簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 王昱棋
Wang, Yu-Qi
論文名稱: 超高性能混凝土(UHPC)噴漿工法於含磚牆RC構架之耐震補強
Seismic Retrofitted RC Frame with Masonry Wall by Sprayed Ultra High Performance Concrete(UHPC)
指導教授: 洪崇展
Hung, Chung-Chan
共同指導: 袁宇秉
Yuen, Yu-Ping
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 土木工程學系
Department of Civil Engineering
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 461
中文關鍵詞: 超高性能混凝土(UHPC) 、含磚牆RC構架 、噴漿 、耐震補強
外文關鍵詞: ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC), Masonry-infilled RC frames, shotcrete, seismic retrofitting
相關次數: 點閱:294  下載:0 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 加強磚造為台灣早期常見的建物構法,經過多次地震災害後,這些建築物被發現有抵抗側向力強度不足的問題,為了提升抗震性能,有許多補強工法已經被發展及使用於實際建物中。
    噴漿工法是被廣泛應用於牆面施工的方法之一。配合擁有出色力學性質的超高性能混凝土(ultra high performance concrete,簡稱UHPC),施作於磚牆表面可以有效提升面內剪力強度並增加面外的抗倒塌能力。
    經實驗證明,不含鋼線網的UHPC噴漿補強層可以在施做少量工序之後有效提升實尺寸含磚RC構架面內強度121%並延後降伏強度及極限強度發生時的位移且初始勁度僅有微幅提升;對於含有中央門型開口之加強磚造在配合鋼線網進行補強過後則可以使其回復至未開口磚牆98%之側向極限強度且韌性可以上升50%。
    整體而言,UHPC噴漿補強可快速且有效提升含磚RC構架耐震性能。

    Confined masonry was a common building construction method in Taiwan in the early days. After many earthquake disasters, these buildings were found to have insufficient strength to resist lateral forces. In order to improve the seismic performance, many retrofitting construction methods have been developed and used in real buildings.
    Shotcrete is one of the methods widely used in wall construction. Combined with ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) with outstanding mechanical properties, applying it on the surface of masonry wall can effectively increase the in-plane lateral strength and increase the out-of-plane collapse resistance.
    Experiments have proved that the UHPC shotcrete retrofitting layer without welded-wire mesh(WWM) can effectively increase the in-plane strength of the full-sized masonry-infilled RC frame by 121% and the ultimate strength and yield strength of CM-U occur at a later stage and the stiffness is only slightly improved. For confined masonry with central door-shaped openings, retrofitting layer with WWM can restore the lateral strength to 98% of the unopened confined masonry and the reduction can be increased by 50% .
    In general, UHPC shotcrete lcan quickly and effectively improve the seismic performance of masonry-infilled RC frames.

    摘要 I 誌謝 V 目錄 VI 表目錄 XII 圖目錄 XIV 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究動機 1 1.2 研究目的 1 1.3 研究方法 2 第二章 文獻回顧 3 2.1 纖維混凝土 3 2.1.1 高性能纖維混凝土 3 2.1.2 超高性能纖維混凝土 4 2.2 內含磚牆混凝土構架破壞模式 5 2.3 內含磚牆RC構架補強方法 9 2.3.1 FRP補強 9 2.3.2 混凝土補強層 10 2.3.3 混凝土補強層強度預測公式 13 第三章 試驗規劃與方法 24 3.1 試體介紹 24 3.1.1 BF試體 25 3.1.2 CM試體 26 3.1.3 CM-U試體 27 3.1.4 CM/O-U試體 28 3.2 試體細部設計 29 3.3 試驗配置與加載歷程 38 3.3.1 水平側力系統 38 3.3.2 抗側力力偶系統 39 3.3.3 軸力系統 39 3.3.4 面外支撐系統 39 3.3.5 加載歷程 42 3.3.6 量測儀器 43 3.3.6.1 應變計 43 3.3.6.2 位移計及轉角計 47 3.3.6.3 NDI 48 3.3.6.4 DIC 48 3.4 試驗使用材料 50 3.4.1 一般混凝土材料 50 3.4.2 鋼筋 50 3.4.2.1 主筋 50 3.4.2.2 橫向鋼筋 50 3.4.3 紅磚 50 3.4.4 填縫砂漿 51 3.4.5 UHPC 52 3.4.6 鋼線網 52 3.4.7 錨栓 53 3.4.8 FRP 54 3.5 試體施工過程 57 3.5.1 結構體施工 57 3.5.2 補強施工 61 3.6 材料試驗 66 3.6.1 一般混凝土抗壓試驗 66 3.6.1.1 梁柱部分混凝土 67 3.6.1.2 基礎部分混凝土 68 3.6.2 鋼筋抗拉試驗 69 3.6.3 磚塊抗壓試驗 70 3.6.4 填縫砂漿抗壓試驗 71 3.6.5 磚墩抗壓試驗 73 3.6.6 灰縫抗剪試驗 76 3.6.7 UHPC抗壓試驗 79 3.6.7.1 圓柱試體抗壓試驗 79 3.6.7.2 噴漿隔板試驗 83 3.6.8 UHPC抗拉試驗 87 第四章 試驗結果與討論 90 4.1 試驗流程 90 4.2 試體破壞歷程 90 4.2.1 試體BF 91 4.2.2 試體CM 108 4.2.3 試體CM-U 117 4.2.4 試體CM/O-U 131 4.3 遲滯迴圈 144 4.3.1 試體BF 144 4.3.2 試體CM 145 4.3.3 試體CM-U 146 4.3.4 試體CM/O-U 147 4.3.5 各試體綜合比較 148 4.4 試驗結果與預測值比較 150 4.4.1 試體BF 150 4.4.1.1 撓曲降伏點 152 4.4.1.2 撓曲強度點 153 4.4.1.3 撓剪破壞點 153 4.4.1.4 軸力破壞點 154 4.4.1.5 結果統整 154 4.4.2 試體CM 156 4.4.2.1 最大強度點 156 4.4.2.2 殘餘強度點 158 4.4.2.3 極限變位點 158 4.4.2.4 結果統整 159 4.4.3 試體CM-U 160 4.4.3.1 試體強度計算 160 4.4.3.2 錨栓設計 161 4.4.3.3 破壞模式檢核 161 4.4.4 試體CM/O-U(I) 164 4.4.4.1 試體強度計算 164 4.4.4.2 錨栓設計 165 4.4.4.3 破壞模式檢核 165 4.4.5 試體CM/O-U(II) 167 4.4.5.1 試體強度計算 167 4.4.5.2 最大強度點 167 4.4.5.3 殘餘強度點 168 4.4.5.4 極限變位點 169 4.4.5.5 錨栓設計 171 4.4.5.6 破壞模式檢核 171 4.4.6 各試體綜合比較 172 4.5 勁度衰退 179 4.6 韌性因子 181 4.7 軸力與側位移關係 183 4.8 試體變形模式 187 4.8.1 柱側向變形 187 4.8.2 柱曲率變化 195 4.8.3 牆體剪力變形 199 4.8.4 牆體邊界關係 203 4.8.5 主應變分析 215 4.9 鋼筋應變計 335 4.9.1 柱鋼筋降伏時機 335 4.9.2 柱箍筋應變計 336 4.9.3 柱主筋應變計 344 4.10 補強效益 348 第五章 結論與建議 352 5.1 結論 352 5.2 建議 353 第六章 參考文獻 355 附錄A. BF試體強度評估 361 附錄B. CM試體強度評估 366 附錄C. CM-U試體強度評估 370 附錄D. CM/O-U試體強度評估(I) 377 附錄E. CM/O-U試體強度評估(II) 383 附錄F. CM-U試體小網格分析結果 393 附錄G. CM/O-U試體小網格分析結果 409 附錄H. 鋼筋應變計結果整理 423 6.1.1.1 柱主筋 423 6.1.1.2 柱箍筋 435 6.1.1.3 梁鋼筋 443

    [1] ACI Committee 318.(2019). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-19): An ACI Standard ; Commentary on Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318R-19): American Concrete Institute.
    [2] ASCE/SEI 41-06, "Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings Supplement No.1 ." American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, 2007, pp. 145-225.
    [3] ASCE/SEI 41-13, "American Society of Civil Engineers, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings." American Society of Civil Engineers,
    Reston, Virginia, 2013.
    [4] Asteris, P. G., Cotsovos, D. M., Chrysostomou, C. Z., Mohebkhah, A., & Al-Chaar, G. K. (2013). Mathematical micromodeling of infilled frames: state of the art. Engineering Structures, 56, 1905-1921.
    [5] ASTM International. (2020). C109/C109M-20b Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50 mm] Cube Specimens). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1520/C0109_C0109M-20B
    [6] ASTM International. (2019). C1140/C1140M-11(2019) Standard Practice for Preparing and Testing Specimens from Shotcrete Test Panels. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1520/C1140_C1140M-11R19
    [7] ASTM International. (2018). C1314-18 Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Masonry Prisms. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1520/C1314-18
    [8] ASTM International. C39/C39M-21 Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. West Conshohocken, PA; ASTM International, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1520/C0039_C0039M-21
    [9] Athanasopoulou, A. (2010). Shear Strength and Drift Capacity of Reinforced Concrete and High-Performance Fiber Reinforced Concrete Low-Rise Walls Subjected to Displacement Reversals.
    [10] BS EN (2002) BS EN 1052-3 Methods of test for masonry - Part 3: Determination of initial shear strength.
    [11] Decanini, L. D., Liberatore, L., & Mollaioli, F. (2014). Strength and stiffness reduction factors for infilled frames with openings. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 13(3), 437-454.
    [12] Dehghani, A., Nateghi-Alahi, F., & Fischer, G. (2015). Engineered cementitious composites for strengthening masonry infilled reinforced concrete frames. Engineering Structures, 105, 197-208.
    [13] El-Dakhakhni, W. W., Hamid, A. A., & Elgaaly, M. (2004). Seismic retrofit of masonry infill walls using advanced composites. Paper presented at the Proceedings of 13th Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC.
    [14] Elwood, K. J., & Eberhard, M. O. (2009). Effective stiffness of reinforced concrete columns. ACI Structural Journal, 106(4), 476.
    [15] Graybeal, B.A.: Design and Construction of Field-Cast UHPC Connections, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Publication No: FHWA-HRT-19-011 (2019)
    [16] Hetenyi M (1946) Beams on elastic foundation theory with applications in the fields of civil and mechanical engineering. Michigan, USA: The university of Michigan Press.
    [17] Hung, C.-C., & Chueh, C.-Y. (2016). Cyclic behavior of UHPFRC flexural members reinforced with high-strength steel rebar. Engineering Structures, 122, 108-120.
    [18] Hung, C.-C., & Li, S.-H. (2013). Three-dimensional model for analysis of high performance fiber reinforced cement-based composites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 45(1), 1441-1447. doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.08.004
    [19] Hung, C.-C., & Su, Y.-F. (2016). Medium-term self-healing evaluation of Engineered Cementitious Composites with varying amounts of fly ash and exposure durations. Construction and Building Materials, 118, 194-203. Retrieved from
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061816307425. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.021
    [20] Hung, C. C., Chen, Y. T., & Yen, C. H. (2020). Workability, fiber distribution, and mechanical properties of UHPC with hooked end steel macro-fibers. Construction and Building Materials, 260, 119944.
    [21] Hung, C. C., Hu, F. Y., & Yen, C. H. (2018). Behavior of slender UHPC columns under eccentric loading. Engineering Structures, 174, 701-711.
    [22] Hung, C. C., & Hsieh, P. L. (2020, February). Comparative study on shear failure behavior of squat high-strength steel reinforced concrete shear walls with various high-strength concrete materials. In Structures (Vol. 23, pp. 56-68). Elsevier.
    [23] Hung, C. C., Kuo, C. W., & Shao, Y. (2021). Cast-in-place and prefabricated UHPC jackets for retrofitting shear-deficient RC columns with different axial load levels. Journal of Building Engineering, 103305.
    [24] Jiang, H., Liu, X., & Mao, J. (2015). Full-scale experimental study on masonry infilled RC moment-resisting frames under cyclic loads. Engineering Structures, 91, 70-84.
    [25] Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association (JBDPA) (2001) Standard for seismic evaluation of existing reinforced concrete buildings.
    [26] Koutromanos, I., & Shing, P. B. (2014). Numerical study of masonry-infilled RC frames retrofitted with ECC overlays. Journal of Structural Engineering, 140(7), 04014045.
    [27] Kyriakides, M., & Billington, S. L. (2014). Cyclic response of nonductile reinforced concrete frames with unreinforced masonry infills retrofitted with engineered cementitious composites. Journal of Structural Engineering, 140(2),
    04013046.
    [28] Leeanansaksiri, A., Panyakapo, P., & Ruangrassamee, A. (2018). Seismic capacity of masonry infilled RC frame strengthening with expanded metal ferrocement. Engineering Structures, 159, 110-127. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.12.034
    [29] Park, R. (1989). Evaluation of ductility of structures and structural assemblages from laboratory testing. Bulletin of the new Zealand society for earthquake engineering, 22(3), 155-166.
    [30] Paulay, T., Priestley(1992,) M.J.N., "Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings." Wiley, New York , pp. 584-594.
    [31] Sen D, Alwashali H, Islam MS, Seki M, Maeda M. (;2021).Lateral Strength Evaluation of Ferrocement Strengthened Masonry Infilled RC frame Based on Experimentally Observed Failure Mechanisms. Research Square DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-422754/v1.
    [32] Yamamoto Y (1990) Ultimate shear strength of reinforced concrete members with extremely small shear span ratios. Workshop on Evaluation, Repair, and Retrofit of Structures — U.S.-Japan Panel on Wind and Seismic Effects. Gaithersburg 3-6-1-3-6–13
    [33] Yuksel, E., Ozkaynak, H., Buyukozturk, O., Yalcin, C., Dindar, A. A., Surmeli, M., & Tastan, D. (2010). Performance of alternative CFRP retrofitting schemes used in infilled RC frames. Construction and Building Materials, 24(4), 596-609. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.09.005
    [34] 中華民國國家標準CNS382普通磚,經濟部標準檢驗局,2007
    [35] 林育瑄(2016),RC 構架內含偏心開口不同構法磚牆面內側向加載試驗., 國立成功大學建築學所碩士論文
    [36] 邱聰智、蕭輔沛、鍾立來、翁健煌、李其航、劉建均、薛強、何郁姍、陳幸均、楊智斌、翁樸文、沈文成、涂耀賢、楊耀昇、李翼安、葉勇凱、黃世建,「臺灣結構耐震評估側推分析法 (TEASPA V3.1)」,國家地震工程研究中心技術報告,No. NCREE-18-015 (2018)。
    [37] 邱聰智(2015),低矮型鋼筋混凝土住宅結構耐震快速評估法之開發與驗證., 國立臺灣大學土木工程學研究所博士論文
    [38] 陳奕信(2003),含磚牆RC建築結構之耐震診斷,國立成功大學建築研究所博士論文
    [39] 許元馨(2015),不同開口形式加強磚造磚牆面內側向加載試驗,國立成功大學建築學所碩士論文
    [40] 許晉維(2019),高韌性纖維混凝土改良傳統磚砌建築灰縫材料之研究,國立成功大學土木工程研究所碩士論文
    [41] 黃嘉德(2019),無開口和含開口加強磚造牆體分析模型,國立成功大學土木工程研究所碩士論文
    [42] 蕭信睿(2020),超高性能纖維混凝土於梁柱接頭耐震補強之效用,國立成功大學土木工程研究所碩士論文
    [43] 戴佑軒(2020),超高性能混凝土噴漿工法於磚牆補強效用之評估,國立成功大學土木工程研究所碩士論文
    [44] 蘇彥方(2014),綠色高韌性纖維混凝土(Green-ECC)本土化發展與自癒合能力之研究,國立中央大學土木工程研究所碩士論文

    下載圖示
    2026-09-01公開
    QR CODE