| 研究生: |
劉冠宜 Liu, Kuan-I |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
公共自行車使用行為特徵變遷之探討—以臺北市YouBike為例 Exploring the Evolution of Public Bicycle Usage Behavior: A Case Study of YouBike in Taipei City |
| 指導教授: |
鄭皓騰
Cheng, Hao-Teng |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
規劃與設計學院 - 都市計劃學系 Department of Urban Planning |
| 論文出版年: | 2026 |
| 畢業學年度: | 114 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 159 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 公共自行車 、行為地理學 、活動空間 、社群結構 、土地使用 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Public Bicycle, Behavioral Geography, Activity Space, Community Structure, Land Use |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:87 下載:9 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
公共自行車已成為我國都市短程通勤與日常活動的重要交通工具,其使用行為亦反映居民活動型態與都市空間組織之變化。都市活動空間係由個體日常移動行為長期累積形成,而移動模式之變化除反映交通需求特徵外,亦呈現都市活動組織與空間使用方式之差異。過往公共自行車研究多著重於單一時間截面下之使用特徵與空間分布分析,然而公共自行車使用行為是否隨時間產生變化,以及其活動空間結構與土地使用環境之關聯如何演變,仍值得從長期尺度進一步探討。
本研究以臺北市 YouBike 使用者為研究對象,旨在探討公共自行車使用行為特徵之長期變遷,並分析其活動空間結構及與土地使用環境之對應關係。研究蒐集2021、2022及2024年平日公共自行車租借紀錄資料,以行為地理學為理論基礎,整合描述性統計、K-means集群分析、社群網絡分析及典型相關分析等方法,從時間、行為、空間及土地使用等面向解析公共自行車使用行為之時空特徵。
研究結果顯示,在活動行為結構方面不同年度公共自行車使用行為皆維持相似之時間結構,平日尖峰時段以短程使用為主,離峰時段則呈現較多中長程及彈性活動特徵,反映出公共自行車使用已形成相對穩定之日常活動模式。雖然各類型使用量隨時間增加,其中短程使用成長最為明顯但整體並未產生大幅變化;在活動空間方面,維持一定程度之社群穩定性,惟不同社群仍呈現擴張、收縮及重組等差異化變化;在土地使用關聯方面,則顯示出不同土地使用類型與公共自行車使用行為及社群空間特徵呈現差異化關聯,整體而言住宅、混合住宅及多元活動機能較高之空間,與公共自行車使用行為特徵呈現較高程度之對應關係。
綜合而言,本研究建構多年度公共自行車租借大數據時空分析架構,提供公共自行車長期使用行為與活動空間演變之分析視角。研究成果證實公共自行車使用行為已逐漸形成穩定之活動結構,並已形成具有持續調整特性之活動空間。公共自行車不僅為都市日常移動工具,更可作為觀察居民實際活動空間的重要媒介,並作為未來都市生活圈建構、人本交通規劃及公共自行車系統優化之參考依據。
Public bicycles have become an important mode of short-distance urban mobility in Taiwan, and their usage behavior reflects changes in daily activity patterns and urban spatial organization. However, previous studies have mainly examined public bicycle usage at a single point in time, with less attention to long-term changes in usage behavior and its relationship with activity space and land use. This study examines Taipei City’s YouBike system using weekday rental records from 2021, 2022, and 2024. Grounded in Behavioral Geography, the study integrates descriptive statistics, K-means clustering, community detection, and canonical correlation analysis to examine changes in usage behavior, activity space, and land-use relationships.
The results show that YouBike usage maintains a similar temporal structure across years, with short-distance trips dominating peak periods and more medium- to long-distance trips occurring during off-peak periods. Although usage volume increases, particularly for short trips, the overall behavioral structure remains relatively stable. Community structures also maintain a degree of stability, while individual communities exhibit expansion, contraction, and reorganization. Land-use relationships vary across spatial contexts, with residential, mixed-residential, and multifunctional areas showing stronger associations with usage behavior and activity space characteristics. Overall, this study provides a multi-year spatiotemporal framework for understanding changes in public bicycle usage and activity space, highlighting the value of public bicycle data for observing urban activity patterns and supporting human-oriented transportation and living-circle planning.
邱華奕. (2024). 臺北市公共自行車系統升級後之使用特性與站點網絡效應分析 國立政治大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 台北市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/h4hny9
曾怡之. (2019). 以租用時間探討公共自行車使用者移動的時空特徵 中國文化大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 台北市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/r8cs44
黃俊良. (2016). 臺北市公共自行車系統旅次特性分析 淡江大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 新北市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/kk97p5
鄭雨桐. (2016). 建成環境對公共自行車使用之影響 國立臺灣大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 台北市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/7utcpx
戴威. (2018). 臺北市YouBike開放大數據為基礎的公共自行車旅次與租賃站特性分析 淡江大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 新北市. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/3r67a8
羅先豪, 孔令傑, 王博群, & 李子璋. (2022). 公共自行車轉乘捷運架構下之大眾運輸導向發展概念調整 [Adjustments of Transit-Oriented Development Concepts under Popular Transport Mode Transfer between the Public Bicycle Sharing System and the Mass Rapid Transit System]. 都市與計劃, 49(2), 181-198. https://doi.org/10.6128/CP.202206_49(2).0003
Alonso, W. (1964). Location and land use: Toward a general theory of land rent. Harvard university press.
Anas, A., Arnott, R., & Small, K. A. (1998). Urban spatial structure. Journal of economic literature, 36(3), 1426-1464.
Arthur, D., & Vassilvitskii, S. (2006). k-means++: The advantages of careful seeding.
Barabási, A.-L. (2013). Network science. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 371(1987).
Batty, M. (2013). The New Science of Cities. In: MIT press.
Ben-Akiva, M. E., & Lerman, S. R. (1985). Discrete choice analysis: theory and application to travel demand (Vol. 9). MIT press.
Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of statistical mechanics: theory and experiment, 2008(10), P10008.
Boccaletti, S., Latora, V., Moreno, Y., Chavez, M., & Hwang, D.-U. (2006). Complex networks: Structure and dynamics. Physics reports, 424(4-5), 175-308.
Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. American journal of sociology, 92(5), 1170-1182.
Buliung, R. N., & Kanaroglou, P. S. (2006). Urban form and household activity‐travel behavior. Growth and Change, 37(2), 172-199.
Cagney, K. A., York Cornwell, E., Goldman, A. W., & Cai, L. (2020). Urban mobility and activity space. Annual Review of Sociology, 46(1), 623-648.
Caulfield, B., O'Mahony, M., Brazil, W., & Weldon, P. (2017). Examining usage patterns of a bike-sharing scheme in a medium sized city. Transportation research part A: policy and practice, 100, 152-161.
Chen, C., Ma, J., Susilo, Y., Liu, Y., & Wang, M. (2016). The promises of big data and small data for travel behavior (aka human mobility) analysis. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 68, 285-299.
Chen, T., Hui, E. C., Wu, J., Lang, W., & Li, X. (2019). Identifying urban spatial structure and urban vibrancy in highly dense cities using georeferenced social media data. Habitat International, 89, 102005.
Cuttone, A., Lehmann, S., & González, M. C. (2018). Understanding predictability and exploration in human mobility. EPJ Data Science, 7(1), 2.
Dehnad, K. (1987). Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. In: Taylor & Francis.
DeMaio, P. (2009). Bike-sharing: History, impacts, models of provision, and future. Journal of public transportation, 12(4), 41-56.
Dong, X., Zhang, B., & Wang, Z. (2023). Impact of land use on bike-sharing travel patterns: Evidence from large scale data analysis in China. Land use policy, 133, 106852.
Du, Y., Deng, F., & Liao, F. (2019). A model framework for discovering the spatio-temporal usage patterns of public free-floating bike-sharing system. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 103, 39-55.
Faghih-Imani, A., Eluru, N., El-Geneidy, A. M., Rabbat, M., & Haq, U. (2014). How land-use and urban form impact bicycle flows: Evidence from the bicycle-sharing system (BIXI) in Montreal. Journal of transport Geography, 41, 306-314.
Fang, C., Yu, X., Zhang, X., Fang, J., & Liu, H. (2020). Big data analysis on the spatial networks of urban agglomeration. Cities, 102, 102735.
Fishman, E., Washington, S., & Haworth, N. (2013). Bike share: a synthesis of the literature. Transport reviews, 33(2), 148-165.
Fortunato, S. (2010). Community detection in graphs. Physics reports, 486(3-5), 75-174.
Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social networks, 1(3), 215-239.
Geurs, K. T., & Van Wee, B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions. Journal of transport Geography, 12(2), 127-140.
Gini, C. (1921). Measurement of inequality of incomes. The economic journal, 31(121), 124-125.
Golledge, R. G. (1997). Spatial behavior: A geographic perspective. Guilford Press.
Gonzalez, M. C., Hidalgo, C. A., & Barabasi, A.-L. (2008). Understanding individual human mobility patterns. nature, 453(7196), 779-782.
Guo, Y., Yang, L., & Chen, Y. (2022). Bike share usage and the built environment: A review. Frontiers in public health, 10, 848169.
Hägerstrand, T. (1970). What about people in regional science. Transport Sociology: Social aspects of transport planning, 143-158.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis.
Hansen, W. G. (1959). How accessibility shapes land use. Journal of the American Institute of planners, 25(2), 73-76.
Hauke, J., & Kossowski, T. (2011). Comparison of values of Pearson's and Spearman's correlation coefficients on the same sets of data. Quaestiones geographicae, 30(2), 87-93.
Hong, Y., Xin, Y., Martin, H., Bucher, D., & Raubal, M. (2021). A clustering-based framework for individual travel behaviour change detection. Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), 208, 4.
Horton, F. E., & Reynolds, D. R. (1971). Effects of urban spatial structure on individual behavior. Economic geography, 47(1), 36-48.
Hotelling, H. (1936). Relations between two sets of variates. Biometrika, 28, 321-377. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/28.3-4.321
Huang, Q., & Wong, D. W. (2016). Activity patterns, socioeconomic status and urban spatial structure: what can social media data tell us? International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30(9), 1873-1898.
Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. ( New York: Random House)
Jones, P. M., Dix, M. C., Clarke, M. I., & Heggie, I. G. (1983). Understanding travel behaviour.
Kim, M., & Cho, G.-H. (2021). Analysis on bike-share ridership for origin-destination pairs: Effects of public transit route characteristics and land-use patterns. Journal of transport Geography, 93, 103047.
Kitamura, R. (1988). An evaluation of activity-based travel analysis. Transportation, 15(1), 9-34.
Kou, Z., & Cai, H. (2019). Understanding bike sharing travel patterns: An analysis of trip data from eight cities. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 515, 785-797.
Kwan, M.-P. (2013). Beyond space (as we knew it): Toward temporally integrated geographies of segregation, health, and accessibility: Space–time integration in geography and GIScience. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(5), 1078-1086.
Kwan, M.-P. (2016). Algorithmic geographies: Big data, algorithmic uncertainty, and the production of geographic knowledge. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106(2), 274-282.
Kwan, M. P. (1998). Space‐time and integral measures of individual accessibility: a comparative analysis using a point‐based framework. Geographical analysis, 30(3), 191-216.
Lee, M., Hwang, S., Park, Y., & Choi, B. (2022). Factors affecting bike-sharing system demand by inferred trip purpose: Integration of clustering of travel patterns and geospatial data analysis. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 16(9), 847-860.
Lee, S., Ko, E., Jang, K., & Kim, S. (2023). Understanding individual-level travel behavior changes due to COVID-19: Trip frequency, trip regularity, and trip distance. Cities, 135, 104223.
Li, S., Dragicevic, S., Castro, F. A., Sester, M., Winter, S., Coltekin, A., Pettit, C., Jiang, B., Haworth, J., & Stein, A. (2016). Geospatial big data handling theory and methods: A review and research challenges. ISPRS journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 115, 119-133.
Li, Y., & Phelps, N. A. (2017). Knowledge polycentricity and the evolving Yangtze River Delta megalopolis. Regional Studies, 51(7), 1035-1047.
Liu, X., Gong, L., Gong, Y., & Liu, Y. (2015). Revealing travel patterns and city structure with taxi trip data. Journal of transport Geography, 43, 78-90.
Liu, Y., Kang, C., Gao, S., Xiao, Y., & Tian, Y. (2012). Understanding intra-urban trip patterns from taxi trajectory data. Journal of geographical systems, 14(4), 463-483.
Louail, T., Lenormand, M., Cantu Ros, O. G., Picornell, M., Herranz, R., Frias-Martinez, E., Ramasco, J. J., & Barthelemy, M. (2014). From mobile phone data to the spatial structure of cities. Scientific reports, 4(1), 5276.
Lynch, K. (1964). The image of the city. MIT press.
MacQueen, J. (1967). Multivariate observations. Proceedings ofthe 5th Berkeley symposium on mathematical statisticsand probability,
Madapur, B., Madangopal, S., & Chandrashekar, M. (2020). Micro-mobility infrastructure for redefining urban mobility. European Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 3(1), 71-85.
Mátrai, T., & Tóth, J. (2016). Comparative assessment of public bike sharing systems. Transportation research procedia, 14, 2344-2351.
Miller, H. J. (1991). Modelling accessibility using space-time prism concepts within geographical information systems. International Journal of Geographical Information System, 5(3), 287-301.
Moreno, C., Allam, Z., Chabaud, D., Gall, C., & Pratlong, F. (2021). Introducing the “15-Minute City”: Sustainability, resilience and place identity in future post-pandemic cities. Smart cities, 4(1), 93-111.
Muth, R. F. (1971). The derived demand for urban residential land. Urban studies, 8(3), 243-254.
Newman, M. E. (2006). Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 103(23), 8577-8582.
Newman, M. E., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical review E, 69(2), 026113.
Newman, M. E. J. (2010). Networks: An Introduction. (Oxford Univ Pr)
Newman, P. W., & Kenworthy, J. R. (1996). The land use—transport connection: An overview. Land use policy, 13(1), 1-22.
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., & Duchesnay, E. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825-2830. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000298103200003
Ratti, C., Frenchman, D., Pulselli, R. M., & Williams, S. (2006). Mobile landscapes: using location data from cell phones for urban analysis. Environment and planning B: Planning and design, 33(5), 727-748.
Rodrigue, J.-P. (2020). The geography of transport systems. Routledge.
Rousseeuw, P. J. (1987). Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of computational and applied mathematics, 20, 53-65.
Schönfelder, S., & Axhausen, K. W. (2003). Activity spaces: measures of social exclusion? Transport policy, 10(4), 273-286.
Siła-Nowicka, K., Vandrol, J., Oshan, T., Long, J. A., Demšar, U., & Fotheringham, A. S. (2016). Analysis of human mobility patterns from GPS trajectories and contextual information. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30(5), 881-906.
Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The quarterly journal of economics, 99-118.
Spearman, C. (1961). The proof and measurement of association between two things.
Tobler, W. (2004). On the first law of geography: A reply. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(2), 304-310.
Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis (Vol. 2). Springer.
Urbanism, C. f. t. N. (2000). Charter of the new urbanism. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 20(4), 339-341.
Vogel, P., Greiser, T., & Mattfeld, D. C. (2011). Understanding bike-sharing systems using data mining: Exploring activity patterns. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 20, 514-523.
Von Thünen, J. H. (2022). Der isolierte staat in beziehung auf landwirtschaft und nationalökonomie. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
Wegener, M. (2004). Overview of land use transport models.
Wilks, D. S. (2011). Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences (Vol. 100). Academic press.
Wolpert, J. (1964). The decision process in spatial context. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 54(4), 537-558.
Xin, R., Yang, J., Ai, B., Ding, L., Li, T., & Zhu, R. (2023). Spatiotemporal analysis of bike mobility chain: A new perspective on mobility pattern discovery in urban bike-sharing system. Journal of transport Geography, 109, 103606.
Xing, Y., Wang, K., & Lu, J. J. (2020). Exploring travel patterns and trip purposes of dockless bike-sharing by analyzing massive bike-sharing data in Shanghai, China. Journal of transport Geography, 87, 102787.
Yang, H., Zhang, Y., Zhong, L., Zhang, X., & Ling, Z. (2020). Exploring spatial variation of bike sharing trip production and attraction: A study based on Chicago’s Divvy system. Applied geography, 115, 102130.
Yang, X., Fang, Z., Yin, L., Li, J., Zhou, Y., & Lu, S. (2018). Understanding the spatial structure of urban commuting using mobile phone location data: A case study of Shenzhen, China. Sustainability, 10(5), 1435.
Yao, Y., Zhang, Y., Tian, L., Zhou, N., Li, Z., & Wang, M. (2019). Analysis of network structure of urban bike-sharing system: A case study based on real-time data of a public bicycle system. Sustainability, 11(19), 5425.
Yuill, R. S. (1971). The standard deviational ellipse; an updated tool for spatial description. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 53(1), 28-39.
Zaltz Austwick, M., O’Brien, O., Strano, E., & Viana, M. (2013). The structure of spatial networks and communities in bicycle sharing systems. PloS one, 8(9), e74685.
Zhang, Y., Marshall, S., Cao, M., Manley, E., & Chen, H. (2021). Discovering the evolution of urban structure using smart card data: The case of London. Cities, 112, 103157.
Zhong, C., Arisona, S. M., Huang, X., Batty, M., & Schmitt, G. (2014). Detecting the dynamics of urban structure through spatial network analysis. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 28(11), 2178-2199.
Zhou, X. (2015). Understanding spatiotemporal patterns of biking behavior by analyzing massive bike sharing data in Chicago. PloS one, 10(10), e0137922.