組織記憶是組織對過去事件反映的累積，蘊含著組織的知識與智慧。在這個變動快速的環境中，為了維持自身的競爭優勢，當組織面臨的任務所需的知識技能需求大於組織本身所能處理的範圍時，他就會尋求其他組織或合作夥伴的支援；在當問題解決之後，組織記憶的內涵就會因為組織本身能力的提高或將本身的知識形之成文儲存在組織之中而更加豐富。藉由組織記憶的運用，除了可以增加組織本身的能力，還可以讓組織過去的智慧結晶得以流傳。
本文旨在從過去知識交換系統的角度，延伸至組織記憶的角度去探討組織之間的信任、溝通、知識分享、知識多樣性、以及網絡關係對組織記憶發展之影響，採用問卷方式，資料分析以回歸模型作為檢視在台灣三大科學園區設廠的企業與合作夥伴交流的狀況，進而了解科技產業對於組織記憶發展的狀況。
其結果發現如下：組織記憶的發展與組織的財務與創新績效呈現正向顯著關係；組織間的溝通與組織記憶的發展呈現正向顯著關係；組織間的知識分享和組織記憶的發展呈現正向顯著的關係；組織間的知識多樣性和組織記憶的發展呈現正向顯著的關係；組織間的網絡強弱關係和組織記憶的發展呈現負向顯著的關係。因此，本研究建議在變化快速以及需要複雜技術的科技產業，組織之間的社會關係與知識管理對於組織記憶的發展與組織績效是有一定的影響。

Organizational memory containing the history of organization reflects the knowledge and wisdom of an organization. In the change quickly and anticipation difficulty environ-ment, the companies must obtain their competitive advantage. The gap between technology processing capabilities of organizations and information processing requirements of their tasks will make them search for help from business partners. OM becomes rich by im-proving tacit knowledge in organization capability or increasing explicit one in organization after solving the problem. Using OM can help organizations gain their ability through search and retrieval of information.
This research investigates the perspective of transactive memory system (TMS) pre-viously extend to the effects of inter-rust, intercommunication, knowledge sharing, know-ledge diversity and network relation on organization memory. With 108 samples collected from high-tech industry in Science Park, this research employs regression to verify the re-lationships among variables to demonstrate the situation of firms in Science Park with their business partners. Furthermore, we can understand the development of organization mem-ory in high-tech industry more.
The results are follows：(1) OM significantly influences the organization financial and innovation performance. (2) Inter-trust significantly influence the development of OM. (3) intercommunication significantly influence the development of OM. (4) knowledge shar-ing significantly influence the development of OM. (5) knowledge diversity significantly influence the development of OM (6) network relation don’t significantly influence the development of OM. Hence, the study suggested that social relations and knowledge management would affect the development of OM and organizational performance be-tween organizations in change quickly and complexity technology high-tech industry.

Ackerman, M. S. & Malone, T. W. 1990. Answer garden: a tool for growing organizational memory. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Office Information Systems Cambridge. MA: 31-39
Akgun, A. E., Byrne, J., Keskin, H., Lynn, G., & Imamoglu, S. Z. 2005. Knowledge net-works in new product development Projects: a transactive memory perspective. Information & Management, 42: 1105-1120
Alavi, M. & Leidner, D. 2001. Knowledge management and knowledge management sys-tems conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1): 107-136.
Alavi, M. & Tiwana, A. 2002. Knowledge integration in virtual teams: the potential role of KMS. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 53: 1029–1037.
Amabile, T., Barsade, S., Mueller, J. & Staw, B. 2005. Affect and Creativity at Work. Ad-ministrative Science. Quarterly, 50: 367-403
Anand, V., Manz, C. C. & Glic, W. H. 1998. An organizational memory approach to in-formation management. Academy of Management Review: 23(4): 796–809.
Anand, V., Skilton, P. F. & Keats, B. W. 1996. Reconceptualizing organizational memory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Cincinnati, OH.
Anderson, J. C. & Narus, J. A. 1990a. A model of the distributor’s perspective of distribu-tor-manufacturer working relationships. Journal of Marketing, 48: 62-74.
Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. 1990b. A model of distribution firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54: 42-58
Argote, L. & Ophir, R.. 2002. Intraorganizational learning, in: J.A.C. Baum (Eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Organizations: 181–207, Blackwell, Oxford, England.
Argote, L.. 1999. Organizational Learning: Creativity, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, .
Austin, J. R. 2003. Transactive memory in organizational groups: the effects of content, consensus, specialization and accuracy on group performance. Journal of Applied Psy-chology , 88: 866–878
Ball, L. 2005. Networking is the buzzword for referrals. Air Conditioning, Heating & Re-frigeration News, 225(2): 36.
Barney, J. B. & Wright, P.M.. 1998. On becoming a strategic partner: the role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage. Human Resource Management, 37: 31-46.
Beccerra, M. & Gupta, A. K.. 1999. Inter-trust within the organization: Integrating the in-ter-trust literature with agency theory and transaction cost economics. Public Administra-tion Quarterly, 23(2): 177–203.
Berry, L. L. 1993. Playing fair in retailing. Arthur Anderson Retailing Issues Newsletter, 5(2)
Boe, A. 1994. Networking success: How to turn business & financial relationships into fun & profit. Deerfield Beach, FL: Health Intercommunications.
Boland, R. J., Tenkasi, R. V. & Te’eni, D. 1994. Designing information technology to support distributed cognition. Organization Science. 5(3): 456–475.
Boland, R. J., Tenkasi, R. V. & Te'eni, D. 1996. Designing information technology to sup-port distributed cognition. In J. R. Meindl, C. Stubbard, & J. F. Porac (Eds.), Cognition within and between organizations: 245-280. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Boyce, G. 2001. Co-operative structures in global business: intercommunication, transfer-ring knowledge and learning across the corporate frontier. New York: Routledge.
Bradach, J. L. & Eccles, R. G. 1989. Price, authority and inter-trust: From ideal types to plural forms. Annual Review of Sociology, 15: 97-118.
Brandon D. P. & Hollingshead A. B. 2004. Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organization Science, 15(6): 633–644.
Brauner, E. & Becker, A. 2006. Beyond knowledge sharing: The management of transac-tive knowledge systems. Knowledge and process management, 13(1): 62-71
Brockman, B. K. & Morgan, R. M.. 2003. The role of existing knowledge in new product innovativeness and performance. Decision Science, 34: 385-419
Brown, J. S. & Duguid, P.. 1998. Organizing knowledge. California Management Review, 40 (3): 90-111.
Brown, N. H., Shevell, S. K. & Rips, L. I. 1986. Public memones and their personal con-text. In D. C. Rubin (Ed.), Autobiographical memory: 137-158. Cambndge: Cambndge University Press.
Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard Univer-sity Press: Cambridge, MA
Burt, R. S. 2004. Structural holes and new ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110: 349-399.
Business Week .1992. Learning from Japan: 52-60.
Calantone, T., Fax, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T., Zhao, T. & Fax, Y. 2002. Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance, Industrial Marketing Management, 31: 515-524.
Cannon-Bowers, J. A. & Salas, E.. 1993.Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In: Castellan N J Jr. (Eds.). Individual and Group Decision Making, 221~246, Current Issues, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Carlile, P. R. & Rebentisch, E. S. 2003. Into the black box: The knowledge transformation cycle. Management Science. 49(9): 1180–1195
Casey, A. 1997. Collective memory in organizations. Advances in Strategic Management, 14: 111-146
Chang, D. R. & Cho, H. 2008. Organizational memory influences new product success. Journal of Business Research, 61: 13-23
Clark, K. 1997. The detectives. Fortune, 14: 122-126.
Cohen, M. & Bacdayan, P.. 1996. Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: evidence from a laboratory study, in Meindl, L, Stubbart, C., Porac, J. (Eds),Cognition Within and Between Organizations, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, .
Cohen, M.. 1991. Individual learning and organizational routine: emerging connections. Organizational Science, 12(1): 135-139.
Cohen, W. & Levinthal, D. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science. Quarterly. 35: 128-152.
Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administration Science Quarterly, 35: 128–52
Cohen, W. M.. & Daniel A. L.. 1994. Fortune Favors the Prepared Firm. Management Science, 40: 227-51.
