| 研究生: |
蘇清林 Sue, Ching-lin |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
河畔取水所引致河川滲漏量之評估 Evaluation of Stream Depletion Caused by Pumping |
| 指導教授: |
李振誥
Lee, Cheng-haw |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 資源工程學系 Department of Resources Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2007 |
| 畢業學年度: | 95 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 112 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 河川滲漏量 、MODFLOW 、河畔取水 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | MODFLOW, stream depletion, pumping near the stream |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:76 下載:1 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
彰化地區無地表蓄水設施,民生與工業用水皆仰賴地下水供應,爲提高水源供應量並使當地水資源能更有效的利用,若能於河畔進行水源開發,可因含水層同時具有河川及地下水補注,減少因地下水位下降對地層之影響。
本研究利用數值軟體MODFLOW建構烏溪流域地下水流數值模式,由地下水位資料率定求得符合現地之地下水流模式,由烏溪流域地下水流線與等勢能線劃定快官地區數值模式,配合現場抽水試驗與雙環入滲試驗推求之現地水力參數,進一步探討河畔取水模式水平衡分析中之各項進出流量,以評估河畔取水對環境之影響。
由數值分析結果顯示,研究區域在未取水之情況下,河川補注含水層約8,037cmd,佔總入流量之13.53%,顯示河川補注效益良好,然而進行河畔取水後,河川補注量則增加至42.76%,評估其抽水引致之河川滲漏補注效益為29.23%。
利用率定後之數值模式,提出五個合適出水方案評估,設定目標出水量為60,000cmd,限制條件以1.04m為下限水位,由模擬結果顯示,將目標出水量分配至8口與12口抽水井方能符合地下水位限制,若水位洩降限制改為嚴重下限水位2.08m,則將目標抽水量分配至6口抽水井方案即可符合水位洩降限制。
Groundwater supplies both civil and industrial requirement in Changhua area because there are no facilities for reserving water on the ground. In order to lift the water supplies and to use the groundwater more efficiently, water source developing near the stream can reduce the effect on the layers due to the excessive drawdown. Since the stream and groundwater can supply the recharge of the aquifer.
This study used MODFLOW to construct a numerical groundwater flow pattern of Wu river basin, and then obtained the optimal hydro-geological model after calibration. The model was demarcated with the flow line and equipotential line of Wu river basin and at Kuai-guan. Integrating the local hydraulic parameters from the pumping test and double-ring infiltration test, each flow term in water budget analysis of the model was discussed. And the influence on the environment by pumping near the stream could be estimated.
The results of the model reveal that the stream recharged the aquifers about 8,037cmd before pumping, 13.53% of the total inflow. And the stream recharge increased to 42.76% after pumping. The assessed stream depletion induced by pumping was 29.23%.
This study proposed five appropriate pumping projects, using the calibrated model with objective pumping quantity 60,000 cmd and the limitative drawdown 1.04m. The simulated results reveal that when distributing the objective pumping quantity into eight to twelve wells could accord with the limitative drawdown. If the drawdown altered to the serious one, 2.08 m, distributing the objective pumping quantity into only six wells could accord that.
1.Bochever, F. M., “Evaluation of well-field yield in alluvial aquifers:The impact of a partially penetrating stream”, In Proceedings of VODGEO(Hydrogeolog) no.13, pp.84-115 (in Russian), 1966.
2.Bouwer, H., “Groundwater hydrology”, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.
3.Butler, J. J., V. A. Zlotnik, and M. S. Tsou, “Drawdown and stream depletion produced by pumping in the vicinity of a partially penetrating stream”, Ground Water, vol.39, no.5, pp.651-659, 2001.
4.Chen, X. H. , and X. Chen, “Effect of aquifer anisotropic on the migration of lnfiltrated stream water to a pumping well”, Journal of Hydrology, vol.8, no.5, pp.287-293, 2003.
5.Chen, X. H., and Y. Yin, “Semianalytical solution for stream depletion in partially penetrating streams”, Ground water, vol.42, no.1, pp.92-96, 2004.
6.Chen , W. P., and C. H. Lee, “Estimating Groundwater Recharge from Stream flow Records”, J. of Environmental Geology, vol 44, pp. 257-265, ,2003. (EI, SCI)
7.Chiang, W. H., and W. Kinzelbach, “Processing Modflow for Windows (Version 5.06)”, Hamburg,Germany, 1998.
8.Dawson, K. J., and J. D. Istok, “Aquifer Testing”, Lewis Publishers, Michigan, pp. 344, 1991.
9.Glover, R. E., and C. G. Balmer, “River depletion from pumping a well near a river”, American Geophysical Union Transactions, vol.35, no.3, pp.468-470, 1954.
10.Grigoryev, V. M., “The effect of streambed siltation on well-field yield in alluvial aquifers”, Water Supply and Sanitation, vol.6, pp.110-118, (in Russian), 1957.
11.Hantush, M. S., “Wells nesr streams with semipervious beds,” Journal Geophysical Research”, vol.70. no.12, pp.2829-2838, 1965.
12.Hazen, R. H., “Comparative compressibilities of silicate spinels: anomalous behavior of (Mg, Fe)2SiO4”, Science, vol.259, pp.206-209, 1993.
13.Hunt, B., “Unsteady stream depletion from ground water pumping”, Ground Water, vol 37, no.1, pp.98-102, 1999.
14.Jenkins, C. T., “Techniques for computing rate and volume of stream depoetion by well”, Ground Water, vol 6, no.2 pp.37-46, 1968.
15.Lee, C. H., and W. P. Chen, “Estimating Groundwater Recharge from Water Balance Model Coupled with Streamflow Hydrographs”, 2006 Western Pacific Geophysics Meeting, American Geophysics Union, AGU, Beijing China, pp.64, 2006.
16.Marshall, T. J., 1957, “Permeability and size distribution of pores”,Nature, vol.180, pp.664-665.
17.Matteo, L. D., and W. Dragoni, “Empirical Relationships for estimating Stream depletion by a well pumping near a gaining stream”, Ground Water, vol.43, no.2, pp.242-249, 2005.
18.McDonald, M. G., and A. W. Harbaugh, “A Modular Three- Dimensional Finite-Difference Ground-Water Flow Model”, U.S. Geological Survey, Virginia, 1988.
19.Morris, J. B., and R. T. Johnson, “Abstract data types in the Model programming language”, ACM SIGPLAN Notices, vol.11, issue.SI, pp.36-46, 1976.
20.Neuman, S. P., “Analysis of pumping test data from anisotropic unconfined aquifers considering delayed gravity response”, Water Resources Research, vol.11, no.2, pp.329-342, 1975.
21.Sheperd, J. C., “Training needs analysis model for qualified nurse practitioners”, Journal of Nursing Management, vol.2, pp.181-185, 1994.
22.Sophocleous, M. A., A. Koussis, J. L. Martin, and S. P. Perkins, “Evaluation of simplified stream-aquifer depletion models for water rights administration”, Ground Water, vol.33, no.4, pp.579-588, 1995.
23.Theis, C. V., “The effect of a well on the flow of a nearby stream”, American Geophysical Union Transactions, vol.22, no.3, pp.734-738, 1941.
24.Wilson, J. L., “Induced infiltration in aquifer with ambient flow”, Water Resources Research, vol.29, no.10, pp.3503-3512, 1993.
25.丁澈士、柯亭帆、吳峰誼,「應用變水頭實驗及推估公式對河床水力傳導係數之分析」,臺灣水利,第44卷,第1期,第26-35頁,1996。
26.丁澈士、簡明克,「補注入滲動態之試驗研究」,農業工程學報,第50卷,第4期,第51-61頁,2004。
27.丁澈士、蘇惠珍,「PMWIN 三維地下水模式」,五南圖書出版公司,台北,2004。
28.中央地質調查所全球資訊網站。網址:http://www.moeacgs.gov.tw/main.jsp
29.中央氣象局,「氣候年報-地面資料」,1990-2004。
30.中興大學農學院土壤學系,「彰化縣土壤調查報告」,1969。
31.台灣省自來水公司第十一區管理處,「快官淨水場水源開發試驗及分析委託研究」,2005。
32.李振誥、陳尉平,「台灣地下水補注量評估與探討」,第六屆地下水資源及水質保護研討會,第387-398頁,2004。
33.李振誥、陳尉平、李如晃,「應用基流資料估計法推估臺灣地下水補注量」,臺灣水利,第50卷,第1期,第69-80頁,2002。
34.高華聲、陳瑞昇、彭瑞國、謝勝彥,「水力傳導係數、湖水深度及地下水深度對人工湖補注地下水之影響」,臺灣水利,第49卷,第2期,第46-54頁,2001。
35.經濟部水利署,「金門地下水資源調查分析」,2007。
36.經濟部水利署水文水資源管理供應系統網站。網址: http://gweb.wra.gov.tw/wrweb/
37.經濟部水利署第三河川局網站,2005。網址: http://www.wra03.gov.tw/area_d.htm
38.經濟部水資源局,「水資源政策白皮書」,1998c。
39.農林航空測量所,國家數值地形模型(Digital Terrain Model),1989。
40.劉志文,「屏東沖積平原地下水資源調配與管理之研究」,國立成功大學地球科學研究所碩士論文,2000。
41.薛禹群,「地下水動力學原理」,北京,地質出版社,1986。