簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 曾啓軒
TSENG, CHI-HSUAN
論文名稱: 法袍之下:性別觀念會影響誰在法庭上得利嗎?
Behind the Robe: Do Gender Attitudes Shape Who Gets What in Court?
指導教授: 林常青
Lin, Chang-Ching
區俊傑
Ao, Chon-Kit
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會科學院 - 經濟學系
Department of Economics
論文出版年: 2025
畢業學年度: 113
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 62
中文關鍵詞: 性別偏見司法裁判行為家庭暴力案件消除對婦女一切形式歧視公約詞向量模型
外文關鍵詞: Gender Slant, Judicial Decision-Making, Domestic Violence Cases, CEDAW Reform, Word Embedding
相關次數: 點閱:13下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究旨在探討性別偏見如何影響司法判決結果。我們共使用了860,000筆刑事判決書為個別法官建構性別態度指標Gender Slant,為控制案件類型及法庭類別的異質性,研究在聚焦於家暴案件的同時分開討論簡易庭與非簡易庭的資料,並進一步透過迴歸模型納入法官性別與性別偏見的交互項以及不同時期與性別偏見的交互項,以便檢驗偏見效果是否隨法官性別或法規變化而有所差異。結果顯示,具較高傳統性別偏見的女性法官在各制度與法院類型下皆傾向輕判;男性法官則在非簡易庭的改制後期,性別偏見與重判傾向呈現正向關聯。我們推測此不對稱性源於性別角色的內化觀點,即傳統男性強調養家責任,女性則強調家庭奉獻,當家暴案件中違反性別角色時,法官對自身性別角色的期待會產生更強烈的回應。本文亦為首篇運用詞嵌入技術量化個別法官性別偏見,並系統性分析其對量刑結果之影響的研究。

    This study investigates how gender bias affects judicial sentencing outcomes. We employ machine learning on 860,000 criminal verdicts to identify judges’ implicit gender attitudes. To control for case-type heterogeneity, the analysis focuses on domestic violence cases and distinguishes between Summary and Ordinary Courts. The empirical strategy uses regression models with interaction terms between judge gender and gender bias, as well as between gender bias and different institutional periods, to examine whether the effect of gender bias varies with judge gender or institutional reforms. The results show that female judges with stronger traditional gender attitudes tend to impose more lenient sentences across all institutional periods and court types. Male judges, however, in the post-reform period of Ordinary Courts, exhibit a positive association between traditional gender bias and harsher sentencing. We argue that this asymmetry may stem from internalized gender norms: Traditional gender norms portray men as authorities and protectors, and women as supporters and followers. When either party in a domestic violence case violates conventional gender expectations, judges may respond more strongly based on the gender roles they themselves internalize. This paper contributes to the literature as the first study to systematically examine the effect of judicial gender bias on sentencing decisions by quantifying it through word embedding techniques.

    Abstract i List of Tables v List of Figures vi 1 Introduction 1 2 Literature Review 7 3 Data Source and Methodology 11 3.1 Data Collection 11 3.2 Data Preprocessing 11 3.3 Word2Vec and Gender Slant 14 3.3.1 What is Word2Vec and What is Gender Slant 14 3.3.2 Gender Slant Construction Methodology 15 3.4 Regression Data 16 4 Empirical Results 18 4.1 Descriptive Statistics 18 4.2 Regression Analysis 26 4.2.1 Regression 26 4.2.2 Summary Court 28 4.2.3 Ordinary Court 34 4.3 Summary and Comparison 38 5 Conclusion 42 References 44 A Supplementary Tables 47 B Supplementary Figures 49

    Ash, Elliot, Daniel L. Chen, and Arianna Ornaghi (2024). “Gender Attitudes in the Judiciary: Evidence from US Circuit Courts”. In: American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 16.1, pp. 314–350. doi: 10.1257/app.20220242.
    Azar, Beth (2008). “IAT: Fad or fabulous?” In. Boldt, Ethan D et al. (2021). “The effects of judge race and sex on pretrial detention decisions”. In: Justice System Journal 42.3-4, pp. 341–358.
    Boyd, Christina L and Michael J Nelson (2017). “The effects of trial judge gender and public opinion on criminal sentencing decisions”. In: Vand. L. Rev. 70, p. 1819.
    Bozdag, Mustafa, Nurullah Sevim, and Aykut Koç (2024). “Measuring and mitigating gender bias in legal contextualized language models”. In: ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data 18.4, pp. 1–26.
    Charlesworth, Tessa ES and Mahzarin R Banaji (2022). “Patterns of implicit and explicit stereotypes III: Long-term change in gender stereotypes”. In: Social Psy- chological and Personality Science 13.1, pp. 14–26.
    Chen, Ying-Yu and Shu-Kai Hsieh (2019). “Extracting Semantic Representations of Sexual Biases from Word Vectors”. In: Proceedings of the 31st Conference on Computational Linguistics and Speech Processing (ROCLING 2019), pp. 192–201.
    Chew, Pat K (2010). “Judges’ gender and employment discrimination cases: emerging evidence-based empirical conclusions”. In: J. Gender Race & Just. 14, p. 359.
    Choi, Donghyun Danny, J Andrew Harris, and Fiona Shen-Bayh (2022). “Ethnic bias in judicial decision making: Evidence from criminal appeals in Kenya”. In: American Political Science Review 116.3, pp. 1067–1080.
    Cohen, Alma and Crystal S. Yang (2019). “Judicial Politics and Sentencing Decisions. In: American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 11.1, pp. 160–191.
    Council, Sentencing Advisory (2010). “Gender differences in sentencing outcomes. In: Sentencing Advisory Council 51.
    Czapanskiy, Karen (1993). “Domestic violence, the family, and the lawyering process: Lessons from studies on gender bias in the courts. In: Family law quarterly, pp. 247–277.
    Dhanesh, Ganga S and Sarah Marschlich (2025). “Gender representations and user engagement in social media posts of companies: Dream crazier or keep walking?”In: Business Horizons.
    Eberhardt, Markus, Giovanni Facchini, and Valeria Rueda (2023). “Gender differences in reference letters: Evidence from the economics job market”. In: The Economic Journal 133.655, pp. 2676–2708.
    Englehart, Neil A and Melissa K Miller (2014). “The CEDAW effect: international law’s impact on women’s rights”. In: Journal of Human Rights 13.1, pp. 22–47.
    Gerber, Glenn L. (1991). “Gender Stereotypes and Power: Perceptions of the Roles in Violent Marriages”. In: Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 24.7-8, pp. 439–458. doi: 10.1007/BF00289333.
    Heilman, Madeline E (2012). “Gender stereotypes and workplace bias”. In: Research in organizational Behavior 32, pp. 113–135.
    Hoyt, Crystal L and Susan E Murphy (2016). “Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership”. In: The leadership quarterly 27.3, pp. 387–399.
    Jones, Jason J et al. (2020). “Stereotypical gender associations in language have decreased over time”. In: Sociological Science 7, pp. 1–35.
    Justicia-Galiano, M José et al. (2023). “Gender stereotypes about math anxiety: Ability and emotional components”. In: Learning and Individual Differences 105, p. 102316.
    Krumpal, Ivar (2013). “Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: a literature review”. In: Quality & quantity 47.4, pp. 2025–2047.
    Laneuville, Helena and Vitor Possebom (2024). Fight like a Woman: Domestic Violence and Female Judges in Brazil. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.07240. arXiv: 2405.07240 [econ.EM].
    Li, Jiali et al. (2022). “Analysis of gender bias in social perception and judgement using chinese word embeddings”. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing (GeBNLP), pp. 8–16.
    Lin, Chang-Ching (2021). Judge Gender, Political Correctness and Sentences in Domestic Violence Cases. Tech. rep. MOST 109-2410-H-006-081. Research Project Report funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology (Taiwan). Department of Economics, National Cheng Kung University.
    Meagher, Kelsey D and Xiaoling Shu (2019). “Trends in US gender attitudes, 1977 to 2018: Gender and educational disparities”. In: Socius 5, p. 2378023119851692.
    Passolunghi, Maria Chiara, Tania Irene Rueda Ferreira, and Carlo Tomasetto (2014).“Math–gender stereotypes and math-related beliefs in childhood and early adolescence”. In: Learning and Individual differences 34, pp. 70–76.
    Rachlinski, J. J. et al. (2008). “Does Unconscious Racial Bias Affect Trial Judges”. In: Notre Dame Law Review 84, pp. 1195–1246.
    Raday, Frances (2012). “Gender and democratic citizenship: The impact of CEDAW”. In: International journal of constitutional law 10.2, pp. 512–530.
    Shrestha, Sunny and Sanchari Das (2022). “Exploring gender biases in ML and AI academic research through systematic literature review”. In: Frontiers in artificial intelligence 5, p. 976838.
    Starr, Sonja B (2015). “Estimating gender disparities in federal criminal cases”. In: American Law and Economics Review 17.1, pp. 127–159.
    Steele, Claude M and Joshua Aronson (1995). “Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.” In: Journal of personality and social psychology 69.5, p. 797.
    Steffensmeier, Darrell and Chris Hebert (1999). “Women and men policymakers: Does the judge’s gender affect the sentencing of criminal defendants?” In: Social forces 77.3, pp. 1163–1196.
    Sun, Tony et al. (2019). “Mitigating gender bias in natural language processing: Literature review”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.08976.
    UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (Aug. 2015). General recommendation No. 33 on women’s access to justice. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/807253?v=pdf. New York.
    Vuletich, Heidi A et al. (2020). “Math and language gender stereotypes: Age and gender differences in implicit biases and explicit beliefs”. In: Plos one 15.9, e0238230.
    Williams, Marian R (1999). “Gender and sentencing: An analysis of indicators”. In: Criminal Justice Policy Review 10.4, pp. 471–490.
    Xia, Yiwei, Tianji Cai, and Hua Zhong (2019). “Effect of Judges’Gender on Rape Sentencing”. In: China Review 19.2, pp. 125–150.
    Zhao, Tianyi (2022). “How Gender Stereotypes Impact Students’Academic Achievement”. In: 2022 2nd International Conference on Modern Educational Technology and Social Sciences (ICMETSS 2022). Atlantis Press, pp. 911–918.
    官曉薇 (2020). “CEDAW 的臺灣實踐: 回顧與檢討”. In: 台灣國際法學刊 16.2, pp. 59–84.
    監察院 (2017). 監察院新聞稿. https://www.cy.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=125&s=13200.
    行政院性別平等會 (n.d.). CEDAW 引用指引及案例:指引摘要供機器讀取格式. https://gec.ey.gov.tw/Page/CD44690CDAB23DC4.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE