similarity." Psychological Review 84: 327-352.
    Walker, T. J., D. J. Thiengtham, et al. (2005). "On the performance of airlines and airplane manufacturers following aviation disasters." Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences 22: 21-34.
    Weigelt, K. and C. Camerer (1988). "Reputation and corporate strategy." Strategic Management Journal 9: 443-454.
    Williams, S. D. (2007). "Gaining and losing market share and returns: A competitive dynamics model." Journal of Strategic Marketing 15: 139-148.
    Zajac, E. J. and M. H. Bazerman (1991). "Blind spots in industry and competitive analysis: Implications of interfirm (mis)perception to strategic decisions." Academy of Management Journal 16: 37-46.

    下載圖示 校內:2010-06-23公開
    校外:2010-06-23公開
    QR CODE