簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳氏麗娟
Tran, Thi-Le-Quyen
論文名稱: 以永續發展目標為基礎的大學平面設計教育之素養導向學習探討
Competency-Based Learning for Undergraduate program in Graphic Design Education toward SDGs
指導教授: 劉世南
Liou, Shyh-Nan
楊佳翰
Yang, Chia-Han
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 規劃與設計學院 - 創意產業設計研究所
Institute of Creative Industries Design
論文出版年: 2024
畢業學年度: 112
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 236
中文關鍵詞: 能力平面 設計 可持續性發展目標設計教育 可持續性德爾菲
外文關鍵詞: Competency, Graphic Design, SDGs, Design Education, Sustainability, Delphi method
相關次數: 點閱:48下載:9
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著環境問題已成為當前世界上最緊迫的議題,例如全球變暖與能源運用等環境挑戰,可持續性逐漸成為企業在設計與開發新產品時至關重要的考慮因子。此外,由於資源與原材料的日漸稀缺減少,也造成許多對產品生產與物流可能產生重大影響的環境限制議題。
    儘管商業從業者與學術研究者都指出也同意在產品生命週期的初期即應考量並介入可持續性的影響,但從製造商的視角來看,成本仍然是產品開發上的根本動力,因此,環境標準與可持續性的遵守往往依然是次要考量的選項,始終仍是產品開發設計上的嚴重問題。
    根據世界環境與發展委員會的定義,「可持續性發展」被定義為「滿足當代人的需求且同時又不損及後代人滿足其自身需求之能力的發展」 ,因此,建立可持續性發展之相關教育能力亦成為聯合國可持續性教育建構十年全球實施計劃的主要目標。而此建置過程的重點即包含如何培養組織或個人可持續性能力的發展流程,內容則包括發展框架的建構、工作文化、政策、流程與可提高組織及個人可持續性績效與成就的系統發展。
    如上所述的產業與社會演變,正於今日對設計教育的應用與變革產生了重大影響,包括教育系統在內的社會技術系統必須經歷重大轉變,才可能擺脫氣候變化、社會不平等與資源枯竭等環境挑戰所帶來的嚴重影響;因此,就設計教育而言,對專業設計師的跨學科與複雜技能的要求正在擴展,這些跨域新能力必須開始被考慮且納入既有的設計教育、終身學習與創業訓練體制中。
    鑑於前述情況與發展趨勢,本研究旨在由可持續性之視角出發,重新檢視產品設計教育發展中關於可持續性能力的能力建置脈絡,同時並檢視於教育系統中,如何針對設計師賦能以解決重大環境與社會問題,進而開發可符合 「可持續發展設計」 之目標的設計產品。
    因此,具體而言,本研究旨在解決以下兩個研究問題:
    1. 越南本科平面设计教育现状
    2. 目前研究中提到能力对于本科平面设计教育至关重要?
    3. 为了满足可持续发展目标(SDGs)的要求,学习平面设计的本科生必须具备哪些最关键的设计能力?
    高為畢業生提供符合永續發展目標(SDG)的能力對於當代高等教育至關重要,可以提高他們的就業能力。這種必要性也延伸到了平面設計本科課程,它在幫助設計師應對全球永續發展挑戰方面發揮關鍵作用。本研究採用混合方法來確定平面設計本科生與永續發展目標相關的基本能力。對 14 篇開創性文章的系統性回顧初步確定了 58 項關鍵能力。然後,這些能力通過德爾福研究得到驗證,該研究涉及44 名講師/教育專家和 77 名平面設計專家。這個迭代過程產生了 31 項關鍵能力的細化列表,分為四組:系統挑戰、績效挑戰、背景挑戰和全球挑戰。
    近年來,全球加強大學自主權的趨勢為機構提供了更大的內部運作自由。此趨勢在越南尤為顯著,2013 年《高等教育法》正式承認院校自主權(越南國民議會,2012 年)。因此,越南大學現在在塑造其學術產品和課程方面擁有更大的權威,從而影響國家的高等教育格局。該法律明確賦予越南高等教育機構在五個關鍵領域的自主權:計畫和課程發展、教學策略、招生流程、培訓舉措和畢業認可、組織結構管理、資源動員和利用以及國內和國際合作(越南國民議會、 2012)。儘管研究探討了越南的大學自主權(Le,2019),但其對課程設計的具體影響仍存在差距。本研究採用了混合方法。二次資料分析檢視了 21 個越南大學平面設計課程(已確定的 28 個),可在線上存取。主要資料包括對 12 位平面設計講師/專家的深入訪談,提供了寶貴的內部觀點。這種資料來源的三角測量增強了研究的可靠性和有效性(Harrison & Reilly,2011;Schram,2014)。
    研究的結果為平面設計教育工作者和產業雇主提供了寶貴的見解,強調了應對永續發展挑戰所需的能力。此外,這項研究提出了一個將永續發展目標相關能力整合到平面設計教育中的結構化框架,從而豐富了學術討論,從而使設計師能夠精通其工藝和永續發展的關鍵領域。

    As the world's most urgent problems are environmental ones, such as global warming and energy use, it is critical for businesses to consider sustainability while creating new products. Due to the increasing scarcity of raw materials and resources, environmental constraints have emerged. These restrictions may have a substantial impact on production and logistics.
    Although both business practitioners and academic scholars agree that sustainability must be implemented early in the life cycle of a product, manufacturers still consider cost as the fundamental motivators for product development. Thus, environmental standards are often regarded as a secondary priority.
    Sustainable development, according to the World Commission on Environment and Development "satisfies the requirements of the present without sacrificing the potential of future generations to satisfy their own needs." The establishment of a sustainable development education competency is one of the main objectives of the global implementation plan for the United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Building. The process of increasing an organization's or a person's capacity involves creating frameworks, work cultures, policies, processes, and systems to enhance performance and achievement.
    The evolution of industry and society has an impact on the application of design education. It has been claimed that socio-technical systems must undergo a substantial shift to escape the most severe effects of climate change, social inequality, and resource depletion.
    As a result, the interdisciplinary and complex skills demanded of professional designers are expanding. These new competencies must be included into design education, lifelong learning, and entrepreneurship training.
    Given these above circumstances, this research seeks to examine the context of capacity building for sustainability in the development of product design education within the perspective of sustainability. In addition, it is crucial to build products that meet the goals of "Design for Sustainability" and to empower designers to address significant environmental and social issues.
    The study specifically seeks to answer the following two research issues:
    1. Current State of Undergraduate Graphic Design Education in Vietnam
    2. Competencies are currently being mentioned in research as essential for undergraduate graphic design education?
    3. To meet the requirements of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), what are the most crucial design competencies required that undergraduate students studying graphic design must possess?
    Equipping graduates with competencies aligned with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is paramount in contemporary higher education, enhancing their employability. This exigency extends to graphic design undergraduate programs, which play a vital role in fostering designers equipped to tackle global sustainability challenges. This study employs a mixed-methods approach to delineate essential SDG-pertinent competencies for graphic design undergraduates. A systematic review of fourteen seminal articles yielded an initial identification of fifty-eight key competencies. These were subsequently validated through a Delphi study involving 44 Lectures/ Education Experts and 77 Graphic Designers Experts. This iterative process culminated in a refined list of thirty-one critical competencies, categorized into four distinct groups: Systemic challenges, Performance challenges, Contextual challenges, and Global challenges.
    A global trend towards enhanced university autonomy has emerged in recent years, granting institutions greater freedom in internal operations. This shift is particularly evident in Vietnam, where the 2013 Law on Higher Education formally recognized institutional autonomy (Vietnamese National Assembly, 2012). Vietnamese universities now possess greater authority in shaping their academic offerings and programs, impacting the nation's higher education landscape. The 2012 Law on Higher Education formally recognized and articulated the concept within the legal framework (Vietnamese National Assembly, 2012). This law explicitly grants Vietnamese higher education institutions autonomy in five key areas: program and curriculum development, teaching strategies, admissions processes, training initiatives and graduation recognition, organizational structure management, resource mobilization and utilization, and domestic and international collaborations (Vietnamese National Assembly, 2012). While research has explored university autonomy in Vietnam (Le, 2019), a gap exists regarding its specific effects on curriculum design. This study employed a mixed-methods approach. Secondary data analysis examined curricula from 21 Vietnamese university Graphic Design programs (out of 28 identified) accessible online. Primary data consisted of in-depth interviews with 12 Graphic Design lecturers/experts, providing valuable insider perspectives. This triangulation of data sources strengthens the research's reliability and validity (Harrison & Reilly, 2011; Schram, 2014).
    The study's findings offer valuable insights for graphic design educators and industry employers, elucidating the competencies essential for addressing sustainability challenges. Furthermore, this research contributes to the academic discourse by proposing a structured framework for integrating SDG-related competencies within graphic design education. This facilitates the development of designers proficient not only in their design craft but also in the crucial area of sustainability.

