在環保能源議題普受重視的同時，能源採集成為矚目焦點之一，若能結合新興的樂活生活型態(LOHAS)，人類的生活必能往前邁向一大步。本研究針對融合趣味、健康、發電等樂活特色的｢活動樂活｣產品進行探討，運用案例式推理的領域知識模型(Domain Knowledge Model)、使用者運動態度問卷、及ACCESS軟體，開發一個活動樂活產品說服設計輔助系統，提供此類產品的設計建議。其領域知識模型包含說服要素、行為矩陣、設計法則、設計技巧及科技應用等五個項目。同時，也設計使用者問卷調查使用者的動機、態度、人口變數等，這將更有助於尋找更適當的設計建議。研究中，蒐集了90個案例，建立領域知識模型，萃取案例的知識，成為案例資料庫，並為瞭解使用者對產品的想法，設計一份調查台灣民眾對於肢體活動的態度、習慣及意願的問卷。透過問卷得到的統計結果，可依照如人口變數中的性別與教育程度、態度中的喜歡運動與否與有固定運動習慣與否等，將使用者類型分類，結合前述的說服機制、領域知識模型與產品案例，提供產品設計者開發產品時的參考，讓所設計的產品更貼近使用者心理，發揮其最大說服效果。最後，綜合使用者類型分析與案例式資料庫，建立一個輔助活動樂活產品說服設計系統，提供對活動樂活產品有興趣的廠商與設計者在進行產品設計時，經由目標市場進行顧客的事先分析，透過輔助系統搜尋相關的產品案例尋找到其設計經驗，或經由設計經驗找尋到相關產品案例，進而得到更能提高使用者意願的活動樂活產品設計建議。

While the issue of green resources is considered in general, energy harvesting is one of the points. If it could be combined with the developing lifestyle, LOHAS, the human life must be able to take a big step. This research discussed about the LOHAS products mixed with the feature of LOHAS, such as fun, health, electricity generation, used the domain knowledge model of case-based reasoning, the questionnaire of the users’ attitude of exercise, and ACCESS, and developed a persuasive design system for LOHAS products to provide the design advices for this kind of products. When they design the products, through the analysis of the target customer in advance, they could search related product cases to get the design experiences or search the design experiences to get the related product cases through by the persuasive design system. Further, the designers and companies would get the design advices for the LOHAS products that raise the users’ desire.

1. 呂幸軒(2009)。以案例式推理輔助產品服務系統策略之選定。國立成功大學，台南。
2. 何菀欣(2013)。運用說服科技趨向永續行為之活動樂活產品開發方法。國立成功大學，台南。
3. 幸漢恩(2012)。活動樂活產品之說服設計。國立成功大學，台南。
4. 張苡絃(2011)。家用ICT產品之為永續行為而設計。國立成功大學，台南。
5. 黃士哲(2009)。以物質場分析法發展產品服務系統創新設計。國立成功大學，台南。
6. 楊永全(2010)。整合仿生學與TRIZ理想化和演化趨勢之綠色創新設計方法。國立成功大學，台南。
英文部分
1. Aamodt, A., &Plaza, E. (1994). Case-based reasoning: foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AI Communications. IOS Press, 7, 39-59.
2. Aha, D. W., (1998). The omnipresence of case-based reasoning in science and application. Knowledge-Based Systems, 11(5-6), 261-273.
3. Anderson, D. R., Sweeney, D. J., Williams, T. A., Camm, J. D., &Cochran, J. J. (2013).統計學(陳可杰、黃聯海、李婉怡)。台北市：新加坡商聖智學習。
4. Ajzen, I.(1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50, 179-211.
5. Bergmann, R., & Althoff, K. D. (2003). Developing industrial case-based reasoning applications. The INRECA Methodology. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, LNAI 1612. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
6. Daae, J., & Boks, C. (2014). A classification of user research methods for design for sustainable behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10, 1016.
7. Dubberly, H., Haque, U., & Pangaro, P. (2009) What is interaction? Are there different types? ACM Interactions, 16, 1, 69–75.
8. Finnie, G., & Sun, Z. (2003). R5 model for case-based reasoning. Knowledge-Based Systems, 16(1), 59-65.
9. Fogg, B. J. (1998). Persuasive computers: perspectives and research directions. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 225-232. Los Angeles, California, United States.
10. Fogg, B. J. (2003). Persuasive Technology – Using Computer to Change What We Think to Do. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco.
11. Fogg, B. J. (2009a). A behavior model for persuasive design. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, ACM, 1-7, Claremont, California.
12. Fogg, B. J. (2009b). The Behavior Grid: 35 Ways Behavior Can Change. Persuasive, 09, April 26-29, Claremont, California, USA.
13. Fogg, B. J. & J. Hreha (2010). The Behavior Wizard: A Method for Matching Target Behaviors with Solutions. LNCS 6137, 17-131.
14. Hendrick, H. W (2008), Applying ergonomics to systems: Some documented “lessons learned. Applied Ergonomics, 39, 418-426.
15. Klöckner, C. & Blöbaum, A. (2010). A comprehensive action determination model: Toward a broader understanding of ecological behavior using the example of travel mode choice. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 574-586.
16. Kolodner, J. (1993). Case-based reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
17. Leake, D. B. (1996). Case-based reasoning: experiences, lessons and future directions. Cambridge, MA, USA, MIT Press.
18. Lockton, D. & Harrison D. (2008). Design with Intent: Persuasive technology in a wider context. Persuasive Technology: Third International Conference, 274-278, Oulu, Finland, Proceedings, Springer, Berlin.
19. Lockton, D. & Harrison D. (2010). The design with intent method: a design tool for influencing user behaviour. Applied Ergonomics, 41(3), 382-392.
20. Lockton, D., Harrison, D., & Stanton, N.A.(2010). Design with intent : 101 patterns for influencing behavior through design. UK: uquifine from: http://danlockton.com/dwi/Main_Page
21. Lockton, D., Harrison, D., & Stanton, N.A. (2012) Models of the user: designers’ perspectives oninfluencing sustainable behavior. Journal of Design Research, 10,1/2, 7-27.
22. Lockton, D (2012), Persuasive technology and digital design for behaviour change, workingpaper, available at http://danlockton.co.uk
23. Maslow, A. H., Frager, R., & Fadiman, J. (1970). Motivation and Personality
24. Oinas-Kukkonen, H. & Harjumaa M. (2009). Persuasive systems design: key issues, process model, and system features. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 24, Article 28, 485-500.
25. Ray, P. & Anderson, S. (2000). The Cultural Creatives : How 50 Million People Are Changing the World. New York : Harmony Books.
26. Riesbeck, C. & Schank, R. (1989). Inside case-based reasoning, lawrence erlbaum associates. Lecture Notes for Computer Science, Hillsdale, N.J
27. Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influence on altruism. L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, Academic Press, New York (1977), 221-279.
28. Vargas, J. E. & S. Raj (1993). Developing maintainable expert systems using case-based reasoning. Expert Systems , 10, No. 4, 219-266.
29. Webb, D., Soutar,G.N., Mazzarol,T., & Saldaris,P. (2013) Self-determination theory and consumer behavioural change:Evidence from a household energy-saving behaviour study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 59-66.