簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李承傑
Li, Cheng-Chieh
論文名稱: 生活緊張因素對都會區國中生初次偏差行為發生之間斷式動態分析
Effects of Life Strain Factors on the Onset of Delinquency for Junior High School Students: A Discrete-time Dynamic Analysis
指導教授: 董旭英
Tung, Yuk-Ying
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 社會科學院 - 教育研究所
Institute of Education
論文出版年: 2018
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 161
中文關鍵詞: 日常生活困擾初次偏差行為負面人際關係負面生活事件動態分析
外文關鍵詞: life hassles, onset of delinquency, negative relations, negative life events, dynamnic analysis approach
相關次數: 點閱:142下載:22
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究嘗試以一般化緊張理論的觀點,運用動態分析技術,探討國中生日常生活困擾、負面生活事件與負面人際關係對於初次偏差行為發生的影響機制。歷時一年半的時間,經歷三個學期之固定樣本縱貫研究,採用學生自陳量表調查臺南市七所國民中學學生,共計完成縱貫調查371位研究對象,並且採用事件史分析法進行統計分析。本研究結果如下:
    1. 國中生初次偷竊行為、暴力和虞犯行為的高峰期都在105學年度下學期,而且國中生初次暴力和虞犯行為的發生會受到國中時期不同時間的發展階段有所影響。
    2. 在國中生初次偷竊行為方面,發現國中生隨著年級的增長,發生初次偷竊行為的可能性愈低。在控制其他變項之後,106學年度上學期的日常生活困擾比105學年度下學期的日常生活困擾,顯著地降低國中生初次偷竊行為發生的可能性,而且國中生日常生活困擾愈多,發生初次偷竊行為的可能性愈高。
    3. 就國中生初次暴力行為而言,發現國中生隨著年級的增長,發生初次暴力行為的可能性愈低。國中生與老師和同儕負面關係愈嚴重,發生初次暴力行為的可能性愈高。
    4. 在國中生初次虞犯行為方面,發現國中生負面生活事件愈多,其發生初次虞犯行為的可能性愈高;國中生與老師負面關係愈嚴重,其發生初次虞犯行為的可能性愈高;國中生與同儕負面關係愈嚴重,其發生初次虞犯行為的可能性愈高。在控制時間和其他變項之後,106學年度下學期國中生與老師負面關係比105學年度下學期時,顯著地降低國中生初次虞犯行為發生的可能性。
    質言之,國中生經歷日常生活困擾、負面生活事件,以及與老師和同儕負面關係等緊張因素,對於初次偏差行為的發生可說是關鍵因素。以教育的觀點,家庭和學校是防治國中生偏差行為發生的重要影響力量;因此,親師互動和師生溝通顯得格外重要,引導學生情緒抒發和導正負面能量,避免學生透過非法手段或途徑,走入偏差行為。

    The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of life hassles, negative life events, and negative relations on the onset of delinquency for junior high school students by dynamic analysis approach, based on the perspective of general strain theory. This study took three semesters to survey 371 participants from seven junior high schools in Tainan. This study indicated that the peaks of the onset of property, violence, and status offences were in the second semester of 2017. In terms of the onset of property, the more life hassles students experienced, the higher probability the onset of property occurred. In respect to the onset of violence, the more serious negative relations with teachers and peers students experienced, the higher probability the onset of violence occurred. With regard to the onset of status offences, the more negative life event students met, the higher probability the onset of status offences occurred. Moreover, The more serious negative relations with teachers and peers students experienced, the higher probability the onset of status offences occurred.
    To sum up, that students meet life hassles, negative life events, and negative relations with teachers and peers has a crucial effects on the onset of delinquency for junior high school students, so family and school are significant influential powers to prevent students from delinquency. Therefore, it is important for teachers to communicate well with parents and to interact peacefully with students in order to lead them to release negative emotions and protect them from illegitimate means.