Cohen, W. M.. & Daniel, A. L.. 1990. Absorptive Capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35:128-52.
Coleman, J. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Conklin, E.. 1996. Capturing organizational memory, Group Decision Support Systems .
Cooper, R. G. & Elko, J. K.. 1986. An Investigation into the New Product Process: steps, deficiencies, and impact. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 3: 71-85.
Corner, P. D., Kinicki, A. J. & Keats, B. W. 1994. Integrating organizational and individual perspectives on choice. Organization Science, 5: 294-308.
Cox, T. 1991. The multicultural organization, Academy of Management Executive, 5(2): 34-47.
Crosby, L. A., Evans, K. R. & Cowels, D.. 1990. Relationship quality in services selling: An interpersonal influence perspective. Journal ofMarketing,54: 68-81.
Cross, R. & Baird, L.. 2000. Technology is not enough: improving performance by building organizational memory. Sloan Management Review, 41(3) : 69-78
Cummings, T. 1984. Transorganizational development. Research in Organizational Beha-vior, 6: 367-422.
Cyert, R. M. & James, G. March.. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. 1986. Organizational informational requirements, media rich-ness and structural design. Management Science, 32: 554-571.
Davenport, T. H. & Prusak, L. 1998. Working knowledge：How organizations manage what they know. President and Fellows of Harvard College
De Man, A. 2004. The networked economy: Strategy, structure and management. Chel-tenham, UK: Edgar Elgar.
Deutsch, M. 1962. Cooperation and inter-trust: Some Theoretical Notes in Nebraska Sym-posium on Motivation, Marshall R. Jones, ed. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press
Duncan, R. B. & Weiss, A.. 1979. Organizational Learning: Implications for organizational design in research in organizational behavior, (1): 75-124, Barry M. Staw, ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press,.
Dwyer, F. R. & Lagace, R. R.. 1986. On the nature and role of buyer-seller inter-trust. American Marketing Association, 52: 40-45.
Dwyer, F. R. & Welsh, M. A.. 1985. Environmental relationships of the internal political economy of marketing channels. Journal of Marketing Research, 22: 48-60
Dyer, J. H. & Chu, W.. 2000. The determinants of inter-trust in supplier-automaker rela-tionships in the U.S., Japan, and Korea. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(2): 259–285
Dyer, J. H. & Nobeoka, K.. 2000. Creating and managing a high-performance know-ledge-sharing network: The Toyota a case. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3): 345-367.
El Sawy, O. A. & Bowles, G. 1997. Redesigning the customer support process for the elec-tronic economy: insights from storage dimensions. MIS Quarterly, 21(4): 457-483
El Sawy, O. A.; Gomes, G. & Gonzalez, M.. 1986. Preserving institutional memory: the management of history as an organizational resource. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 37: 118-22
Faraj, S. & Xiao, Y. 2006. Coordination in fast response organizations. Management Science, 52(8): 1155–1169
Ford, I. D. 1998. Managing business-relationships. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons
Ford, I. D.; Gadde, L-E.; Hakansson, H. & Snehota, I. 2003. Managing business relation-ships. 2nd Edition. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons
Gagnon, R. & Sheu, C.. 2000. The impact of learning, forgetting and capacity profiles on the acquisition of advanced technology. Omega: International Journal Management Studies: 20(1): 51-76
Ganesan, S. 1994. Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationship. Journal of Marketing, 59: 1-19
Garton, L., Haythornthwaite, C. & Wellman, B. 1997. Studying online social networks.
Geműnden, H. G., Ritter, T. & Walter, A. (Eds.). 1997. Relationships and networks in international markets. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
Ghoshal, S., H. & Korine, G. S.. 1994. Interunit intercommunication in multinational cor-porations. Management Science, 40: 96–110.
Goerzen, A. & Beamish, P. W.. 2005. The effect of alliance network diversity on multina-tional enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 333–354
Grant, R. M. 1991. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3): 114-35.
Grant, R.M.. 2002. Contemporary Strategy Analysis. Concepts, Techniques, Applications, 4th ed., Blackwell, Cambridge
Griffin R. W.. 1996. Managing Interpersonal Relations and Intercommunication., Man-agement,5th ed., Houghton Miffin Company Press.
