簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃吉村
Huang, Chi-Tsun
論文名稱: 研發團隊成員之內隱知的流動與績效
Tacit knowledge flow and it's impact on the performance of R&D team members
指導教授: 劉宗其
Liu, Tsung-Chi
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理學系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2003
畢業學年度: 91
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 81
中文關鍵詞: 知識網絡研發績效知識創造內隱知
外文關鍵詞: tacit knowledge, knowledge creation, knowledge network, R&D performance
相關次數: 點閱:105下載:4
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  •   研發團隊或者其成員之專業知識是該團隊創造其競爭優勢之主要來源。雖然許多有價值之知識是顯性、可以明確說明、甚或書面紀錄的,然而在研發領域中,更多的是難以形式化與溝通的「內隱知」,比如個人之邏輯思考或知識擷取過程。內隱知附身於個人身上,其流動須藉由團隊成員間的人際互動,方能成為團隊的鑲嵌知識;亦即,此知識之優劣,除涉及團隊成員個人在內隱知上之轉換能力(人力資本)外,亦涉及充當內隱知流動與儲存平台的團隊社會網絡(社會資本),以及兩者的交互作用。本論文目的即在利用知識網絡的分析方法,來探討附身於個人之內隱知,是如何在研發團隊中轉換、流動與影響研發績效。個人之創造能力,是啟動內隱知庫存成為可流動知識之鑰匙;而團隊組織之知識網絡結構,則是決定後續知識傳輸與擴張態勢之主要機制,兩者對研發團隊績效之影響,當是必然。
      準此,本研究乃針對12家公民營企業之研發團隊共206位研發人員進行實證研究,結果發現除了Noanka & Takeuchi(1995)及Becerra-Fernandez & Sabherwal (2001) 所指出的「外化、內化、共同化及結合能力」四項知識創造能力外,還多了一項「電腦中介溝通能力」(CMC)。除了結合能力以外,其餘四項知識創造能力對研發績效均有正面影響。其中,個人知識創造能力中之「外化能力」、「內化能力」、「共同化能力」對研發績效均有影響,由於此三項能力均與內隱知的流動有關,顯見內隱知的流動對研發績效有正面的影響。再者,成員越居於知識網絡的核心,對研發績效的影響越大,同時成員的外化能力與網絡中心性有顯著關係,尤其是外化能力越強者,其網絡中心性越高。此外,成員的年資與外化能力、結合能力及知識網絡中心性有正向的顯著關係。以上的這些發現,意味著組織應該盡量鼓勵研發團隊成員增進及積極應用其外化能力,尤其是較資深的研發成員,透過教導與師承學習(mentoring)的方式傳授給專業資歷較淺的成員,將有助於團隊的研發績效。
      但這並非指其他的知識創造與轉換能力無關緊要,本論文亦發現外化能力與其他四項能力(內化、共同化、結合與電腦中介溝通能力)均有顯著的相關,說明彼此間可能存有如Nonaka & Takeuchi(1995)所述的知識螺旋的相應相生的關係,因此企業也應多方鼓勵各種多元的知識創造過程與能力的培養及應用。
      除此之外,年資具有鈣化效果:不僅年資平方對研發績效有直接的負面影響,且年資平方項對知識網絡中心的影響亦為負向關係,使年資平方項透過網絡中心性對研發績效的間接影響也為負向,說明年資太高對研發績效有不良的影響,值得研發產業注意。本論文另一項發現為CMC能力獨立成一項知識創造能力,一方面說明台灣研發產業使用電腦中介溝通的情形尚不普及,還未能分化為結合及共同化能力,仍有推展的空間;另一方面CMC對研發績效的影響及採用傳統面對面(face-to-face)的交流學習方式(如外化、共同化與內化),有分庭抗禮之勢。本論文依據這些研究發現提出理論與實務意涵。

      The flow of tacit knowledge is well-known one of critical issues in Knowledge management and R & D management as well. However, the empirical study is few. Based on the perspectives of knowledge creation (human capital) and knowledge network (social capital), this dissertation constructs a framework to depict and highlight the relationships among knowledge creation abilities, the centrality of knowledge network, and R&D performance, and then tests the hypotheses with a sample of 206 R&D personnel from 12 manufacturing firms in Taiwan.

      The result reveals that there is a fifth ability called CMC (Computer-Mediated Communications) ability, beyond the traditional knowledge creation abilities, such as socialization, combination, externalization, and internalization. Except combination ability, all the knowledge creation abilities have positive relationships with R&D performance. Moreover, the more central the R&D team member locates in the knowledge network, the better R&D performance they perceive. Meanwhile, those who master in externalizing their tacit knowledge, would tend to be located, by their colleagues who come to them ask for helps in daily R&D activities, in the center of the knowledge network, and vice versa. Besides, the phenomenon of knowledge ossification tenure also exists. That means too longer tenure of the R&D team members would lead to decay their R&D performance. Several implications for research and management practices are also provided.

    第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………1   第一節 研究動機…………………………………………………1   第二節 研究目的…………………………………………………6   第三節 研究流程…………………………………………………7 第二章 文獻探討………………………………………………………8   第一節 內隱知及其重要性………………………………………8   第二節 內隱知的分類……………………………………………12   第三節 知識創造能力……………………………………………15   第四節 知識網絡…………………………………………………22   第五節 內隱知流動:個人層次…………………………………27 第三章 研究設計………………………………………………………35   第一節 研究架構…………………………………………………35   第二節 研究假設…………………………………………………36   第三節 研究方法與流程…………………………………………37   第四節 變數衡量…………………………………………………41   第五節 分析方法…………………………………………………44   第六節 樣本………………………………………………………45 第四章 研究結果………………………………………………………48   第一節 個人認知研發績效與年資特性之因素分析……………48   第二節 知識創造能力之因素分析………………………………49   第三節 結構模式分析結果………………………………………54 第五章 結論與建議……………………………………………………62   第一節 結論與討論………………………………………………62   第二節 研究限制…………………………………………………67   第三節 建議………………………………………………………69 參考文獻…………………………………………………………………72 附錄 問卷………………………………………………………………79

    李仁芳(1999),「技術與產業分工網絡運作:四個產業個案之對照」,收於張芝雲編,網絡台灣:企業的人情關係與經濟理性,台北:遠流,頁129-200。

    吳思華(1999),「台灣積體電路產業的動態網絡」,收於張芝雲編,網絡台灣:企業的人情關係與經濟理性,台北:遠流,頁65-128。

    徐進鈺(1999),「流動的鑲嵌:新竹科學園區的勞動力市場與高科技發展」,台灣社會研究季刊,33,頁75-118。

    陳介玄(1998),台灣產業的社會學研究-轉型中的中小企業,台北:聯經。

    陳東升(2000),「創新、創業與台灣積體電路產業組織網絡的動態發展」,台大社會學刊,28,頁。

    張文政(2001),「台灣報社知識管理現況初探」,收於吳思華編,知識資本在台灣,頁229-296,台北:遠流。

    葉桂珍(2002),「科技研發人員之事業決策、工作認知、與工作涉入之重審視」,90年度國科會專題研究報告。

    蔡敦浩(1999),「大型工業組織之技術網絡:中鋼公司個案研究」,收於張芝雲編,網絡台灣:企業的人情關係與經濟理性,台北:遠流,頁201-224。

    謝國雄(1991),「網絡式生產組織:台灣外銷工業中的外包制度」,中央研究院民族學研究所集刊,71,台北:南港,頁161-182。

    Allen, Thomas. J. (1997), Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information within the R&D Organization. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Ancona, D., and D. F. Caldwell (1992), “Demography and Design: Predictors of New Product Team Productivity,” Organization Science, 3: 321-341.

    Argyris, C., and D. A. Schon (1991), Organizational LearningⅡ: Theory, Method, and Practice, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Argyris, C. (1999), “Tacit Knowledge and Management,” In R. S. Sternberg & J. A. Horvath (Eds.), Tacit Knowledge in Professional Practice: 123-140, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Augier, M., and M. T. Vendelo (1999), “Networks, Cognition and Management of Tacit Knowledge,” Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(4): 252-261.

    Bagozzi, R. 1977. Convergent and discriminant validity by analysis of covariance structures: The case of affective behavioral, and cognitive components of attitude. in W. D. Perreault, Jr. (ed.) Advances in Consumer Research, 4: 9-31.

    Bagozzi, R. 1980. Causal Models in Marketing. N.Y.: Wiley.

    Bailyn, L. (1988), “Automony in the Industrial R & D Organizations,” in R. Katz (ed.), Managing Professionals in Innovative Organizations, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing, Co.

    Bandura, A. (1977a), “Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change,” Psychological Review, 84(2): 191-215.

    Bandura, A. (1977b), Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Barney, J. (1991), “Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage,” Journal of Management, 17: 99-120.

    Becerra-Fernandez, I. And R. Savherwal (2001), “Organizational Knowledge Management: A Contingency Perspective,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1): 23-55.

    Berman, S. L., Down, J,, and Hill, C. W. (2002), “Tacit Knowledge As A Source of Competitive Advantage in the NBA,” Academy of Management Journal, 45(1): 13-31.

    Bollen, K. 1989. Structural Equations With Latent Variables. N.Y.: Wiley.

    Bollen, K. & J. S. Long. 1993. Testing Structural Equation Models. Beverly Hill, CA: Brown, J. S. and P. Duguid (1991), Organizational Learning and Communities of Practice: Towards a unified View of Working, Learning and Innovation,” Organization Science, 2(1): 40-57.

    Burt, R. S. (1976). “Positions in Networks,” Social Forces, 55: 93-122.

    Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, M. A.: Harvard University Press.

    Clark, K. and S. Wheelwright (1993), Managing New Product and Process Development. NY: Free Press.

    Cohen, W., and Levinthal, D. (1990), “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128-152.

    Coleman, J. S. (1998), “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital,” American Journal of Sociology, 94: S95-S120.

    Coleman, J. S. (1990), Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Conner,K. R., & C. K. Prahalad ( 1996), “A Resource-based Theory of the firm: Knowledge versus Opportunism,” Organization Science, 32: 554-571.

    Coombs, R. (1996), “Core Competencies and Strategic Management of R & D,” R & D Management, 26(4): 345-355.

    Cross, R., S. P. Borgatti, and A. Parker (2002), “Making Invisible Work Visible: Using Social Network Analysis to Support Strategic Collaboration,” California Management Review, 44(2): 25-46.

    Davenport, T. and L. Prusak (1998), Working Knowledge, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.

    Davenport, T. H., D. De Long, and M. Beers (1998), “Successful Knowledge Management Projects,” Sloan Management Review, 39(2): 43-57.

    Fornell, C. (1982) A Second Generation of Multivariate Analysis: Measurement and Evaluation. N.Y.: Praeger.

    Freeman, L. C. (1979), “Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification,” Social Networks, 1: 215-239.

    Freeman, L. C. (1994), “The Economics of Technical Change,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 18: 463-514.

    Gabbay, Ezra and W. Zuckerman. (1998), “Social capital and opportunity in corporate R&D: The contingent effect of contact density on mobility expectations, “ Social Science Research, 27: 189-217.

    Goldhaber, G. H. (1986), Organizational Communication. Dobuque: IW Wm, C. Brown.

    Granovetter, M. S. (1973), “The Strength of Weak Ties,” American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360-1380.

    Griffin, A. and Hauser, J.R.(1996), ”Integrating R&D and marketing: A Review and Analysis of the Literature,” Journal of Product Innovation Management,13:191-215.

    Gupta, A.K., Raj, S.P. and Wilemon, D. (1986), “A Model for Studying R&D-marketing Interface in the Product Innovation Process,” Journal of Marketing, 50(2):7-17

    Hackman, J. R. and G. R. Oldham (1975), “Development the Job Diagnostic Survey,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 60: 159-170.

    Haldin-Herrgard, T. (2000), “Difficulties in Diffusion of Tacit Knowledge in Organizations,” Journal of Intellectual Capital, 1(4): 357-365.

    Hall, G., and S. Howell (1985), “The Experience Curve From an Economist’s Perspective,” Strategic Management Journal, 6: 197-212.

    Hammersley, M. (1989), The Dilemma of Qualitative Method: Herbert Blummer and the Chicago Tradition. NY: Routledge.

    Hansen, Morten T (1999), “The Search-transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge Across Organization Subteams,” Administration Science Quarterly, 44: 82-111.

    Hansen, M. T. (2002), “Knowledge Networks: Explaining Effective Knowledge Sharing in Multiunit Companies,” Organization Science, 13(3): 232-248.

    Heck, R. and S. Thomas (2000), An Introduction to Multilevel modeling Techniques. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Hedlund,G.(1994), “A Model of Knowledge Management and the N-Form Corporation,” Strategic Management Journal, 15:73-90.

    Higgins, M.C. and K.E. Kram (2001), “Re-conceptualizing Mentoring at Work: A Developmental Network Perspective,” Academy of Management Review, 26(2): 264-288

    Hill, C. W., and G. R. Jones (1995), Strategic Management Theory, Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Ibarra, H. (1993a), “Network Centrality, Power, and Innovation Involvement: Determinants of Technical and Administrative Roles,” Academy of Management Journal, 36(3): 471-501.

    Ibarra, H. (1993b), “Power, Social Infulence, and Sense Making: Effects of Network Centrality and Proximity on Employee Perceptions,” Administration Science Quarterly, 38: 277-303.

    Inkpen, A. and A. Dinur (1998), “Knowledge Management Process and International Joint venture,” Organization Science, 9(4): 454-468.

    Kahai, S. and R. Cooper (1999), “The Effect of Computer-Mediated Communication on Agreement and Acceptance,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(1):165-188.

    Katz, Ralph. (1982). “Project communication and performance: An investigation into the effects of group longevity, “ Administration Science Quarterly, 29 81-104.

    Katz, Robert Tushman. (1979), “Communication Patterns, Project Productivity, and Task Characteristics: An Empirical Evaluation and Integration in an R&D Setting,” Organzational Behavior Human Productivity 23 139-162,

    Knoke, D. and J. Kuklinski (1982), Network Analysis, Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Kogut, B., and Zander, U. (1993), “Knowledge of the Firm and the Evolutionary Theory of the Multinational Corporation,” Journal of International Business Studies, 24: 625-646.

    Krackhardt, D., M. Lunberg, and L. O’Rourket (1993), “Krackplot: A Picture’s Worth a Thousand Words,” Connections, 16(1&2): 37-47.

    Kram, K. E., and L. Isabella (1985), “Mentoring Alternatives: The Role of Peer Relationships in Career Development,” Academy of Management Journal, 28(10): 110-132.

    Lam, A. (2000), “Tacit Knowledge, Organizational Learning and Social Institutions: An Integrated Framework,” Organization Studies, 21(3): 487-513.

    Lazear, E. P. (1979), “Why Is There Mandatory Retirement?” Journal of Political Economy, 87:1261-64.

    Lincoln, J. R. and J. Miller (1979), “Work and Friendship Ties in Organizations: A Comparative Analysis of Relational Networks,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 24: 181-199.

    Madhavan, R., and R. Grover(1998), “From Embedded Knowledge to Embodied Knowledge: New Product Development as Knowledge Management,” Journal of Marketing, 64(4):1-12.

    Manners, Jr. G. E., J. A. Steger, and T. W. Zimmerer(1988), “Motivating Your R&D Staff, ” in R. Katz (ed.), Managing Professionals in Innovative Organizations. pp.19-26. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing, Co.

    Mascitelli, R. (2000), “From experience: Harnessing Tacit Knowledge to Achieve Breakthrough Innovation,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17: 179-193.

    McCain, B. E., C. O’Reilly, and J. Pfeffer (1983), “The effects of Departmental Demography on Turnover: The Case of a University,” Academy of Management Journal, 26: 626-641.

    McCall, M. W. (1988), “Leadership and the Professonal,” in R. Katz (ed.) Managing the High –Tech Professionals in Innovative Organizations, 148-161, Cambridge: Ballinger Publishing.

    McFletcher, D. (1996), Teaming by Design: Real Teams for Real People, Chicago, IL: Irwin Professional Publishing.

    Mead, S. P. (2001), “Using Social Network Analysis to Visualize Project Teams,” Project Management Journal, 32 (4): 32-38.

    Miller, J. (1986), Pathways in the Workplace, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Moenaert, R. and W. Souder (1990), “Context and Antecedents of Information Utility at the R&D / marketing interface,” Management Science, (11): 1592-1610.

    Moenaert, R., F. Caeldries, A. Lievens, and E. Wauters (2000), “Communication Flows in International Product Innovation Teams,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17: 360-377.

    Mullen, E. J. and R. A. Noe (1999), “The Mentoring information Exchange: Who Do Mentors Seek Information from Their Proteges? ” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(2): 233-242.

    Nelson, R., and S. Winter (1982), An Evolutional Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi (1995), The Knowledge-Creating Company, NY: Oxford University Press, Inc.

    Nonaka, I. (1994), “A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge,” Organization Science, 5: 14-37.

    Nonaka, I., & N. Konno (1998), “The Concept of ‘Ba’: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation,” California Management Review, 40(3): 1-15.

    Nonaka, I., Toyama, R. & Konno, N. (2000), “SECI, Ba and Leadership: A Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation,” Long Rang Planning, 33: 5-34.

    Pfeffer, J. (1983), “Organizational Demography: Implications for Management,” California Management Review, 28: 67-81.

    Pelled, L. H. (1996), “Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work group Outcomes: An Intervening Process Theory,” Organization Science, 7: 615-631.

    Pelled, L. H., K. M. Eisenhardt, and K. R. Xin (1999), “Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict, and Productivity,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 1-28.

    Porter, L. W. and E. E. Lawler (1968), Managerial Attitudes and Performance. Homewood, Ill: Richard D. Irwin.

    Powell, W. W. (1998), “Learning from Collaboration: Knowledge and Networks in the Biotechnology and Pharmaceutical Industries,” California Management Review, 40(3): 228-240.

    Reagans, R. and E. W. Zuckerman (2001), “Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R &D Teams,” Organization Science, 12(4): 502-517.

    Reed, R., and R. J. Defillippi (1990), “Causal Ambiguity, Barriers to Imitation, and Sustainable Competitive Advantage,” Academy of Management Review, 15: 88-102.

    Rice, R. (1994), “Network Analysis and Computer-Mediated Communication Systems,” in S. Wasserman and J. Galakiewicz (eds.), Advances in Social Network Analysis. 167-203. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Rogers,E. (1983), Diffusion of Innovations, NY: The Free Press.

    Scott, J. (1998), “Organizational Knowledge and the Intranet,” Decision Support Systems., 23: 3-17.

    Simon, H. (1991), “Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning,” Organization Science, 2: 125-34.

    Shapero, A. (1988), “Managing Creative Professionals,” in R. Katz (ed.), Managing Professionals in Innovative Organizations. Pp.215-222, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing, Co.

    Steiner, G. (1988), “The Creative Organization,” in R. Katz (ed.), Managing Professionals in Innovative Organizations, pp.201-214. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing, Co.

    Stenmark, D. (2001), “Leveraging Tacit Organizational Knowledge, ” Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(3): 9-24.

    Sternberg, R. and J. A. Horvath (1999), Tacit Knowledge in Professional Practice: Researcher and Practitioner Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Strauss, A. and J. Carbin (1990), Basics of Qualitative Research. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Subramaniam, M., and N. Venkatraman (2001), “Determinants of Transnational New Product Development Capability: Testing the Influence of Transferring and Deploying Tacit Overseas Knowledge,” Strategic Management Journal, 22: 359-378.

    Swap, W., D. Leonard, M. Shields, and L. Abrams (2001), “Using Mentoring and Storytelling to Transfer Knowledge in The Workplace,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1): 95-114.

    Teece, D. J. (1982), “Towards an Economic Theory of the Multiproduct Firm,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3: 39-63.

    Teece, D. J., and G. Pisano (1982), “The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms,” In G. Dosi et al. (Eds), Technology, Organization and Competitiveness: 193-212. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Toffler, A.(1990), Power Shift: Knowledge, Wealth and Violence at the Edge of the 21th Century, NY: Bantam Books.

    Tsai, W., (2000) “Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intraorganizational linkages,” Strategic Management Journal, 21: 925-939

    Tsai, W., and Ghoshal, S. (1998), “Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks,” Academy of Management Journal, 41: 464-476.

    Tsai, W., (2001), “Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks: Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance,” Academy of Management Journal, 44: 996-1004.

    Tuomi, I. (2000), “Data is More Than Knowledge: Implications of Reversed Knowledge Hierarchy for Knowledge Management and Organizational Memory,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(3): 103-117.

    Weick, K. E., and K. H. Roberts (1993), “Collective Mind in Organizations: Heedful Interrelating on Flight Decks,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 38: 357-381.

    Winter, S. (1987), “Knowledge and Competence as Strategic assets,” In D. J. Teece (Ed.), The Competitive Challenge: Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal: 159-184, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    White, F. M., and E. A. Locke(1981), “Perceived Determinants of High and Low Productivity in Three Occupational Groups: A Critical Incident Study,” Journal of Management Studies, 18(4), 375-87.

    Wright, P. M., B. B. Dunford, S. A. Snell (2001), “Human Resource and the Reosurce Based View of the Firm,” Journal of Management, 27: 701-721.

    Yli-Renko, H., E. Autio, and H. J. Sapienza (2001), “Social Capital, Knowledge Acquisition, and Knowledge Exploitation in Young Technology-Based Firms,” Strategic Management Journal, 22: 587-613.

    Yin, R.(1984), Case Study Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Zenger, Todd R., Barbara S. Lawrence (1989), “Organizational Demography: The Differential Effects of Age and Tenure Distributions on Technical Communication,” Academy of Management Journal, 32: 353-376.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:2003-02-25公開
    QR CODE