    第一章 緒論 ....................................................................................................................... 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 ............................................................................................... 1 壹、 研究動機 .............................................................................................................. 1 貳、 研究目的 .............................................................................................................. 4 第二節 名詞釋義 ........................................................................................................... 4 壹、 一般化緊張理論 .................................................................................................. 5 貳、 初次偏差行為 ...................................................................................................... 5 參、 日常生活困擾 ...................................................................................................... 5 肆、 負面生活事件 ...................................................................................................... 6 伍、 負面人際關係 ...................................................................................................... 6 陸、 動態分析 .............................................................................................................. 6 第二章 文獻探討 ............................................................................................................... 9 第一節 青少年偏差行為與初次偏差行為的內涵 ....................................................... 9 壹、 青少年偏差行為的內涵 ...................................................................................... 9 貳、 偏差行為之動態分析 ........................................................................................ 10 參、 青少年初次偏發行為的內涵 ............................................................................ 14 第二節 一般化緊張理論對於偏差行為的影響 ......................................................... 15 壹、 一般化緊張理論的內涵 .................................................................................... 15 貳、 一般化緊張理論的實徵研究 ............................................................................ 17 第三節 青少年初次偏差行為之動態分析 ................................................................. 23 第三章 研究方法 ............................................................................................................. 25 第一節 研究設計 ......................................................................................................... 25 第二節 研究問題與假設 ............................................................................................. 26 第三節 研究對象 ......................................................................................................... 31 第四節 變項測量 ......................................................................................................... 32 壹、 依變項 ................................................................................................................ 32 貳、 自變項 ................................................................................................................ 33 參、 控制變項 ............................................................................................................ 36 第五節 資料分析 ......................................................................................................... 38 壹、 描述性統計 ........................................................................................................ 38 貳、 事件史分析法 .................................................................................................... 38 參、 階層Logistic迴歸分析 ..................................................................................... 41 第四章 研究結果 ............................................................................................................. 43 第一節 初次偏差行為與生活緊張因素之資料分析 ................................................. 43 壹、 國中生初次偷竊、暴力和虞犯行為之描述性分析 ........................................ 43 貳、 國中生生活緊張因素與個人屬性及家庭背景描述性分析 ............................ 46 第二節 生活緊張因素與初次偷竊行為之關聯性分析 ............................................. 60 壹、 國中階段與初次偷竊行為之關聯性 ................................................................ 60 貳、 日常生活困擾與初次偷竊行為之關聯性 ........................................................ 61 參、 負面生活事件與初次偷竊行為之關聯性 ........................................................ 65 肆、 與老師負面關係和初次偷竊行為之關聯性 .................................................... 68 伍、 與同儕負面關係和初次偷竊行為之關聯性 .................................................... 71 陸、 生活緊張因素與初次偷竊行為之關聯性 ........................................................ 74 柒、 小結 .................................................................................................................... 79 第三節 生活緊張因素與初次暴力行為之關聯性分析 ............................................. 81 壹、 國中階段與初次暴力行為之關聯性 ................................................................ 81 貳、 日常生活困擾與初次暴力行為之關聯性 ........................................................ 82 參、 負面生活事件與初次暴力行為之關聯性 ........................................................ 86 肆、 與老師負面關係和初次暴力行為之關聯性 .................................................... 90 伍、 與同儕負面關係和初次暴力行為之關聯性 .................................................... 94 陸、 生活緊張因素與初次暴力行為之關聯性 ........................................................ 98 柒、 小結 .................................................................................................................. 103 第四節 生活緊張因素與初次虞犯行為之關聯性分析 ........................................... 104 壹、 國中階段與初次虞犯行為之關聯性 .............................................................. 104 貳、 日常生活困擾與初次虞犯行為之關聯性 ...................................................... 105 參、 負面生活事件與初次虞犯行為之關聯性 ...................................................... 109 肆、 與老師負面關係和初次虞犯行為之關聯性 .................................................. 113 伍、 與同儕負面關係和初次虞犯行為之關聯性 .................................................. 117 陸、 生活緊張因素與初次虞犯行為之關聯性 ...................................................... 121 柒、 小結 .................................................................................................................. 126 第五節 綜合討論 ....................................................................................................... 128 壹、 生活緊張因素對於國中生初次偷竊行為之討論 .......................................... 128 貳、 生活緊張因素對於國中生初次暴力行為之討論 .......................................... 129 參、 生活緊張因素對於國中生初次虞犯行為之討論 .......................................... 132 第五章 結論與建議 ....................................................................................................... 135 第一節 研究結論 ....................................................................................................... 135 壹、 生活緊張因素對於國中生初次偷竊行為之關係 .......................................... 135 貳、 生活緊張因素對於國中生初次暴力行為之關係 .......................................... 136 參、 生活緊張因素對於國中生初次虞犯行為之關係 .......................................... 137 第二節 研究建議 ....................................................................................................... 138 壹、 給學生家長的建議 .......................................................................................... 138 貳、 給學校的建議 .................................................................................................. 140 第三節 研究限制與未來研究方向 ........................................................................... 142 第四節 研究貢獻 ....................................................................................................... 143 參考文獻 ........................................................................................................................... 145 壹、 中文部份 ........................................................................................................... 145 貳、 英文部份 ........................................................................................................... 149 附錄:國中生日常生活行為與態度調查問卷 ............................................................... 157

    壹、 中文部份
    王爾暄、李承傑、董旭英(2017)。國中生生活緊張因素、負向情緒調節能力與幸福感之相關研究。教育理論與實踐學刊,35,31-61。
    王濟川、郭志剛(2010)。Logistic迴歸模型:方法及應用。臺北市:五南。
    何明晃(2014)。探訪一位因釋字第664號解釋意外獲釋虞犯少年之生命經驗。青少年犯罪防治研究期刊,6(2),81-130。
    吳文琪、李蘭(2001)。臺北市國中生之暴力行為與溝通技巧的關係。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,20(6),485-494。
    吳啟安、譚子文(2013)。負面人際關係、低自我控制對青少年偏差行為的影響。青少年犯罪防治研究期刊,5(1),35-62。
    吳齊殷、李文傑(2003)。青少年憂鬱症狀與偏差行為併發之關係機制。臺灣社會學,6,119-175。
    李文傑、吳齊殷(2004)。棒打出壞子?青少年暴力行為的連結機制。臺灣社會學,7,1-46。
    李威辰(2003)。父母社經地位、青少年緊張與青少年偏差行為相關性研究。載於齊力、董旭英(主編),臺灣青少年偏差行為之剖析(169-198頁)。嘉義縣:南華大學教社所。
    杜素豪、黃俊龍(譯)(2001)。事件史分析(原作者:K. Yamaguchi)。臺北市:弘智文化。(原著出版年:1991)
    周愫嫻(2001)。愛上學的孩子,不會變壞嗎?論學校因素與青少年偏差行為之關係。應用心理研究,11,93-115。
    周愫嫻(2004)。少年犯罪。臺北市:五南。
    周愫嫻、曹立群(2007)。犯罪學理論及其實證。臺北市:五南。
    周震歐、趙碧華(1996)。青少年逃學逃家行為的社會心理因素分析。犯罪學期刊,2,79-98。
    法務部(2017)。法部部統計年報(105年)。取得http://www.rjsd.moj.gov.tw/rjsdweb/book/Book_Detail.aspx?book_id=245
    法務部司法官學院(2017)。法務部司法官學院106年委託研究計劃:105年犯罪狀況及其分析─2016犯罪趨勢關鍵報告。取得https://www.tpi.moj.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=488316&ctNode=35595&mp=302
    邱慶華、龔心怡(2015)。社會連結、低自我控制與非行少年偏差行為之研究:以臺灣地區少年矯治機構為例。彰師大教育學報,27,69-100。
    侯崇文(2003)。理性選擇與犯罪決定:以少年竊盜為例。犯罪與刑事司法研究,1,1-36。
    張峰彬(2013)。婚育溢酬或懲罰?家庭生命週期與公司內權威晉陞之性別差異。臺灣社會學刊,53,1-53。
    張楓明(2006)。親子、師生及同儕關係對國中學生初次偏差行為影響之動態分析研究(未發表之博士論文)。國立臺南大學教育經營與管理研究所博士論文,臺南市。
    張楓明(2007)。親子、師生及同儕關係對國中學生初次暴力行為發生之影響。中等教育,58(5),74-91。
    張楓明(2011)。學業層面之參與、抱負、自我效能及緊張因素對初次偏差行為影響之縱貫性研究。當代教育研究季刊,19(3),39-81。
    張楓明、譚子文(2011)。個人信念、負向生活事件、偏差同儕與青少年初次偏差行為關聯性之實證研究。青少年犯罪防治研究期刊,3(1),133-159。
    許春金、鄭凱寶、蔡田木(2010)。少年生活壓力對犯罪經驗的影響分析:以一般化緊張理論的縱貫性檢驗。中央警察大學犯罪防治學報,12,31-64。
    陳巧雲(2013)。論負面情緒如何影響衝動型暴力青少年的行為能力。青少年犯罪防治研究期刊,5(2),77-108。
    陳巧雲、白新名(2014)。負面情緒對暴力青少年抑制能力之影響:腦波研究。青少年犯罪防治研究期刊,6(2),21-52。
    陳巧雲、吳宣霈(2013)。從抑制控制與錯誤監控機制來探討青少年的暴力行為。青少年犯罪防治研究期刊,5(1),63-90。
    陳巧雲、邱重儒(2014)。從實驗室引發的攻擊情境來探討青少年暴力行為。青少年犯罪防治研究期刊,6(2),53-80。
    陳易甫(2016)。青少年暴力行為之研究:暴力認知以及友伴特質的影響。社會分析,13,83-112。
    陳易甫(2017)。暴力知識結構與青少年暴力行為:一個社會認知理論的觀點。人文及社會科學集刊,29(3),343-379。
    曾正奇、陳信昭(2004)。運用敘事治療取向處理青少年偏差行為:以偷竊行為為例。諮商與輔導,226,7-10。
    游美惠、柯伯昇(2008)。國小校長職位晉遷的事件史分析:性別和家庭照顧責任的探討。臺灣社會學刊,40,45-88。
    黃毅志(2008)。如何精確測量職業地位?「改良版臺灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表」。臺東大學教育學報,19(1),151-160。
    楊士儀、簡後聰(2007)。青少年暴力犯罪的理論與實務之個案研究。北市教大社教學報,6,1-28。
    楊志堅、吳齊殷(2001)。潛藏轉移模式在社會縱貫研究之應用:以青少年暴力行為發展研究為例。調查研究,9,5-33。
    董旭英(2000)。美國青少年與父母、校園互動、同儕間的緊張關係對其初次暴力行為發生的年齡差異效應之動態分析研究。犯罪學期刊,6,63-94。
    董旭英(2003)。一般化緊張理論的實證性檢證。犯罪學期刊,6(1),103-128。
    董旭英(2009)。生活壓迫事件、社會支持、社會心理特質與臺灣都會區國中生偏差行為之關係。青少年犯罪防治研究期刊,1(1),129-164。
    董旭英(2016)。資料分析方法(五):偏差及犯罪行為研究之模組建立─巢式迴歸模式之應用。載於許春金、楊士隆等合著,刑事司法與犯罪學研究方法(301-318頁)。臺北市:五南。
    詹怡華、張楓明、董旭英(2012)。國中生接觸偏差同儕在其衝動性格、知覺父母監督與偏差行為間關聯性之中介效果。犯罪與刑事司法研究,18,89-123。
    鄒穎峰(2012)。臺灣青少年的家庭依附與偏差行為之動態關係。犯罪與刑事司法研究,19,105-135。
    廖鳳池、許雅惠、翁令珍(2003)。高雄地區青少年逃家經驗之調查研究。諮商輔導學報,9,47-80。
    蔡東敏、譚子文、董旭英(2015)。臺南都會區國中生緊張因素、接觸偏差同儕、認同非法手段對偏差行為之影響:建構整合理論解釋模型。青少年犯罪防治研究期刊,7(2),37-80。
    蔡德輝、楊士隆(2017a)。少年犯罪:理論與實務。臺北市:五南。
    蔡德輝、楊士隆(2017b)。犯罪學。臺北市:五南。
    鄧煌發(2000)。輟學少年之家庭與社會學習因素的比較分析。犯罪學期刊,5,233-275。
    鄭瑞隆(2000)。暴力犯罪少年家庭特徵與家庭生活經驗。犯罪學期刊,5,49-78。
    譚子文、范書菁(2010)。依附關係、參與傳統活動、社會緊張因素與臺灣地區青少年外向性偏差行為及內向性偏差行為關聯性之研究。輔導與諮商學報,32(1),17-42。
    譚子文、張楓明(2012)。緊張因素、接觸偏差同儕及低自我控制與青少年偏差行為關聯性之研究。臺中教育大學學報:數理科技類,26(1),27-50。
    譚子文、董旭英、葉雅馨(2010)。社會緊張因素與臺灣大學生內化適應問題關聯性之研究。中華輔導與諮商學報,28,143-185。
    貳、 英文部份
    Aalen, O. O., Borgan, Ø., & Gjessing, H. K. (2008). Survival and event history analysis: A process point of view. New York: Springer.
    Agnew, R. (1984). Goal achievement and delinquency. Sociology and Social Research, 68, 435-451.
    Agnew, R. (1985). A revised strain theory of delinquency. Social Forces, 64(1), 151-167.
    Agnew, R. (1989). A longitudinal test of the revised strain theory. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 5(4), 373-387.
    Agnew, R. (1991). The interactive effect of peer variables on delinquency. Criminology, 29(1), 47-72.
    Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47-87.
    Agnew, R. (2001). Building on the foundation of general strain theory: Specifying the types of strain most likely to lead to crime and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38(4), 319-361.
    Agnew, R. (2006). Pressured into crime: An overview of general strain theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Agnew, R. (2011). Crime and time: The temporal patterning of causal variables. Theoretical Criminology, 15(2), 115-140.
    Agnew, R. (2012). Reflection on “a revised strain theory of delinquency”. Social Forces, 91(1), 33-38.
    Agnew, R. (2013). When criminal coping is likely: An extension of general strain theory. Deviant Behavior, 34(8), 653-670.
    Agnew, R. (2015). Using general strain theory to explain crime in Asian society. Asian Journal of Criminology, 10(2), 131-147.
    Agnew, R. (2016). Strain, economic status, and crime. In Alex R. Piquero (Ed.), The handbook of criminological theory (pp. 209-229). UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    Agnew, R., & White, H. R. (1992). An empirical test of general strain theory. Criminology, 30(4), 475-499.
    Agnew, R., Brezina, T., Wright, J. P., & Cullen, F. T. (2002). Strain, personality trait, and delinquency: Extending general strain theory. Criminology, 40(1), 43-72.
    Akers, R. L., Krohn, M. D., Lanza-Kaduce, L., & Radosevich M. (1979). Social learning and deviant behavior: A specific test of a general theory. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 636-655.
    Allison, P. (2004). Event history analysis. In M. Hardy & A. Bryman (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis (pp. 369-385). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Allison, P. D. (2014).Discrete-time methods. In P. D. Allison (Ed.), Event history and survival analysis (pp. 7-18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Ayers, C. D., Williams, J. H., Hawkins, J. D., Peterson, P. L., Catalano, R. F., & Abbott, R. D. (1999). Assessing correlates of onset, escalation, de-escalation, and desistance of delinquent behavior. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 15(3), 277-306.
    Barrera, D. J., Gaga-a, B., & Pabayos, J. (2016). Negative life events and maladaptive behaviors among Filipino adolescents: An empirical test of the general strain theory. Asian Journal of Criminology, 11(4), 265-287.
    Botchkovar, E. V., Tittle, C. R., & Antonaccio, O. (2009). General strain theory: Additional evidence using cross-cultural data. Criminology, 47(1), 131-176.
    Broidy, L., & Agnew, R. (1997). Gender and crime: A general strain theory perspective. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34(3), 275-306.
    Bucher, J., Manasse, M., & Milton, J. (2015). Soliciting strain: Examining both sides of street prostitution through general strain theory. Journal of Crime and Justice, 38(4), 435-453.
    Burgess, R. L., & Akers, R. L. (1966). A differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior. Social Problems, 14(2), 128-147.
    Burt, C. H., Simons, R. L., & Simons, L. G. (2006). A longitudinal test of the effects of parenting and the stability of self-control: Negative evidence for the general theory of crime. Criminology, 44(2), 353-396.
    Bushway, S. D., Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M. D. (2003). Desistance as a developmental process: A comparison of static and dynamic approaches. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19(2), 129-153.
    Button, D. M. (2016). Understanding the effects of victimization: Applying general strain theory to the experiences of LGBQ youth. Deviant Behavior, 37(5), 537-556.
    Cloward, R. A. (1959). Illegitimate means, anomie, and deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 24(2), 164-176.
    Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Colvin, M., Cullen, F. T., Vander Ven, T. (2002). Coercion, social support, and crime: An emerging theoretical consensus. Criminology, 40(1), 19-42.
    Crawford, D. M., Whitbeck, L. B., & Hoyt, D. R. (2011). Propensity for violence among homeless and runaway adolescents: An event history analysis. Crime & Delinquency, 57(6), 950-968.
    Cudmore, R. M., Cuevas, C. A., & Sabina, C. (2017). The impact of polyvictimization on delinquency among Latino adolescents: A general strain theory perspective. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(17), 2647-2667.
    Eitle, D., & Eitle, T. M. (2016). General strain theory and delinquency: Extending a popular explanation to American India youth. Youth & Society, 48(4), 470-495.
    Elder, Jr. G. H. (1995). The life course paradigm: Social change and individual development. In P. Moen, G. H. Elder, Jr., & K. Ljscher (Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development (pp. 101-140). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
    Elliott, D. S. (1994). Serious violent offenders: Onset, developmental course, and termination. Criminology, 32(1), 1-21.
    Farrington, D. P. (2003). Developmental and life-course criminology: Key theoretical and empirical issue. Criminology, 41(2), 221-256.
    Farrington, D. P., Harada, Y., Shinkai, H., & Moriya, T. (2015). Longitudinal and criminal career research in Japan. Asian Journal of Criminology, 10(4), 255-276.
    Froggio, G. (2007). Strain and juvenile delinquency: A critical review of Agnew’s general strain theory. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 12(4), 383-418.
    Gao, Y., & Wong, S. W. (2018). Strains and delinquency of migrant adolescents in China: An investigation from the perspective of general strain theory. Youth & Society, 50(4), 509-528.
    Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Standford, CA: Standford University Press.
    Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., Bursik, R. J., & Arneklev,B. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(1), 5-29.
    Greco, R., & Curci, A. (2017). Does the general strain theory explain gambling and substance use? Journal of Gambling Studies, 33(3), 919-936.
    Hareven, T. K. (1994). Aging and generational relations: A historical and life course perspective. In J. Hagan & S. C. Karen (Eds.), Annual review of sociology (Vol. 20, pp. 437-461). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Review.
    Hauck, W. W., & Donner, A. (1977). Wald’s test as applied to hypotheses in Logit analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 72(360), 851-853.
    Haynie, D. L., Doogan, N. J., & Soller, B. (2014). Gender, friendship networks, and delinquency: A dynamic network approach. Criminology, 52(4), 688-722.
    Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Hoffmann, J. P., & Cerbone, F. G. (1999). Stressful life events and delinquency escalation in early adolescence. Criminology, 37(2), 343-374.
    Huck, J. L., Spraitz, J. D., Bowers, J. H., & Morris, C. S. (2017). Connecting opportunity and strain to understand deviant behavior: A test of general strain theory. Deviant Behavior, 38(9), 1009-1026.
    Jang, S. J. (2007). Gender differences in strain, negative emotions, and coping behaviors: A general strain theory approach. Justice Quarterly, 24(3), 523-553.
    Jang, S. J., & Song, J. (2015). A “rough test” of a delinquency coping process model of general strain theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(6), 419-430.
    Johnson, R. A., Hoffmann, J. P., Su, S. S., & Gerstein, D. R. (1997). Growth curves of deviant behavior in early adolescence: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 13(4), 429-467.
    Kurtz, D. L., & Zavalia, E. (2016). The importance of social support and coercion to risk of impulsivity and juvenile offending. Crime & Delinquency, 63(14), 1838-1860.
    Lin, W. H. (2012). General strain theory in Taiwan: A latent growth curve modeling approach. Asian Journal of Criminology, 7(1), 37-54.
    Lin, W. H., & Mieczkowski, T. (2011). Subjective strains, conditioning factors, and juvenile delinquency: General strain theory in Taiwan. Asian Journal of Criminology, 6(1), 69-87.
    Link, N. W., Cullen, F. T., Agnew, R., & Link, B. G. (2016). Can general strain theory help us understand violent behavior among people with mental illnesses? Justice Quarterly, 33(4), 729-754.
    Matsueda, R. L., & Anderson, K. (1998). The dynamics of delinquent peers and delinquent behavior. Criminology, 36(2), 269-308.
    Matthews, S. K. (2011). Self-complexity and crime: Extending general strain theory. Justice Quarterly, 28(6), 863-902.
    Mazerolle, P., Brame, R., Paternoster, R., Piquero, A., & Dean, C. (2000). Onset age, persistence, and offending versatility: Comparisons across gender. Criminology, 38(4), 1143-1172.
    Menard, S. (1995). A developmental test of Mertonian anomie theory. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 32(2), 136-174.
    Menard, S. (2002). Applied Logistic regression analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Mills, M. (2011). Discrete-time models. In M. Mills (Ed.), Introducing survival and event history analysis (pp. 179-189). London: Sage.
    Moon, B., & Morash, M. (2017a). A test of general strain theory in South Korea: A focus on objective/subjective strains, negative emotions, and composite conditioning factors. Crime & Delinquency, 63(6), 731-756.
    Moon, B., & Morash, M. (2017b). Gender and general strain theory: A comparison of strains, mediating, and moderating effects explaining three types of delinquency. Youth & Society, 49(4), 484-504.
    Moon, B., Blurton, D., & McCluskey, J. D. (2008). General strain theory and delinquency: Focusing on the influences of key strain characteristics on delinquency. Crime & Delinquency, 54(4), 582-613.
    Moon, B., Hays, K., & Blurton, D. (2009). General strain theory, key strains, and deviance. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(1), 98-106.
    Nagin, D. S., & Farrington, D. P. (1992). The onset and persistence of offending. Criminology, 30(4), 501-523.
    Orak, U., & Solakoglu, O. (2017). Alcohol consumption among Turkish adolescents: An empirical test of general strain theory. Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse, 26(4), 293-302.
    Pampel, F. C. (2000). Logisitic regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Patchin J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2011). Traditional and nontraditional bullying among youth: A test of general strain theory. Youth & Society, 43(2), 727-751.
    Paternoster R., & Mazerolle, P. (1994). General strain theory and delinquency: A replication and extension. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31(3), 235-263.
    Piquero, A., Paternoster, R., Mazerolle, P., Brame, R., & Dean, C. (1999). Onset age, and offense specialization. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36(3), 275-299.
    Reid, J. A., & Riquero, A. R. (2016). Applying general strain theory to youth commercial sexual exploitation. Crime & Delinquency, 62(3), 341-367.
    Reiss, A. J., & Rhodes, A. L. (1963). Status deprivation and delinquent behavior. Sociological Quarterly, 4(2), 135-149.
    Shim, H. S., Jo, Y., & Hoover, L. T. (2015). A test of general strain theory on police officers’ turnover intention. Asian Journal of Criminology, 10(1), 43-62.
    Sigfusdottir, I. D., Kristjansson, A. L., & Agnew, R. (2012). A comparative analysis of general strain theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(2), 117-127.
    Simons, R. L., Stewart, E., Gordon, L., Conger, R. D., & Elder, G. H. J. (2002). A test of life-course explanations for stability and change in antisocial behavior from adolescence to young adulthood. Criminology, 40(2), 401-434.
    Smith, D. A., & Brame, R. (1994). On the initiation and continuation of delinquency. Criminology, 32(4), 607-629.
    Thaxton, S., & Agnew, R. (2018). When criminal coping is likely: An examination of conditioning effects in general strain theory. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 34, 1-34.
    Thornberry, T. P. (1987). Toward an interactional thoery of delinquency. Criminology, 25(4),863-891.
    Tuma, N. B., Hannan, M. T., & Groeneveld, L. P. (1979). Dynamic analysis of event histories. American Journal of Sociology, 84(4), 820-854.
    Turanovic, J. J., & Pratt, T. C. (2013). The consequences of maladaptive coping: Integrating general strain and self-control theories to specify a causal pathway between victimization and offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 29(3), 321-345.
    White, H. R., Pandina, R. J., & LaGrange, R. L. (1987). Longitudinal predictors of serious substance use and delinquency. Criminology, 25(3), 715-740.
    Wu, C. I., & Lei, M. K. (2013). Deviant peers and delinquency: The influence of classroom context, In Chin Chun Yi (Ed.), The psychological well-being of east Asian youth (pp. 91-107). Dordrecht, NL: Springer Publishing Co.
    Zhang, L., Wieczorek, W. F., & Welte, J. W. (1997). The impact of age of onset of substance use on delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34(2), 253-268.

    下載圖示 校內:2020-08-14公開
    校外:2020-08-14公開
    QR CODE