| 研究生: |
曾家律 Tseng, Chia-Lu |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
考慮資源限制之模糊品質機能展開模式 Fuzzy Mathematical Models for Fuzzy Quality Function Deployment Considering Resource Constraints |
| 指導教授: |
陳梁軒
Chen, Liang-Hsuan |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 工業與資訊管理學系 Department of Industrial and Information Management |
| 論文出版年: | 2021 |
| 畢業學年度: | 109 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 125 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 品質機能展開 、模糊集合理論 、資源分配與限制 、Kano概念 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Quality function deployment (QFD), Fuzzy set theory, Resource allocation and constraints, Kano concept |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:51 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
作為一項基於顧客導向為出發點之品質管理工具,品質機能展開(Quality Function Deployment, QFD)已廣泛應用於企業的產品設計、開發與改善。其核心價值在於,得以將顧客需求藉由品質機能展開之流程整合,納入市場競爭相關資訊與設計需求間的影響關係,轉換為產品設計或改善所不可或缺之設計需求與其重要性排序。許多研究將顧客滿意度、預算限制與技術困難度整合至決策模式中,在最大化顧客滿意度的前提之下,求取各項設計需求的執行度,以提供決策者更為清晰之決策方向。在現實問題當中,資源限制往往對於決策問題具有關鍵性的影響,然而,部分研究僅針對成本進行簡單的線性限制,而忽略資源分配與其使用效率等議題,因此,本研究將提出一考量資源限制之模糊品質機能展開模式,使得決策結果更為貼近實務應用。
本研究模式之決策流程共分為三個階段。第一階段為專家意見整合,針對品質屋當中的各個評估項目,專家皆採用模糊數進行評估,並利用群體決策方法整合所有專家意見;第二階段為計算各個顧客需求之設計需求執行度上限;第三階段則為計算考量資源限制之設計需求執行度,並以三種模式進行求解。此外,第二與第三階段皆分為模糊品質屋及執行度決策模式兩部分進行,於第三階段之模糊品質屋方法,亦將設計需求競爭分析資訊納入考量,以利於經費運用效率之運算;執行度決策模式則皆採用模糊目標規劃進行求解,而執行度的計算將分為實際執行度與規劃執行度,避免在針對成本進行列式時,產生不符常理之情形,希望透過本研究的決策模式,除了能夠為決策者提供更加具體的決策方向之外,更得以在滿足顧客需求且考量資源限制的前提之下,找到決策者所能接受之顧客滿意度與成本滿意度之間的平衡點,進而最大化整體之滿意度總和。
Quality Function Deployment (QFD) has been widely used in enterprise product design, development and improvement. Because it is a customer-driven quality management tool, many studies have integrated customer satisfaction, budget constraints, and technical difficulties into the QFD decision-making model. However, some studies only carry out simple linear constraints on costs, and ignore issues such as resource allocation and diminishing marginal utility. Therefore, this research proposes a fuzzy quality function deployment mode, which takes resource constraints into account in order to make the decision-making results closer to practical applications.
The decision-making model used in this research is divided into three stages. The first stage is the integration of expert opinions. For each evaluation item in the house of quality, experts use fuzzy numbers to evaluate, and use group decision-making methods to integrate all their opinions. In the second stage, the upper limit of the fulfillment level of each design requirement is calculated. In the third stage, the fulfillment level of design requirements considering resource constraints are calculated, and solved in three different models. In addition, the calculation of the fulfillment levels will be divided into actual fulfillment levels and planned fulfillment levels to avoid unreasonable situations when the cost is considered in the budget function. It is hoped that through the modes proposed in this research, in addition to providing more specific decision-making guidance for decision-makers, the decision-making model will also help them find a balance between customer satisfaction and cost satisfaction that is acceptable under the premise of meeting customer needs and considering resource constraints.
Akkawuttiwanich, P., and Yenradee, P. (2018). Fuzzy QFD approach for managing SCOR performance indicators. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 122, 189-201.
American Supplier Institute (1994). Quality Function Deployment (Service QFD): 3-Day Workshop. ASI Press, Dear-born, MI.
Anderson, E. W., and Mittal, V. (2000). Strengthening the Satisfaction-Profit Chain. Journal of Service Research, 3(2), 107–120.
Armacost, R. L., Componation, P. J., Mullens, M. A., and Swart, W. W. (1994). An AHP Framework For Prioritizing Customer Requirements In QFD - An Industrialized Housing Application. IIE Transactions, 26(4), 72-79.
Baki, B., Basfirinci, C.S., Cilingir, Z., and Ar, I.M. (2009). An application of integrating SERVQUAL and Kano’s model into QFD for logistics services. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 21(1), 106-126.
Beheshtinia, M. A., and Farzaneh Azad, M. (2019). A fuzzy QFD approach using SERVQUAL and Kano models under budget constraint for hotel services. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 30(7-8), 808-830.
Berger, C., Blauth, R., and Boger, D. (1993). Kano’s Methods for Understanding Customer-defined Quality. Center for Quality Management Journal, 2(4), 2–28.
Bhattachary, A., Sarkar, B., and Mukherjeez, S. K. (2005). Integrating AHP with QFD for Robot Selection under Requirement Perspective.” International Journal of Production Research 43 (17): 3671–3685.
Chan, L.-K., and Wu, M.-L. (2005). A systematic approach to quality function deployment with a full illustrative example. Omega, 33(2), 119-139.
Chan, L.-K., Kao, H.-P., Ng, A., and Wu, M.-L. (1999). Rating the importance of customer needs in quality function deployment by fuzzy and entropy methods. International Journal of Production Research, 37(11), 2499-2518.
Chen, L.-H., and Chen, C.-N. (2014). Normalisation models for prioritising design requirements for quality function deployment processes. International Journal of Production Research, 52(2), 299-313.
Chen, L.-H., and Ko, W.-C. (2009a). Fuzzy approaches to quality function deployment for new product design. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 160(18), 2620-2639.
Chen, L.-H., and Ko, W.-C. (2009b). Fuzzy linear programming models for new product design using QFD with FMEA. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 33(2), 633-647.
Chen, L.-H., and Ko, W.-C. (2010). Fuzzy linear programming models for NPD using a four-phase QFD activity process based on the means-end chain concept. European Journal of Operational Research, 201(2), 619-632.
Chen, L.-H., and Weng, M.-C. (2003). A fuzzy model for exploiting quality function deployment. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 38(5-6), 559-570.
Chen, L.-H., and Weng, M.-C. (2006). An evaluation approach to engineering design in QFD processes using fuzzy goal programming models. European Journal of Operational Research, 172(1), 230-248.
Chen, L.-H., Ko, W.-C., and Tseng, C. (2013). Fuzzy Approaches for Constructing House of Quality in QFD and Its Applications: A Group Decision-Making Method. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 60(1), 77-87.
Chen, L.-H., Ko, W.-C., and Yeh, F.-T. (2017). Approach based on fuzzy goal programing and quality function deployment for new product planning. European Journal of Operational Research, 259(2), 654-663.
Cohen, L. (1995). Quality function deployment: how to make QFD work for you. Prentice Hall.
Dai, J., and Blackhurst, J. (2012). A four-phase AHP–QFD approach for supplier assessment: a sustainability perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 50(19), 5474-5490.
Dubois, D., and Prade, H. (1978). Operations On Fuzzy Numbers. International Journal of Systems Science, 9(6), 613-626.
Fung, R. Y. K., Tang, J., Tu, P. Y., and Chen, Y. (2003). Modelling of quality function deployment planning with resource allocation. Research in Engineering Design, 14(4), 247-255.
Fung, R. Y. K., Tang, J., Tu, Y., and Wang, D. (2002). Product design resources optimization using a non-linear fuzzy quality function deployment model. International Journal of Production Research, 40(3), 585-599.
Hashim, A., and S. Dawal. (2012). Kano Model and QFD Integration Approach for Ergonomic Design Improvement. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 57(9), 22–32.
Hauser, J. R., and Clausing, D. (1988). The House Of Quality. Harvard Business Review, 66(3), 63-73.
Huiskonen, J., and Pirttilä, T. (1998). Sharpening logistics customer service strategy planning by applying Kano's quality element classification. International Journal of Production Economics, 56, 253-260.
Jafarzadeh, H., Akbari, P., and Abedin, B. (2018). A methodology for project portfolio selection under criteria prioritisation, uncertainty and projects interdependency – combination of fuzzy QFD and DEA. Expert Systems with Applications, 110, 237–249.
Ji, P., Jin, J., Wang, T., and Chen, Y. (2014). Quantification and integration of Kano’s model into QFD for optimising product design. International Journal of Production Research, 52(21), 6335-6348.
Ji, X., Gao, Q., Yin, F., and Guo, H. (2016). An Efficient Imperialist Competitive Algorithm for Solving the QFD Decision Problem. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2016, 1-13.
Kamakura, W., Mittal, V., Rosa, F., and Mazzon, J. (2000). Producing Profitable Customer Satisfaction and Retention," working paper, University of Iowa, Iowa City. doi:10.1177/109467050032001
Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F., and Tsuji, S. (1984) Attractive quality and must-be quality. Hinshitsu (Quality, The Journal of Japanese Society for Quality Control), 14(2), 39-48.
Karol, M., Liu, Z., and Eng, K. (1995). An efficient demand-assignment multiple access protocol for wireless packet (ATM) networks. Wireless Networks, 1(3), 267-279.
Karsak, E. E. (2004). Fuzzy multiple objective programming framework to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 47(2-3), 149-163.
Karwowski, W., and Mital, A. (1986). Potential applications of fuzzy sets in industrial safety engineering. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 19(2), 105–120.
King, B. (1987). Better designs in half the time: implementing QFD in America, goal/QPC. Methuen, MA.
Ko, W. C. (2015). Construction of house of quality for new product planning: A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic approach. Computers in Industry, 73, 117-127.
Ko, W. C., and Chen, L. H. (2014). An approach of new product planning using quality function deployment and fuzzy linear programming model. International Journal of Production Research, 52(6), 1728-1743.
Kuo, Y. F. (2004). Integrating Kano’s model into web-community service quality. Total Quality Management, 15(7), 925-939.
Leekwijck, W. V., and Kerre, E. E. (1999). Defuzzification: criteria and classification. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 108(2), 159-178.
Liu, H. (2011). Product design and selection using fuzzy QFD and fuzzy MCDM approaches. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35(1), 482-496.
Liu, J., Chen, Y., Zhou, J., and Yi, X. (2015). An Exact Expected Value-Based Method to Prioritize Engineering Characteristics in Fuzzy Quality Function Deployment. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 18(4), 630-646.
Li, S., Tang, D., and Wang, Q. (2019). Rating engineering characteristics in open design using a probabilistic language method based on fuzzy QFD. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 135, 348-358.
Luor, T., Lu, H., Chien, K., and Wu, T. (2015). Contribution to quality research: A literature review of Kanos model from 1998 to 2012. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 26(3-4), 234-247.
Lyman, D. (1990, June). Deployment normalization. In Transactions from the Second Symposium on Quality Function Deployment (pp. 307-315).
Löfgren, M., and Witell, L. (2008). Two Decades of Using Kanos Theory of Attractive Quality: A Literature Review. Quality Management Journal, 15(1), 59-75.
Matzler, K., and Hinterhuber, H. H. (1998). How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano’s model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment. Technovation, 18, 25–38.
Moinpur, R., and Wiley, J. B., 1974, Application of multi-attribute models of attribute in marketing. Journal of Business Administration, 5(2), 3-16.
Pandey, M. M. (2020). Evaluating the strategic design parameters of airports in Thailand to meet service expectations of Low-Cost Airlines using the Fuzzy-based QFD method. Journal of Air Transport Management, 82, 101738.
Park, T., and Kim, K.-J. (1998). Determination of an optimal set of design requirements using house of quality. Journal of Operations Management, 16(5), 569-581.
Reich, Y., and Levy, E. (2004). Managing product design quality under resource constraints. International Journal of Production Research, 42(13), 2555-2572.
Reich, Y., and Paz, A. (2008). Managing product quality, risk, and resources through resource quality function deployment. Journal of Engineering Design, 19(3), 249-267.
Rust, R. T., and Zahorik, A. J. (1993). Customer satisfaction, customer retention, and market share. Journal of Retailing, 69(2), 193-215.
Schvaneveldt, S. J., Enkawa, T., and Miyakawa, M. (1991). Consumer evaluation perspectives of service quality: evaluation factors and two-way model of quality. Total Quality Management, 2, 149–161.
Shahin, A. (2004). Integration of FMEA and the Kano model: an exploratory examination. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 21(7), 731-746.
Shahin, A., Pourhamidi, M., Antony, J., and Park, S. H. (2013). Typology of Kano models: A critical review of literature and proposition of a revised model. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 30(3), 341-358.
Sullivan, L. P. (1986). Quality Function Deployment. Quality Progress, 19(6), 39-50.
Tiwari, R. N., Dharmar, S., and Rao, J. R. (1987). Fuzzy goal programming –An additive model. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 24 (1), 27–34.
Vanegas, L. V., and Labib, A. W. (2001). A Fuzzy Quality Function Deployment (FQFD) model for deriving optimum targets. International Journal of Production Research, 39(1), 99-120.
Wang, T., and P. Ji. (2010). Understanding Customer Needs through Quantitative Analysis of Kano’s Model. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 27(2), 173–184.
Wang, Y.-M. (2012). A Fuzzy-normalization-based Group Decision-making Approach for Prioritizing Engineering Design Requirements in QFD under Uncertainty. International Journal of Production Research, 50(23), 6963–6977.
Wasserman, G. S. (1993). On How To Prioritize Design Requirements During The QFD Planning Process. IIE Transactions, 25(3), 59-65.
Xu, L., and Zhang, Y. (2020). A quality function deployment–based resource allocation approach for elderly care service: Perspective of government procurement of public service. International Social Work, doi:10.1177/0020872819884-987
Xu, Q., Jiao, R. J., Yang, X., Helander, M., Khalid, H. M., and Opperud, A. (2009). An analytical Kano model for customer need analysis. Design Studies, 30(1), 87-110.
Yan, B., Yu, L., and Wang, J. (2020). Research on Evaluating the Sustainable Operation of Rail Transit System Based on QFD and Fuzzy Clustering. Entropy, 22(7), 750.
Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Coulibaly, A., and Zavadskas, E. K. (2017). A group decision making support system in logistics and supply chain management. Expert Systems with Applications, 88, 376–392.
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338-353.
Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—I. Information Sciences, 8(3), 199-249.
Zhou, J., Yang, F., and Wang, K. (2015). Fuzzy arithmetic on LR fuzzy numbers with applications to fuzzy programming. Journal of Intelligent&Fuzzy Systems, 30(1),71-87.
吳佳樺(2014)。考慮成本效益之品質機能展開多目標決策模式。國立成功大學工業與資訊管理學系碩士論文,台南市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/j94jpd
黃雅君(2015)。考慮顧客需求缺口之模糊品質機能展開模式。國立成功大學工業與資訊管理學系碩士論文,台南市。 取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/234fee