| 研究生: |
林辰澔 Lin, Chen-Hao |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
具軸向作動自調節之徑向磁通磁制動器導體優化設計與實驗評估 Design and Experimental Evaluation of Conductor Optimization for a Radial-Flux Self-Regulating Magnetic Brake with Axial Adjustment |
| 指導教授: |
歐峯銘
Ou, Feng-Ming |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 機械工程學系 Department of Mechanical Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2026 |
| 畢業學年度: | 114 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 103 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 被動調節磁制動器 、渦電流制動 、徑向磁通 、具導磁塊導體設計 、導磁塊 、軸向調節 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | self-regulating magnetic brake, eddy-current brake, radial flux, conductor optimization, soft-magnetic insert, axial adjustment |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:7 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
磁制動器具有非接觸、低磨耗及低噪音等特性,適合應用於需長時間運轉之旋轉系統。然而,固定構型磁制動器之制動扭矩受轉速與幾何配置限制,且磁石與導體間不可避免之氣隙易造成磁通發散與洩漏,使其難以在有限尺寸與調節行程下兼具高制動性能與自動調節能力。因此,本研究提出具軸向作動自調節之徑向磁通磁制動器,並於鋁導體內嵌入軟磁性導磁塊,以提升磁通利用率及調節過程之制動性能。
本研究以垂直軸風力發電機之運轉資料作為工程設計案例,將操作需求映射為磁制動器端 355–492 RPM 之轉速範圍。首先建立包含永久磁石、氣隙、導體、導磁塊及背鐵之等效磁路與解析扭矩模型,並分析磁石規格、導體厚度、導磁塊數量、展開角度及軸向位置之影響。最終採用厚度 3 mm 之 Al1060 導體、32 個展開角度 2°之 S20C 導磁塊,軸向調節範圍為 −12.5 至 −2.7 mm。自調節機構利用質量塊產生之離心力,經 45°斜面轉換為軸向推力,並配合彈簧回復力,使導體位置及有效感應面積隨轉速自動改變。其後以三維有限元素分析驗證解析模型,並製作實體樣機進行導體效益及被動調節實驗。
實驗結果顯示,具導磁塊構型於 355–492 RPM 之調節過程中,平均制動扭矩由 2.26 Nm 穩定增加至 5.19 Nm,各操作點標準差介於 0.03–0.08 Nm。於 492 RPM、−2.7 mm 之最大設計操作點,具導磁塊與一般導體構型之實驗扭矩分別為 5.19 Nm 與 1.68 Nm,制動扭矩提升約 208.9%。被動調節實驗亦證實,導體可隨轉速上升產生軸向位移,並於轉速下降時藉由彈簧復歸,驗證無外部電力控制下之自調節作動可行性。綜合而言,本研究所提出之具導磁塊導體設計可於有限調節行程內改善磁通導引、提升制動性能與輸出穩定性,並結合離心式被動調節機構實現隨轉速變化之制動調節。
This study proposes a radial-flux self-regulating magnetic brake with axial conductor adjustment and soft-magnetic inserts embedded in an aluminum conductor. The inserts provide additional low-reluctance flux paths to improve magnetic-flux utilization and braking performance within a limited adjustment stroke. A vertical-axis wind-turbine operating condition was adopted as an engineering design case, corresponding to a magnetic-brake shaft speed range of 355–492 RPM. An equivalent magnetic-circuit model, an analytical eddy-current torque model, three-dimensional finite element analysis, and prototype experiments were integrated to evaluate the proposed design. Experimental results demonstrated that the optimized conductor increased braking torque from 2.26 Nm at 355 RPM to 5.19 Nm at 492 RPM. At the maximum design operating point, its braking torque was approximately 208.9% higher than that of the conventional conductor. The centrifugal self-regulating mechanism also successfully produced speed-dependent axial displacement without external electrical control.
[1] M. Collignon, A. L. Cristol, P. Dufrenoy, Y. Desplanques, and D. Balloy, “Failure of truck brake discs: A coupled numerical–experimental approach to identifying critical thermomechanical loadings,” Tribol. Int., vol. 59, pp. 114–120, 2013.
[2] M. Savioli, “Investigation of frictionless brake systems analyzing their current and future use for automotive applications,” Ph.D. dissertation, Politecnico di Torino, Turin, Italy, 2021.
[3] 吳澄豐, “應用於緩降裝置之自調節磁制動器設計與實驗,” 碩士論文, 國立成功大學, 臺南, 臺灣, 2025.
[4] L. Ye, D. Li, Y. Ma, and B. Jiao, “Design and performance of a water-cooled permanent magnet retarder for heavy vehicles,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 953–958, 2011.
[5] L. Ye, C. Liang, X. Li, and D. Li, “Energy efficiency improvement of eddy-current braking and heating system for electric bus based on fuzzy control,” IET Electr. Syst. Transp., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 385–390, 2020.
[6] V. Kramer, “Design and development of an innovative controller for small wind turbines,” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. Huddersfield, Huddersfield, U.K., 2016.
[7] H. Jeong, H. Ji, S. Choi, and J. Baek, “Parametric study of eddy current brakes for small-scale household wind turbine systems,” Energies, vol. 14, no. 20, Art. no. 6633, 2021.
[8] Telma, “Fonctionnement.” [Online]. Available:https://www.telma.com/produits/fonctionnement.
[9] Head Rush Technologies, “Our technology.” [Online]. Available:https://headrushtech.com/about/our-technology.
[10] H. J. Shin, J. Y. Choi, H. W. Cho, and S. M. Jang, “Analytical torque calculations and experimental testing of permanent magnet axial eddy current brake,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 4152–4155, 2013.
[11] R. Yazdanpanah and M. Mirsalim, “Hybrid electromagnetic brakes: Design and performance evaluation,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 60–69, 2014.
[12] K. H. Shin, H. I. Park, H. W. Cho, and J. Y. Choi, “Semi-three-dimensional analytical torque calculation and experimental testing of an eddy current brake with permanent magnets,” IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 1–5, 2018.
[13] J. Y. Choi and S. M. Jang, “Analytical magnetic torque calculations and experimental testing of radial flux permanent magnet-type eddy current brakes,” J. Appl. Phys., vol. 111, no. 7, 2012.
[14] A. Sinmaz, M. O. Gulbahce, and D. A. Kocabas, “Design and finite element analysis of a radial-flux salient-pole eddy current brake,” in Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Electr. Electron. Eng. (ELECO), Nov. 2015, pp. 590–594.
[15] S. Meier and I. Hahn, “Modeling single and double stator axial eddy current brakes considering current displacement, magnetic leakage, fringing and saturation using coupled electric and magnetic equivalent circuits,” in Proc. 40th Annu. Conf. IEEE Ind. Electron. Soc. (IECON), Oct. 2014, pp. 736–742.
[16] A. M. Mahfouz, M. H. Mohammed, S. Shams, and H. S. Abbas, “Accurate and simple modeling of eddy current braking torque: Analysis and experimental validation,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 1–9, 2023.
[17] R. Yazdanpanah and M. Mirsalim, “Analytical study of axial-flux hybrid excitation eddy current brakes,” Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mech., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 885–896, 2015.
[18] R. Yazdanpanah, “Design and analysis of radial-flux hybrid excitation eddy current brake,” in Proc. 10th Int. Power Electron., Drive Syst. Technol. Conf. (PEDSTC), Feb. 2019, pp. 12–16.
[19] R. R. Sattarov, “The controllable eddy current brakes with permanent magnets: Basic concept,” in Proc. X Int. Conf. Electr. Power Drive Syst. (ICEPDS), Oct. 2018, pp. 1–5.
[20] R. Sattarov and D. Garafutdinov, “Simulation of a self-regulating eddy-current brakes with permanent magnets,” in Proc. Int. Ural Conf. Electr. Power Eng. (UralCon), Sep. 2021, pp. 587–591.
[21] 游恩瑞, “自動確保器之渦電流制動機構性能分析,” 碩士論文, 國立雲林科技大學, 雲林, 臺灣, 2023.
[22] C. Holtmann, F. Rinderknecht, and H. E. Friedrich, “Simplified model of eddy current brakes and its use for optimization,” in Proc. 10th Int. Conf. Ecological Vehicles Renewable Energies (EVER), Mar. 2015, pp. 1–8.
[23] H. K. Razavi and M. U. Lampérth, “Eddy-current coupling with slotted conductor disk,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 405–410, 2006.
[24] S. Sharif, J. Faiz, and K. Sharif, “Performance analysis of a cylindrical eddy current brake,” IET Electr. Power Appl., vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 661–668, 2012.
[25] Y. Jin, B. Kou, and L. Li, “Improved analytical modeling of an axial flux double-sided eddy-current brake with slotted conductor disk,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 13277–13286, 2022.
[26] M. Entezami, “Novel operational condition monitoring techniques for wind turbine brake systems,” Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. Birmingham, Birmingham, U.K., 2013.
[27] A. Koswatta, S. Yasusi, S. Tamaki, F. Alsharif, and J. Tamura, “Power analysis of eddy current brake system applied on small-scaled wind turbine for DC greenhouse,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Intelligent Informatics Biomedical Sciences (ICIIBMS), Nov. 2019, pp. 105–109.
[28] A. Koswatta, F. Alsharif, Y. Shiroma, M. Khosravy, S. Tamaki, and J. Tamura, “Alternative braking method for small scaled-wind turbines connected DC green house with analogical experiment on blade destruction,” Adv. Sci., Technol. Eng. Syst. J., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 500–511, 2020.
[29] Vestas Wind Systems A/S, “Wind turbine generator having an eddy current brake,” U.S. Patent US9518562B2, 2016.
[30] Sumitomo Heavy Industries, Ltd., “Eddy current brake device,” Japan Patent JP2011-019374A, 2011.
[31] D. C. Hanselman, Brushless Permanent Magnet Motor Design, 2nd ed. Cranston, RI, USA: The Writers’ Collective, 2003.
[32] S. Mohammadi, M. Mirsalim, and S. Vaez-Zadeh, “Nonlinear modeling of eddy-current couplers,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 224–231, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1109/TEC.2013.2288948.
[33] C. Yang, Z. Peng, J. Tai, L. Zhu, B. J. K. Telezing, and P. D. Ombolo, “Torque characteristics analysis of slotted-type eddy-current couplings using a new magnetic equivalent circuit model,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 1–8, 2020.
[34] Supermagnete, “How do you calculate the magnetic flux density?” [Online]. Available: https://www.supermagnete.cz/eng/faq/How-do-you-calculate-the-magnetic-flux-density.
[35] M. T. Duong and Y. D. Chun, “Design of an electromagnetic energy harvesting system applied to shock absorber in sport utility vehicle: Part II. Improvement of the power & power density,” J. Magn., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 392–398, 2018.
[36] M. Z. Baharom, M. Z. Nuawi, G. Priyandoko, S. M. Harris, and L. M. Siow, “Eddy current braking study for brake disc of aluminium, copper and zinc,” in Proc. Regional Engineering Postgraduate Conf., 2011, pp. 1–6.