| 研究生: |
愛力 Jafari, Alireza |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
具社會意識電動滑板車之群體動態研究:社會作用力模型 Collective Dynamics for Socially-Aware Micro-Mobility Vehicles in Public Spaces: A Social Force Approach |
| 指導教授: |
劉彥辰
Liu, Yen-Chen |
| 學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 機械工程學系 Department of Mechanical Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2024 |
| 畢業學年度: | 113 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 184 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Intelligent transportation systems, human-vehicle interaction, Personal mobility vehicles, electric scooters, autonomous robots, mobile robots, scooter-pedestrian interaction, shared public space, heterogeneous public space, heterogeneous crowds, social force model, subjective safety, objective safety, discomfort metric, Time To Collision, Monte Carlo simulations |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:65 下載:1 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
微型移動解決方案的快速崛起,特別是電動滑板車和自動化移動機器人,為城市交通系統帶來了挑戰與機遇。我們研究了這些個人移動工具與行人群體之間的互動,以確保所有使用者在共享通行道上的安全與舒適。我們修改了社會力模型,以捕捉電動滑板車的動態,並進一步更新模型,以將移動機器人納入未來的步道中。這些模型改善了對電動滑板車和移動機器人與行人互動的預測。此外,碰撞時間度量的整合增強了主觀安全感知的評估,使我們對異質性群眾動態有了更深入的理解。
研究通過隔離和群體實驗驗證了數學框架,提供了影響行人安全的因素見解,如人行道寬度和行人密度。實際挑戰也得到了處理,具體表現為開發非線性控制策略,讓自動電動滑板車能夠在導航至充電站時自我平衡,從而減少與遺棄車輛相關的問題。
我們強調了需要優先考慮行人舒適度和安全性的監管方法和設計策略。通過展示預測碰撞時間與主觀安全之間的強相關性,我們提出了一個評估和統一潛在解決方案的指標。我們為城市規劃師、政策制定者和設計師提供了可行的建議。該研究創造了更安全、更高效的共享城市環境,有效地容納了電動滑板車的增長及即將整合的自動化機器人。
The rapid rise of micro-mobility solutions, particularly electric scooters and autonomous mobile robots, presents both challenges and opportunities for urban transportation systems. We investigate the interactions between these personal mobility vehicles and pedestrian crowds to ensure safety and comfort for all users on shared travelways. We modify the social force model to capture the dynamics of electric scooters, and, further update it to incorporate mobile robots into futuristic sidewalks. The models improve predictions of e-scooter and mobile robot interactions with pedestrians. Additionally, the integration of time-to-collision metrics enhances the assessment of subjective safety perceptions, enabling a more nuanced understanding of heterogeneous crowd dynamics.
The research validates the mathematical frameworks through isolated and crowd
experiments, providing insights into factors influencing pedestrian safety, like sidewalk width and pedestrian density. Practical challenges are also addressed, namely through developing nonlinear control strategies for autonomous e-scooters that can self-balance when navigating to charging stations, thereby reducing issues related to abandoned vehicles.
We highlight the necessity for regulatory approaches and design strategies prioritizing pedestrian comfort and safety. By showing a strong correlation between projected time-to-collision and subjective safety, we propose a metric to evaluate and unify the potential solutions. We offer actionable recommendations for urban planners, policymakers, and designers. The study creates safer and more efficient shared urban environments that effectively accommodate the growing presence of electric scooters and the imminent integration of autonomous robots.
[1] Y.-C. Liu, A. Jafari, J. K. Shim, and D. A. Paley, “Dynamic modeling and simulation of electric scooter interactions with a pedestrian crowd using a social force model,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 16448–16461, 2022.
[2] A. Jafari and Y.-C. Liu, “A heterogeneous social force model for personal mobility vehicles on futuristic sidewalks,” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, vol. 131, p. 102879, 2024.
[3] ——, “Pedestrians’ safety using projected time-to-collision to electric scooters,” Nature Communications, vol. 15, p. 5701, 2024.
[4] ——, “Time-to-collision based social force model for intelligent agents on shared public spaces,” International Journal of Social Robotics, 2024.
[5] Y.-H. Lin, A. Jafari, and Y.-C. Liu, “Dynamic modeling and stability analysis of balancing in riderless electric scooters,” in 2024 American Control Conference (ACC), 2024, pp. 421–426.
[6] Y. Guan, Z. Zeng, D. Chen, T. Zhang, H. Zhu, and L. He, “Kinematic modeling, analysis, and verification of an essboard-like robot,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 864–875, 2021.
[7] K. Kazemzadeh, A. Laureshyn, E. Ronchi, C. D’Agostino, and L. W. Hiselius, “Electric bike navigation behaviour in pedestrian crowds,” Travel Behaviour and Society, vol. 20, pp. 114–121, 2020.
[8] R. Deto, “Pennsylvania legalizes autonomous delivery robots, classifies them as pedestrians,” Pittsburgh City Paper, Dec. 02, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.pghcitypaper.com/pittsburgh/pennsylvania-legalizes-autonomous-delivery-robots-classifies-them-as-pedestrians/Content?oid=18482040
[9] S. Gössling, “Integrating e-scooters in urban transportation: Problems, policies, and the prospect of system change,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 79, p. 102230, 2020.
[10] S. Shaheen and A. Cohen, “Shared micromobility policy toolkit: Docked and dockless bike and scooter sharing,” C Berkeley: Transportation Sustainability Research Center, April 01, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/00k897b5
[11] M. Liu, J. K. Mathew, D. Horton, and D. M. Bullock, “Analysis of recreational and last mile e-scooter utilization in different land use regions,” in IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2020, pp. 1378–1385.
[12] 2018 E-Scooter Findings Report, Portland Bureau of Transportation, Portland, Oregon, USA, 2019.
[13] Q. Ma, Y. Xin, H. Yang, and K. Xie, “Connecting metros with shared electric scooters: Comparisons with shared bikes and taxis,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 109, p. 103376, 2022.
[14] N. R. Shah, J. Guo, L. D. Han, and C. R. Cherry, “Why do people take e-scooter trips? Insights on temporal and spatial usage patterns of detailed trip data,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 173, p. 103705, 2023.
[15] S. Pourfalatoun and E. E. Miller, “Effects of the covid-19 pandemic on use and perception of shared e-scooters,” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, vol. 22, p. 100925, 2023.
[16] C. Moon and A. B. Sharpin, “Insider: 3 ways cities can harness the benefits of the bike-share revolution,” World Resources Institute, January 16, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.wri.org/blog/2019/01/insider-3-ways-cities-can-harness-benefits-bike-share-revolution
[17] O. I. Asensio, C. Z. Apablaza, M. C. Lawson, E. W. Chen, and S. J. Horner, “Impacts of micromobility on car displacement with evidence from a natural experiment and geofencing policy,” Nature Energy, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 1100–1108, 2022.
[18] A. Schwedhelm, A. B. Sharpin, and C. Adriazola-Steil, “Scooter use skyrocketing in cities, but are they safe? A look at the evidence,” World Resources Institute, May 03, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.wri.org/blog/2019/05/scooter-use-skyrocketing-cities-are-they-safe-look-evidence
[19] M. Corno and S. M. Savaresi, “Design and control of an all-in-the-wheel assisted kick scooter,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1858–1867, 2016.
[20] K. Wang, X. Qian, D. T. Fitch, Y. Lee, J. Malik, and G. Circella, “What travel modes do shared e-scooters displace? A review of recent research findings,” Transport Reviews, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 5–31, 2023.
[21] M. Che, K. M. Lum, and Y. D. Wong, “Users’ attitudes on electric scooter riding speed on shared footpath: A virtual reality study,” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 152–161, 2021.
[22] M. ˇSucha, E. Drimlov´a, K. Reˇcka, N. Haworth, K. Karlsen, A. Fyhri, P. Wallgren, P. Silverans, and F. Slootmans, “E-scooter riders and pedestrians: Attitudes and interactions in five countries,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 4, p. e15449, 2023.
[23] C. Zhang, B. Du, Z. Zheng, and J. Shen, “Space sharing between pedestrians and micro-mobility vehicles: A systematic review,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 116, p. 103629, 2023.
[24] J. B. Cicchino, P. E. Kulie, and M. L. McCarthy, “Severity of e-scooter rider injuries associated with trip characteristics,” Journal of Safety Research, vol. 76, pp. 256–261, 2021.
[25] J. Buckley, “E-scooters suddenly appeared everywhere, but now they’re riding into serious trouble,” CNN travel, November, 22 2019. [Online]. Available: https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/electric-scooter-bans-world/index.html
[26] L. L. Mauricio Orozco-Fontalvo and V. Cantillo, “Dockless electric scooters: A review of a growing micromobility mode,” International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 406–422, 2023.
[27] Y. Zhang, J. D. Nelson, and C. Mulley, “Learning from the evidence: Insights for regulating e-scooters,” Transport Policy, vol. 151, pp. 63–74, 2024.
[28] V. Mehranfar and C. Jones, “Exploring implications and current practices in e-scooter safety: A systematic review,” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, vol. 107, pp. 321–382, 2024.
[29] N. Coretti Sanchez, I. Martinez, L. Alonso Pastor, and K. Larson, “On the performance of shared autonomous bicycles: A simulation study,” Communications in Transportation Research, vol. 2, p. 100066, 2022.
[30] ——, “On the simulation of shared autonomous micro-mobility,” Communications in Transportation Research, vol. 2, p. 100065, 2022.
[31] P. Hurlet, O. Manout, and A. O. Diallo, “Policy implications of shared e-scooter parking regulation: an agent-based approach,” Procedia Computer Science, 2024.
[32] B. Turan and T. Wakolbinger, “The electric scooter collection problem: A case study in the city of vienna,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 13, 2023.
[33] W. Philipp and F. Allgower, “A first step towards an autonomously driving e-scooter,” in IFAC World Congress, 2021, pp. 1–4.
[34] D. Kondor, X. Zhang, M. Meghjani, P. Santi, J. Zhao, and C. Ratti, “Estimating the potential for shared autonomous scooters,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 4651–4662, 2022.
[35] C. Mercˆe, K. Davids, D. Catela, M. Branco, V. Correia, and R. Cordovil, “Learning to cycle: a constraint-led intervention programme using different cycling task constraints,” in Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 2023, pp. 1–214.
[36] M. B. Alatise and G. P. Hancke, “A review on challenges of autonomous mobile robot and sensor fusion methods,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 39 830–39 846, 2020.
[37] S. Scott, “What’s next for amazon scout?” Amazon blog, August 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/transportation/whats-next-for-amazon-scout
[38] K. Matthews, “Where to spot mobile robots in 2020?” Collaborative Robotics Trends, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.cobottrends.com/where-spot-mobile-robots-2020
[39] A. Bauer, K. Klasing, G. Lidoris, Q. M¨uhlbauer, F. Rohrm¨uller, S. Sosnowski, T. Xu, K. K¨uhnlenz, D. Wollherr, and M. Buss, “The autonomous city explorer: Towards natural human-robot interaction in urban environments,” International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 127–140, 2009.
[40] Y. Jung, Y. Kim, W. H. Lee, M. S. Bang, Y. Kim, and S. Kim, “Path planning algorithm for an autonomous electric wheelchair in hospitals,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 208 199–208 213, 2020.
[41] B. Zhang and M. Tanaka, “Development of a safety assistance system based on computer vision for mobility scooters—system design—,” in Proceedings of the ISCIE International Symposium on Stochastic Systems Theory and its Applications, vol. 2023, 2023, pp. 19–27.
[42] M. Dozza, A. Violin, and A. Rasch, “A data-driven framework for the safe integration of micro-mobility into the transport system: Comparing bicycles and e-scooters in field trials,” Journal of Safety Research, vol. 81, pp. 67–77, 2022.
[43] S. D. Sierra M., M. F. Jimenez, M. M´unera, C. A. Cifuentes, and A. Frizera, “Haptic human-robot collaboration for walker-assisted navigation based on admittance controllers,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 2622–2628, 2023.
[44] S. A. Useche, S. O’Hern, A. Gonzalez-Marin, J. Gene-Morales, F. Alonso, and A. N. Stephens, “Unsafety on two wheels, or social prejudice? proxying behavioral reports on bicycle and e-scooter riding safety – a mixed-methods study,” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, vol. 89, pp. 168–182, 2022.
[45] M. Mintrom, S. Sumartojo, D. Kuli´c, L. Tian, P. Carreno-Medrano, and A. Allen, “Robots in public spaces: implications for policy design,” Policy Design and Practice, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 123–139, 2021.
[46] K. Charalampous, I. Kostavelis, and A. Gasteratos, “Recent trends in social aware robot navigation: A survey,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 93, pp. 85 – 104, 2017.
[47] P. Salvini, D. Paez-Granados, and A. Billard, “Safety concerns emerging from robots navigating in crowded pedestrian areas,” International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 14, pp. 441–462, 2021.
[48] Y. Gao and C.-M. Huang, “Evaluation of socially-aware robot navigation,” Frontiers in Robotics and AI, p. 420, 2022.
[49] S. Boglietti, B. Barabino, and G. Maternini, “Survey on e-powered micro personal mobility vehicles: Exploring current issues towards future developments,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 7, 2021.
[50] Y. Zheng, T. Chase, L. Elefteriadou, B. Schroeder, and V. P. Sisiopiku, “Modeling vehicle–pedestrian interactions outside of crosswalks,” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, vol. 59, pp. 89 – 101, 2015.
[51] T. Fraichard and V. Levesy, “From crowd simulation to robot navigation in crowds,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 729–735, 2020.
[52] A. Jafari, A. Both, D. Singh, L. Gunn, and B. Giles-Corti, “Building the road network for city-scale active transport simulation models,” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, vol. 114, p. 102398, 2022.
[53] A. Jafari and Y.-C. Liu, “Perceived time-to-collision as public space users’ discomfort metric,” paper presented at the 22nd World Congress of the International Federation of Automatic Control, Yokohama, Japan, 9–14 July 2023.
[54] D. Goswami, A. Riggins, and D. A. Paley, “Data-driven prediction of urban micromobility: A study of dockless electric scooters [applications of control],” IEEE Control Systems Magazine, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 18–31, 2022.
[55] V. B. Hoang, V. H. Nguyen, T. D. Ngo, and X.-T. Truong, “Socially aware robot navigation framework: Where and how to approach people in dynamic social environments,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1322–1336, 2023.
[56] A. Wykowska, R. Chellali, M. M. Al-Amin, and H. J. M¨uller, “Implications of robot actions for human perception. how do we represent actions of the observed robots?” International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 6, pp. 357–366, 2014.
[57] F. Farina, D. Fontanelli, A. Garulli, A. Giannitrapani, and D. Prattichizzo, “Walking ahead: The headed social force model,” PLoS One, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2017.
[58] W. Suh, D. Henclewood, A. Greenwood, A. Guin, R. Guensler, M. P. Hunter, and R. Fujimoto, “Modeling pedestrian crossing activities in an urban environment using microscopic traffic simulation,” SIMULATION, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 213–224, 2013.
[59] D. Helbing, I. Farkas, and T. Vicsek, “Simulating dynamic features of escape panic,” Nature, vol. 407, pp. 487–490, 2000.
[60] V. Tabak, B. de Vries, and J. Dijkstra, “Simulation and validation of human movement in building spaces,” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 592–609, 2010.
[61] Y. Zhang, J. Li, D. Kong, X. Xing, Q. Luo, and J. Mao, “Modeling and simulation of departure passenger’s behavior based on an improved social force approach: A case study on an airport terminal in china,” Advances in Civil Engineering, vol. 2021, no. 1, p. 6657017, 2021.
[62] R. Zhou, Y. Cui, Y. Wang, and J. Jiang, “A modified social force model with different categories of pedestrians for subway station evacuation,” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, vol. 110, p. 103837, 2021.
[63] B. Zhou, X. Wang, and X. Tang, “Understanding collective crowd behaviors: Learning a mixture model of dynamic pedestrian-agents,” in 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2012, pp. 2871–2878.
[64] D. Helbing, A. Johansson, and H. Z. Al-Abideen, “Dynamics of crowd disasters: An empirical study,” Phys. Rev. E, vol. 75, p. 046109, 2007.
[65] R. L¨ohner, E. Haug, and B. M., “Social force modeling of the pedestrian motion in the mataf,” Collective Dynamics, vol. 5, p. 528–530, 2020.
[66] C. G. Keller, C. Hermes, and D. M. Gavrila, “Will the pedestrian cross? probabilistic path prediction based on learned motion features,” in Pattern Recognition, R. Mester and M. Felsberg, Eds. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 386–395.
[67] M. Chraibi, A. Seyfried, and A. Schadschneider, “Generalized centrifugal-force model for pedestrian dynamics,” Physical Review E, vol. 82, p. 046111, 2010.
[68] I. G. Georgoudas, G. C. Sirakoulis, and I. T. Andreadis, “An anticipative crowd management system preventing clogging in exits during pedestrian evacuation processes,” IEEE Systems Journal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 129–141, 2011.
[69] D. Helbing and P. Moln´ar, “Social force model for pedestrian dynamics,” Phys. Rev. E, vol. 51, pp. 4282–4286, 1995.
[70] D. Zhang, H. Zhu, L. Du, and S. Hostikka, “An optimization-based overtaking model for unidirectional pedestrian flow,” Physics Letters A, vol. 382, no. 44, pp. 3172 – 3180, 2018.
[71] J. Was, B. Gudowski, and P. J. Matuszyk, “Social distances model of pedestrian dynamics,” in Cellular Automata. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006, pp. 492–501.
[72] S. Bouzat and M. N. Kuperman, “Game theory in models of pedestrian room evacuation,” Phys. Rev. E, vol. 89, p. 032806, 2014.
[73] I. E. Huarte, Ángel Garcimartín Montero, R. C. Hidalgo, C. M. Gómez, and I. Zuriguel, “Estimating density limits for walking pedestrians keeping a safe interpersonal distancing,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, p. 1534, 2021.
[74] D. Helbing, I. J. Farkas, and T. Vicsek, “Freezing by heating in a driven mesoscopic system,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 84, pp. 1240–1243, 2000.
[75] H. E. Stanley, “Freezing by heating,” Nature, vol. 404, p. 718–719, 2000.
[76] D. Helbing, L. Buzna, A. Johansson, and T. Werner, “Self-organized pedestrian crowd dynamics: Experiments, simulations, and design solutions,” Transportation Science, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2005.
[77] D. Helbing and A. Johansson, Pedestrian, Crowd and Evacuation Dynamics. Springer New York, 2009, pp. 6476–6495.
[78] C. Gershenson and D. Helbing, “When slower is faster,” Complexity, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 9–15, 2015.
[79] E. T. Hall, “A system for the notation of proxemic behavior,” American Anthropologist, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 1003–1026, 1963.
[80] M. M. E. Neggers, R. H. Cuijpers, P. A. M. Ruijten, and W. A. IJsselsteijn, “Determining shape and size of personal space of a human when passed by a robot,” International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 561–572, 2022.
[81] C. Dias, M. Iryo-Asano, K. Shimono, and K. Nakano, “Calibration of a social force-based shared space model for personal mobility vehicle and pedestrian mixed traffic,” Traffic, vol. 3, p. 4, 2017.
[82] C. Dias, M. Iryo-Asano, H. Nishiuchi, and T. Todoroki, “Calibrating a social force based model for simulating personal mobility vehicles and pedestrian mixed traffic,” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, vol. 87, pp. 395 – 411, 2018.
[83] A. Johansson, D. Helbing, and P. K. Shukla, “Specification of the social force pedestrian model by evolutionary adjustment to video tracking data,” Advances in Complex Systems, vol. 10, pp. 271–288, 2007.
[84] I. Echeverría-Huarte and A. Nicolas, “Anticipating collisions, navigating in complex environments, elbowing, pushing, and smartphone-walking: A versatile agent-based model for pedestrian dynamics,” arXiv, 2023.
[85] I. Karamouzas, B. Skinner, and S. J. Guy, “Universal power law governing pedestrian interactions,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 113, p. 238701, 2014.
[86] D. Helbing, P. Molnar, I. Farkas, and K. Bolay, “Self-organizing pedestrian movement,” Environ. Plann. B: Plann. Design, vol. 28, pp. 361–383, 2001.
[87] T. Kretz, J. Lohmiller, and P. Sukennik, “Some indications on how to calibrate the social force model of pedestrian dynamics,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 2672, no. 20, pp. 228–238, 2018.
[88] B. Liu, H. Liu, H. Zhang, and X. Qin, “A social force evacuation model driven by video data,” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, vol. 84, pp. 190–203, 2018.
[89] S. Seer, C. Rudloff, T. Matyus, and N. Brändle, “Validating social force based models with comprehensive real world motion data,” Transportation Research Procedia, vol. 2, pp. 724 – 732, 2014.
[90] X. Song, H. Xie, J. Sun, D. Han, Y. Cui, and B. Chen, “Simulation of pedestrian rotation dynamics near crowded exits,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 3142–3155, 2019.
[91] H. Yamamoto, D. Yanagisawa, C. Feliciani, and K. Nishinari, “Body-rotation behavior of pedestrians for collision avoidance in passing and cross flow,” Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, vol. 122, pp. 486–510, 2019.
[92] J. Peng, Z. Wei, S. Wang, Y. Chen, Y. Li, Z. Wang, and F. Taku, “A torsional social force model for simulating rotation behavior of pedestrians under multiple scenarios,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 163, p. 104630, 2024.
[93] X. Qin, H. Liu, H. Zhang, and B. Liu, “A collective motion model based on two-layer relationship mechanism for bi-direction pedestrian flow simulation,” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, vol. 84, pp. 268–285, 2018.
[94] W. Xie, D. Gao, and E. W. Lee, “Detecting undeclared-leader-follower structure in pedestrian evacuation using transfer entropy,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, pp. 1–10, 2022.
[95] W. Li, Y. Li, P. Yu, J. Gong, and S. Shen, “The trace model: A model for simulation of the tracing process during evacuations in complex route environments,” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, vol. 60, pp. 108–121, 2016.
[96] Y. Han, H. Liu, and P. Moore, “Extended route choice model based on available evacuation route set and its application in crowd evacuation simulation,” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, vol. 75, pp. 1–16, 2017.
[97] S. M. P. Siddharth and P. Vedagiri, “Modeling the gender effects of pedestrians and calibration of the modified social force model,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 2672, no. 31, pp. 1–9, 2018.
[98] M. Moussaïd, D. Helbing, S. Garnier, A. Johansson, M. Combe, and G. Theraulaz, “Experimental study of the behavioural mechanisms underlying self-organization in human crowds,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 276, no. 1668, pp. 2755–2762, 2009.
[99] F. Pascucci, N. Rinke, C. Schiermeyer, B. Friedrich, and V. Berkhahn, “Modeling of shared space with multi-modal traffic using a multi-layer social force approach,” Transportation Research Procedia, vol. 10, pp. 316 – 326, 2015, 18th Euro Working Group on Transportation, EWGT 2015, 14-16 July 2015, Delft, The Netherlands.
[100] B. Anvari, M. G. H. Bell, P. Angeloudis, and W. Y. Ochieng, “Calibration and validation of a shared space model: Case study,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 2588, no. 1, pp. 43–52, 2016.
[101] X. Zhang, H. Chen, W. Yang, W. Jin, and W. Zhu, “Pedestrian path prediction for autonomous driving at un-signalized crosswalk using w/cdm and msfm,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 3025–3037, 2021.
[102] H. Chen and X. Zhang, “Path planning for intelligent vehicle collision avoidance of dynamic pedestrian using att-lstm, msfm, and mpc at unsignalized crosswalk,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 4285–4295, 2022.
[103] H. Chen, C. Wei, Y. Liu, C. Hu, and X. Zhang, “Vulnerable traffic participant trajectory prediction based on gate recurrent unit-attention and ameliorative social force model,” IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, pp. 1–1, 2024.
[104] W. Zeng, P. Chen, H. Nakamura, and M. Iryo-Asano, “Application of social force model to pedestrian behavior analysis at signalized crosswalk,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 40, pp. 143 – 159, 2014.
[105] Q. Chao, P. Liu, Y. Han, Y. Lin, C. Li, Q. Miao, and X. Jin, “A calibrated force-based model for mixed traffic simulation,” IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, pp. 1–1, 2021.
[106] F. T. Johora, D. Yang, J. P. Müller, and U. Özgüner, “On the generalizability of motion models for road users in heterogeneous shared traffic spaces,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, pp. 1–15, 2022.
[107] D. Yang, X. Zhou, G. Su, and S. Liu, “Model and simulation of the heterogeneous traffic flow of the urban signalized intersection with an island work zone,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1719–1727, 2019.
[108] J. Li, W. Deng, Y. Wang, J. Wang, and J. Ding, “Modeling of complex traffic interaction under uncontrolled intersection scenario,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, pp. 1–12, 2024.
[109] X. Hou, R. Zhang, M. Yang, and T. Wang, “Modeling and simulation of the non-motorized vehicle riding behavior considering retrograde effects,” SSRN, 2024.
[110] Y. Li, Y. Ni, and J. Sun, “A modified social force model for high-density through bicycle flow at mixed-traffic intersections,” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, vol. 108, p. 102265, 2021.
[111] L. Fu, Y. Zhang, H. Qin, Q. Shi, Q. Chen, Y. Chen, and Y. Shi, “A modified social force model for studying nonlinear dynamics of pedestrian-e-bike mixed flow at a signalized crosswalk,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 174, p. 113813, 2023.
[112] Z. He and L. Li, “Simulation framework for vehicle and electric scooter interaction,” in 2023 IEEE 26th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2023, pp. 4479–4484.
[113] Y. Hasegawa, C. Dias, M. Iryo-Asano, and H. Nishiuchi, “Modeling pedestrians’ subjective danger perception toward personal mobility vehicles,” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, vol. 56, pp. 256–267, 2018.
[114] T. Q. Pham, C. Nakagawa, A. Shintani, and T. Ito, “Evaluation of the effects of a personal mobility vehicle on multiple pedestrians using personal space,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 2028–2037, 2015.
[115] X. Truong and T. D. Ngo, “Toward socially aware robot navigation in dynamic and crowded environments: A proactive social motion model,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1743–1760, 2017.
[116] Y. Morales, T. Miyashita, and N. Hagita, “Social robotic wheelchair centered on passenger and pedestrian comfort,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 87, pp. 355 – 362, 2017.
[117] E. Repiso, A. Garrell, and A. Sanfeliu, “People’s adaptive side-by-side model evolved to accompany groups of people by social robots,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 2387–2394, 2020.
[118] A. K. Reddy, V. Malviya, and R. Kala, “Social cues in the autonomous navigation of indoor mobile robots,” International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1335–1358, 2020.
[119] H. M. Mu’allimi, B. Sena Bayu Dewantara, D. Pramadihanto, and B. S. Marta, “Human partner and robot guide coordination system under social force model framework using kinect sensor,” in 2020 International Electronics Symposium (IES), 2020, pp. 260–264.
[120] M. Kamezaki, Y. Tsuburaya, T. Kanada, M. Hirayama, and S. Sugano, “Reactive, proactive, and inducible proximal crowd robot navigation method based on inducible social force model,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 3922–3929, 2022.
[121] M. Shiomi, F. Zanlungo, K. Hayashi, and T. Kanda, “Towards a socially acceptable collision avoidance for a mobile robot navigating among pedestrians using a pedestrian model,” International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 6, pp. 443–455, 2014.
[122] E. Repiso, A. Garrell, and A. Sanfeliu, “Adaptive side-by-side social robot navigation to approach and interact with people,” International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 909–930, 2020.
[123] ——, “Adaptive social planner to accompany people in real-life dynamic environments,” International Journal of Social Robotics, 2022.
[124] Z. Wan, C. Jiang, M. Fahad, Z. Ni, Y. Guo, and H. He, “Robot-assisted pedestrian regulation based on deep reinforcement learning,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 1669–1682, 2020.
[125] C. Jiang, Z. Ni, Y. Guo, and H. He, “Learning human–robot interaction for robot-assisted pedestrian flow optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 797–813, 2019.
[126] J. C. Hayward, “Near miss determination through use of a scale of danger,” Pennsylvania State University University Park, 1972.
[127] X. Jiang, W. Wang, and K. Bengler, “Intercultural analyses of time-to-collision in vehicle–pedestrian conflict on an urban midblock crosswalk,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1048–1053, 2015.
[128] S. Tak, S. Kim, and H. Yeo, “Development of a deceleration-based surrogate safety measure for rear-end collision risk,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 2435–2445, 2015.
[129] Y. Zhang, D. Yao, T. Z. Qiu, L. Peng, and Y. Zhang, “Pedestrian safety analysis in mixed traffic conditions using video data,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, no. 4, pp. 1832–1844, 2012.
[130] J.-A. Jang, K. Choi, and H. Cho, “A fixed sensor-based intersection collision warning system in vulnerable line-of-sight and/or traffic-violation-prone environment,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1880–1890, 2012.
[131] Y. Jo, J. Jang, J. Ko, and C. Oh, “An in-vehicle warning information provision strategy for v2v-based proactive traffic safety management,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 19 387–19 398, 2022.
[132] R. Masaki and N. Motoi, “Remote control method with force assist based on time to collision for mobile robot,” IEEE Open Journal of the Industrial Electronics Society, vol. 1, pp. 157–165, 2020.
[133] M. Shahriari and M. Biglarbegian, “Toward safer navigation of heterogeneous mobile robots in distributed scheme: A novel time-to-collision-based method,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 9302–9315, 2022.
[134] J.-Y. Kuo, N. T. Tangirala, J. Murugesan, A. Sayeed, Y. H. V. Chua, J. Dauwels, and M. P. Mayer, “Experimental analysis of pedestrians’ discomfort zone for personal mobility devices on the footpath,” in 2019 IEEE 90th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2019-Fall), 2019, pp. 1–5.
[135] O. James, J. I. Swiderski, J. Hicks, D. Teoman, and R. Buehler, “Pedestrians and e-scooters: An initial look at e-scooter parking and perceptions by riders and non-riders,” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 20, 2019.
[136] D. Paez-Granados and A. Billard, “Crash test-based assessment of injury risks for adults and children when colliding with personal mobility devices and service robots,” Scientific Reports, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 5285, 2022.
[137] C. Zhou, M.-C. Miao, X.-R. Chen, Y.-F. Hu, Q. Chang, M.-Y. Yan, and S.-G. Kuai, “Human-behaviour-based social locomotion model improves the humanization of social robots,” Nature Machine Intelligence, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 1040–1052, 2022.
[138] M. Kalenberg, C. Hofmann, S. Martin, and J. Franke, “Human comfort factors in people navigation: Literature review, taxonomy and framework,” in Robotics, Computer Vision and Intelligent Systems, J. Filipe and J. Röning, Eds. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024, pp. 225–243.
[139] K. Suzuki, T. Suzuki, N. Tyler, and K. Suzuki, “Discomfort in pedestrian-electric scooter interactions during frontal approaches,” IATSS Research, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 447–455, 2024.
[140] H. Sun and B. J. Frost, “Computation of different optical variables of looming objects in pigeon nucleus rotundus neurons,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 296–303, 1998.
[141] N. Formosa, M. Quddus, S. Ison, and A. Timmis, “A new modeling approach for predicting vehicle-based safety threats,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 18 175–18 185, 2022.
[142] J. Archer, Indicators for traffic safety assessment and prediction and their application in micro-simulation modelling: A study of urban and suburban intersections. PhD dissertation, KTH, Stockholm, 2005.
[143] L. Zhang, K. Yuan, H. Chu, Y. Huang, H. Ding, J. Yuan, and H. Chen, “Pedestrian collision risk assessment based on state estimation and motion prediction,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 98–111, 2022.
[144] B. Nie, Q. Li, S. Gan, B. Xing, Y. Huang, and S. E. Li, “Safety envelope of pedestrians upon motor vehicle conflicts identified via active avoidance behaviour,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 3996, 2021.
[145] C. Schwarz, “On computing time-to-collision for automation scenarios,” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, vol. 27, pp. 283–294, 2014, vehicle Automation and Driver Behaviour.
[146] M. Dozza, T. Li, L. Billstein, C. Svernlöv, and A. Rasch, “How do different micro-mobility vehicles affect longitudinal control? Results from a field experiment,” Journal of Safety Research, vol. 84, pp. 24–32, 2023.
[147] H. Yetkin, S. Kalouche, M. Vernier, G. Colvin, K. Redmill, and U. Ozguner, “Gyroscopic stabilization of an unmanned bicycle,” in 2014 American Control Conference (ACC), 2014, pp. 4549–4554.
[148] L. Cui, S. Wang, Z. Zhang, and Z. P. Jiang, “Asymptotic trajectory tracking of autonomous bicycles via backstepping and optimal control,” IEEE Control Systems Letters, vol. 6, pp. 1292–1297, 2022.
[149] P. Wang and J. Yi, “Dynamic stability of a rider-bicycle system: Analysis and experiments,” in 2015 American Control Conference (ACC), 2015, pp. 1161–1166.
[150] P. Wang, J. Yi, T. Liu, and Y. Zhang., “Trajectory tracking and balance control of an autonomous bikebot,” in 2017 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2017, pp. 2414–2419.
[151] P. Wang, Y. Gong, J. Yi, and T. Liu, “An integrated stationary/moving balance control of an autonomous bikebot,” in 2019 American Control Conference (ACC), 2019, pp. 3273–3278.
[152] K. He, Y. Deng, G. Wang, X. Sun, Y. Sun, and Z. Chen, “Learning-based trajectory tracking and balance control for bicycle robots with a pendulum: A gaussian process approach,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 27, pp. 634–644, 2022.
[153] P. Seekhao, K. Tungpimolrut, and M. Parnichkun, “Development and control of a bicycle robot based on steering and pendulum balancing,” Mechatronics, vol. 69, 2020.
[154] S. Wang, L. Cui, J. Lai, S. Yang, X. Chen, Y. Zheng, Z. Zhang, and Z.-P. Jiang, “Gain scheduled controller design for balancing an autonomous bicycle,” in 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2020, pp. 7595–7600.
[155] R. Soloperto, P. Wenzelburger, D. Meister, D. Scheuble, V. S. Breidohr, and F. Allgöwer, “A control framework for autonomous e-scooters,” in IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2021, pp. 252–258.
[156] M. A. Carmona, D. Milutinovic, and A. Faust, “Metrics-only training neural network for switching among an array of feedback controllers for bicycle model navigation,” in 2022 American Control Conference (ACC), 2022, pp. 3224–3229.
[157] S. S. Poojari, J. Lee, and D. A. Paley, “Outdoor localization and path planning for repositioning an autonomous electric scooter,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, pp. 1–9, 2024.
[158] J. Xiong, B. Li, R. Yu, D. Ma, W. Wang, and C. Liu, “Reduced dynamics and control for an autonomous bicycle,” in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2021, pp. 6775–6781.
[159] N. Getz, Dynamic inversion of nonlinear maps with applications to nonlinear control and robotics. University of California, Berkeley, 1995.
[160] C. Chih-Keng and D. Thanh-Son, “Fuzzy control for equilibrium and roll-angle tracking of an unmanned bicycle,” Multibody System Dynamics, vol. 15.4, pp. 321–346, 2006.
[161] Y. Zhang, G. Zhao, and H. Li, “Multibody dynamic modeling and controlling for unmanned bicycle system,” ISA Transactions, vol. 118, pp. 174–188, 2021.
[162] D. Helbing, Social Forces. Springer International Publishing, 2021, pp. 35–61.
[163] F. Johansson, D. C. Duives, W. Daamen, and S. P. Hoogendoorn, “The many roles of the relaxation time parameter in force based models of pedestrian dynamics,” Transportation Research Procedia, vol. 2, pp. 300–308, 2014.
[164] C. Rudloff, T. Matyus, S. Seer, and D. Bauer, “Can walking behavior be predicted?: Analysis of calibration and fit of pedestrian models,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 2264, no. 1, pp. 101–109, 2011.
[165] R. Rajamani, Vehicle Dynamics and Control. Boston, MA: Springer, MA, 2006.
[166] J. D’Errico, “fminsearchbnd, fminsearchcon,” MATLAB Central File Exchange, Aug. 2020.
[167] J. Lagarias, J. Reeds, M. Wright, and P. Wright, “Convergence properties of the nelder–mead simplex method in low dimensions,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, vol. 9, pp. 112–147, 1998.
[168] R. L. Sanders, M. Branion-Calles, and T. A. Nelson, “To scoot or not to scoot: Findings from a recent survey about the benefits and barriers of using e-scooters for riders and non-riders,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 139, pp. 217–227, 2020.
[169] S. P. Hoogendoorn and W. Daamen, “Free speed distributions for pedestrian traffic,” Tech. Rep., 2006.
[170] J. L. Pauls, “Suggestions on evacuation models and research questions,” in Conference Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Human Behaviour in Fire, 2004.
[171] S. Szomiński, W. Turek, and A. Byrski, “Socially-inspired fully decentralized robot coordination,” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, vol. 119, p. 102528, 2022.
[172] P. Kothari, S. Kreiss, and A. Alahi, “Human trajectory forecasting in crowds: A deep learning perspective,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 7386–7400, 2022.
[173] F. Zanlungo, T. Ikeda, and T. Kanda, “Social force model with explicit collision prediction,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 93, no. 6, p. 68005, 2011.
[174] A. M. Bloch, P. S. Krishnaprasad, J. E. Marsden, and R. M. Murray, “Nonholonomic mechanical systems with symmetry,” Archive for rational mechanics and analysis, vol. 136, pp. 21–99, 1996.
[175] D. J. N. Limebeer and M. Massaro, The Dynamics and Optimal Control of Road Vehicles. Oxford University Press, 2018.
[176] E. H. Lockwood, A Book of Curves. Cambridge University Press, 1961.
[177] G. Casella and R. L. Berger, Statistical inference (Second ed.). Australia: Thomson Learning, 2002.
[178] M. Brännström, E. Coelingh, and J. Sjöberg, “Model-based threat assessment for avoiding arbitrary vehicle collisions,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 658–669, 2010.
[179] -, “Dockless electric scooter - related injuries study,” Austin Public Health, Tech. Rep., 2019.
[180] C. Gioldasis, Z. Christoforou, and R. Seidowsky, “Risk-taking behaviors of e-scooter users: A survey in Paris,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 163, p. 106427, 2021.
[181] S. Das and A. K. Maurya, “Defining time-to-collision thresholds by the type of lead vehicle in non-lane-based traffic environments,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 4972–4982, 2020.
[182] Ninebot Kickscooter by Segway-ES4 Technical Specification, Online, 2020.
校內:2028-01-01公開