自1980年代以來，病態建築症候群(SBS)、退伍軍人症(Legionellosis)以及SARS蔓延全球，造成全球恐慌，凸顯室內環境污染問題之嚴重性，世界各國已警覺到21世紀所處之地球環境，將有更多威脅人類生存的挑戰孕育而生，未來可能面臨更多更強悍的病毒出現，必須以「建築預防醫學」及「建築治療醫學」觀念面對下一波的生存危機。位處亞熱帶高溫、高濕氣候的台灣，既存建築佔有97％的數量，必須承受21世紀新議題的考驗，不斷的再活化、再更新，以持續發揮其基本的功能。
本研究論文主要是從使用者與室內環境的健康舒適性為發展目標，透過客觀的儀器量測進行室內環境品質(Indoor Environment Quality)的定量化分析，以及使用者心理問卷評價，瞭解「環境」與「人」健康舒適之關連性，並建立一套室內環境品質診斷及改善標準程序，提供未來為數眾多之「既存建築」，進行室內環境診斷與改善成效評估之用。本研究主要參考內政部建築研究所之室內環境改善方法及國外相關方法，以主訴自體檢查(發現問題)、初勘(尋找病源)、建築健檢(專業診斷)、設計規劃與評估分析(改善對策)、使用後改善追蹤與評估(成效評估)等步驟程序，針對「封閉型的室內空間-室內靶場建築」做診斷及改善評估，研究結果發現，封閉型之室內空間，不僅室內空氣環境品質不良，容易造成室內有機性氣體及無機性氣體的濃度增加，其物理性懸浮微粒及生物性細菌、真菌亦相對偏高，而且其室內音環境品質、光環境品質及溫熱環境品質皆明顯低於「健康基準值」，有立即改善的需要。因此，透過「室內環境品質改善」對策的建立，有效的維持室內環境之健康舒適性能，本研究結論如下：
(1) 建立既存建築物之室內環境品質診斷檢測模式
本研究之「既存建築室內環境品質檢測完整模式」：從案例背景及基本資料調查、 使用者心理問卷調查、室內環境品質檢測與診斷、提出改善目標策略、進行環境品質改善、改善後成效驗證與使用者問卷評估等項目。
(2) 評估台灣靶場空間室內環境品質之診斷與量測結果
量測結果顯示：室內噪音值過高（67dB（A））、平均照度偏低（310Lux）、平均溫度及相對濕度（30.2℃及64.3％）高於健康舒適基準值、打靶時CO及粉塵濃度急劇攀升（36ppm及0.88mg/m3）。
(3) 提出改善對策之可行性分析與成效分析方法
提出改善對策之「性能、安全、節能、施工、經濟、美觀、維護性及特殊需求」等面向優缺點及檢核表，分析對策方案可行性。另透過改善前後進行之室內環境ASM-24小時連續性量測及心理問卷調查二種方法，提出改善前後比對分析，各環境因子改善成效均達成目標。
(4) 完成室內環境品質簡易診斷評估方法
本研究提出之「改善對策檢核表」，可轉換提供使用者自主室內環境品質簡易診斷評估方法，經由檢核表內各性能評估子項，主訴建築室內環境品質性能，簡易快速顯示並判斷須進行改善項目。

Since the 1980s, diseases such as Sick Building Syndromes(SBS)、Legionellosis and SARS has been swept all over the world, causing fear and threats toward human emotions and health, calling the world’s attention to the critical issue of indoor environment pollution, making nations to realize that the living environment of our planet in the 21st century is in great jeopardy. More and more life-risky changes would be occurred to threaten the existence of human being, stronger and tougher viruses could be emerged anytime anywhere to endager our every day life, only when we realize and actualize the concept of “Architecture preventive medicine” and ” Architecture treatment medicine”, that we are able to face and fight against the next wave of life-threatening crisis. Taiwan, located in the humid subtropical climate, having 97% of existing buildings islandwide, has now facing the task as how to strengthen the existing buidlings with capability to survive the grand changlleges in the 21st century.
The perspective of this research is to evaluate Indoor Environment Quality on the basis of user health and environmental cozyness with Quantitative Analysis method through objective equipments.With the questionnaire retrieved from users, we are able to comprehend the correlation between “environment” and “people”, to set up a standard diagnosis and improvement procedure for Indoor Environment Quality control, finally to accomplish the purpose of assisting numerous existing buildings to proceed meaningful diagnosis and analysis. This research has referred to the Indoor Enviornment Improvement Practice issued by The Ministry of The Interior of Taiwan Government and related research methods overseas, step by step using practices such as Chief Complaint Examination (finding problems), Initial Diagnosis(searching for origin of disease), Architectural Health Examination (professional diagnosis), Design and Analysis (Improvement Practice), Result Tracing and Analysis (Evaluation), to analysis and evaluate our research target – Interior Shooting Building - a closed environment, in the most effective manner. Our research pointed out, the poor air quality of a closed environment would bring high concentration of both organic and non-organic gases, raising the percentage of particle suspension, biological germ and fungus concentration, other than that, the noise, light and temperature standard were far beyond acceptable health criteria, which was in need of immediate improvement. Through the establishment of “Indoor Enviroment Quality Improvement” policy, we are able to effectively maintain a healthy and comfortable indoor environment quality. The conclusions of the research are as following:
(1)Establish diagnosis mode for indoor environment quality of the existing buildings
Diagnosis full mode for indoor environment quality of the existing buildings: Case background and data check, questionnaire of user experience, indoor environment quality diagnosis, improvement strategy, improvement practice implement, evaluation, questionnaire of user satisfaction.
(2)Diagnosis Result of Indoor Environment Quality of Shooting Buildings in Taiwan
The results indicated the quality as following: over-high noise level (67dB(A)), average over-low light intensity (310 Lux), average temperature and humidity higher than human comfort standard, rapid raise of high concentration of carbon monoxide (CO) and dust pollution（36ppm and 0.88mg/m3）.
(3)Improvement Strategy Feasibility Study and Evaluation
A check sheet based on “performance, safety, energy-saving, construction, economy, aesthetics, preservation and destintivel needs” was designed to evaluate the feasibility of improvement strategy. By comparing the differences before and after the implement of 24-hours indoor environment ASM assessment and psychology questionnaire, it was found that all environmental variety factors had been successfully improvement.
(4)The Offer of A Simple Diagnosis Practice For Indoor Environment Quality
The “improvement check sheet” is simple and easy to use, by the check of each item listed on the sheet, users can proceed simple diagnosis and determine what items need to be improved.

中文部分
1.江哲銘，住宅室內空氣年齡指標與換氣效率性能檢測法評估研究，國科會研究報告（NSC86-2621-E-006-003），1997。
2.江哲銘，住宅室內通風效率實測評估法研究，國科會研究報告（NSC88-2211-E-006-047），1999。
3.江哲銘，建築技術規則有關通風條文增修訂之研究，內政部建築研究所，1997。
4.江哲銘，建築物噪音與振動，胡氏圖書，1993。
5.江哲銘，建築室內環境保健控制綜合指標之研究，內政部建築研究所，1999。
6.江哲銘、李彥頤、周伯丞、邵文政，辦公空間室內裝修對空氣品質影響，第二屆 中華民國室內設計學術研討會論文集，pp.257-262，高雄，台灣，2000。
7.江哲銘、林俊興等，住居空間物理環境基準之研究（室內品質量測法初探），中華民國建築學會第四屆建築學術研究發表會論文集，1991。
8.江哲銘、賴啟銘、周伯丞、李彥頤，綠建築室內環境指標之研究 A Study on the Indoor Environment Index (IEI) for labelling Green Building in Taiwan，”第十二屆建築研究成果發表會論文集”，中華民國建築學會，Ref. No. 256，台北，台灣，2000。
9.江哲銘等，住宅室內空氣環境使用後評估，中華民國建築學會學術研究成果發表會論文集，1993。
10.江哲銘等，辦公空間通風效果與污染物濃度之研究-以台灣商業辦公大樓為例 A Study on the Relation of Ventilation to Pollutant in Commercial Office Spaces of Taiwan，中華民國建築學會 第十三屆建築研究成果發表會論文集，CD-ROM，高雄，台灣，2001。
11.營建雜誌社，建築技術規則，1992。
12.蘇慧貞、江哲銘、李俊璋，室內空氣品質標準與管制策略之研究，行政院環保署，2000.8。
13.蘇慧貞、江哲銘、李俊璋，高雄市辦公大樓之室內空氣品質調查與健康危害之評估，高雄市環保局，2000。
14.蘇慧貞、江哲銘，室內空氣品質檢測方法之研究，行政院環保署環境檢驗所，2003.7。

外文部分
1.Air Quality and Human Health-Indoor Air Quality, State of the Environment Reporting, En-vironment Australia, Australia, 1997.
2.Che-Ming Chiang, Po-Cheng Chou, Chi-Ming Lai, A Methodology to Access the Indoor Environment in Care Centers for Senior Citizens, Building and Environment Vol. 36, No. 4., 2000.
3.CM Lai, CM Chiang, A Study on the Comprehensive Indicator of Indoor Environment Assessment for Occupants’ Health in Taiwan, Building and Environment, Vol. 37, No.4, pp.387-392, 2001.
4.Etkin DS. Ceilings/Walls & IAQ: Health impacts, prevention & mitigation. Cutter Information Corp. Arlington, U.S.A. 1994.
5.Etkin DS. Office furnishings/equipment & IAQ: Health impacts, prevention & mitigation. Cutter Information Corp. Arlington, U.S.A. 1992.
6.F. M. Lin, C. M. Chiang, and S. F. Chen, Prediction and Reduction Evaluation of Floor Vibration Induced by Foot Steps, Building Acoustics Vol. 8, No. 2., 2001.
7.Healthy Building 2000 Proceedings, International Conference on Healthy Building, Espoo, Finland. 2000.
8.Hiroyoshi Otsuki, 電磁波白書，株式會社，Japan，1997.05
9.ICNIRP Statement, General Approach to Protection Against Non-Inonizing Radiation, International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, 2002.
10.International Conference Sustainable Building 2000 Proceedings, Maastricht, Netherlands. 2000.
11.Marie Hult, Assessment of indoor environment in existing buildings, Green Building Challenge ’98 , Vol. 2, pp.139-146, 1998.10., Sweden. 1998.
12.O’Reilly JT, Hagan P, Gots R, Hedege A. Keeping Buildings Healthy: How to monitor and prevent indoor environmental problems. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Canada. 1998.
13.Seppänen O, Tuomainen M, Säteri J. Healthy Buildings 2000: Workshop Summaries. Espoo, Finland. 2000.
14.Ventilation for Acceptable Air Quality, ASHARE Standard 62-1998, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning and Sanitary Engineers Inc., Atlanta: 1998.
15.日本建設省建築研究所，室內環境評價法，1994。
16.日本建築學會，環境磁場計測技術，1998。
17.田邊新一，室內化學污染シックハウス常識と對策，株式會社講談社，Japan，1998.。
18.高木任之，建築基準法性能規定をみこなすコツ，學藝出版社，2000.11。
19.國土交通省住宅局，必攜「住宅の品質確保の促進等に關する法律」改訂版2001，創樹社，Japan，2001