| 研究生: |
高宗永 Kao, Tsung-Yung |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
以複合材料模型驗證分析加勁擋土牆行為之研究 The Simulation and Verification on the GRS Retaining Wall Using Composite Material Model |
| 指導教授: |
陳景文
Chen, Jing-Wen |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 土木工程學系碩士在職專班 Department of Civil Engineering (on the job class) |
| 論文出版年: | 2007 |
| 畢業學年度: | 95 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 98 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 複合材料 、加勁擋土牆 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | GRS Retaining Wall, Composite Material |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:108 下載:2 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究利用Lee(2000)的複合材料觀念及Boyle(1995)所進行UCD(Unit Cell Device)試驗的結果,發展出一系列在平面應變下,GRS(Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil)及土壤之彈性模數,同時以二維有限差分法程式FLAC(Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua)建立加勁擋土牆之複合材料數值模型,分析建造完成後之應力應變行為,並與現地實體擋土牆量測到之變位與應變,進行比較討論。
本文以美國華盛頓州Rainier Avenue wall做為數值分析模型,該加勁擋土牆採用回包式牆面,設計高度為12.6公尺,加勁材埋置長度為9.5公尺。並於牆後3公尺處裝置傾斜計(Inclinometer)與加勁材上之應變計,取得牆體隨深度變化之水平變位與加勁材應變之實測值。複合模型以0.5%、1.0%及2.0%三種不同側向應變條件下,分析觀測牆後3公尺之應力應變變化,以便與實測值比較分析。
研究成果顯示,利用FLAC 有限差分程式配合複合材料模型,分析加勁擋土牆之牆體變位及應變,可得到與實測值良好之一致性。加勁擋土牆之h/H小於0.38時,以0.5%側向應變模型較接近實測值,而h/H介於0.38到0.48時,則實測值與1.0%側向應變模型相近,h/H大於0.48時,則以2.0%側向應變模擬,可獲得較合理之預測。
Based on the concept of composite material for the GRS (Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil) retaining wall (Lee, 2000), this study developed a series of elastic moduli in plain strain using the UCD(Unit Cell Device)testing results from Boyle(1995). Subsequently, the finite difference method of FLAC(Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua)was utilized to build the composite material model of GRS retaining wall and to analyze its stress-strain behavior after construction. A comparison was therefore made and discussed between the analyzed results and the field measurements.
The Rainier Avenue Wall of GRS retaining wall built in Washington State in US was adopted as the simulated object. The wrapped-around facing was adopted for the 12.6m-heighted wall with the 9.5m-lengthed reinforcements embedded in a vertical spacing of 0.38m. The field measurement of the inclinometer and the strain gage on the reinforcements at a distance of 3m behind the wall facing were collected for the comparison with the simulation results as of different lateral strain condition in 0.5%, 1.0%, 2.0% of the composite models.
It is found that the performance of the composite material model using FLAC reveals its consistency with the field measurement. The horizontal displacement of the GRS wall was related to the height ratio h/H of the height in concern. When h/H less than 0.38, 0.5% of lateral strain model is suitable, while 0.38〈h/H〈0.48, the deformation is close to the 1.0% model. As for h/H greater than 0.48, the model of 2.0% in lateral strain would be appropriate for the simulation and prediction.
1.周南山,「地工合成物加勁坡分析設計之探討與評估」,地工技術,第43期,第32-42頁,(1993)。
2.Allen, T. M., Christopher, B.R., and Holtz, R.D. (1992) “Performance of a 12.6 m High Geotextile Wall in Seattle, Washington”, Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls, Denver, J.T.H. Wu, Ed., Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 81-100.
3.Bathurst, R.J., and Koerner R.M., “Results of Class A Predictions for the RMC Reinforced Soil Wall Trials,” The Application of Polymeric Reinforcement in Soil Retaining Structures, P.M. Jarrett and A. McGown, Eds., NATO ASI Series, Series E: Applied Sciences – Vol. 147, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 127-171, (1988).
4.Bathurst, R.J., and Hatami, K., “Seismic Response Analysis of a Geogrid-Reinforced Soil Retaining Wall”, Geosynthetics International, Vol.5, No.1-2, pp.127-166, (1998).
5.Bell, J. R., Barrett, R. K., and Ruckman, A. C. (1983) “Geotextile Earth-Reinforced Retaining Wall tests: Glenwood Canyon, Colorado,” Transportation Research Record 916, pp. 59-69.
6.Boyle, S.R. (1995) “Deformation Prediction of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, 391p
7.Duncan, J.M., Byrne, P., Wong, K.S., and Mabry, P. “Strength, Stress-Strain and Bulk Modulus Parameters for Finite Element Analyses of Stresses and Movements in Soil Masses,” Geotechnical Engineering Report, No. UCB/GT/80-01, University of California, Berkeley, (1980).
8.Christopher, B.R. (1993) “Deformation Response and Wall Stiffness in Relation to Reinforced Soil Wall Design,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 354p.
9.Gray, D.H., and Ohashi, H., “Mechanics of Fiber Reinforcement in Sand,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 109, No. 3, pp. 335-353, (1983).
10.Hausmann, M.R., “Strength of Reinforced Soil,” Proceeding of Eighth Australian Road Research Board Conference, Perth, Session 13, pp. 1-3, (1976).
11.Hausmann, M.R., and Lee, K.L., “Strength Characteristics of Reinforced Soil,” Proceedings of the International Symposium on New Horizons in Construction Materials, Lehigh, Vol. 1, pp. 165-176, (1976).
12.Hausmann, M.R. (1990) Engineering Principles of Ground Modification, McGraw-Hill, 632p.
13.Holtz, R.D. and Lee, W.F. (1998) Geosynthetic Reinforced Wall Analysis, Phase II: Use of In-Soil Geosynthetic Behavior to Predict Deformation, Report No. WA-RD 452.1, Washington State Department of Transportation, 32p.
14. Itasca Consulting Group, Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua, Itasca Consulting Group, Inc.Volume I, II, III, IV, (1999).
15.Jones, C. J.F.P., Earth Reinforcement and Soil Structures, Thomas Telford, (1997).
16.Lade, P.V., and Lee, K.L., “Engineering Properties of Soils,” Report UCLA-ENG-7652, pp. 145, (1976).
17.Lee, W.F., Internal Stability Analyses of Geosynthetic Reinforced Retaining Walls, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, (2000).
18.Lindquist, D.D., “Seismic Modeling of Geosynthetic Reinforced Slopes,” Master of Science Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, (1998).
19.Mitchell, J.K. and Villet, W.C.B., “Reinforcement of Earth Slopes and Embankments,” National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 290, Transportation Research Board, 323 p., (1987).
20.NCMA, “Segmental Retaining Walls – Seismic Design Manual”, 1st Edition, National Concrete Masonry Association, Bathurst, R. J., USA, (1998).
21.Rowe, R.K. and Ho, S.K., “Application of Finite Element Techniques to the Analysis of Reinforced Soil Walls,” The Application of Polymeric Reinforcement in Soil Retaining Structures, P.M. Jarrett and A. McGown, Eds., NATO ASI Series, Series E: applied Sciences – Vol. 147, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 541-556, (1988).
22.Rowe, R.K. and Ho, S.K., “Keynote Lecture: A Review of the Behavior of Reinforced Soil Walls,” Earth Reinforcement Practice, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Earth Reinforcement Practice, Fukuoka, H. Ochiai, S. Hayashi and J. Otani, Eds., Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 801-830, (1993).
23.Schlosser, F. and Long, H.T., “Recent Results in French Research on Reinforced Earth,” Journal of the Construction Division, ASCE, Vol. 100, No. CO3, pp. 223-227, (1972).
24.Seed, H.B. and Whitman, R.V., “Design of Earth Retaining Structures for Dynamic Loads,” ASCE Specialty Conference: Lateral Stresses in the Ground and Design of Earth Retaining Structures, Ithaca, NY, pp. 103-147, (1970).
25.Stanley R.Boyle, Deformation Prediction of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Retaining Walls, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, (1995).
26.Yang, M.A. and Singh, A., “Strength and Deformation Characteristics of Reinforced Sand,” National Meeting on Water Resources Engineering, ASCE, Los Angeles, Preprint 2189, (1974).