Gruszczynski, W. 2005. Small enterprises’ cooperation groups. Importance of personal re-lationships in small enterprises’ cooperation. Paper delivered at the 4th International Con-ference of Entrepreneurship – Employment and Beyond, Sodertörns Högskola University College, Stockholm Sweden
Gulati, R.. 1998. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19(4): 293–317
Hadjikhani, A. & Thilenius, P.. 2005. Non-business actors in a business network: A com-parative case on firms’ actions in developing and developed countries. Ghauri, Amsterdam: Elsevier
Hägglund, S.. 1998. Knowledge management for collective learning and organizational memory. in Waern, Y. (Eds), Co-operative Process Management: Cognition and Information Technology: 203-209, Taylor and Francis, London.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. 2006. Multivariate data analysis. NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hallen, L. and M. Sandstrom (1991). Relationship Atmosphere in International Business. New Perspectives on International Marketing, 108-125
Hambrick, D., Cho, T. & Chen, M-J. 1996. The influence of top management team hete-rogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 659–684.
Hamel, G. 1991. Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within interna-tional strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 83-103.
Hansen, M. T. 1999. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing know-ledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44 82–111.
Hansen, M. T. 2002. Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organization Science, 13(3): 232-248
Hanson, M. T., Nohria, N. & Tierney, T. 1999. What’s your strategy for managing know-ledge? Harvard Business Review, 77(2): 106-116
Haragdon, A. & Sutton, R.. 1997. Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 716-749
Hedberg, B. 1981. How organizations learn and unlearn. In: Nystrom PC, Starbuck WH, editors. Handbook of organizational design: 3−27. London: Oxford University Press..
Hendriks, P. 1999. Why share knowledge？The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process management, 6(2): 91-100.
Hollingshead, A. B. 1998. Intercommunication, learning, and retrieval in transactive mem-ory systems. Journal of Experiment. Social Psychology, 34:423–442
Hollingshead, A. B. 2001. Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 81: 1080–1089.
Holtshouse, D. 1998. Knowledge research issues. California Management Review, 40(3): 277-280
Hosmer, L. T. 1995. Inter-trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics. Academy of Management Review, 20: 379-403
Huang, P. F., 1998. Relationship Marketing: Investigation into Consumers,” Imitation, Maintenance and Adjustment/ Disengagement of Marketing Relationship, Business Ad-ministration, the University of Mississippi.
Huber, G. P. 1991. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2: 88-115.
Huber, G. P., & Glick, W. H. 1993. Sources and forms of organizational change. In G. P. Huber & W. H. Glick (Eds.), Organizational change and redesign: Ideas and insights for improving performance: 3-15. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jackson, B.W., LaFasto, F., Schultz, H.G. & Kelly, D. 1992. Diversity. Human Resource Management, 31(1/2): 21-34.
Jackson, S. E., Joshi, A., & Erhardt, N. L. 2003. Recent research on teams and organiza-tional diversity: SWOT analysis, and implications. Journal of Management, 29: 801–830.
Jarvenpaa, S. L. & Majchrzak, A. 2008. Knowledge collaboration among professionals protecting national security: Role of transactive memories in ego-centered knowledge networks. Organization Science, 19(2): 260–276
Jarvenpaa, S., Knoll, K. & Leidner, D. 1998. Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(4): 29-64
Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B. & Neale, M. A. 1999. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 741-763
Kapp, J. and Barnett, G. 1983. Predicting organizational effectiveness from intercommu-nication activities: A multiple indicator model. Human Intercommunication. Research, 9: 239-254.
Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S. 1994. Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20, 403–437.
Krackhardt, D. 1992. The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organiza-tions. N. Nohria, R. Eccles, eds. Networks and Organizations: Structures, Form and Action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 216–239
Kraiger, K., & Wenzel, L. C. 1997. Conceptual development and empirical evaluation of measures of shared mental models as indicators of team effectiveness. In M. T. Brannick, E. Salas, & C. Prince (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement: Theory, methods, and applications: 45–84. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Larsson, M. & Lundberg, D. 1998. The transparent market: Management challenges in the electronic age. London, UK: MacMillan Press Ltd.
Lee, C., Lee, K. & Pennings, J. M.. 2001. Internal capabilities, external networks, and per-formance: A study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7): 615–640.
Lee, J. N. 2001. The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partner-ship quality on IS outsourcing success. Information and Management, 38(5): 323-335.
Lee, J. N. and Young, G..1999. Effect of partnership quality on is outsourcing success: conceptual Framework and empirical validation. Journal of management information sys-tem, 15(4): 29-61
Lewis, K. 2003. Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88: 587–604.
Lewis, K., Lange, D., & Gallis, L. 2005. Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning transfer. Organization Science, 16(6) 581–598.
Liang, D.W. The effect of top management team formation on firm performance and orga-nizational effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA ,1994
Liang, T., Liu, C., Lin, T., & Lin, B. 2007. Effect of team diversity on software project performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(5): 36-653
Liebeskind, J.P. 1996. Knowledge, strategy, and the theory of the firm. Strategic Manage-ment Journal 17: 93-107.
Lin, C. 2007. To share or not to share: Modeling tacit knowledge sharing, its mediators and antecedents. Journal of Business Ethics, 70: 411-428
Lynn, G.S.. 1998. New Product Team Learning: developing and profiting from your knowledge capital. California Management Review, 40:pp. 74–93.
Majchrzak, A., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. 2005. Information security in crossenterprise collabora-tive knowledge work. Emergence 6(4): 4–8.
March. J. G., & Simon, H. A. 1958. Organisations. New York: Wiley
Markus, M. L. 2001. Toward a theory of knowledge reuse: types of knowledge reuse situa-tions and factors in reuse success. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1): 57-93
McAllister, D. 1995. Affect-and cognition-based inter-trust as foundations for interperson-al cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 24-59
Mckeen, J.D., Guimaraes T. & Wetherbe, J.C. 1994. The relationship between user partic-ipation and user satisfaction: An investigation of four contingency factors. MIS Quarterly, 18(4): 427-451.
Megill, K.. 1997. The Corporate Memory: Information Management in the Electronic Age, Bowker Saur, London, .
Mohr, J. & Spekman, P. 1994. Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, intercommunication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 135-152
Mohr, J. and Nevin, J. R.1990. Intercommunication strategies in marketing channels: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Marketing, 54:36-51
Moore, Kevin R.1998. Inter-trust and Alliances: A Buyer Perspective,” International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management: 24-37
Moorman, C. & Miner, A. S. 1997.The impact of organization memory on new product performance and creativity. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1):91-106
Moorman, C. & Miner, A.. 1998. Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, 23 (4): 698-723
Moorman, C., Deshpande, R., & Zaltman, G.1993. Factors affecting inter-trust in market research relationships. Journal of Marketing, 57: 81-101
Moreland, R. L., Argote, L, & Krishnan R.. 1996. Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. In: J L Nye, A M Brower (Eds.). What’s social about social cognition? Research on socially shared cognition in small groups: 57~84. Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage,
Moreland, R, L,, & Myaskovsky, L. 2000. Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved intercommunication? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82: 117 – 133
Moreland, R. L., & Myaskovsky L.. 2000. Exploring the performance benefits of group training: transactive memory or improved communication? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes(82):117–133.
Moreland, R. L., Levine J. M.1992. Problem identification by groups. In: Worchel S, Wood W, Simpson J ( Eds. ) , Group process and productivity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 11-35
Moreland. 1999. Transactive memory: learning who knows what in work group and or-ganizations, in: L. L. Thompson, J.M. Levine, D.M. Messick (Eds.), Shared Cognition in Organizations: The Management of Knowledge: 3–31Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D.1994. The commitment- inter-trust theory of relationship. Journal of Marketing, 58: 20-38.
Nielsen, B. B. 2005. The role of knowledge embeddedness in the creation of synergies in strategic alliances, Journal of Business Research, 58: 1194-1204
Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. 1998. The concept of `Ba' : building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review 40 (3): 40-54.
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Konno, N. 2000. SECI, ba and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning, 33: 5-34.
Ősterle, H., Fleisch, E. & Alt, R. 2001. Business networking: Shaping collaboration be-tween enterprises. 2nd Edition. Berlin, Germany : Springer.
Paoli, M. & Prencipe, A. 2003. Memory of the organisation and memories within the orga-nisation. Journal of Management and Governance, 7: 145-162
Parkhe, A. 1998. Understanding inter-trust in international alliances. Journal of World Business
Patchell, J. 1993. From production system to learning system: lessons from Japan. Envi-ronment and Planning, 5(8): 797-815
Patrashkova, R. R. & McComb, S.A.. 2004. Exploring why more communication is not better: insights from a computational model of cross-functional teams. Journal of Engi-neering and Technology Management, (21): 83–114.
Perry-Smith, J. E. & Shalley, C. E. 2003. The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28(1): 89-106.
Petrusewicz, M. 2003. Innovators navigate around cliques. Stanford University. [Online] http://www.gsb.stanford.edu/news/bmag/sbsm0305/ideas. Accessed 24 Mar 2005
Polanyi, M. 1966. The Tacit Dimension, Bantam Doubleday and Company, New York
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W. and Smith-Doerr L.. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 116-145.
Quinn, J. B. 1993. Intelligent enterprise. New York: Free Press.
Rentsch, J. R., & Klimoski, R. J. 2001. Why do great minds think alike? Antecedents of team member schema agreement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22: 107– 120.
Rico, R., Sanchez-Manzanares, M., Gil, F., & Gibson, C. 2008. Team implicit coordination processes: A team knowledge–based approach. Academy of Management Review, 33(1):163–184
Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. 1994. Developmental processes of cooperative interor-ganizational relationships. Academy of Management,19(1): 90-119
Robbins, S.P. 1974. Managing Organization Conflict, NJ: Prentice-Hall
Robinson, J. P. & Shaver, P. R. 1973. Measures of social psychological attitudes. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center.
Robinson, R. D.. 1991The international intercommunication of technology: A book of readings, Taylor & Francis.
Roth, G. & Kleiner, A..1998. Developing organizational memory through learning histories. Organizational Dynamics, 27 (2): 43-60
Rotter, J. 1967. A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal inter-trust. Journal of Personality, 35 (4): 651-665.
Rousseau, S. B., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S. and Camerer, C.1998. Not so different after all: A cross-discripline view of inter-trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 393-404.
Rubin, D. C. 1986. Autobiographicai memory. Cambndge: Cambridge University Press
Ruef, M. 2002. Strong ties, weak ties and islands: Structural and cultural predictors of or-ganizational innovation. Industrial and Cooperate Change, 11(3): 427-449
Rulke D. L., Zaheer S. & Anderson, M. H. 2000. Sources of managers’ knowledge of or-ganizational capabilities. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82: 139–141.
Scarbrough, H. 2003 Knowledge management, HRM and the innovation process. Interna-tional Journal of Manpower 24(5): 501 – 516
Schilling, M. 2005. A small-world network model of cognitive insight. Creativity Research Journal, 17(2): 131-154.
Schuman, H. & Scott, J. 1989. Generations and collective memones. American Sociological Review, 54: 359-381
Schurr, P. H. & Julie L. O.. 1985. Influences on exchange processes: Buyers’ preconcep-tions of a seller’s inter-trustworthiness and bargaining toughness. Journal of Consumer Research, 11: 939-53
Senge, P. 1998. Sharing knowledge. Executive Excellence, 15(6): 11-12
Sepehri, P. & Wagner, D. 2000. Managing diversity – eine empirische Bestandsaufnahme, Personalfu¨hrung, 7: 50-59.
Sherman, S. 1992. Are strategic alliances working? Fortune:77-78
Shrivastava, P., & Schneider, S. 1984. Organizational frames of reference. Human Relations, 37: 795-809.
Simonin, B. L. 1999. Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic al-liances. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 595-623.
Simonton, D.K. 1999. Origins of Genius: Darwinian perspectives on creativity. New York. Oxford Univ. Press.
Singer, B. 2004. The ABC’s of building a business team that wins: The invisible code of honor that takes ordinary people and turns them into a championship team. New York: Warner Business Books.
Sitkin, S.B., & Roth, N.L.1993. Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic remedies for inter-trust/disinter-trust. Organization Science, 4: 367-392.
Smith, J. B. 1997. Selling Alliances,. Industrial Marketing Management , 26: 149-161.
Snyder, R. & Morris, J. 1984. Organizational intercommunication and performance. Jour-nal of Applied Psychology, 69: 461-465.
Soda, G., & Usai, A. 2004. Network memory: The influence of past and current networks on performance. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6)893–906.
Spender, J. C., & Grant, R.M. 1996. Knowledge and the firm, Strategic Management Journal, 17: 5-9.
Stam, W. & Elfring, T.. 2008. Entrepreneurial Orientation and New Venture Performance: The Moderating Role of Intra- and Extra-Industry Social Capital. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1): 97-111
Starbuck, W. & Hedberg, B. 1977. Saving an organization from a stagnating environment. In H. Thorelli (Ed.), Strategy + structure = performance: 249-258. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Stasser, G. 1992. Information salience and the discovery of hidden profiles by deci-sion-making groups: A thought experiment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52: 156-181
Stein, E. W. & Zwass, V. 1995. Actualizing organizational memory with information systems. Information Systems Research, 6(2): 85-117
Stein, E. W. 1995. Organizational memory: review of concepts and recommendations for management. International Journal of Information Management 15 (1):17– 32.
Szulanski, G. 1996. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best prac-tice within the firm. Strategic Management of Journal, 17: 27–43.
Te’eni, D. 2001. Review: A cognitive-affective model of organizational intercommunica-tion for designing IT. MIS Quarterly, 25(2): 251–312
Teece D. J.. 1982. Toward an economic theory of the multiproduct firm, 3: 39–63. J Econ Behav Organ.
Templeton, T. L. 2003. The referral of a lifetime: The networking system that produces bottom-line results every day. San Francisco, CA : Blanchard Family Partnership
Thomas, L. 2001. Social Interaction: A Determinant of Entrepreneurial Team Venture Success. Small Business Economics, 16: 263–278
Trevino, L. K., Daft, R. L. & Lengel, R. H. 1990. Understanding managers' media choices: A symbolic interactionist perspective. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfeld (Eds.), Organizations and intercommunication technology: 71-94. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Tsai, W. & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social Capital and Value Creation: The role of intra-firm networks. The Academy of Management Journal,41(4):464-476
Uzzi, B. 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic perfor-mance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61: 674–698.
Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in inter-firm networks:
Walsh, J. P. & Ungson, G. R. 1991. Organizational memory. Academy of Management Re-view, 16(1): 57-91.
Walsh, J. P. 1995. Managerial and organizational cognition: A trip down memory lane. Or-ganization Science, 6: 280- 321.
Wasko, M. & Faraj, S. 2000. It is what one does: Why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(2): 155-173.
Wegner, D. M. 1986. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind: 185–208. G. Mullen, G. Goethals, eds. Theories of Group Behavior. Springer-Verlag, New York
Wegner, D.M., Erber, R. & Raymond, P. 1991. Transactive memory incloses relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61: 923–929.
Weick, K. E. & Gilfillan, D. P. 1971. Fate of arbitrary traditions in a laboratory microcul-ture. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17: 179-191
Weick, K. E. 1979. The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
West, M. A., Borrill, C. S. & Unsworth, K. L. 1998. Team effectiveness in organizations. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 13: 1– 48
Wijnhoven, F. 1998. Designing organizational memories: concept and method. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 8(1): 29-55
Wind J, & Mahajan V. 1997. Issues and opportunities in new product development: an in-troduction to the special issue: 34:1−12. J Mark Res.
Wu, L. Y., Wang, C. J., Chen, C. P. & Pan, L. Y. 2008. Internal resources, external net-work, and competitiveness during the growth stage: A Study of Taiwanese High-Tech Ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(3): 529-549
Zack, M. H. 1999. Managing codified knowledge. Sloan Management Review : 45-58
Zaheer, A. & Venkataraman, N.. 1995. Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of inter-trust in economic behavior. Strategic Man-agement Journal, 16: 373–392