簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳宥森
Chen, You-Sen
論文名稱: 離子液體碳捕捉製程最佳化與經濟評估
Optimization and Economic Evaluation of Ionic Liquid Carbon Capture Process
指導教授: 李瑞元
Lee, Jui-Yuan
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 化學工程學系
Department of Chemical Engineering
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 82
中文關鍵詞: 碳捕捉離子液體製程模擬單乙醇胺技術經濟評估
外文關鍵詞: Carbon capture, Ionic liquid, Process simulation, MEA, TAC
相關次數: 點閱:22下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究以[P2228][2-CNPyr]與[P66614][2-CNPyr]兩種離子液體為吸收劑,利用Aspen Plus建立CO2吸收/再生製程,並以30 wt% MEA製程作為比較基準,探討不同煙道氣CO2濃度下之操作條件、公用工程需求與經濟表現。離子液體之物性描述以亨利常數、反應平衡與黏度關係式。物性與吸收資料回歸結果顯示,兩種離子液體之黏度模型R2皆為0.99,CO2吸收等溫線之R2分別為0.9766與0.9939;導入文獻基準流程後,主要製程結果亦與既有COSMO-based案例維持相近量級,可作為後續流程分析之基礎。
    研究案例分別採用低CO2濃度之FCC煙道氣與高CO2濃度之Cement煙道氣,皆以10 t/h進料及90% CO2捕捉率為共同基準。操作條件篩選顯示,[P2228][2-CNPyr]於兩種煙道氣條件下皆可維持 1 bar 吸收;[P66614][2-CNPyr]則分別需升壓至2.9與4.8 bar。於FCC案例中,經操作條件篩選與貧富液熱交換後,[P2228][2-CNPyr]之單位加熱與冷卻負荷分別由0.757與0.845降至0.431與0.521 kWh/kg CO2;[P66614][2-CNPyr]則由2.014與2.102降至0.427與0.973 kWh/kg CO2,但升壓吸收使其電力需求增加至0.628 kWh/kg CO2,顯示製程改善可能伴隨不同形式公用工程需求之轉移。
    經濟評估中,[P2228][2-CNPyr]於電力加熱情境下之FCC與Cement單位CO2捕獲成本分別為167.63與97.97 USD/t CO2,低於MEA之309.34與197.53 USD/t CO2,於蒸氣加熱情境下亦維持最低成本。[P66614][2-CNPyr]則因煙道氣壓縮、冷卻及設備成本,在FCC蒸氣加熱情境下成本高於MEA。納入吸收劑庫存與補充成本後,[P2228][2-CNPyr]於四種成本情境下皆具有正值價格上限。依本研究流程與成本假設,[P2228][2-CNPyr]在不同煙道氣條件下呈現較穩定之製程與經濟表現。

    This study evaluates two aprotic heterocyclic anion ionic liquids, [P2228][2-CNPyr] and [P66614][2-CNPyr], for post-combustion CO₂ capture and compares them with 30 wt% monoethanolamine (MEA). An Aspen Plus V14 absorption/regeneration framework was established using temperature-dependent correlations for CO₂ physical dissolution, reversible chemical absorption, and ionic-liquid viscosity. The model was validated against experimental property data and a published process benchmark. Two industrial flue-gas cases were then investigated: FCC gas containing 13 wt% CO₂ and cement gas containing 28 wt% CO₂, both at 10 t/h and with 90% CO₂ capture. Absorption and regeneration conditions were screened, followed by lean/rich heat recovery and total annualized cost analysis. [P2228][2-CNPyr] maintained 1 bar absorption in both cases and achieved specific total process loads of 1.043 and 1.031 kWh/kg CO₂ for FCC and cement gases, respectively, about 62% lower than MEA. Under electric heating, its capture costs were 167.63 and 97.97 USD/t CO₂, and it remained the lowest-cost option under steam heating. In contrast, [P66614][2-CNPyr] required pressurized absorption and showed greater sensitivity to flue-gas composition and utility pricing. Overall, [P2228][2-CNPyr] exhibited the most favorable energy and economic performance under the assumptions of this study.

    摘要 I Extended Abstract II 誌謝 VII 目錄 VIII 表目錄 XI 圖目錄 XII 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景 1 1.2 研究動機與目標 3 第二章 文獻回顧 4 2.1 工業CO2廢氣與溶劑吸收製程概況 4 2.2 MEA吸收製程與其限制 5 2.3 離子液體CO2吸收劑之發展 6 2.4 COSMO方法於離子液體之應用 7 2.5 NRTL模型於離子液體碳捕捉製程之應用 8 第三章 研究方法 10 3.1 研究流程概述 10 3.2 模擬工具與方法 10 3.3 離子液體物性模型 11 3.3.1 CO2吸收模型 11 3.3.2 反應平衡常數之溫度關係 12 3.3.3 亨利常數之溫度關係 13 3.3.4 黏度模型 14 3.4 碳捕捉製程設計 14 3.4.1 文獻基準案例建立 14 3.4.2 煙道氣案例 15 3.4.3 離子液體吸收與再生製程設計 16 3.4.4 MEA製程設計 17 3.5 製程優化與靈敏度分析 18 3.5.1 操作條件篩選指標 18 3.5.2 離子液體吸收端條件篩選 19 3.5.3 離子液體再生端分析方法 20 3.5.4 MEA製程優化方法 21 3.5.5 熱回收方法 22 3.6 經濟評估方法 22 3.6.1 總年成本 22 3.6.2 設備成本計算 23 3.6.3 操作成本計算 24 第四章 結果與討論 26 4.1 離子液體物性模型與驗證 26 4.1.1 物性與CO2吸收驗證 26 4.1.2 離子液體文獻基準案例之製程層級驗證 28 4.2 FCC煙道氣條件下離子液體製程操作條件分析 31 4.2.1 吸收端操作條件分析 31 4.2.2 再生端操作條件分析 32 4.2.3 FCC案例優化前後能耗比較 34 4.3 不同煙道氣條件下離子液體製程評估 37 4.3.1 Cement煙道氣條件下吸收端操作條件分析 37 4.3.2 Cement煙道氣條件下再生端操作條件分析 38 4.3.3 不同煙道氣條件下離子液體操作條件篩選結果比較 40 4.4 MEA製程與操作條件篩選 41 4.4.1 MEA吸收塔操作條件分析 41 4.4.2 MEA再生塔操作條件分析 43 4.4.3 離子液體與MEA最佳操作條件 44 4.5 不同吸收系統之公用工程負荷與經濟性比較 46 4.5.1 不同吸收系統之負荷組成比較 46 4.5.2 不同加熱成本情境下之單位CO2捕獲成本比較 47 4.5.3 離子液體價格上限 50 第五章 結論 53 參考文獻 55 附錄 63

    [1] International Energy Agency (IEA), *Global Energy Review 2025*, International Energy Agency, Paris, 2025. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2025.
    [2] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), *Global Warming of 1.5 °C: An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5 °C above Pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways*, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. and New York, NY, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157940.
    [3] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), *Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change*, IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 2023. https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647.
    [4] Bui, M.; Adjiman, C. S.; Bardow, A.; Anthony, E. J.; Boston, A.; Brown, S.; Fennell, P. S.; Fuss, S.; Galindo, A.; Hackett, L. A.; et al., “Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS): The Way Forward,” *Energy & Environmental Science*, Vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 1062–1176, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EE02342A.
    [5] Lyons, M.; Durrant, P.; Kochhar, K., *Reaching Zero with Renewables: Capturing Carbon*, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi, 2021. https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Technical-Papers/IRENA_Capturing_Carbon_2021.pdf.
    [6] Kenarsari, S. D.; Yang, D.; Jiang, G.; Zhang, S.; Wang, J.; Russell, A. G.; Wei, Q.; Fan, M., “Review of Recent Advances in Carbon Dioxide Separation and Capture,” *RSC Advances*, Vol. 3, No. 45, pp. 22739–22773, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RA43965H.
    [7] Boot-Handford, M. E.; Abanades, J. C.; Anthony, E. J.; Blunt, M. J.; Brandani, S.; Mac Dowell, N.; Fernández, J. R.; Ferrari, M.-C.; Gross, R.; Hallett, J. P.; et al., “Carbon Capture and Storage Update,” *Energy & Environmental Science*, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 130–189, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EE42350F.
    [8] Wang, M.; Lawal, A.; Stephenson, P.; Sidders, J.; Ramshaw, C., “Post-Combustion CO₂ Capture with Chemical Absorption: A State-of-the-Art Review,” *Chemical Engineering Research and Design*, Vol. 89, No. 9, pp. 1609–1624, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2010.11.005.
    [9] Oexmann, J.; Kather, A., “Minimising the Regeneration Heat Duty of Post-Combustion CO₂ Capture by Wet Chemical Absorption: The Misguided Focus on Low Heat of Absorption Solvents,” *International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control*, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 36–43, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2009.09.010.
    [10] Rochelle, G. T., “Amine Scrubbing for CO₂ Capture,” *Science*, Vol. 325, No. 5948, pp. 1652–1654, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1176731.
    [11] Vinjarapu, S. H. B.; Neerup, R.; Larsen, A. H.; Jørsboe, J. K.; Villadsen, S. N. B.; Jensen, S.; Karlsson, J. L.; Kappel, J.; Lassen, H.; Blinksbjerg, P.; von Solms, N.; Fosbøl, P. L., “Results from Pilot-Scale CO₂ Capture Testing Using 30 wt% MEA at a Waste-to-Energy Facility: Optimisation through Parametric Analysis,” *Applied Energy*, Vol. 355, Article 122193, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122193.
    [12] Kwak, N. S.; Lee, J. H.; Lee, I. Y.; Jang, K. R.; Shim, J. G., “A Study of the CO₂ Capture Pilot Plant by Amine Absorption,” *Energy*, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 41–46, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.07.016.
    [13] Hamborg, E. S.; Smith, V.; Cents, T.; Brigman, N.; Falk-Pedersen, O.; de Cazenove, T.; Chhaganlal, M.; Feste, J. K.; Ullestad, Ø.; Ulvatn, H.; et al., “Results from MEA Testing at the CO₂ Technology Centre Mongstad. Part II: Verification of Baseline Results,” *Energy Procedia*, Vol. 63, pp. 5994–6011, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.634.
    [14] Uyanga, I. J.; Idem, R. O., “Studies of SO₂- and O₂-Induced Degradation of Aqueous MEA during CO₂ Capture from Power Plant Flue Gas Streams,” *Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research*, Vol. 46, No. 8, pp. 2558–2566, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0614024.
    [15] Kittel, J.; Idem, R.; Gelowitz, D.; Tontiwachwuthikul, P.; Parrain, G.; Bonneau, A., “Corrosion in MEA Units for CO₂ Capture: Pilot Plant Studies,” *Energy Procedia*, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 791–797, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.105.
    [16] Mullen, D.; Braakhuis, L.; Knuutila, H. K.; Gibbins, J.; Lucquiaud, M., “Monoethanolamine Degradation Rates in Post-Combustion CO₂ Capture Plants with the Capture of 100% of the Added CO₂,” *Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research*, Vol. 63, No. 31, pp. 13677–13691, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.4c01525.
    [17] Zhang, R.; Ke, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Zhou, B.; Cui, G.; Lu, H., “Tuning Functionalized Ionic Liquids for CO₂ Capture,” *International Journal of Molecular Sciences*, Vol. 23, No. 19, Article 11401, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911401.
    [18] Hasib-ur-Rahman, M.; Siaj, M.; Larachi, F., “Ionic Liquids for CO₂ Capture—Development and Progress,” *Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification*, Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 313–322, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2010.03.008.
    [19] Palomar, J.; Lemus, J.; Navarro, P.; Moya, C.; Santiago, R.; Hospital-Benito, D.; Hernández, E., “Process Simulation and Optimization on Ionic Liquids,” *Chemical Reviews*, Vol. 124, No. 4, pp. 1649–1737, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00512.
    [20] Gurkan, B.; Goodrich, B. F.; Mindrup, E. M.; Ficke, L. E.; Massel, M.; Seo, S.; Senftle, T. P.; Wu, H.; Glaser, M. F.; Shah, J. K.; Maginn, E. J.; Brennecke, J. F.; Schneider, W. F., “Molecular Design of High Capacity, Low Viscosity, Chemically Tunable Ionic Liquids for CO₂ Capture,” *The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters*, Vol. 1, No. 24, pp. 3494–3499, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz101533k.
    [21] Seo, S.; DeSilva, M. A.; Xia, H.; Brennecke, J. F., “Effect of Cation on Physical Properties and CO₂ Solubility for Phosphonium-Based Ionic Liquids with 2-Cyanopyrrolide Anions,” *The Journal of Physical Chemistry B*, Vol. 119, No. 35, pp. 11807–11814, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b05733.
    [22] Moya, C.; Alonso-Morales, N.; de Riva, J.; Morales-Collazo, O.; Brennecke, J. F.; Palomar, J., “Encapsulation of Ionic Liquids with an Aprotic Heterocyclic Anion (AHA-IL) for CO₂ Capture: Preserving the Favorable Thermodynamics and Enhancing the Kinetics of Absorption,” *The Journal of Physical Chemistry B*, Vol. 122, No. 9, pp. 2616–2626, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b12137.
    [23] Madugula, A. C. S.; Jeffryes, C.; Henry, J.; Gossage, J.; Benson, T. J., “A Simulation-Based Model Studying Monoethanolamine and Aprotic Heterocyclic Anion Ionic Liquid (AHA-IL) Mixtures for Carbon Capture,” *Computers & Chemical Engineering*, Vol. 183, Article 108599, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2024.108599.
    [24] Zhang, X.; Liu, Z.; Wang, W., “Screening of Ionic Liquids to Capture CO₂ by COSMO-RS and Experiments,” *AIChE Journal*, Vol. 54, No. 10, pp. 2717–2728, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.11573.
    [25] de Riva, J.; Suarez-Reyes, J.; Moreno, D.; Díaz, I.; Ferro, V. R.; Palomar, J., “Ionic Liquids for Post-Combustion CO₂ Capture by Physical Absorption: Thermodynamic, Kinetic and Process Analysis,” *International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control*, Vol. 61, pp. 61–70, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.03.019.
    [26] Qin, H.; Wang, K.; Ma, X.; Li, F.; Liu, Y.; Ji, X., “Predicting the Solubility of CO₂ and N₂ in Ionic Liquids Based on COSMO-RS and Machine Learning,” *Frontiers in Chemistry*, Vol. 12, Article 1480468, 2024. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2024.1480468.
    [27] Renon, H.; Prausnitz, J. M., “Local Compositions in Thermodynamic Excess Functions for Liquid Mixtures,” *AIChE Journal*, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 135–144, 1968. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690140124.
    [28] Zoubeik, M.; Mohamedali, M.; Henni, A., “Experimental Solubility and Thermodynamic Modeling of CO₂ in Four New Imidazolium and Pyridinium-Based Ionic Liquids,” *Fluid Phase Equilibria*, Vol. 419, pp. 67–74, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2016.03.009.
    [29] Noorani, N.; Mehrdad, A., “Solubility of Carbon Dioxide in Some Imidazolium and Pyridinium-Based Ionic Liquids and Correlation with NRTL Model,” *Australian Journal of Chemistry*, Vol. 75, No. 5, pp. 353–361, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1071/CH21302.
    [30] Huang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.; Dong, H.; Zhang, S., “Thermodynamic Modeling and Assessment of Ionic Liquid-Based CO₂ Capture Processes,” *Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research*, Vol. 53, No. 29, pp. 11805–11817, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie501538e.
    [31] Ma, T.; Wang, J.; Du, Z.; Abdeltawab, A. A.; Al-Enizi, A. M.; Chen, X.; Yu, G., “A Process Simulation Study of CO₂ Capture by Ionic Liquids,” *International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control*, Vol. 58, pp. 223–231, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.01.017.
    [32] Ma, C.; Wang, N.; Ye, N.; Ji, X., “CO₂ Capture Using Ionic Liquid-Based Hybrid Solvents from Experiment to Process Evaluation,” *Applied Energy*, Vol. 304, Article 117767, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117767.
    [33] Hospital-Benito, D.; Lemus, J.; Santiago, R.; Palomar, J., “Thermodynamic and Kinetic Evaluation of Ionic Liquids + Tetraglyme Mixtures on CO₂ Capture,” *Journal of CO₂ Utilization*, Vol. 35, pp. 185–193, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2019.09.015.
    [34] Song, D.; Seibert, A. F.; Rochelle, G. T., “Mass Transfer Parameters for Packings: Effect of Viscosity,” *Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research*, Vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 718–729, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b04396.
    [35] Xu, Z.; Singh, R. K.; Bao, J.; Wang, C., “Direct Effect of Solvent Viscosity on the Physical Mass Transfer for Wavy Film Flow in a Packed Column,” *Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research*, Vol. 58, No. 37, pp. 17524–17539, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b01226.
    [36] Hospital-Benito, D.; Lemus, J.; Moya, C.; Santiago, R.; Ferro, V. R.; Palomar, J., “Techno-Economic Feasibility of Ionic Liquids-Based CO₂ Chemical Capture Processes,” *Chemical Engineering Journal*, Vol. 407, Article 127196, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.127196.
    [37] Zea, F.; Varela, C.; Camarda, K. V., “AsPyCC: Post-Combustion Carbon Capture Design through Aspen Plus® & Python,” *Fuel*, Vol. 409, Article 137896, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2025.137896.
    [38] Li, B. H.; Zhang, N.; Smith, R., “Rate-Based Modelling of CO₂ Capture Process by Reactive Absorption with MEA,” *Chemical Engineering Transactions*, Vol. 39, pp. 13–18, 2014. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1439003.
    [39] Abu-Zahra, M. R. M.; Schneiders, L. H. J.; Niederer, J. P. M.; Feron, P. H. M.; Versteeg, G. F., “CO₂ Capture from Power Plants. Part I. A Parametric Study of the Technical Performance Based on Monoethanolamine,” *International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control*, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 37–46, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1750-5836(06)00007-7.
    [40] Wang, N.; Wang, D.; Krook-Riekkola, A.; Ji, X., “MEA-Based CO₂ Capture: A Study Focuses on MEA Concentrations and Process Parameters,” *Frontiers in Energy Research*, Vol. 11, Article 1230743, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2023.1230743.
    [41] Hospital-Benito, D.; Lemus, J.; Moya, C.; Santiago, R.; Palomar, J., “Process Analysis Overview of Ionic Liquids on CO₂ Chemical Capture,” *Chemical Engineering Journal*, Vol. 390, Article 124509, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.124509.
    [42] Moya, C.; Hospital-Benito, D.; Santiago, R.; Lemus, J.; Palomar, J., “Prediction of CO₂ Chemical Absorption Isotherms for Ionic Liquid Design by DFT/COSMO-RS Calculations,” *Chemical Engineering Journal Advances*, Vol. 4, Article 100038, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceja.2020.100038.
    [43] Williams, M. L.; Holahan, S. P.; McCorkill, M. E.; Dickmann, J. S.; Kiran, E., “Thermal and Spectral Characterization and Stability of Mixtures of Ionic Liquids [EMIM]Ac and [BMIM]Ac with Ethanol, Methanol, and Water at Ambient Conditions and at Elevated Temperatures and Pressures,” *Thermochimica Acta*, Vol. 669, pp. 126–139, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2018.09.013.
    [44] Davis, J.; Rochelle, G., “Thermal Degradation of Monoethanolamine at Stripper Conditions,” *Energy Procedia*, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 327–333, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.045.
    [45] Danaci, D.; Bui, M.; Petit, C.; Mac Dowell, N., “En Route to Zero Emissions for Power and Industry with Amine-Based Post-Combustion Capture,” *Environmental Science & Technology*, Vol. 55, No. 15, pp. 10619–10632, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07261.
    [46] Oko, E.; Zacchello, B.; Wang, M.; Fethi, A., “Process Analysis and Economic Evaluation of Mixed Aqueous Ionic Liquid and Monoethanolamine (MEA) Solvent for CO₂ Capture from a Coke Oven Plant,” *Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology*, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 686–700, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.1772.

    下載圖示
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE