本研究目的為：（一）探討國內國中生在數學科學習上學業自尊、學業情緒與自我設限之現況。（二）探究負/正向學業情緒各自在學業自尊與自我設限二者間的中介角色。（三）考驗本研究所提出的負/正向學業情緒歷程模式與觀察資料的適配度。（四）根據研究結果提出具體建議，以供教學、輔導與未來研究之參考。為完成上述目的，本研究以叢集抽樣方式，抽取台灣地區之八年級學生共821人，作為本研究之研究樣本。研究工具包括學業情緒量表、學業自尊組合量尺與自我設限量表。為完成研究目的，本研究所蒐集的觀察資料以單一樣本t檢定、單因子重複量數變異數分析及結構方程模式進行分析。
本研究的發現如下：
一、國中生在各種學業自尊、負向學業情緒、正向學業情緒與自我設限和檢定值3.5（六點量表中位數）皆有顯著差異。三種學業自尊皆顯著大於3.5；五種負向情緒皆顯著小於3.5；四種正向情緒中，僅有放心顯著大於3.5，其他正向情緒皆顯著小於3.5；二種自我設限皆顯著小於3.5。
二、國中生在各種學業自尊、負向學業情緒與正向學業情緒皆有顯著差異，其各自以學業價值感、無聊及放心的得分為最高。而國中生在自我設限則無顯著差異。
三、本研究所建構的負向學業情緒中介模式獲得觀察資料的支持，即學業自尊會透過負向學業情緒對自我設限產生間接效果。但本研究所建構的正向學業情緒中介模式則
未獲得觀察資料的支持，即正向學業情緒並非學業自尊與自我設限的中介變項。
四、本研究所建立的負向學業情緒歷程模式及正向學業情緒歷程模式皆可用來解釋國中的觀察資料。

The purposes of this study were: (a) to investigate the current status of the academic self-esteem, academic emotions and self-handicapping strategies in math on junior high school students, (b) to examine the mediated effect of positive/negative academic emotions between academic self-esteem and self-handicapping strategies, (c) to examine the goodness of fit between the positive/negative academic emotions process model proposed by the author and the observed data. The sample was consisted of 821 junior high school students in Taiwan. The collection data were analyzed by one-sample t test, one-way repeated measures ANOVA, and SEM. The results of this study were summarized as follows:
(1) There were significant differences between the junior high school students’ academic self-esteem, positive academic emotions, negative academic emotions and the test value which was 3.5.
(2) There were significant differences among junior high school students’ academic self-esteem, positive academic emotions, and negative academic emotions. However, there was no significant difference on self-handicapping strategies of junior high school students.
(3) In this study, the effects of academic self-esteem and self-handicapping strategies are mediated by negative academic emotions.
(4) The positive/negative academic emotions process model proposed by the author fitted the observed data well and could be used to explain the observed data in Taiwan.

一、中文部分
向天屏（2000）。國中小學生成就目標導向、學習策略、自我跛足策略與學業成就關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化市。
向天屏（2001）。國中小學生使用自我跛足策略之研究。國語學報，13，213-256。
危芷芬（譯）（2007）。從課堂教學中培養兒童的自信心（原作者：D. Lawrence）。臺北市：華騰文化。
李俊青（2007）。學業情緒歷程模式之分析（未出版之碩士論文）。國立成功大學，臺南市。
李麗君（2006）。低成就學生逃避行為之探討。教育資料與研究，73，91-103。
李俊青、程炳林（2006年10月）。學業情緒之控制-價值與認知-動機中介模式之分析。「台灣心理學會第45屆年會」發表之論文，台北市私立東吳大學。
吳永清（2007）。國中學生考試焦慮、完美主義傾向與自我設限行為之相關研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
吳怡欣、張景媛（2000）。青少年自我尊重模式之驗證。教育心理學報，31（2），105-127。
吳玉萍、李碧霞、呂昌明、卓俊辰、賴香如、陳庭儀（2010）。台灣地區國中生知覺班級社會環境與自尊之相關研究。學校衛生，56，59-81。
林杏足（2003）。青少年自尊量表編製報告。測驗學刊，50（2），223-256。
林淑梨、王若蘭、黃慧真（譯）（1991）。人格心理學（原作者：E. T. Phares）。臺北市：心理出版社。
周淑楓、程炳林（2007年10月）。未來取向之自我調整學習歷程模式分析。「台灣心理學會第46屆年會」發表之論文，臺南市國立成功大學。
侯玫如（2002）。多重目標導向對國中生認知、動機、情緒與學習行為之影響（未出版之碩士論文）。國立成功大學，臺南市。
施怡如（2011）。國中生個人目標導向與考試情緒之關係：知覺的測驗威脅與情緒調整之調節效果分析（未出版之碩士論文）。國立成功大學，臺南市。
翁淑緣（1985）。青少年的自尊以及相關變項的研究。教育與心理研究，8，79-113。
程炳林（2000）。國中生認知/意動成份與學習表現之相關研究。師大學報：教育類，45（1），43-59。
陳惠邦（1990）。自我設限與行為歸因（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　
陳嘉成（2006）。為什麼自我跛足？與數學能力知覺、測驗焦慮對學習行為組型的中介效果。測驗學刊，53（1），49-78。
張筱涵（2011）。國中生自我價值、行動/狀態導向對逃避策略的預測暨課室目標結構的調節效果（未出版之碩士論文）。國立成功大學，臺南市。
張春興（主編）（2006）。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市：東華。
陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵（2009）。多變量分析方法-統計軟體應用（五版）。臺北市：五南。
黃豊茜（2010）。學業情緒歷程模式：探析情緒調整策略的效果（未出版之碩士論文）。國立成功大學，臺南市。
楊淑芬（1992）。數學史在數學教育中的重要性。數學傳播，16（3），16-22。
楊岫穎（2003）。國中生自我設限的情境及歷程因素之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立成功大學，臺南市。
趙英婷（2005）。高中生之自尊、個人目標導向、自我設限與學業表現之相關研究（以臺北市某一高中為例）（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
葉懿萱（2007）。台北市兩所國中學生同儕情感關係、學業成就與自尊關係之縱貫性研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學，臺北市。
鄭衣婷（2007）。國中生學業情緒與學業成就之相關研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立成功大學，臺南市。
鄭伊真（2011）。Rosenberg自尊量表中文版的修訂分析（未出版之碩士論文）。國立成功大學，臺南市。
蔡逸勝、林炎全（2006）。將離散數學納入中小學數學課程－以遞迴關係為例。科學教育月刊，290，36-42。
賴美璇（2006）。動機調整策略融入英語科之教學效果（未出版之碩士論文）。國立成功大學，臺南市。
簡嘉菱（2009）。自我決定動機與學業情緒模式之探討（未出版之碩士論文）。國立成功大學，臺南市。
二、西文部分
Ang, R. P., Neubronner, M., Oh, S. A., & Loeng, V. (2006). Dimensionality of Rosenberg’s self-esteem scale among normal-technical stream students in Singapore. Current Psychology, 25(2), 120-131.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Baumgardner, A. H., Lake, E. A., & Arkin, R. M. (1985). Claiming mood as a self-handicap: The influence of spoiled and unspoiled public identities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(4), 349-367.
Brett, L. B., Susan, R. K., & Debra, L. M. (2001). Correlates and consequences ofbehavioral procrastination: The effects of academic procrastination, self-consciousness, self-esteem and self-handicapping. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 16, 3-14.
Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Hutton, D. G. (1989). Self presentational motivations and personality differences in self-esteem. Journal of Personality, 57, 547-579.
Beedie, C. J., Terry, P. C., & Lane, A. M. (2005). Distinctions between emotion and mood. Cognition and Emotion, 19(6), 847-878.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Academic of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94.
Coopersmith, S. (1959). A method for determining types of self-esteem. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59(1), 87-94.
Coopersmith, S. (1967). The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.

Covington, M. V. (1992). Making the grade: A self- worth perspective on motivation and school reform. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, J. (1997). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Deppe, R., & Harackiewicz, J. (1996). Self-handicapping and intrinsic motivation: Buffering intrinsic motivation from the threat of failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 868-876.
Daniels, L. M., Stupnisky, R. H., Pekrun, R., Haynes, T. L., Perry, R. P., & Newall, N. E. (2009). A longitudinal analysis of achievement goals: From affective antecedents to emotional effects and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 948-963.
Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM).Psychological Bulletin, 117, 39-66.
Fleming, J. S., & Courtney, B. E. (1984). The dimensionality of self-esteem: II. Hierarchical facet model for revised measurement scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(2), 404-421.
Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2007). Girls and mathematics - A “hopeless” issue? A control-value approach to gender differences in emotions towards mathematics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(4), 497-514.
Guindon, M. H. (2002). Toward accountability in the use of the self-esteem construct. Journal of Counseling and Development, 80(2), 204-214.
Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Hall, N. C., & Pekrun, R. (2008). Antecedents of academic
emotions: Testing the internal/external frame of reference model for academic
enjoyment. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(1), 9-33.
Jones, S. C. (1973). Self and interpersonal evaluations: Esteem theory versus
consistency theories. Psychological Bulletin, 79(3), 185-199.
Jones, E. E., & Berglas, S. (1978). Control of attributions about the self through self-handicapping strategies: The appeal of alcohol and the role of underachievement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4(2), 200-206.
Lent, S. A., & Figueira-McDonough, J. (2002). Gender and poverty: Self-esteem among elementary school children. Journal of Children and Poverty, 8(1), 5-22.
Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Achievement goal theory and affect: An asymmetrical bidirectional model. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 69-78.
Leary, M. R., & Shepperd, J. A. (1986). Behavioral self-handicaps versus self-reported handicaps: A conceptual note. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1265-1268.
Leary, M. R., Schreindorfer, L. S., & Haupt, A. L. (1995). The role of low self-esteem in emotional and behavioral problems: Why is low self-esteem dysfunctional. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 14(3), 297-314.
Mruk, C. (1999). Self-esteem: Research, theory, and practice. New York, NY:　Springer.
Midgley, C., Arunkumer, R., & Urdan, T. (1996). “If I don't do well tomorrow, there's a reason”: Predictors of adolescents' use of academic self-handicapping strategies. Journal of Education Psychology, 88(3), 423-434.
McFarlin, D. B., & Blascovich, J. (1981). Effects of self-esteem and performance feedback on future affective preferences and cognitive expectations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(3), 521-531.
Mello-Goldner, D., & Jackson, J. (1999). Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) as aself-handicapping strategy among college woman. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 14, 607-611.
Niemiec, C. P., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2009). The path taken: Consequences of attaining intrinsic and extrinsic aspirations in post-college life. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(3), 291-306.
Pekrun, R. (1992). The impact of emotions on learning and achievement: Towards a theory of cognitive/motivational mediators. Applied psychology, 41(4), 359-376.
Pekrun, R. (2000). A social-cognitive, control-value theory of achievement emotions. In J. Heckhausen (Ed.), Motivational psychology of human development (pp. 143-163). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
Pintrich, P. R. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In C. Ames, & M. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation enhancing environments (pp. 117-160). Greenwich, England: JAI Press.
Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 583-597.
Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., & Maier, M. A. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 115-135.
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 36-48.
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2005). Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ): User’s manual. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91-105.
Pope, A. W., McHale, S. M., & Craighead, W. E. (1988). Self-esteem enhancement with children and adolescents. New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. New Jersey, NJ: Merrill.
Rosenberg, E. L. (1998). Levels of analysis and the organization of affect. Review of General Psychology, 2, 247-270.
Rhodewalt, F., & Davison, J. (1986). Self-handicapping and subsequent performance: Role of outcome valence and attributional certainty. Basic and Applied SocialPsychology, 7(4), 307-322.
Rosenberg, M., Schooler, C., Schoenbach, C., & Rosenberg, F. (1995). Globalself-esteem and specific self-esteem: Different concepts, different outcomes. American Sociological Review, 60(1), 141-156.
Skaalvik, E. M. (1990). Attribution of perceived academic results and relations withself-esteem in senior high school students. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 34(4), 259-269.
Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46(3), 407-441.
Snyder, C. R., & Smith, T. W. (1982). Symptoms as self-handicapping strategies: The virtues of old wine in a new bottle. In G. Weary & H. L. Mirels (Eds.), Integrations of clinical and social psychology (pp. 104-127). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Smith, T. W., Snyder C. R., & Handelsman, M. M. (1982). On the self-serving function of an academic wooden leg: Test anxiety as a self-handicapping strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 314-321.
Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1990). Self-esteem, self-handicapping, and self-presentation: The strategy of inadequate practice. Journal of Personality, 58(2), 443-464.
Tafarodi, R. W., & Swann, W. B. Jr. (1995). Self-liking and self-competence as dimensions of global self-esteem: Initial validation of a measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 65(2), 322-342.
Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2001). Academic self-handicapping: What we know, what more there is to learn. Education Psychology Review, 13(2), 115-138.
Urdan, T., Midgley, C., & Anderson, E. M. (1998). The role of classroom goal structure in students’ use of self-handicapping strategies. American Educaational Research Journal, 35(1), 101-122.
Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures andgoal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 236-250.
Warner, S., & Moore, S. (2004). Excuses, excuses: Self-handicapping in an Australianadolescent sample. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33(4), 271-281.
Winne, P. H., Marx, R. W., & Taylor, T. D. (1977). A multitrait-multimethod study of three self-concept inventories. Child Development, 48(3), 893-901.