    中文摘要 iii Abstract v TABLE OF CONTENTS viii LIST OF TABLES xii LIST OF FIGURES xiv CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Statement of the Problem 3 1.2 Research Gap 5 1.3 The purpose of the research 5 1.4 Research Questions 7 1.5 Structure of the Study 7 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 11 2.1 Sustainability 11 2.1.1 Definition of Sustainability 11 2.1.2 Sustainability Development Goals (SDGs) 16 2.2 Design for Sustainability in historical perspective 20 2.2.1 Design and Sustainability 20 2.2.2 Sustainability Product Design 22 2.2.3 Design for sustainability and its history (DfS) 28 2.3 Design education for Sustainability 38 2.3.1 Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) 38 2.3.2 The Changing Role of Design education 40 2.4 Competency - based curriculum development 43 2.4.1 Defining competency 43 2.4.2 The concept of competency - based Curiculum 46 2.5 Competencies in the disciplines of Design and Sustainable 52 2.5.1 Key Competences for Sustainability 52 2.5.2 Key Competences for Design 55 2.6 Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG4) and Higher Education 58 2.6.1 An Overview of SDG4 58 2.6.2 The implementation of SDG 63 2.6.3 SDG4 and Higher Education in Vietnam 67 2.7 Teaching Graphic Design for undergraduate students in Vietnam 71 2.7.1 The concept of university autonomy 72 2.7.2 University autonomy in Vietnam 72 2.7.3 University autonomy in designing undergraduate graphic design curricula in Vietnam 73 2.8 Competency Based Learning 74 2.8.1 Competency Based Learning 74 2.8.2 Limitation and Advantages of the Method Competency Based Learning 78 CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODS 81 3.1 Bibliometric Analysis 81 3.2 Delphi Method 83 3.2.1 Delphi method 83 3.2.2 Expert panel 86 3.2.3 Data collection and analysis 87 3.2.4. Limitation of the Method 89 3.3 Mixed methods 91 CHAPTER 4 RESULT 94 4.1 Bibliometric Analysis for a Systematic Review 94 4.2 Delphi method Result 98 4.2.1 Expert panel panel selection 98 4.2.2 Rule for analyzing the ratings from multiple Experts With Delphi Approach 104 4.2.3 Questionnaire development and completion 105 4.2.4 Data collection and analysis of Delphi Round ‘s Lectures/ Education Experts 106 4.2.5 Data collection and analysis of Delphi Round ‘Designer Experts 115 4.2.6 Key Competencies For Sustainable Graphic Designers Extracted From Lectures/ Education Experts and Desiger Experts 125 4.3 Mixed Methods Ressult 129 4.3.1 Differences in the Overall Structure of Graphic Design Curriculum Before and After Autonomy Policy in 2014 131 4.3.2 Distinctive Aspects of Curriculum Components 132 4.3.3 Differences in General Knowledge and Skills Courses Before and After the Autonomy Policy in 2014 134 4.3.4 The differences regarding Major knowledge of graphic design before and after autonomy policy in 2014 137 4.3.5 Differences in Major Knowledge of Graphic Design Before and After the Autonomy Policy in 2014 140 4.3.6 Differences in Teaching Specializations for Graphic Design Students: Multi-disciplinary vs. Design/Architect-Oriented Universities 142 4.3.7 Professional Internship and Graduation Thesis in Graphic Design Education: A Comparative Analysis before and after 2014 145 CHAPTER 5 CONCLUTION AND DISCUSSION 147 5.1 Research Finding 148 5.1.1 Key Competenices for Graphic Design Education 151 5.1.2 Graphic Design education in Vietnam 157 5.2 Discussion 159 5.2.1 Key Competenices for Graphic Design Education 159 5.2.2 Graphic Design education in Vietnam 161 5.3 Research Limitation and Future Study 163 REFERENCES 166 APPENDIX 204 Appendix A.1: List of 14 key papers 203 Appendix A.2: Delphi Round Questionair 204 A.2.1 Delphi Round of Lecturers/Education Experts ‘s questionair 204 A.2.2 Delphi Round of Designer Experts‘s questionair 213 Appendix A.3: List of 21 Universities in Vietnam that offer Design programs 221

    1915 Academic Freedom and Tenure Declaration. (1915). American Association of University Professors. https://www.aaup.org/NR/rdonlyres/A6520A9D-0A9A-47B3-B550-C006B5B224E7/0/1915Declaration.pdf
    1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure. (1940). American Association of University Professors. https://www.aaup.org/report/1940-statement-principles-academic-freedom-and-tenure
    Aftab, M., & Rusli, H. A. (2017). Designing Visceral, Behavioural and Reflective Products. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 30(5), 1058–1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10033-017-0161-x
    Academic Freedom and Tenure Declaration (1915). American Association of University Professors. https://www.aaup.org/NR/rdonlyres/ A6520A9D- 0A9A- 47B3- B550- C006B5B224E7/0/1915Declaration.pdf (accessed September 27, 2023).
    Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S Back in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Multilevel Theory of Social Change in Organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836–863. https://doi.org/https://www.jstor.org/stable/20159338
    Alli, H., Rashid, M. S. S. M., Sulaiman, R., Me, R. C., & Kamarudin, K. M. (2019). The Development of Sustainable Product Design Method for Sustainable and Successful New Products. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 697(1), 012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/697/1/012025
    Alm, K., Beery, T. H., Eiblmeier, D., & Fahmy, T. (2022). Students’ learning sustainability – implicit, explicit or non-existent: a case study approach on students’ key competencies addressing the SDGs in HEI program. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 23(8), 60–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-12-2020-0484
    Anderson, J., & Markides, C. (2007). Strategic Innovation at the Base of the Pyramid. MIT Sloan Management Review, 49(1), 83e88. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/strategic-innovation-at-the-base-of-the-pyramid/
    Andersson, K., Eide, M. H., Lundqvist, U., & Mattsson, B. (1998). The feasibility of including sustainability in LCA for product development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 6(3–4), 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(98)00028-6
    Athey, T. R., & Orth, M. S. (1999). Emerging competency methods for the future. Human Resource Management, 38(3), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-050X(199923)38:3<215::AID-HRM4>3.0.CO;2-W
    Baartman, L. K. J., Bastiaens, T. J., Kirschner, P. A., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2007). Evaluating assessment quality in competence-based education: A qualitative comparison of two frameworks. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2007.06.001
    Bäckstrand, K. (2003). Civic Science for Sustainability: Reframing the Role of Experts, Policy-Makers and Citizens in Environmental Governance. Global Environmental Politics, 3(4), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1162/152638003322757916
    Bammer, G. (2005). Integration and Implementation Sciences: Building a New Specialization. Ecology and Society, 10(2). https://www.jstor.org/stable/26267751#metadata_info_tab_contents
    Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why Companies Go Green: A Model of Ecological Responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556363
    Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-Based Research: Putting a Stake in the Ground. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1
    Barbero, S., & Fassio, F. (2011). Energy and food production with a systemic approach. Environmental Quality Management, 21(2), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.20318
    Barbero, S., & Toso, D. (2010). Systemic design of a productive chain: Reusing coffee waste as an input to agricultural production. Environmental Quality Management, 19(3), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.20254
    Barman, A., & Konwar, J. (2014). Competency Based Curriculum in Higher Education. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275645747_Competency_Based_Curriculum_in_Higher_Education
    Barrios, M., Guilera, G., Nuño, L., & Gómez-Benito, J. (2021). Consensus in the delphi method: What makes a decision change? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120484
    Basiago, A. D. (1996). The search for the sustainable city in 20th century urban planning. The Environmentalist, 16(2), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01325104
    Basiago, A. D. (1999). Economic, social, and environmental sustainability in development theory and urban planning practice. The Environmentalist, 19, 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006697118620
    Beech, B. (1997). Studying the future: a Delphi survey of how multi‐disciplinary clinical staff view the likely development of two community mental health centres over the course of the next two years. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25(2), 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997025331.x
    Bell, D. V. J. (2016). Twenty-first Century Education: Transformative Education for Sustainability and Responsible Citizenship. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2016-0004
    Ben-Eli, M. (2015). Sustainability: Definition and five core principles a new framework. The Sustainability Laboratory New York. http://www.sustainabilitylabs.org/assets/img/SL5CorePrinciples.pdf
    Bennett, N., Dunne, E., & Carré, C. (1999). Patterns of core and generic skill provision in higher education. Higher Education, 37, 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003451727126
    Berdichevsky, D., & Neuenschwander, E. (1999). Toward an ethics of persuasive technology. Communications of the ACM, 42(5), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1145/301353.301410
    Bhander, G. S., Hauschild, M., & McAloone, T. (2003). Implementing life cycle assessment in product development. Environmental Progress, 22(4), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.670220414
    Binswanger, M. (2001). Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect? Ecological Economics, 36(1), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00214-7
    Bistagnino, L. (2009). Design sistemico: Progettare la sostenibilita produttiva e ambientale. Slow Food Editore.
    Bistagnino, L. (2011). Systemic Design: Designing the Productive and Environmental Sustainability. Slow Food Editore.
    Blackstock, K. L., & Carter, C. E. (2007). Operationalising Sustainability Science for a Sustainability Directive? Reflecting on Three Pilot Projects. The Geographical Journal, 173(4), 343–357. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30130630
    Bloch, P. H. (1995). Seeking the Ideal Form: Product Design and Consumer Response. Journal of Marketing, 59(3), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299505900302
    Boks, C., & McAloone, T. C. (2009). Transitions in sustainable product design research. International Journal of Product Development, 9(4), 429. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPD.2009.027475
    Bonnemaizon, A., Cova, B., & Louyot, M.-C. (2007). Relationship Marketing in 2015. European Management Journal, 25(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2006.12.002
    Boterf, G. Le. (1994). De la Compe ́tence: Essai sur un Attracteur E ́trange. Editions d’Organisation.
    Bowden, J., & Marton, F. (1998). The university of learning: beyond quality and competence in higher education. Routledge.
    Braungart, M., McDonough, W., & Bollinger, A. (2007). Cradle-to-cradle design: creating healthy emissions – a strategy for eco-effective product and system design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(13–14), 1337–1348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.08.003
    Brezet, H., & Hemel, C. van. (1997). Ecodesign: A Promising Approach to Sustainable Production and Consumption. United Nations Environment Programme, Industry and Environment, Cleaner Production.
    Broadus, R. (1987). Toward a definition of “bibliometrics”. Scientometrics, 12(5–6), 373–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02016680
    Brookes, L. (2000). Energy efficiency fallacies revisited. Energy Policy, 28(6–7), 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00030-6
    Brown, T. (2009.). Change by design: How design thinking can transform your life and the world. Harper Perennial.
    Buchert, T., Kaluza, A., Halstenberg, F. A., Lindow, K., Hayka, H., & Stark, R. (2014). Enabling Product Development Engineers to Select and Combine Methods for Sustainable Design. Procedia CIRP, 15, 413–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.06.025
    Burall, P. (1991). Green Design. Design Council.
    Burke, J. W. (1999). Competence-based education and training. The Falmer Press. http://eksis.ditpsmk.net/uploads/book/file/3CE28F16-301F-495A-9FA9-0309403F1EE1/20171023_Competency_Based_Education_And_Training.pdf
    Campbell, A., & Luchs, K. S. S. (1997). Core Competency-Based Strategy. Thomson.
    Carrington, L. (1994). Competent to manage. International Management.
    Carson, R. L. (1962). Silent Spring (Anniversar). Houghton Mifflin Company.
    Castillo, L., Diehl, J. C., & Brezet, H. (2012). Design consider- ations for base of the pyramid (BoP) projects. Cumulus 2012. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257927083_Design_Considerations_for_Base_of_the_Pyramid_BoP_Projects
    Catulli, M. (2012). What uncertainty? Further insight into why consumers might be distrustful of product service systems. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 23(6), 780–793. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410381211253335
    Cedefop. (2011). Annual report 2011. https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/publications/4115
    Cedefop. (n.d.). National qualifications frameworks (NQFs). https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/en/projects/national-qualifications-framework-nqf
    Ceppa, C. (2009). New connections to create self-generate and self-maintain production systems. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 491–501. https://doi.org/10.2495/ECO090451
    Ceschin, F. (2013). Critical factors for implementing and diffusing sustainable product-Service systems: insights from innovation studies and companies’ experiences. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.05.034
    Ceschin, F. (2014). Sustainable Product-Service Systems: Between Strategic Design and Transition Studies. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03795-0
    Ceschin, F. (2012). The Introduction and Scaling up of Sustainable Product-Service Systems: A New Role for Strategic Design for Sustainability. In Politecnico di Milano.
    Ceschin, F., & Gaziulusoy, I. (2016). Evolution of design for sustainability: From product design to design for system innovations and transitions. Design Studies, 47, 118–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.002
    Cezzar, J. (2020). Teaching the Designer of Now: A New Basis for Graphic and Communication Design Education. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 6(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2020.05.002
    Chan, H. K., Wang, X., & Raffoni, A. (2014). An integrated approach for green design: Life-cycle, fuzzy AHP and environmental management accounting. The British Accounting Review, 46(4), 344–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.10.004
    Chang, D., Lee, C. K. M., & Chen, C.-H. (2014). Review of life cycle assessment towards sustainable product development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 83, 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.050
    Chapman, J. (2005). Emotionally Durable Design. Objects, Experiences, and Empathy. Earthscan.
    Chapman, J. (2009). Design for (Emotional) Durability. Design Issues, 25(4), 29–35. https://doi.org/https://www.jstor.org/stable/20627827
    Charter, M., & Tischner, U. (Eds.). (2001). Sustainable Solutions: Developing Products and Services for the Future. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351282482
    Chen, L., Ng, E., Huang, S.-C., & Fang, W.-T. (2017). A Self-Evaluation System of Quality Planning for Tourist Attractions in Taiwan: An Integrated AHP-Delphi Approach from Career Professionals. Sustainability, 9(10), 1751. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101751
    Chiu, M.-C., & Kremer, G. E. O. (2011). Investigation of the applicability of design for X tools during design concept evolution: A literature review. International Journal of Product Development, 13(2), 132–167. https://www.academia.edu/29068807/Investigation_of_the_applicability_of_Design_for_X_tools_during_design_concept_evolution_a_literature_review
    Clayton, M. J. (1997). Delphi: a technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision‐making tasks in education. Educational Psychology, 17(4), 373–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341970170401
    Civil Society Organization. (2017). 2017 Commissioners Standard Ordinary (CSO) Tables. Society of Actuaries. https://www.soa.org/resources/experience-studies/2015/2017-cso-tables/
    Clark, W. (2003). Sustainability Science Program. Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253376966_Institutional_Needs_for_Sustainability_Science
    Clark, W. C., & Dickson, N. M. (2003). Sustainability science: The emerging research program. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(14), 8059–8061. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231333100
    Clayton, M. J. (1997). Delphi: a technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision‐making tasks in education. Educational Psychology, 17(4), 373–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341970170401
    Conley, C. (2004). A Review of Parenting Capacity Assessment Reports. Journal of the Ontario Association of Children’s Aid Societies, 47(3), 16–23. http://www.oacas.org/pubs/oacas/journal/2003_2004winter/2003_2004winter.pdf
    Cook, M. B., Bhamra, T. A., & Lemon, M. (2006). The transfer and application of Product Service Systems: from academia to UK manufacturing firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(17), 1455–1465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.01.018
    Coomer, J. C. (1979). Quest for a sustainable society. The Woodlands Conference by Pergamon Press.
    Coomer, J. C. (1981). Introduction: The Nature of the Quest for a Sustainable Society. In Quest for a Sustainable Society (pp. 1–9). Pergamon Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-027168-2.50006-4
    Cooper, T. (2004). Inadequate Life?Evidence of Consumer Attitudes to Product Obsolescence. Journal of Consumer Policy, 27(4), 421–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-004-2284-6
    Coskun, A., Zimmerman, J., & Erbug, C. (2015). Promoting sustainability through behavior change: A review. Design Studies, 41, 183–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2015.08.008
    Couper, M. R. (1984). The Delphi technique. Advances in Nursing Science, 7(1), 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-198410000-00008
    Crisp, J., Pelletier, D., Duffield, C., Adams, A., & Nagy, S. (1997). The Delphi Method? Nursing Research, 46(2), 116–118. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-199703000-00010
    Crul, M. (2003). Ecodesign in Central America. Design for Sustainability research program. Delft University of Technology.
    Dale, A., & Newman, L. (2005). Sustainable development, education and literacy. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 6(4), 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370510623847
    Daly, H. E. (1992). U.N. conferences on environment and development: Retrospect on Stockholm and prospects for Rio. Ecological Economics, 5(1), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(92)90018-N
    Dang Nguyen. (2013). Từ năm 2013, các ngành khối nghệ thuật chỉ thi môn năng khiếu [Since 2013, arts-related majors have only required aptitude tests]. Thanh Nien News. https://thanhnien.vn/tu-nam-2013-cac-nganh-khoi-nghe-thuat-chi-thi-mon-nang-khieu-18541794.htm#
    Do, H. T. H., & Mai, A. N. (2022). Policies on university autonomy in Vietnam. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(5), 575–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2021.1986475
    Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
    Delaney, E., Liu, W., Zhu, Z., Xu, Y., & Dai, J. S. (2022). The investigation of environmental sustainability within product design: a critical review. Design Science, 8, e15. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2022.11
    Delbecq, A. L., Ven, A. Van De, & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Scott, Foresman and Company. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601176001002
    Department of Economic and Social Affairs - UN. (2022). THE 17 GOALS - Sustainable Development. United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/goals
    Department of Economic and Social Affairs - UN. (2002). Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development. United Nations. https://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/WSSD_POI_PD/English/POI_PD.htm
    Department of Economic and Social Affairs - UN. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
    Department of Economic and Social Affairs - UN. (n.d.). Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG 4). United Nations. https://www.sdg4education2030.org/the-goal
    Dernbach. (2003). Achieving Sustainable Development: The Centrality and Multiple Facets of Integrated Decisionmaking. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 10(1), 247. https://doi.org/10.2979/gls.2003.10.1.247
    Devanathan, S., Ramanujan, D., Bernstein, W. Z., Zhao, F., & Ramani, K. (2010). Integration of Sustainability Into Early Design Through the Function Impact Matrix. Journal of Mechanical Design, 132(8). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4001890
    Dewberry, E., Cook, M., Angus, A., Gottberg, A., & Longhurst, P. (2013). Critical Reflections on Designing Product Service Systems. The Design Journal, 16(4), 408–430. https://doi.org/10.2752/175630613X13746645186089
    Dick, B. (2000). Delphi face to face [On line]. The University of Queensland. http://www.uq.net.au/action_research/arp/delphi.html
    Diehl, J. C., & Crul, M. (2008). Design for sustainability (D4S): Manual and tools for developing countries. 7th Annual ASEE Global Colloquium on Engineering Education, 19e23. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258278093_Design_for_Sustainability_D4S_Manual_and_Tools_for_Developing_Countries
    Diehl, J. C., Crul, M., & Ryan, C. (2009). Design for Sustainability: A Step-by-Step Approach. United Nations Environment Programme.
    Diesendorf, M. (2000). Sustainability and sustainable development. In D. Dunphy, J. Benveniste, A. Griffiths, & P. Sutton (Eds.), Sustainability: The corporate challenge of the 21st century (pp. 2, 19–37). Allen & Unwin.
    Dixon, J. A., & Fallon, L. A. (1989). The concept of sustainability: Origins, extensions, and usefulness for policy. Society & Natural Resources, 2(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941928909380675
    Du Pisani, J. A. (2006). Sustainable development – historical roots of the concept. Environmental Sciences, 3(2), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/15693430600688831
    Du, Q., & Kang, J. T. (2016). Tentative ideas on the reform of exercising state ownership of natural resources: Preliminary thoughts on establishing a state-owned natural resources supervision and administration commission. Jiangxi Social Science, 6, 160.
    Duffield, C. (1988). The Delphi technique. The Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 6(2), 5–41. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2980638/
    Duffield, C. (1993). The Delphi technique: a comparison of results obtained using two expert panels. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 30(3), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7489(93)90033-Q
    Earth Institute at Columbia University. (2008). Report from the International Commission on Education for Sustainable Development Practice. New York. Earth Institute at Columbia University and the John D. & Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. https://www.macfound.org/media/article_pdfs/develcomm-execsumm.pdf
    Eckman, C. A. (1983). Development of an instrument to evaluate intercollegiate athletic coaches: A modified Delphi study. West Virginia University.
    Economic and Social Council - UN. (2016). 2016 Resolution on the QCPR. UN Economic and Social Council. https://www.un.org/ecosoc/en/content/2016
    Ehrenfeld, J. R. (2008). Sustainability by Design: A Subversive Strategy for Transforming Our Consumer Culture. Yale University Press.
    Endacott, R., Clifford, C. M., & Tripp, J. H. (1999). Can the needs of the critically ill child be identified using scenarios? Experiences of a modified Delphi study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30(3), 665–676. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01116.x
    Environmental Change Unit. (1997). 2MTC DECADE: Domestic Equipment and Carbon Dioxide Emissions. Oxford University. https://www.eci.ox.ac.uk/research/energy/downloads/2mtc.pdf
    Evans, S., Bergendahl, M. N., Gregory, M., & Ryan, C. (2009). Towards a Sustainable Industrial System. With Recommendations for Educations, Research, Industry and Policy. University of Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing. https://www.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk/uploads/Resources/industrial_sustainability_report.pdf
    Evers, B. (2018). Why adopt the Sustainable Development Goals? The case of multinationals in the Colombian coffee and extractive sector [Erasmus University Rotterdam]. http://hdl.handle.net/2105/41819
    Everwijn, S. E. M., Bomers, G. B. J., & Knubben, J. A. (1993). Ability- or competence-based education: Bridging the gap between knowledge acquisition and ability to apply. Higher Education, 25(4), 425–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383845
    Fargnoli, M., De Minicis, M., & Tronci, M. (2014). Design Management for Sustainability: An integrated approach for the development of sustainable products. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 34, 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2013.09.005
    Fiksel, J. (Ed.). (1995). Design for Environment: Creating Eco-Efficient Products and Processes (70th ed. e). McGraw-Hill.
    Fink, A., Kosecoff, J., Chassin, M., & Brook, R. H. (1984). Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. American Journal of Public Health, 74(9), 979–983. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.74.9.979
    Fletcher, K. (2012). Sustainable Fashion and Textiles. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849772778
    Franklin, K. K., & Hart, J. K. (2006). Idea Generation and Exploration: Benefits and Limitations of the Policy Delphi Research Method. Innovative Higher Education, 31(4), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-006-9022-8
    Friedman, K. (2019). Design Education Today - Challenges, Opportunities, Failures. In The University of Cincinnati (Chatterjee Global Lecture Series). https://www.academia.edu/40519668/Friedman_2019_Design_Education_Today_Challenges_Opportunities_Failures
    Fusakul, S. M., & Siridej, P. (2010). DSEP: implementation of Sufficiency Economy Philosophy in design. In F. Ceschin, C. Vezzoli, & J. Zhang (Eds.), Sustainability in design: now! Challenges and opportunities for design research, education and practice in the XXI century. Proceedings of the Learning Network on Sustainability (LeNS) conference (vol. 1). Greenleaf Publishing.
    Gangani, N. T., McLean, G. N., & Braden, R. A. (2004). Competency-Based Human Resource Development Strategy. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED492513.pdf
    Gaziulusoy, A. I. (2015). A critical review of approaches available for design and innovation teams through the perspective of sustainability science and system innovation theories. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 366–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.012
    Gaziulusoy, A. I., & Brezet, H. (2015). Design for system innovations and transitions: a conceptual framework integrating insights from sustainablity science and theories of system innovations and transitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 558–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.066
    Gaziulusoy, İ. (2010). System Innovation for Sustainability: A Scenario Method and a Workshop Process for Product Development Teams [University of Auckland]. https://www.academia.edu/444370/System_Innovation_for_Sustainability_A_Scenario_Method_and_a_Workshop_Process_for_Product_Development_Teams_PhD_Thesis_
    Gebauer, H., & Friedli, T. (2005). Behavioral implications of the transition process from products to services. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 20(2), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/08858620510583669
    Geels, F. (2005). Technological Transitions and System Innovations. A Co-evolutionary and Socio-technical Analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845424596
    Georgescu, D. (2006). Curriculum Philosophies for the Twenty-first Century: What is “Old” and What is “New”? In A. Crisan (Ed.), Current and Future Challenges in Curriculum Development: Policies, Practices and Networking for Change. Editura Educatia 2000+ & Humanitas Educational.
    Georgescu, D., Stabback, P., Jahn, K., Ag-Muphtah, E., & De Castro, P. (2008). Preparation for Life and Work: Comparative Study with a Focus on Basic (Primary and Lower Secondary) Education in Developing African Countries. International Bureau of Education. http://www.ibe.unesco.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Thematic_studies/IBE-GTZ_Preparation_for_life_and_work.pdf
    Gibbons, M. (1998). Higher education relevance in the 21st century (English). The World Bank. https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/437341468782126524/higher-education-relevance-in-the-21st-century
    Gibson, J. M. E. (1998). Using the Delphi technique to identify the content and context of nurses’ continuing professional development needs. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 7(5), 451–459. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2702.1998.00175.x
    Goldense, B. L. (2019). A History of Product Design. Researchgate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332091475_A_History_of_Product_Design_A160
    Goodman, C. M. (1987). The Delphi technique: a critique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 12(6), 729–734. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1987.tb01376.x
    Gordon, T. J. (2003). The Delphi method. In T. J. Gordon & J. C. Glenn (Eds.), Futures research methodology, (Version 2) [CD]. Millennium Project of the American Council for the United Nations University.
    Graedel, T. E., Comrie, P. R., & Sekutowski, J. C. (1995). Green Product Design. AT&T Technical Journal, 74(6), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1995.tb00262.x
    Grant, J. S., & Kinney, M. R. (1992). Using the Delphi Technique to Examine the Content Validity of Nursing Diagnoses. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications, 3(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-618X.1992.tb00193.x
    Green, B., Jones, M., Hughes, D., & Williams, A. (1999). Applying the Delphi technique in a study of GPs’ information requirements. Health & Social Care in the Community, 7(3), 198–205. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2524.1999.00176.x
    Green, K., & Vergragt, P. (2002). Towards sustainable households: a methodology for developing sustainable technological and social innovations. Futures, 34(5), 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(01)00066-0
    Green, P. C. (1999). Building Robust Competencies. Jossey-Bass.
    Grunwald, A. (2004). Strategic knowledge for sustainable development: the need for reflexivity and learning at the interface between science and society. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 1(1/2), 150. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJFIP.2004.004619
    Guo, F. (2017). The spirit and characteristic of the general provisions of civil law. Law and Economics, 3(54), 5–16.
    de Haan, G. (2006). The BLK ‘21’ programme in Germany: a ‘Gestaltungskompetenz’‐based model for Education for Sustainable Development. Environmental Education Research, 12(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620500526362
    Hák, T., Janoušková, S., & Moldan, B. (2016). Sustainable Development Goals: A need for relevant indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60, 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.003
    Halme, M., Jasch, C., & Scharp, M. (2004). Sustainable homeservices? Toward household services that enhance ecological, social and economic sustainability. Ecological Economics, 51(1–2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.04.007
    Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the Future. Harvard Business School Press.
    Harrison, R. L., & Reilly, T. M. (2011). Mixed methods designs in marketing research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 14(1), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522751111099300
    Hayden, M., & Lam, Q. T. (2007). Institutional autonomy for higher education in Vietnam. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(1), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360601166828
    Haw Hamburg. (n.d.). Inter-University Sustainable Development Research Programme (IUSDRP). https://www.haw-hamburg.de/ftz-nk/programme/iusdrp/
    Hejblum, G., Ioos, V., Vibert, J.-F., Böelle, P.-Y., Chalumeau-Lemoine, L., Chouaid, C., Valleron, A.-J., & Guidet, B. (2008). A Web-Based Delphi Study on the Indications of Chest Radiographs for Patients in ICUs. Chest, 133(5), 1107–1112. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.06-3014
    Hillgren, P.-A., Seravalli, A., & Emilson, A. (2011). Prototyping and infrastructuring in design for social innovation. CoDesign, 7(3–4), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.630474
    Hirsh, W., & Strebler, M. (1994). Defining managerial skills and competences. In A. Mumford (Ed.), Gower Handbook of Management Development (pp. 79–96). Aldershot: Gower.
    Hitch, P. J., & Murgatroyd, J. D. (1983). Professional communications in cancer care: a Delphi survey of hospital nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 8(5), 413–422. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1983.tb00465.x
    Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Jacob, D., Taylor, M., Bindi, M., Brown, S., Camilloni, I., Diedhiou, A., Djalante, R., Ebi, K. L., Engelbrecht, F., Guiot, J., Hijioka, Y., Mehrotra, S., Payne, A., Seneviratne, S. I., Thomas, A., Warren, R., & Zhou, G. (2018). Impacts of 1.5oC Global Warming on Natural and Human Systems. In J. A. Marengo, J. Pereira, & B. Sherstyukov (Eds.), Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change,. IPCC. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/09/SR15_3SM_Low_Res.pdf
    Hyeng, G. J. (2019). The evolution of the policy environment for climate change migration in Bangladesh: Competing narratives, coalitions and power. Development Policy Review, dpr.12384. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12384
    Hyland, T. (1993). Competence, Knowledge and Education. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 27(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.1993.tb00297.x
    Hylton, K. N. (2002). When should we prefer tort law to environmental regulation? Washburn Law Journal, 515. https://scholarship.law.bu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1787&context=faculty_scholarship
    International Bureau of Education. (n.d.). Soft skills. http://www.ibe.unesco.org/en/glossary-curriculum-terminology/s/soft-skills
    International Bureau of Education. (n.d.). National Qualifications Framework (NQF). http://www.ibe.unesco.org/en/glossary-curriculum-terminology/n/national-qualifications-framework-nqf
    International Bureau of Education. (2006). Key competences/competencies or skills. http://www.ibe.unesco.org/en/glossary-curriculum-terminology/k/key-competencescompetencies-or-skills
    International Bureau of Education. (n.d.). Competency-based Education and Training (CBET). UNESCO International Bureau of Education. http://www.ibe.unesco.org/en/glossary-curriculum-terminology/c/competency-based-education-and-training-cbet
    International Commission on the Futures of Education. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: a new social contract for education. UNESCO Digital Library. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707.locale=en
    International Social Science Council. (2017). Annual Report 2017. https://council.science/icsu-annual-report-2017/
    Jagtap, S., Larsson, A., Warell, A., Santhanakrishnan, D., & Jagtap, S. (2015). Design for the BOP and the TOP: Requirements Handling Behaviour of Designers. In A. Chakrabarti (Ed.), ICoRD’15 – Research into Design Across Boundaries Volume 2. Creativity, Sustainability, DfX, Enabling Technologies, Management and Applications (pp. 191–200). Springer India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2229-3_17
    Jégou, F. (2011). Social innovations and regional acupuncture towards sustainability. Chinese Journal of Design, 214, 56e61.
    Jégou, F., & Manzini, E. (2008). Collaborative Services: Social Innovation and Design for Sustainability. Edizioni POLI.design.
    Jenkins, D. A., & Smith, T. E. (1994). Applying Delphi methodology in family therapy research. Contemporary Family Therapy, 16(5), 411–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02197902
    Jone, E. A., A.Voorhees, R., & Paulson, K. (2002). Defining and Assessing Learning: Exploring Competency-Based Initiatives (Report of the National Postsecondary Education Cooperative Working Group on CompetencyBased Initiatives in Postsecondary Education). National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/2002159.pdf
    Jones, J., & Hunter, D. (1995). Qualitative Research: Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ, 311(7001), 376–380. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7001.376
    Joore, P. (2010). New to Improve, The Mutual Influence Between New Products and Societal Change Processes. Technical University of Delft.
    Joore, P., & Brezet, H. (2015). A Multilevel Design Model: the mutual relationship between product-service system development and societal change processes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 97, 92–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.043
    Jucker, R. (2002). “Sustainability? Never heard of it!” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 3(1), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370210414146
    Kaivo-oja, J., Panula-Ontto, J., Vehmas, J., & Luukkanen, J. (2014). Relationships of the dimensions of sustainability as measured by the sustainable society index framework. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 21(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2013.860056
    Kajikawa, Y. (2008). Research core and framework of sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 3(2), 215–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-008-0053-1
    Kandachar, P. (2010). Designing for global sustainable solutions: challenges and opportunities. In F. Ceschin, C. Vezzoli, & J. Zhang (Eds.), Sustainability in design: now! Challenges and opportunities for design research, education and practice in the XXI century. Proceedings of the Learning Network on Sustainability (LeNS) conference (vol. 1). Greenleaf Publishing.
    Kandachar, P., & Halme, M. (2008). No TitleSustainability Challenges and Solutions at the Base of the Pyramid: Business, Technology and the Poor. Green Leaf Publishing. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282809104_Sustainability_challenges_and_solutions_at_the_base_of_the_pyramid_Business_technology_and_the_poor
    Kanie, N., & Biermann, F. (Eds.). (2017). Governing through Goals: Sustainable Development Goals as Governance Innovation. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10894.001.0001
    Karlsson, R., & Luttropp, C. (2006). EcoDesign: what’s happening? An overview of the subject area of EcoDesign and of the papers in this special issue. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(15–16), 1291–1298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.010
    Keeney, S., Hasson, F., & McKenna, H. P. (2001). A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 38(2), 195–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7489(00)00044-4
    Keoleian, G. A. (1993). The application of life cycle assessment to design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 1(3–4), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-6526(93)90004-U
    Knasel, E. G., & Meed, J. (1994). Becoming Competent: Effective Learning for Occupational Competence: a Report Produced for Employment Department Learning Methods Branch by Learners First. Employment Department, Learning Methods Branch.
    Kouwenhoven, W. (2009). Competence-based Curriculum Development in Higher Education: a Globalised Concept? In Technology Education and Development. InTech Open. https://doi.org/10.5772/7297
    Kumar, S., Raizada, A., & Biswas, H. (2014). Prioritising development planning in the Indian semi-arid Deccan using sustainable livelihood security index approach. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 21(4), 332–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2014.886309
    Kurz, R., & Bartram, D. (2002). Competency and Invidual Performance: Modeling the World of Work. In I. T. Robertson, M. Callinan, & D. Bartram (Eds.), Organizational Effectiveness: The Role of Psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    Le, N. H. (2019). University autonomy is inevitable for the fundamental and comprehensive innovation of education in Vietnam. http://lyluanchinhtri.vn/home/en/index.php/cadre-training/item/611-university- autonomy- is- inevitable- for- the- fundamental- and- comprehensive- innovation- of- education-in-vietnam.html (accessed September 11, 2023).
    Leal Filho, W., Shiel, C., Paço, A., Mifsud, M., Ávila, L. V., Brandli, L. L., Molthan-Hill, P., Pace, P., Azeiteiro, U. M., Vargas, V. R., & Caeiro, S. (2019). Sustainable Development Goals and sustainability teaching at universities: Falling behind or getting ahead of the pack? Journal of Cleaner Production, 232, 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.309
    Lélé, S. M. (1991). Sustainable development: A critical review. World Development, 19(6), 607–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(91)90197-P
    Lilley, D. (2009). Design for sustainable behaviour: strategies and perceptions. Design Studies, 30(6), 704–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2009.05.001
    Linstone, H. A. (2002). Eight Basic Pitfalls: a checklist. In H. A. Linstone & M. Turoff (Eds.), The Delphi Method: techniques and applications (pp. 559–571). NJIT.
    Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (2002). Introduction. In H. A. Linstone & M. Turoff (Eds.), The Delphi Method: techniques and applications (pp. 1–12). NJIT. http://www.is.njit.edu/pubs/delphibook/index.html
    Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (2002). The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. NJIT.
    Lockton, D. (2013). Design With Intent: A Design Pattern Toolkit for Environmental & Social Behaviour Change [Brunel University London]. https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/7546
    Lockton, D., Harrison, D., & Stanton, N. A. (2010). The Design with Intent Method: A design tool for influencing user behaviour. Applied Ergonomics, 41(3), 382–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2009.09.001
    Loo, R. (2002). The Delphi method: a powerful tool for strategic management. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 25(4), 762–769. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510210450677
    Loorbach, D. (2010). Transition Management for Sustainable Development: A Prescriptive, Complexity-Based Governance Framework. Governance, 23(1), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x
    Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J. (2006). Managing Transitions for Sustainable Development. In X. Olshoorn & A. J. Wieczorek (Eds.), Understanding Industrial Transformation (pp. 187–206). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4418-6_10
    Loorbach, D., & Wijsman, K. (2013). Business transition management: exploring a new role for business in sustainability transitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.002
    Lopopolo, R. B. (1999). Hospital Restructuring and the Changing Nature of the Physical Therapist’s Role. Physical Therapy, 79(2), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/79.2.171
    Loughlin, K. G., & Moore, L. F. (1979). Using Delphi to achieve congruent objectives and activities in a pediatrics department. Academic Medicine, 54(2), 101–106. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-197902000-00006
    Lucia, A. D., & Lepsinger, R. (1999). The Art and Science of Competency Models: Pinpointing Critical Success Factors in an Organization. Jossey-bass.
    Lustri, D., Miura, I., & Takahashi, S. (2007). Knowledge management model: practical application for competency development. The Learning Organization, 14(2), 186–202. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470710727023
    MacKenzie, D. (1997). Green Design: Design for Environment (2nd ed.). Laurence King.
    Madge, P. (1997). Ecological Design: A New Critique. Design Issues, 13(2), 44. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511730
    Mai, A. N., Do, H. T. H., Mai, C. N., and Nguyen, N. D. (2022). Models of university autonomyandtheirrelevancetoVietnam.J.AsianPublicPolicy15,394–410.doi: 10.1080/17516234.2020.1742412
    Maldonado, T. (1972). Design, Nature, and Revolution: Toward a Critical Ecology. Harper & Row.
    Malthus, T. (1798). An Essay on the Principle of Population. The Electronic Scholarly Publishing Project. http://www.esp.org/books/malthus/population/malthus.pdf
    Manzini, E. (2014). Making Things Happen: Social Innovation and Design. Design Issues, 30(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00248
    Manzini, E., & Jegou, F. (2003). Sustainable Everyday: The Voice of Sustainment. Design Philosophy Papers, 1(4), 187–191. https://doi.org/10.2752/144871303X13965299302271
    Manzini, E., & Rizzo, F. (2011). Small projects/large changes: Participatory design as an open participated process. CoDesign, 7(3–4), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.630472
    Manzini, E., Vezzoli, C., & Clark, G. (2001). Product-Service Systems. Using an Existing Concept as a New Approach to Sustainability. Journal of Design Research, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1504/JDR.2001.009811
    Margolin, V. (2002). The Politics of the Artificial: Essays on Design and Design Studies. University of Chicago Press.
    Mathews, F. (2011). Towards a Deeper Philosophy of Biomimicry. Organization & Environment, 24(4), 364–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026611425689
    McAloone, T. C., & Bey, N. (2009). Environmental improvement through product development: A guide. Danish Environmental Protection Agency. https://backend.orbit.dtu.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/3996106/mpu-elektronisk-uk.pdf
    McArthur, J. W., & Sachs, J. D. (2009). Needed: a New Generation of Problem Solvers. The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/needed-a-new-generation-of-problem-solvers/
    McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for “intelligence.” American Psychologist, 28(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034092
    McDonough, W. (2002). Design for the Triple Top Line: New Tools for Sustainable Commerce. Corporate Environmental Strategy, 9(3), 251–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1066-7938(02)00069-6
    McKenna, H. P. (1994). The Delphi technique: a worthwhile research approach for nursing? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19(6), 1221–1225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01207.x
    Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & III, W. W. B. (1972). The limits to growth: a report of the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. Universe Books. https://www.donellameadows.org/wp-content/userfiles/Limits-to-Growth-digital-scan-version.pdf
    Mensah, J. (2019). Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review. Cogent Social Sciences, 5(1), 1653531. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2019.1653531
    Mensah, J., & Enu-Kwesi, F. (2019). Implications of environmental sanitation management for sustainable livelihoods in the catchment area of Benya Lagoon in Ghana. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 16(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2018.1554591
    Meroni, A. (Ed.). (2007). Creative Communities. People Inventing Sustainable Ways of Living. Edizioni Polidesign.
    Meroni, A. (2008). Strategic design to take care of the territory. Networking creative communities to link people and places in a scenario of sustainable development. 8o Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Em Design.
    Metcalf, L., & Benn, S. (2012). The Corporation is Ailing Social Technology: Creating a ‘Fit for Purpose’ Design for Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(2), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1201-1
    Meyer, M. W., & Norman, D. (2020). Changing Design Education for the 21st Century. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 6(1), 13–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.12.002
    Miles-Tapping, C., Dyck, A., Brunham, S., Simpson, E., & Barber, L. (1990). Canadian Therapists’ Priorities for Clinical Research: A Delphi Study. Physical Therapy, 70(7), 448–454. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/70.7.448
    Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press.
    Milne, M. J., & Gray, R. (2013). W(h)ither Ecology? The Triple Bottom Line, the Global Reporting Initiative, and Corporate Sustainability Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1543-8
    Milsom, K., Tickle, M., Jenner, A., & Moulding, G. (1999). The identification of agreed criteria for referral following the dental inspection of children in the school setting. British Dental Journal, 186(1), 37–40. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800011
    Mindt, L., & Rieckmann, M. (2017). Developing competencies for sustainability-driven entrepreneurship in higher education: A literature review on teaching and learning methods [Desarrollo de las competencias para el emprendimiento orientado a la sostenibilidad en la educación superior: una]. Teoría de La Educación. Revista Interuniversitaria, 29(1), 129–159. https://doi.org/10.14201/teoredu291129159
    Mitrani, A., Dalziel, M., & Fitt, D. X. (1992). Competency Based Human Resource Management. Kogan Page.
    Moldan, B., Janoušková, S., & Hák, T. (2012). How to understand and measure environmental sustainability: Indicators and targets. Ecological Indicators, 17, 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.033
    Molinario, E., Kruglanski, A. W., Bonaiuto, F., Bonnes, M., Cicero, L., Fornara, F., Scopelliti, M., Admiraal, J., Beringer, A., Dedeurwaerdere, T., DeGroot, W., Hiedanpää, J., Knights, P., Knippenberg, L., Ovdenden, C., Polajnar Horvat, K., Popa, F., Porras-Gomez, C., Smrekar, A., … Bonaiuto, M. (2020). Motivations to Act for the Protection of Nature Biodiversity and the Environment: A Matter of “Significance.” Environment and Behavior, 52(10), 1133–1163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518824376
    Mont, O. . (2002). Clarifying the concept of product–service system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10(3), 237–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00039-7
    Mont, O. (2004). Product-Service Systems: Panacea or Myth? [Lund University]. https://lup.lub.lu.se/search/publication/0a91751c-f7ff-4ea9-8156-1ba487f8f44b
    Morelli, J. (2011). Environmental Sustainability: A Definition for Environmental Professionals. Journal of Environmental Sustainability, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.14448/jes.01.0002
    Morton, S., Pencheon, D., & Squires, N. (2017). Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), and their implementation: A national global framework for health, development and equity needs a systems approach at every level. British Medical Bulletin, 124(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldx031
    Muff, K., Kapalka, A., & Dyllick, T. (2017). The Gap Frame - Translating the SDGs into relevant national grand challenges for strategic business opportunities. The International Journal of Management Education, 15(2), 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.03.004
    Mugge, R. (2007). Product Attachment [Delft University of Technology]. https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid%3A0a7cef79-cb04-4344-abb1-cff24e3c3a78
    Mulà, I., Tilbury, D., Ryan, A., Mader, M., Dlouhá, J., Mader, C., Benayas, J., Dlouhý, J., & Alba, D. (2017). Catalysing Change in Higher Education for Sustainable Development. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 18(5), 798–820. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-03-2017-0043
    Mulgan, G. (2006). The architecture of social innovation: A new generation of social change. Demos.
    Mullen, P. M. (2003). Delphi: myths and reality. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 17(1), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777260310469319
    Murphy, M. K., Black, N., Lamping, D. L., McKee, C. M., Sanderson, C. F. B., Askham, J., & Marteau, T. (1998). Consensus development methods, and their use in clinical guideline development. Health Technology Assessment, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.3310/hta2030
    Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation. Anthem Press. http://temp.uefiscdi.ro/edigiregion_v2/the_open_book_of_social_innovationNESTA.pdf
    Murry, J. W., & Hammons, J. O. (1995). Delphi: A Versatile Methodology for Conducting Qualitative Research. The Review of Higher Education, 18(4), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.1995.0008
    Nadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. L. (1999). The organization of the future: Strategic imperatives and core competencies for the 21st century. Organizational Dynamics, 28(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(00)80006-6
    Naquin, S. S., & Wilson, J. (2002). Creating Competency Standards, Assessments, and Certification. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4(2), 180–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422302004002007
    Nes, N. van. (2003). Replacement of Durables: Influencing Product Life Time Through Product Design. Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    Nguyen, H. T., Hamid, M. O., & Moni, K. (2016). English-medium instruction and self-governance in higher education: the journey of a Vietnamese university through the institutional autonomy regime. Higher Education, 72(5), 669–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9970-y
    Nguyen, V. P. (2019). Tăng cường tự chủ chương trình đào tạo - yếu tố căn bản nâng cao chất lượng đào tạo của các Trường Đại học Việt Nam [Enhancing curriculum autonomy - fundamental factor in advancing the quality of education at Vietnamese universities]. Tạp Chí Giáo Dục, April Spec, 96–99. https://doi.org/https://tapchigiaoduc.moet.gov.vn/vi/magazine/so-dac-biet-thang-4-371/20-tang-cuong-tu-chu-chuong-trinh-dao-tao-yeu-to-can-ban-nang-cao-chat-luong-dao-tao-cua-cac-truong-dai-hoc-viet-nam-6579.html
    Nielsen, C., & Thangadurai, M. (2007). Janus and the Delphi Oracle: Entering the new world of international business research. Journal of International Management, 13(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2006.07.003
    Nielsen, P. ., & Wenzel, H. (2002). Integration of environmental aspects in product development: a stepwise procedure based on quantitative life cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10(3), 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00038-5
    Nitardy, C. N., & McLean, G. N. (2002). Project Management Competencies Needed by HRD Professionals: A Literature Review. Academy of Human Resource Development Conference, 956–963.
    Norman, D. (2016). The ‘Science’ in the Science of Design (R. Batra, C. M. Seifert, & D. Brei (Eds.)). Routledge.
    Norman, D., & Klemmer, S. (2014). State of design: How design education must change. Linkedin.
    OECD. (2016). OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2016. In OECDiLibrary. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/sti_in_outlook-2016-en
    Oficina Internacional de Educación. (n.d.). Competency-based curriculum. http://dmz-ibe2-vm.unesco.org/es/node/12065
    Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002
    Oliva, R., & Kallenberg, R. (2003). Managing the transition from products to services. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 14(2), 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1108/09564230310474138
    Orr, D. W. (2002). Four challenges of sustainability. Conservation Biology, 16(6), 1457–1460. https://doi.org/https://www.jstor.org/stable/3095399
    Papanek, V. (1971). Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co. https://monoskop.org/images/f/f8/Papanek_Victor_Design_for_the_Real_World.pdf
    Paxton, L. (1993). Enviro facts 3: sustainable development. Howick, South Africa: Environmental Education Association of Southern Africa. https://eopcw.com/find/downloadLectureNote/532
    Peet, R. (1999). Theories of Development. Guilford Press.
    Perveen, S., Kamruzzaman, M., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2017). Developing Policy Scenarios for Sustainable Urban Growth Management: A Delphi Approach. Sustainability, 9(10), 1787. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9101787
    Petras, J. (1981). Dependency and world system the- ory: A critique and new directions. Latin American Perspectives, 8(3/4), 148–155. https://doi.org/https://www.jstor.org/stable/2633477
    Pigosso, D. C. A., McAloone, T. C., & Rozenfeld, H. (2015). Characterization of the state-of-the-art and identification of main trends for ecodesign tools and methods: Classifying three decades of research and implementation. Journal of the Indian Institute of Science, 95(4), 405e427. http://journal.library.iisc.ernet.in/index.php/iisc/article/view/4587
    Pigosso, D. C. A., Rozenfeld, H., & McAloone, T. C. (2013). Ecodesign maturity model: a management framework to support ecodesign implementation into manufacturing companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.040
    Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). Essentials of nursing research: methods, appraisal, and utilization. In Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Mirabeau’s, Vol. 6, Issue 8). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.13.4.91.s11
    Popov, V., Jiang, Y., & So, H.-J. (2020). Shared lessons in mobile learning among K-12 education, higher education and industry: an international Delphi study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1149–1180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09731-x
    Potter, M., Gordon, S., & Hamer, P. (2003). The physiotherapy experience in private practice: The patients’ perspective. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 49(3), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60239-7
    Prahalad, C. K. (2004). The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty Through Profits. Wharton School Publishing. https://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu/article/the-fortune-at-the-bottom-of-the-pyramid-eradicating-poverty-through-profits/
    Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/1990/05/the-core-competence-of-the-corporation
    Prahalad, C. K., & Hart, S. L. (2002). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. StrategyþBusiness, 26, 2e14. https://www.strategy-business.com/article/11518
    Procter, S., & Hunt, M. (1994). Using the Delphi survey technique to develop a professional definition of nursing for analysing nursing workload. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19(5), 1003–1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01180.x
    Raoufi, K., Park, K., Hasan Khan, M. T., Haapala, K. R., Psenka, C. E., Jackson, K. L., Okudan Kremer, G. E., & Kim, K.-Y. (2019). A cyberlearning platform for enhancing undergraduate engineering education in sustainable product design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 730–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.085
    Reed, R., & Fronmueller, M. P. (1990). Vertical integration: A comparative analysis of performance and risk. Managerial and Decision Economics, 11(3), 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4090110305
    Reijnders, L. (2008). Are emissions or wastes consisting of biological nutrients good or healthy? Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(10), 1138–1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.02.003
    Retchless, D. P., & Brewer, C. A. (2016). Guidance for representing uncertainty on global temperature change maps. International Journal of Climatology, 36(3), 1143–1159. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4408
    Reyes, G. E. (2001). Four main theories of development: modernization, dependency, word-system, and glo- balization. Revista Crítica de Ciencias Sociales y Jurídicas, 4(2), 109–124. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303351364_Four_main_theories_of_development_modernization_dependency_world-systems_and_globalization
    Rifkin, J. (2010). The Empathic Civilization: The Race to Global Consciousness in a World in Crisis. Jeremy P. Tarcher.
    Ritchie, H., & Roser, M. (2018). Introducing the Our World in Data ‘Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Tracker.’ Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/sdg-tracker
    RobecoSAM AG. (2018). The Sustainability Yearbook 2018. https://www.goldfields.com/pdf/sustainbility/awards-achievements/robecosam-yearbook-2018.pdf
    Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., Nykvist, B., de Wit, C. A., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P. K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., … Foley, J. A. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461(7263), 472–475. https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a
    Romli, A., Prickett, P., Setchi, R., & Soe, S. (2015). Integrated eco-design decision-making for sustainable product development. International Journal of Production Research, 53(2), 549–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.958593
    Rostow, W. W. (1978). The World Economy: History & Prospect. University of Texas Press.
    Rowe, D. (2007). Education for a Sustainable Future. Science, 317(5836), 323–324. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1143552
    Russ-Eft, D. (1995). Defining competencies: A critique. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 6(4), 329–335. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.3920060402
    Ryan, C. (2013). Critical agendas: Designing for sustainability from products and systems. In The Handbook of Design for Sustainability. New York: Bloomsbury.
    Ryan, C. (2013). Eco-Acupuncture: designing and facilitating pathways for urban transformation, for a resilient low-carbon future. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.029
    Rychen, D. S., & Salganik, L. H. (2003). Key competencies for a successful life and a well-functioning society (D. S. Rychen & L. H. Salganik (Eds.)). Hogrefe & Huber Publishers. https://pubengine2.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/preview/99.110005/9781616762728_preview.pdf
    Sackman, H. (1975). Delphi Critique. Lexington Books. http://www.foresight.pl/assets/downloads/publications/Turoff_Linstone.pdf
    Sadiq, R., & Khan, F. I. (2006). An integrated approach for risk‐based life cycle assessment and multi‐criteria decision‐making. Business Process Management Journal, 12(6), 770–792. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150610710927
    Salmi, J., & Orjuela, M. C. (2018). University of the Future: A Review of Innovative and Disruptive Practices. In OECD. OECD.
    Schifferstein, H. N. J., & Zwartkruis-Pelgrim, E. P. H. (2008). Consumer-Product Attachment: Measurement and Design Implications. International Journal of Design, 2(3), 1–14. http://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/325/218
    Schleicher, J., Schaafsma, M., & Vira, B. (2018). Will the Sustainable Development Goals address the links between poverty and the natural environment? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 34, 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.09.004
    Schmalzbauer, B., & Visbeck, M. (2018). German Future Earth Summit - Conference Summary Report Berlin, 28th & 29th of January 2016. DKN Future Earth. https://oceanrep.geomar.de/id/eprint/43575/
    Schmidt, R. C. (1997). Managing Delphi Surveys Using Nonparametric Statistical Techniques. Decision Sciences, 28(3), 763–774. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01330.x
    Schmidt-Bleek. (1996). MIPS Book or the Fossil Makers [Wieviel Umwelt Braucht Der Mensch – MIPS, Das Mass Fûr Ökologisches Wirtschaften]. http://www.factor10-institute.org/files/the_fossil_makers/FossilMakers_Intro.pdf
    SDG For Education. (n.d.). UNESCO SDG4 Education: Who we are? https://www.sdg4education2030.org/who-we-are
    Sherwin, C., & Bhamra, T. (1998). Ecodesign Innovation: Present Concepts, Current Practice and Future Directions for Design and the Environment. Design History Society Conference 1998. https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/bitstream/1826/3543/1/Sherwin_Thesis_2000.pdf
    Shippmann, J. S., Ash, R. A., Batjtsta, M., Carr, L., Eyde, L. D., Hesketh, B., Kehoe, J., Pearlman, K., Prien, E. P., & Sanchez, J. I. (2000). The Practice of Competency Modeling. Personnel Psychology, 53(3), 703–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00220.x
    Short, T., Lee-Mortimer, A., Luttropp, C., & Johansson, G. (2012). Manufacturing, sustainability, ecodesign and risk: lessons learned from a study of Swedish and English companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 37, 342–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.037
    Simanis, E., & Hart, S. (2008). Base of the Pyramid Protocol (2nd ed.). Cornell University. johnson.cornell.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2019/04/BoP_Protocol_2nd_ed.pdf
    Skulmoski, G. J., Hartman, F. T., & Krahn, J. (2007). The Delphi method for graduate research. Journal of Information Technology Education, 6, 1–21. https://www.jite.org/documents/Vol6/JITEv6p001-021Skulmoski212.pdf
    Smith, C. E. (2007). Design for the Other 90%. Cooper-Hewitt, National Design Museum.
    Social Enterprise Guide. (2020). 5 pillars of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). http://socialenterpriseguide.com/5-pillars-of-sustainable-development-goals-sdgs/
    Soini, K., Jurgilevich, A., Pietikäinen, J., & Korhonen-Kurki, K. (2018). Universities responding to the call for sustainability: A typology of sustainability centres. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1423–1432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.228
    Sonego, M., Echeveste, M. E. S., & Galvan Debarba, H. (2018). The role of modularity in sustainable design: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 176, 196–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.106
    Soumitri, V., & Vezzoli, C. (2002). ‘Product Service System Design: Sustainable opportunities for all. A design research working hypothesis. Clothing care System for Kumaon Hostel at IIT Delhi. Ecodesign International Conference.
    Spady, W. G. (1994). Outcome-based education: critical issues and answers. American Association of School Administrators.
    Srinivas, S., & Sutz, J. (2008). Developing countries and innovation: Searching for a new analytical approach. Technology in Society, 30(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2007.12.003
    Stahel, W. R. (1997). The functional economy: Cultural and organizational change. In D. J. Richards (Ed.), The Industrial Green Game (pp. 91–100). National Academy Press. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/4982/chapter/7
    Steffen, W., & Hughes, L. (2013). The critical decade 2013: climate change science, risks and response. Climate Commission; Climate Commission. https://climatecommission.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/the-critical-decade-2013-summary_lowres.pdf
    Stern, N. (2006). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. London School of Economics and Political Science. https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/publication/the-economics-of-climate-change-the-stern-review/
    Stheeman, S. E., Hof, M. A. van ’t, Mileman, P. A., & Stelt, P. F. van der. (1995). Use of the Delphi technique to develop standards for quality assessment in diagnostic radiology. Community Dental Health, 12(4), 194–199. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8536080/
    Sudsomboon, W. (2007). Construction Of A Competency-Based Curriculum Content Framework For Mechanical Technology Education Program on Automotive Technology Subjects. Proceedings of the ICASE Asian Symposium. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/227452769_Competency_Based_Curriculum_in_Higher_Education_A_Necessity_Grounded_by_Globalization_English_version/fulltext/000060690cf270e24c8938d6/Competency-Based-Curriculum-in-Higher-Education-A-Necessity-Grounded
    Sumsion, T. (1998). The Delphi Technique: An Adaptive Research Tool. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61(4), 153–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/030802269806100403
    Sundar, A., Arroniz, I., & Machleit, K. (2014). Consumer Knowledge of Product Aesthetics: Moderating Role of Category on Purchase Intention (AMA Winter Marketing Educators’ Conference 2014 Engaging Customers). http://toc.proceedings.com/22402webtoc.pdf
    Sustainable Development Report. (n.d.). Vietnam (East and South Asia) SDG Index. https://dashboards.sdgindex.org/profiles/vietnam
    Sustainable Development Report. (2021). The SDG Index and Dashboards Part 2. https://dashboards.sdgindex.org/chapters/part-2-the-sdg-index-and-dashboards#2-1-global-trends-and-rankings
    Sustainable Development Report. (2017). SDG Index and Dashboards 2017. https://www.sdgindex.org/reports/sdg-index-and-dashboards-2017/
    Taha, Z., Alli, H., & Abdul Rashid, S. H. (2012). Users’ Requirements and Preferences in the Success of a New Product: A Case Study of Automotive Design. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 215–216, 484–488. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.215-216.484
    Taha, Z., Alli, H., & Abdul-Rashid, S. H. (2013). The Characteristics of a New Product through User Knowledge in the Early Stages of a Design Process. Advanced Materials Research, 739, 678–683. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.739.678
    Talwar, S., Wiek, A., & Robinson, J. (2011). User engagement in sustainability research. Science and Public Policy, 38(5), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234211X12960315267615
    Tang, T., & Bhamra, T. (2009). Improving energy efficiency of product use: An exploration of environmental impacts of household cold appliance usage patterns. The 5th International Conference on Energy Efficiency in Domestic Appliances and Lighting. https://repository.lboro.ac.uk/articles/conference_contribution/Improving_energy_efficiency_of_product_use_an_exploration_of_environmental_impacts_of_household_cold_appliance_usage_patterns/9341678
    Taylor, S. J. (2016). A review of sustainable development principles: Centre for environmental studies. Niversity of Pretoria, South Africa.
    Teichler, U. (1998). Thematic debate: the requirements of the world of work. World Conference on Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century: Vision and Action. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000113609
    TES Team. (2022). Following up on the transformative commitments made at the Summit. Transforming Education Hub. https://transformingeducationsummit.sdg4education2030.org/TESFollowUp
    The MDG Achievement Fund (MDG-F). (n.d.). Millennium Development Goals. The MDG Achievement Fund (MDG-F). http://www.mdgfund.org/node/922
    Thomas, C. F. (2015). Naturalizing Sustainability Discourse: Paradigm, Practices and Pedagogy of Thoreau, Leopold, Carson and Wilson [Arizona State University]. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/79576433.pdf
    Tischner, U., & Charter, M. (2001). Sustainable Product Design. In M. Charter & U. Tischner (Eds.), Sustainable Solutions: Developing Products and Services for the Future. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351282482
    Tischner, U., Ryan, C., & Vezzoli, C. (2009). Product-service systems. In M. R. M. CrulJ & J. C. Diehl (Eds.), Design for Sustainability: A Step by Step Approach. United Nations Environment Programme. https://api.globalewaste.org/publications/file/163/Design-for-Sustainability-A-Step-by-Step-Approach.pdf
    Tischner, U., & Verkuiji, M. (2006). Design for (social) sustainability and radical change. Proceedings, Perspectives on Radical Changes to Sustainable Consumption and Production.
    Tjarve, B., & Zemīte, I. (2017). The Role of Cultural Activities in Community Development. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 64(6), 2151–2160. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201664062151
    Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2006). Economic Development (8th Editio). Addison-Wesley.
    Toohey, S. (1999). Designing courses for higher education. Buckingham: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
    Tukker, A. (2004). Eight types of product–service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(4), 246–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.414
    Tukker, A., & Tischner, U. (2006). New Business for Old Europe: Product Services, Sustainability and Competitiveness. Greenleaf Publishing.
    UN. General Assembly. (2015). Work of the Statistical Commission pertaining to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: resolution / adopted by the General Assembly. United Nations Digital Library. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/1291226?ln=en
    UNESCO. (2016). UNESCO Global Action Programme on Education for Sustainable Development: information folder. UNESCO Digital Library. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000246270
    UNESCO. (2018). Global Action Programme (GAP) on Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). https://www.oneplanetnetwork.org/knowledge-centre/projects/global-action-programme-gap-education-sustainable-development-esd-0
    UNESCO. (2005). UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development, 2005-2014: the DESD at a glance. UNESCO Digital Library. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000141629
    UNESCO. (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: learning objectives . UNESCO Digital Library. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444
    UNESCO Director General 2017. (2018). UNESCO 2017. UNESCO Digital Library. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000261971
    United Nation. (1972). United Nations Conference on the Human Environment. https://www.un.org/en/conferences/environment/stockholm1972
    United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP). (2006). Design for Sustainability: A Practical Approach for Developing Countries. United Nations Environmental Program.
    United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP). (2002). Product-Service Systems and Sustainability. Opportunities for Sustainable Solutions. UNEP, Division of Technology Industry and Economics, Production and Consumption Branch. https://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/8123
    United Nations, & Department of Economic and Social Affairs - UN. (2018). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2017. United Nations. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2016/the sustainable development goals report 2016.pdf
    UNSD. (2018). SDG indicators metadata repository. United Nations. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/
    van Kerkhoff, L., & Lebel, L. (2006). Linking Knowledge and Action for Sustainable Development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31(1), 445–477. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.31.102405.170850
    Vergragt, P. J., & van Grootveld, G. (1994). Sustainable technology development in the Netherlands: the first phase of the Dutch STD programme. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2(3–4), 133–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-6526(94)90035-3
    Vezzoli, C. (2003). Systemic design for sustainability (Proceedings, Cumulus Working Paper).
    Vezzoli, C., Ceschin, F., Diehl, J. C., & Kohtala, C. (2015). New design challenges to widely implement ‘sustainable producteservice systems’. Journal of Cleaner Production, 97, 1e12. https://bura.brunel.ac.uk/bitstream/2438/10987/3/FullText.pdf
    Vezzoli, C., Kohtala, C., & Srinivasan, A. (2014). Product-service system. In M. R. M. Crul & J. C. Diehl (Eds.), Design for Sustainability: A Step by Step Approach (p. 502). Greenleaf.
    Vezzoli, C., & Manzini, E. (2008). Design for Environmental Sustainability. Springer London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-163-3
    Vietnam’s Prime Minister. (2016). Decision No. 1982/QD-TTg 2016: Vietnam Qualifications Framework [Quyết định về việc phê duyệt khung trình độ Quốc gia Việt Nam]. Thuvienphapluat. https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Giao-duc/Quyet-dinh-1982-QD-TTg-phe-duyet-khung-trinh-do-quoc-gia-Viet-Nam-2016-327841.aspx (accessed September 21, 2023).
    Mô hình giáo dục đại học ở một số nước [The Higher Education models in some countries]. (2008). Communist Review (Tạp Chí Cộng Sản). https://tapchicongsan.org.vn/web/guest/thong-tin-ly-luan/-/2018/2767/mo-hinh-giao-duc-dai-hoc-o-mot-so-nuoc.aspx
    UNESCO European Centre for Higher Education. (1992). International Conference on Academic Freedom and University Autonomy, Sinaia, Romania. International Conference on Academic Freedom and University Autonomy. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000092770 (accessed September 21, 2023).
    University of Bologna. (1988). Magna Charta Universitatum. Observatory Magna Charta Universitatum. https://www.cicic.ca/docs/bologna/Magna_Charta.en.pdf (accessed September 21, 2023).
    University of Industrial Fine Art. (n.d.). Lịch sử trường Đại học Mỹ thuật Công nghiệp [The history of the University of Industrial Fine Arts]. https://mtud.edu.vn/lich-su-truong-dai-hoc-my-thuat-cong-nghiep/ (accessed September 21, 2023).
    Vietnam Ministry of Education and Training. (2007). Quyết định số 43/2007/QĐ-BGDĐT của Bộ Giáo dục và Đào tạo: Ban hành Quy chế đào tạo đại học và cao đẳng hệ chính quy theo hệ thống tín chỉ [Decision No. 43/2007/QĐ-BGDĐT of the Ministry of Education and Training: Issuance of Regulations for Undergraduate . https://chinhphu.vn/default.aspx?pageid=27160&docid=38739 (accessed September 21, 2023).
    Vietnam Ministry of Education and Training. (2010). Thông tư số 28/2010/TT-BGDĐT Ban hành chương trình khung Giáo dục Đại học khối ngành Văn hóa - Nghệ thuật - Thông tin, trình độ Đại học và Cao đẳng [Circulars No. 28/2010/TT-BGDĐT Issued by the Ministry of Education and Training, Establishing the Framewor. Thuvienphapluat. https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Giao-duc/Thong-tu-28-2010-TT-BGDDT-chuong-trinh-khung-giao-duc-dai-hoc-khoi-nganh-113888.aspx (accessed September 21, 2023).
    Vietnam Ministry of Education and Training. (2021). Quy chế đào tạo trình độ Đại học - Ban hành kèm theo Thông tư số 08/2021/TT-BGDĐT của Bộ Giáo dục và Đào tạo [Regulations on University-Level Education - Issued in accordance with Circular No. 08/2021/TT-BGDĐT by the Ministry of Education and Training]. https://moet.gov.vn/content/vanban/Lists/VBPQ/Attachments/1395/Quy chế đào tạo trình độ đại học.pdf (accessed September 21, 2023).
    Vietnam Political Bureau. (2011). Nghị quyết số 14-NQ/TW Bộ Chính trị khoá IV về cải cách giáo dục [Resolution No. 14-NQ/TW of the 4th Political Bureau of Vietnam on educational reform]. Communist Party of Vietnam Online Newspaper (Báo Điện Tử Đảng Cộng Sản Việt Nam). https://dangcongsan.vn/doi-moi-can-ban-va-toan-dien-giao-duc-dao-tao/duong-loi-chinh-sach/nghi-quyet-cua-bo-chinh-tri-khoa-iv-ve-cai-cach-giao-duc-347269.html (accessed September 21, 2023).
    Vietnamese National Assembly. (2012). Luật Giáo dục Đại học [Law No. 08/2012/QH13 On Higher Education]. Thuvienphapluat. https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Giao-duc/Luat-Giao-duc-dai-hoc-2012-142762.aspx (accessed September 21, 2023).
    Vietnamese National Assembly. (2019). Luật Giáo dục [Law No. 43/2019/QH14: Education Law]. Thuvienphapluat. https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Giao-duc/Luat-giao-duc-2019-367665.aspx (accessed September 21, 2023).
    Vo, M. T. H., & Laking, R. (2020). An institutional study of autonomisation of public universities in Vietnam. Higher Education, 79(6), 1079–1097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00457-6
    Volstad, N. L., & Boks, C. (2012). On the use of Biomimicry as a Useful Tool for the Industrial Designer. Sustainable Development, 20(3), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1535
    Voorhees, R. A. (2001). Competency-Based Learning Models: A Necessary Future. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2001(110), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.7
    Wahl, D. C. (2016). Designing Regener- ative Cultures. Triarchy Press.
    Wanamaker, C. (2018). The Environmental, Economic, and Social Components of Sustainability. Soapboxie. https://soapboxie.com/social-issues/The-Environmental-Economic-and-Social-Components-of-Sustainability
    Warburton, K. (2003). Deep learning and education for sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 4(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370310455332
    WCED. (1987). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf
    Weaver, P., Jansen, L., van Grootveld, G., van Spiegel, E., & Vergragt, P. (2017). Sustainable Technology Development. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351283243
    Weinert, F. E. (2001). Concept of competence: A conceptual clarification. In D. S. Rychen & L. H. Salganik (Eds.), Defining and Selecting Key Competencies (pp. 45–65). Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
    Westley, F., Zimmerman, B., & Patton, D. (2011). A framework for transdisciplinary research in sustainable food systems. Sustainable Agriculture Research & Extension, 24(4), 39–62.
    Wever, R. (2012). Editorial: Design Research for Sustainable Behaviour. Journal of Design Research, 10(1/2), 1–6. https://www.academia.edu/77758063/Editorial_Design_Research_for_Sustainable_Behaviour
    White, A. L., Stoughton, M., & Feng, L. (1999). Servicizing: The Quiet Transition to Extended Product Responsibility. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Office of Solid Waste. https://www.tellus.org/pub/Servicizing - The Quiet Transition to Extended Product Responsibility.pdf
    Wilde, D. (2020). Design Research Education and Global Concerns,. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 6(2), 170–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2020.05.003
    Willard, M., Wiedmeyer, C., Warren Flint, R., Weedon, J. S., Woodward, R., Feldman, I., & Edwards, M. (2010). The sustainability professional: 2010 competency survey report. Environmental Quality Management, 20(1), 49–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.20271
    Winterton, J. (2009). Competence across Europe: highest common factor or lowest common denominator? Journal of European Industrial Training, 33(8/9), 681–700. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090590910993571
    Wise, R., & Baumgartner, P. (1999). Go downstream e the new profit imperative in manufacturing. Harvard Business Review. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/1999/09/go-downstream-the-new-profit-imperative-in-manufacturing
    Wong, C. (2003). How will the e-explosion affect how we do research?Phase I: The E- DEL+I proof-of-concept exercise. Rand Publishing.
    World Bank. (2019). World Bank Open Data 2019. https://data.worldbank.org/ (accessed September 27, 2023).
    World Bank. (2018). Human Capital Index and Components, 2018. https://www.worldbank.org/en/data/interactive/2018/10/18/human-capital-index-and-components-2018 (accessed September 27, 2023).
    World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Towards Sustainable Develop- ment (Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future).
    World Commission on Environment Development. (1987). A Threatened Future (Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future). https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf
    Wright, I. (1998). Design methods in engineering and product design. McGraw-Hill.
    Wüstenhagen, R., Sharma, S., Starik, M., & Wuebker, R. (2008). Sustainability, Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Introduction to the Volume. In Sustainable Innovation and Entrepreneurship (p. 1e23). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848441552.00007
    Yang, L. (2020). From the General Provisions of Civil Law to the General Rules of Civil Law: A Historic Leap. Social Sciences in China, 41(2), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2019.1674029
    Young, W. H., & Hogben, D. (1978). An experimental study of the Delphi technique. Education Research and Perspectives. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/aeipt.2321
    Zhai, T., & Chang, Y.-C. (2018). Standing of Environmental Public-Interest Litigants in China: Evolution, Obstacles and Solutions. Journal of Environmental Law, 30(3), 369–397. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqy

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE