簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 張修維
Chang, Hsiu-Wei
論文名稱: 分析Cd248基因剔除對小鼠胰臟癌腫瘤表達PD-L1/PD-L2與細胞增殖之影響
Effects of Cd248 Gene Knockout on Tumoral PD-L1/PD-L2 Expression and Proliferation in KPC Mouse Model of Pancreatic Cancer
指導教授: 黃柏憲
Huang, Po-Hsien
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 醫學院 - 生物化學暨分子生物學研究所
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 42
中文關鍵詞: 胰臟癌CD248成纖維細胞細胞增生上皮-間質轉化PD-L1PD-L2
外文關鍵詞: CD248, Pancreatic cancer, Proliferation, EMT, PD-L1, PD-L2
相關次數: 點閱:116下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • CD248基因在多種類型的間質細胞(mesenchymal cell)中表達,包括癌症相關的纖維母細胞(cancer-associated fibroblasts, CAFs),常與癌症的預後不佳有關,其中介導了發炎反應的發生或者細胞外間質的重塑。本篇研究透過觀察癌相關纖維母細胞在胰臟癌當中的組成比例及Cd248對癌細胞免疫抑制功能的影響。Cd248對促進癌症的轉移和遷移有重要影響,在過去是被認為與癌細胞的上皮-間質轉化(EMT)相關的特性,但近期的研究對逐漸重視藉由改變腫瘤微環境以抵抗宿主免疫系統攻擊的可能性。因此我們分析癌症基因組圖譜(TCGA)資料庫,針對胰臟癌的數據表示,CD248 基因高表達的患者總體存活率較低,以及免疫抑制標記的提高的情形。為了找出CD248對CAFs的占比及對癌細胞EMT狀態誘導的免疫抑制功能改變,我透過流式細胞技術(Flow cytometry, FCM)分析Cd248KO KPC胰臟癌小鼠模型的多種抗原的表達情形。在FCM數據中顯示,Cd248對於CAFs (CK19-; EpCAM-; PDGFR+)的組成無顯著影響。此外,Cd248WT KPC的平均腫瘤重量比Cd248KO KPC提高約1.40倍,並且癌細胞在腫瘤內所佔的比例更高。我的研究呈現Cd248+ CAFs對小鼠腫瘤內癌細胞增殖的作用。以Ki67 / PanCK對晚期PDAC切片進行的多重免疫螢光組織化學染色分析也證實Cd248+ CAFs對腫瘤增長的影響。因此,我未來將透過觀察癌細胞分泌的細胞激素是否對CAFs分化造成影響,並且了解Cd248是否干擾此過程的發生。

    CD248 gene, expressed in several types of mesenchymal cells, including cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), is related to a poor prognosis in cancer. CAFs mediate the occurrence of inflammation or the remodeling of extracellular matrix. Therefore, this study aims to observe the effects of Cd248 on the immunosuppressive function in cancer cells by observing the composition ratio of CAFs in mouse pancreatic tumors. Recent studies report that CD248 promotes cancer metastasis and migration in cancers. Tumoral epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) in cancer cells may alter the tumor microenvironment against the host immune systems. Our database analysis of the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) pancreatic cancer cohort suggested that patients with high mRNA expression of CD248 associated with poor overall survival and increases of immunosuppressive markers. To identify potential effects of Cd248 on CAFs and immunosuppressive changes induced upon the cancer cells, I used the Cd248KO KPC mouse pancreatic cancer model and analyzed the cellular expression of multiple antigens by flow cytometry (FCM). Our FCM data showed that Cd248 had minor effects on the composition of CAFs (CK19-; EpCAM-; PDGFR+) in mouse tumors. Our data showed that the average tumor weight in Cd248WT KPC is about 1.40 folds heavier than in Cd248KO KPC; and the proportion of cancer cells in tumors is significantly higher. My results showed that Cd248 plays a role in the proliferation of cancer cells in the tumors. I also verify this finding by using Ki67/PanCK immunostains in multiple immunofluorescence histochemical staining of advanced PDAC sections. Therefore, I will observe whether cytokines secreted by cancer cells might affect the differentiation of CAFs to understand whether Cd248 interferes with this process.

    摘要 I ABSTRACT II ACKNOWLEDGEMENT III CONTENT IV INTRODUCTION 1 AIMS 4 Aim 1. To analyze the effect of Cd248 on proportion and immuno-suppressive function of CK19-; EpCAM-; PDGFR+ CAFs. 4 Aim 2. To understand whether Cd248 leaded to PD-L1 and PD-L2 positive rate change in tumor. 4 Aim 3. To detect cancer cell numbers difference between Cd248WT and Cd248KO KPC PDAC. 4 Aim 4. To discuss the relationship between Cd248, cancer cells EMT and impact immuno-suppressive function. 4 Aim 5. To discover the effect of Cd248 on cancer cell proliferation in vivo. 4 ABBREVIATIONS 5 MATERIALS AND METHODS 6 1. Mouse model 6 2. Pancreatic tumor cells isolation 6 3. Primary cell lines 6 4. Cell culture 7 5. 3D hang-drop culture 7 6. Immunofluorescent staining of spheroids 8 7. Staining and flow cytometric analysis 8 8. Multiplex fluorescent immunohistochemistry 9 9. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) 9 10. Statistics 10 RESULTS 11 1. Cd248 slightly affected the proportion of PDGFR+ CAFs. 11 2. MHC class I presentation pathway and PD-L1 expression were slightly associated with Cd248. 11 3. Cd248 increased the among of hybrid-type and mesenchymal-type cancer cells. 12 4. EMT impacted PD-L1 and PD-L2 positive rate in cancer cell pool. 13 5. Cd248 induced cancer cells proliferation in vivo. 14 6. PDGFR+ cancer cells contain less proportion of PD-L1+ and PD-L2+ cells in both Cd248WT and Cd248KO KPC. 15 DISCUSSION 16 CONCLUSION 19 REFERENCES 20 FIGURES 29 Figure 1. Cd248 leaded to lower survival rate of pancreatic cancer. 29 Figure 2. Compared PD-L1 and PD-L2 positive percentage in PDGFR+ CAFs population. 30 Figure 3. Treating INF or coculature the primary cell line with MEF to test MHC class I presentation pathway and PD-L1 expression ability. 32 Figure 4. The effect of EMT to tumoral immunosuppressive function. 33 Figure 5. Cd248WT KPC tumor contained higher percentage of CK19+ cells. 35 Figure 6. Cd248 induced cancer cell proliferation. 37 Figure 7. PDGFR+ cancer cells contained less percentage of PD-L2+ cells in both Cd248WT and Cd248KO KPC. 39 TABLES 40 Table 1. Flow cytometry Antibody list 40 Table 2. Immunofluorescence Antibody list 41 Table 3. Primer sequences qPCR analysis 42

    1. Ryan DP, Hong TS, Bardeesy N. Pancreatic adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 371, 1039-1049 (2014).

    2. DeSantis CE, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 64, 252-271 (2014).

    3. Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res 74, 2913-2921 (2014).

    4. Conroy T, Gavoille C, Adenis A. Metastatic pancreatic cancer: old drugs, new paradigms. Curr Opin Oncol 23, 390-395 (2011).

    5. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 70, 7-30 (2020).

    6. Warshaw AL, Fernandez-del Castillo C. Pancreatic carcinoma. N Engl J Med 326, 455-465 (1992).

    7. Sellam F, et al. Delayed diagnosis of pancreatic cancer reported as more common in a population of North African young adults. J Gastrointest Oncol 6, 505-510 (2015).

    8. Stapley S, Peters TJ, Neal RD, Rose PW, Walter FM, Hamilton W. The risk of pancreatic cancer in symptomatic patients in primary care: a large case-control study using electronic records. Br J Cancer 106, 1940-1944 (2012).

    9. Schmidt-Hansen M, Berendse S, Hamilton W. Symptoms of Pancreatic Cancer in Primary Care: A Systematic Review. Pancreas 45, 814-818 (2016).

    10. Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C. Identifying patients with suspected pancreatic cancer in primary care: derivation and validation of an algorithm. Br J Gen Pract 62, e38-45 (2012).

    11. Sahai E, et al. A framework for advancing our understanding of cancer-associated fibroblasts. Nat Rev Cancer 20, 174-186 (2020).

    12. Wang M, et al. Role of tumor microenvironment in tumorigenesis. J Cancer 8, 761-773 (2017).

    13. Quail DF, Joyce JA. Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis. Nat Med 19, 1423-1437 (2013).

    14. Kalluri R. The biology and function of fibroblasts in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 16, 582-598 (2016).

    15. Gascard P, Tlsty TD. Carcinoma-associated fibroblasts: orchestrating the composition of malignancy. Genes Dev 30, 1002-1019 (2016).

    16. Ohlund D, Elyada E, Tuveson D. Fibroblast heterogeneity in the cancer wound. J Exp Med 211, 1503-1523 (2014).

    17. Chandler C, Liu T, Buckanovich R, Coffman LG. The double edge sword of fibrosis in cancer. Transl Res 209, 55-67 (2019).

    18. Aggarwal BB, Vijayalekshmi RV, Sung B. Targeting inflammatory pathways for prevention and therapy of cancer: short-term friend, long-term foe. Clin Cancer Res 15, 425-430 (2009).

    19. Fujii S, et al. TEM1 expression in cancer-associated fibroblasts is correlated with a poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer. Cancer Med 4, 1667-1678 (2015).

    20. Wang X, Zhang W, Sun X, Lin Y, Chen W. Cancer-associated fibroblasts induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition through secreted cytokines in endometrial cancer cells. Oncol Lett 15, 5694-5702 (2018).

    21. MacFadyen J, Savage K, Wienke D, Isacke CM. Endosialin is expressed on stromal fibroblasts and CNS pericytes in mouse embryos and is downregulated during development. Gene Expr Patterns 7, 363-369 (2007).

    22. Rupp C, et al. Mouse endosialin, a C-type lectin-like cell surface receptor: expression during embryonic development and induction in experimental cancer neoangiogenesis. Cancer Immun 6, 10 (2006).

    23. Norton J, Foster D, Chinta M, Titan A, Longaker M. Pancreatic Cancer Associated Fibroblasts (CAF): Under-Explored Target for Pancreatic Cancer Treatment. Cancers (Basel) 12, (2020).

    24. Biffi G, et al. IL1-Induced JAK/STAT Signaling Is Antagonized by TGFbeta to Shape CAF Heterogeneity in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Discov 9, 282-301 (2019).

    25. Ohlund D, et al. Distinct populations of inflammatory fibroblasts and myofibroblasts in pancreatic cancer. J Exp Med 214, 579-596 (2017).

    26. Elyada E, et al. Cross-Species Single-Cell Analysis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Reveals Antigen-Presenting Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts. Cancer Discov 9, 1102-1123 (2019).

    27. Berdiel-Acer M, et al. Differences between CAFs and their paired NCF from adjacent colonic mucosa reveal functional heterogeneity of CAFs, providing prognostic information. Mol Oncol 8, 1290-1305 (2014).

    28. Hsia LT, Ashley N, Ouaret D, Wang LM, Wilding J, Bodmer WF. Myofibroblasts are distinguished from activated skin fibroblasts by the expression of AOC3 and other associated markers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113, E2162-2171 (2016).

    29. Chockley PJ, Keshamouni VG. Immunological Consequences of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Tumor Progression. J Immunol 197, 691-698 (2016).

    30. Sperb N, Tsesmelis M, Wirth T. Crosstalk between Tumor and Stromal Cells in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Int J Mol Sci 21, (2020).

    31. Vennin C, et al. CAF hierarchy driven by pancreatic cancer cell p53-status creates a pro-metastatic and chemoresistant environment via perlecan. Nat Commun 10, 3637 (2019).

    32. Chen Y, et al. Dual reporter genetic mouse models of pancreatic cancer identify an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition-independent metastasis program. EMBO Mol Med 10, (2018).

    33. Djurec M, et al. Saa3 is a key mediator of the protumorigenic properties of cancer-associated fibroblasts in pancreatic tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115, E1147-E1156 (2018).

    34. Lakins MA, Ghorani E, Munir H, Martins CP, Shields JD. Cancer-associated fibroblasts induce antigen-specific deletion of CD8 (+) T Cells to protect tumour cells. Nat Commun 9, 948 (2018).

    35. Tomkowicz B, et al. Interaction of endosialin/TEM1 with extracellular matrix proteins mediates cell adhesion and migration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104, 17965-17970 (2007).

    36. Becker R, et al. Tumor stroma marker endosialin (Tem1) is a binding partner of metastasis-related protein Mac-2 BP/90K. FASEB J 22, 3059-3067 (2008).

    37. Nieto MA, Huang RY, Jackson RA, Thiery JP. Emt: 2016. Cell 166, 21-45 (2016).

    38. Roche J. The Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 10, (2018).

    39. Garside VC, Chang AC, Karsan A, Hoodless PA. Co-ordinating Notch, BMP, and TGF-beta signaling during heart valve development. Cell Mol Life Sci 70, 2899-2917 (2013).

    40. Wells A, Yates C, Shepard CR. E-cadherin as an indicator of mesenchymal to epithelial reverting transitions during the metastatic seeding of disseminated carcinomas. Clin Exp Metastasis 25, 621-628 (2008).

    41. Micalizzi DS, Farabaugh SM, Ford HL. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer: parallels between normal development and tumor progression. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 15, 117-134 (2010).

    42. Kalluri R, Weinberg RA. The basics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Clin Invest 119, 1420-1428 (2009).

    43. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100, 57-70 (2000).

    44. Thiery JP. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer 2, 442-454 (2002).

    45. Fidler IJ, Poste G. The "seed and soil" hypothesis revisited. Lancet Oncol 9, 808 (2008).

    46. Brabletz T, et al. Variable beta-catenin expression in colorectal cancers indicates tumor progression driven by the tumor environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98, 10356-10361 (2001).

    47. Zeisberg M, Shah AA, Kalluri R. Bone morphogenic protein-7 induces mesenchymal to epithelial transition in adult renal fibroblasts and facilitates regeneration of injured kidney. J Biol Chem 280, 8094-8100 (2005).

    48. Jechlinger M, Grunert S, Beug H. Mechanisms in epithelial plasticity and metastasis: insights from 3D cultures and expression profiling. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 7, 415-432 (2002).

    49. Bissell MJ, Radisky DC, Rizki A, Weaver VM, Petersen OW. The organizing principle: microenvironmental influences in the normal and malignant breast. Differentiation 70, 537-546 (2002).

    50. Smit MA, Peeper DS. Deregulating EMT and senescence: double impact by a single twist. Cancer Cell 14, 5-7 (2008).

    51. Weinberg RA. Twisted epithelial-mesenchymal transition blocks senescence. Nat Cell Biol 10, 1021-1023 (2008).

    52. Shi Y, Massague J. Mechanisms of TGF-beta signaling from cell membrane to the nucleus. Cell 113, 685-700 (2003).

    53. Kokudo T, Suzuki Y, Yoshimatsu Y, Yamazaki T, Watabe T, Miyazono K. Snail is required for TGFbeta-induced endothelial-mesenchymal transition of embryonic stem cell-derived endothelial cells. J Cell Sci 121, 3317-3324 (2008).

    54. Hamidi S, Nagai H, Sheng G. Partial EMT/MET: An Army of One. Methods Mol Biol 2179, 29-33 (2021).

    55. Terry S, et al. New insights into the role of EMT in tumor immune escape. Mol Oncol 11, 824-846 (2017).

    56. Zhang Y, Weinberg RA. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in cancer: complexity and opportunities. Front Med 12, 361-373 (2018).

    57. Dongre A, et al. Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition Contributes to Immunosuppression in Breast Carcinomas. Cancer Res 77, 3982-3989 (2017).

    58. Kudo-Saito C, Shirako H, Takeuchi T, Kawakami Y. Cancer metastasis is accelerated through immunosuppression during Snail-induced EMT of cancer cells. Cancer Cell 15, 195-206 (2009).

    59. Pylayeva-Gupta Y, Lee KE, Hajdu CH, Miller G, Bar-Sagi D. Oncogenic Kras-induced GM-CSF production promotes the development of pancreatic neoplasia. Cancer Cell 21, 836-847 (2012).

    60. Bayne LJ, et al. Tumor-derived granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor regulates myeloid inflammation and T cell immunity in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Cell 21, 822-835 (2012).

    61. Ashizawa T, et al. Impact of combination therapy with anti-PD-1 blockade and a STAT3 inhibitor on the tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte status. Immunol Lett 216, 43-50 (2019).

    62. Rolver MG, Elingaard-Larsen LO, Pedersen SF. Assessing Cell Viability and Death in 3D Spheroid Cultures of Cancer Cells. J Vis Exp, (2019).

    63. Cavaco ACM, Eble JA. A 3D Spheroid Model as a More Physiological System for Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Differentiation and Invasion In Vitro Studies. J Vis Exp, (2019).

    64. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J Clin 69, 7-34 (2019).

    65. Erkan M, et al. StellaTUM: current consensus and discussion on pancreatic stellate cell research. Gut 61, 172-178 (2012).

    66. Nurmik M, Ullmann P, Rodriguez F, Haan S, Letellier E. In search of definitions: Cancer-associated fibroblasts and their markers. Int J Cancer 146, 895-905 (2020).

    67. LeBleu VS, Kalluri R. A peek into cancer-associated fibroblasts: origins, functions and translational impact. Dis Model Mech 11, (2018).

    68. Konen J, et al. Image-guided genomics of phenotypically heterogeneous populations reveals vascular signalling during symbiotic collective cancer invasion. Nat Commun 8, 15078 (2017).

    69. Sharon Y, Alon L, Glanz S, Servais C, Erez N. Isolation of normal and cancer-associated fibroblasts from fresh tissues by Fluorescence Activated Cell Sorting (FACS). J Vis Exp, e4425 (2013).

    70. Baharvand H, Hashemi SM, Kazemi Ashtiani S, Farrokhi A. Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into hepatocytes in 2D and 3D culture systems in vitro. Int J Dev Biol 50, 645-652 (2006).

    71. Benya PD, Shaffer JD. Dedifferentiated chondrocytes reexpress the differentiated collagen phenotype when cultured in agarose gels. Cell 30, 215-224 (1982).

    72. Nelson CM, Bissell MJ. Modeling dynamic reciprocity: engineering three-dimensional culture models of breast architecture, function, and neoplastic transformation. Semin Cancer Biol 15, 342-352 (2005).

    73. Shield K, Ackland ML, Ahmed N, Rice GE. Multicellular spheroids in ovarian cancer metastases: Biology and pathology. Gynecol Oncol 113, 143-148 (2009).

    74. Zietarska M, et al. Molecular description of a 3D in vitro model for the study of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Mol Carcinog 46, 872-885 (2007).

    75. Lee J, Cuddihy MJ, Kotov NA. Three-dimensional cell culture matrices: state of the art. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 14, 61-86 (2008).

    76. Jeon S, et al. Shift of EMT gradient in 3D spheroid MSCs for activation of mesenchymal niche function. Sci Rep 7, 6859 (2017).

    77. Piotrowski-Daspit AS, Simi AK, Pang MF, Tien J, Nelson CM. A 3D Culture Model to Study How Fluid Pressure and Flow Affect the Behavior of Aggregates of Epithelial Cells. Methods Mol Biol 1501, 245-257 (2017).

    78. Haessler U, Teo JC, Foretay D, Renaud P, Swartz MA. Migration dynamics of breast cancer cells in a tunable 3D interstitial flow chamber. Integr Biol (Camb) 4, 401-409 (2012).

    79. Shields JD, Fleury ME, Yong C, Tomei AA, Randolph GJ, Swartz MA. Autologous chemotaxis as a mechanism of tumor cell homing to lymphatics via interstitial flow and autocrine CCR7 signaling. Cancer Cell 11, 526-538 (2007).

    80. Bhome R, et al. A top-down view of the tumor microenvironment: structure, cells and signaling. Front Cell Dev Biol 3, 33 (2015).

    81. McCoy RJ, O'Brien FJ. Influence of shear stress in perfusion bioreactor cultures for the development of three-dimensional bone tissue constructs: a review. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 16, 587-601 (2010).

    82. Chang SF, et al. Tumor cell cycle arrest induced by shear stress: Roles of integrins and Smad. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105, 3927-3932 (2008).

    83. Pathak JL, et al. Mechanical loading reduces inflammation-induced human osteocyte-to-osteoclast communication. Calcif Tissue Int 97, 169-178 (2015).

    84. Guo R, et al. Fabrication of 3D Scaffolds with Precisely Controlled Substrate Modulus and Pore Size by Templated-Fused Deposition Modeling to Direct Osteogenic Differentiation. Adv Healthc Mater 4, 1826-1832 (2015).

    85. Santoro M, Lamhamedi-Cherradi SE, Menegaz BA, Ludwig JA, Mikos AG. Flow perfusion effects on three-dimensional culture and drug sensitivity of Ewing sarcoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112, 10304-10309 (2015).

    86. Ribatti D, Tamma R, Annese T. Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Cancer: A Historical Overview. Transl Oncol 13, 100773 (2020).

    87. Pirinen RT, Hirvikoski P, Johansson RT, Hollmen S, Kosma VM. Reduced expression of alpha-catenin, beta-catenin, and gamma-catenin is associated with high cell proliferative activity and poor differentiation in non-small cell lung cancer. J Clin Pathol 54, 391-395 (2001).

    88. Kase S, Sugio K, Yamazaki K, Okamoto T, Yano T, Sugimachi K. Expression of E-cadherin and beta-catenin in human non-small cell lung cancer and the clinical significance. Clin Cancer Res 6, 4789-4796 (2000).

    89. Moody SE, et al. The transcriptional repressor Snail promotes mammary tumor recurrence. Cancer Cell 8, 197-209 (2005).

    90. Satelli A, Li S. Vimentin in cancer and its potential as a molecular target for cancer therapy. Cell Mol Life Sci 68, 3033-3046 (2011).

    91. Hugo H, et al. Epithelial--mesenchymal and mesenchymal--epithelial transitions in carcinoma progression. J Cell Physiol 213, 374-383 (2007).

    92. Lee TK, et al. Twist overexpression correlates with hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis through induction of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Clin Cancer Res 12, 5369-5376 (2006).

    93. Aiello NM, et al. EMT Subtype Influences Epithelial Plasticity and Mode of Cell Migration. Dev Cell 45, 681-695 e684 (2018).

    94. Hyun KA, et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition leads to loss of EpCAM and different physical properties in circulating tumor cells from metastatic breast cancer. Oncotarget 7, 24677-24687 (2016).

    95. Sahu N, et al. Cotargeting of MEK and PDGFR/STAT3 Pathways to Treat Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Mol Cancer Ther 16, 1729-1738 (2017).

    無法下載圖示
    校外:不公開
    電子論文及紙本論文均尚未授權公開
    QR CODE