簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳雍涵
Chen, Yong-Han
論文名稱: 考量需求學習下供應鏈定價策略分析
Pricing strategy in a supply chain system with demand learning
指導教授: 莊雅棠
Chuang, Ya-Tang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 工業與資訊管理學系
Department of Industrial and Information Management
論文出版年: 2022
畢業學年度: 110
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 59
中文關鍵詞: 需求學習供應鏈批發價格
外文關鍵詞: Demand learning, Supply chain, wholesale price
相關次數: 點閱:77下載:27
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 過往供應鏈考量需求不確定研究大多假設需求參數為已知,但在現實中多數情
    形則未必符合參數已知假設,而未知參數與需求的隨機性會使供應鏈決策者難以
    做出最佳決策。雖然決策者在決策前對於需求參數為未知,但仍可透過資訊獲取
    來學習參數為何,而在決策的過程加入考量資訊獲取即稱之為需求學習。本研究
    使用斯塔克爾柏格賽局(Stackelberg game)建立一個兩期的供應鏈模型,供應鏈成
    員包含製造商與零售商,製造商負責生產產品以及決策批發價格販售給零售商,
    零售商則依製造商給定的批發價格決定訂購量以滿足市場需求。在決策的過程中
    加入考量需求學習來獲取資訊以降低需求不確定性,並且探討考量需求學習決策
    具有的特性以及需求學習給決策帶來是否能帶來正面效益。從文獻中可得知單一
    階層的情形下零售商考量學習會增加訂購量,但本研究透過數值範例發現不管是
    製造商亦或者是零售商,兩者考量需求學習的決策並不一定具有固定特性,有可
    能會出現上升、下降亦或是持平的狀況發生,此外透過數值範例也可得出考量學
    習皆可有效提升決策者自身利潤,證實需求學習可為決策者帶來正面效益。

    We investigate a supply chain management problem where the demand model is
    unknown a priori, but can be learned through information acquisition. A two-period Stackelberg game is adopted for demand learning. In each period, a manufacturer sells a product to a retailer; the retailer then needs to determine an order quantity to maximize her profit based on the posted price determined by the manufacturer. In the inventory control literature, it has been shown that the retailer will set a higher inventory level to avoid shortage event, which is less favorable for demand learning. Motivated by this managerial insight, the goal of this paper is to study the structural results of the manufacturer’s optimal price decision. In our numerical experiments, we find that the manufacturer’s optimal decision will be less or more than the myopic price, which is the optimal decision of the single-period problem. Besides the decision affect, we also find using demand learning can increase revenue.

    摘要 i 英文延伸摘要 ii 誌謝 viii 目錄 ix 表目錄 xii 圖目錄 xiii 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究動機 1 1.2 研究目標 3 1.3 論文架構 5 第二章 文獻回顧 6 2.1 供應鏈管理 6 2.2 報童問題擴展 8 2.3 需求學習 9 2.3.1 訂價需求學習 9 2.3.2 庫存需求學習 10 2.4 小結 12 第三章 模型建構 13 3.1 情境假設 13 3.2 資訊已知模型 15 3.3 資訊未知模型 16 3.3.1 零售商利潤式 17 3.3.2 製造商利潤式 19 3.4 資訊未知模型短視近利策略 20 3.4.1 零售商短視近利策略均衡解 21 3.4.2 製造商短視近利策略均衡解 22 3.5 資訊未知模型考量學習決策 23 第四章 數值範例 25 4.1 伽瑪分配分析 25 4.1.1 伽瑪分配範例:分散趨勢不同 26 4.1.2 伽瑪分配範例:中央趨勢不同 29 4.2 貝它分配分析 31 4.2.1 貝它分配範例:分散趨勢不同 31 4.2.2 貝它分配範例:中央趨勢不同 35 4.2.3 貝它分配範例:偏態趨勢不同 36 4.3 截尾常態分配分析 38 4.3.1 截尾常態分配範例:分散趨勢不同 39 4.3.2 截尾常態分配範例:中央趨勢不同 40 4.4 小結 42 第五章 結論與未來研究方向 45 5.1 結論 45 5.2 未來研究方向 46 附錄 48 1 Proposition 2.證明 48 2 Proposition 3.證明 49 3 最佳策略補充 51 參考文獻 56

    Agrawal, N., & Smith, S. A. (1996). Estimating negative binomial demand for retail
    inventory management with unobservable lost sales. Naval Research Logistics, 43(6),839–861.

    Aviv, Y., & Pazgal, A. (2005). A partially observed markov decision process for dynamic pricing. Management Science, 51(9), 1400–1416.

    Azoury, K. S. (1985). Bayes solution to dynamic inventory models under unknown demand distribution. Management Science, 31(9), 1150–1160.

    Bensoussan, A., & Sethi, S. P. (2009). A note on “the censored newsvendor and the
    optimal acquisition of information”. Operations Research, 57(3), 791–794.

    Cachon, G. P. (2003). Supply chain coordination with contracts. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, 11, 227–339.

    Cachon, G. P., & Lariviere, M. A. (2005). Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts: strengths and limitations. Management Science, 51(1), 30–44.

    Chen, J. (2011). Returns with wholesale-price-discount contract in a newsvendor problem. International Journal of Production Economics, 130(1), 104–111.

    Chen, X., Zhang, H., Zhang, M., & Chen, J. (2017). Optimal decisions in a retailer
    stackelberg supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 187, 260–
    270.

    Chiu, C.-H., Choi, T.-M., & Tang, C. S. (2011). Price, rebate, and returns supply contracts for coordinating supply chains with price-dependent demands.Production and Operations Management, 20(1), 81–91.

    Christopher, M. (1992). Logistics & supply chain management. Pearson UK.

    Cooper, M. C., Lambert, D. M., & Pagh, J. D. (1997). Supply chain management: more
    than a new name for logistics. The international Journal of Logistics Management,
    8(1), 1–14.

    Cope, E. (2007). Bayesian strategies for dynamic pricing in e-commerce. Naval Research Logistics, 54(3), 265–281.

    Ding, X., Puterman, M. L., & Bisi, A. (2002). The censored newsvendor and the optimalacquisition of information. Operations Research, 50(3), 517–527.

    Eeckhoudt, L., Gollier, C., & Schlesinger, H. (1995). The risk-averse (and prudent) newsboy. Management Science, 41(5), 786–794.

    Ferguson, M., & Ketzenberg, M. E. (2006). Information sharing to improve retail product freshness of perishables. Production and Operations Management, 15(1), 57–73.

    Jerath, K., Kim, S.-H., & Swinney, R. (2017). Product quality in a distribution channel
    with inventory risk. Marketing Science, 36(5), 747–761.

    Khouja, M. (1999). The single-period (news-vendor) problem: literature review and suggestions for future research. Omega, 27(5), 537–553.

    Kouvelis, P., Chambers, C., & Wang, H. (2006). Supply chain management research andproduction and operations management: Review, trends, and opportunities. Productionand Operations Management, 15(3), 449–469.

    Kraiselburd, S., Narayanan, V., & Raman, A. (2004). Contracting in a supply chain with stochastic demand and substitute products. Production and Operations Management,13(1), 46–62.

    La Londe, B. J., & Masters, J. M. (1994). Emerging logistics strategies: blueprints for the next century. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management.

    Lariviere, M. A., & Porteus, E. L. (2001). Selling to the newsvendor: An analysis of
    price-only contracts. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 3(4), 293–
    305.

    Lovejoy, W. S. (1990). Myopic policies for some inventory models with uncertain demand distributions. Management Science, 36(6), 724–738.

    Lu, X., Song, J.-S., & Regan, A. (2007). Rebate, returns and price protection policies in channel coordination. IIE Transactions, 39(2), 111–124.

    Lu, X., Song, J.-S., & Zhu, K. (2008). Analysis of perishable-inventory systems with
    censored demand data. Operations Research, 56(4), 1034–1038.

    Monczka, R. M., Handfield, R. B., Giunipero, L. C., & Patterson, J. L. (1998). Purchasing and supply chain management. Cengage Learning.

    Nahmias, S. (1994). Demand estimation in lost sales inventory systems. Naval Research Logistics, 41(6), 739–757.

    Papanastasiou, Y. (2020). Newsvendor decisions with two-sided learning. Management Science, 66(11), 5408–5426.

    Pasternack, B. A. (1985). Optimal pricing and return policies for perishable commodities. Marketing Science, 4(2), 166–176.

    Qin, Y., Wang, R., Vakharia, A. J., Chen, Y., & Seref, M. M. (2011). The newsvendor
    problem: Review and directions for future research. European Journal of OperationalResearch, 213(2), 361–374.

    Scarf, H. (1959). Bayes solutions of the statistical inventory problem. The Annals of
    Mathematical Statistics, 30(2), 490–508.

    Spengler, J. J. (1950). Vertical integration and antitrust policy. Journal of Political Economy, 58(4), 347–352.

    Weng, Z. K. (1997). Pricing and ordering strategies in manufacturing and distribution alliances. IIE Transactions, 29(8), 681–692.

    Yu, Y., Chu, F., & Chen, H. (2009). A stackelberg game and its improvement in a vmi system with a manufacturing vendor. European Journal of Operational Research, 192(3),929–948.

    Zhang, S., & Zhang, J. (2018). Contract preference with stochastic cost learning in a
    two-period supply chain under asymmetric information. International Journal of Production Economics, 196, 226–247

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE