簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 李昕宜
Lee, Hsin-I
論文名稱: 使用即時通訊軟體對工作績效產生影響之研究
Research on the effects of using instant messaging on job performance
指導教授: 李憲達
Li, Hsien-Ta
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理學系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 70
中文關鍵詞: 認知有用性認知易用性工作負荷相容性溝通效能工作績效
外文關鍵詞: Cognition, Workload, Compatibility, Communication, Job performance
相關次數: 點閱:115下載:5
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 近年來,隨著網路和智慧型手機普及化,即時通訊軟體的使用率也年年攀升,許多企業也因此改用即時通訊軟體來做為溝通媒介,然而一體兩面,即時通訊軟體產生所帶來的問題也跟著浮出水面。員工對於即時通訊軟體的看法,會影響員工溝通中所產生的滿意度以及有效性,進而影響他(她)們工作中的做法。本研究主要探討員工在工作中使用即時通訊軟體的情況下,他(她)們所產生的認知、工作負荷以及與目前工作的相容性對於員工在工作中的溝通效能的影響,並瞭解是否真的能夠有效提升員工工作績效。
    本研究主要研究對象為目前有使用即時通訊軟體在工作上溝通者,並且透過網路發送問卷的型式進行調查,總共收回891份問卷,扣除無效問卷296份,有效問卷有595份,占收回問卷的66.77%。個人基本資料部分採用統計軟體SPSS 17.0進行分析,而結構方程模式則採用統計軟體Smart PLS 2.8.1進行分析。研究結果發現:一、員工的認知有用性、認知易用性、使用即時通訊軟體產生的工作負荷以及即時通訊軟體與目前工作的相容性皆會影響員工的溝通滿意度,並且也會影響他(她)們的工作績效。二、員工的認知有用性、認知易用性以及與目前工作的相容性皆會影響員工的溝通有效性,並且能夠提升工作績效。三、當員工認為使用即時通訊軟體產生工作負荷增加時,會對溝通產生排斥,造成溝通滿意度降低,因此主管應制定相關規範來避免員工因即時通訊軟體而產生工作負荷。四、當員工在溝通的過程中有高度的溝通滿意度時,產生衝突的機率會降低,能夠提升組織成員彼此之間的人際關係,他(她)們會更願意幫助其他組織成員,並且在個人任務績效表現上也更佳。最後,本研究根據統計資料分析提出管理意涵,以及研究限制,並給予建議,期盼對於使用即時通訊軟體的相關議題有所貢獻。

    Since instant messaging is fast to transfer the information and easy to use, so many companies trying to use instant messaging to replace the traditional communication tools. However, some strengths aren't always advantages. When the employees are using instant messaging in the work, they might feel their loading is more than before, and they are also forced to receive the information after work. Employees' perceptions of instant messaging can affect their satisfaction and effectiveness in communication and also affects their practices.
    This study was conducted by an online survey from 891 samples those whom are using instant messaging as the regular communication at their work. There are 595 validated samples (66.77%) and the data were applied by SPSS 17.0 to the background data analysis, and Smart PLS 2.8.1 to the hypothesis structural equation modeling examine in respectively.
    The results of this study shows: (1) in relation to perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, workload and the compatibility after applying instant messaging with current work does directly affect communication satisfaction and as well as job performance. (2) in relation to perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and compatibility after applying instant messaging with current work can directly affect communication effectiveness and also affect their job performance. (3) a negative correlation between workload and communication satisfaction from instant messaging application. (4) the higher communication satisfaction, the less communication confliction, moreover, the higher communication satisfaction, the higher improvement to the work relationship.

    第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 研究流程 3 第二章 文獻回顧 4 第一節 即時通訊軟體 4 第二節 科技接受模型 6 第三節 工作負荷 9 第四節 創新擴散理論 10 第五節 溝通 13 第六節 工作績效 15 第三章 研究方法 18 第一節 研究架構與假設 18 第二節 研究對象與資料來源 22 第三節 研究設計 22 第四節 資料分析方法 28 第四章 資料分析結果 30 第一節 樣本特徵描述 30 第二節 變數之敘述性統計分析 32 第三節 信度與效度分析 39 第四節 假設檢定 45 第五節 共同方法變異之檢測 51 第五章 結論與建議 52 第一節 研究結果 52 第二節 管理意涵 55 第三節 研究限制 56 第四節 未來研究建議 56 參考文獻 58 中文文獻 58 英文文獻 60 附錄一 研究問卷 65

    中文文獻
    財團法人台灣網路資訊中心(2018),2018台灣網路報告。
    資策會產業情報研究所(2013),台灣數位生活型態與消費趨勢。
    數位時代(2015),2015年8月號。
    王誠煦(2009),探討企業員工即時通訊軟體採用意願之關鍵影響因素-以海運承攬業為例,國立臺灣海洋大學航運管理學系碩士論文。
    林震岩(2007),多變量分析:SPSS的操作與應用,智勝出版社。
    張鈞垣(2005),影響組織內工作者採用即時通訊軟體因素之研究,國立中正大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
    陳澤寬(2016),使用通訊軟體對個人工作績效的影響-以台北市北投和士林區派出所員警為例,臺灣大學國家發展研究所學位論文。
    黃怡翎、高有智(2015),過勞之島:台灣職場過勞實錄與對策,臺灣職業安全健康連線。
    葉倩妏、劉念琪(2009),工作負荷、工作家庭衝突與工作滿意度之關聯研究,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所。
    彭台光、高月慈及林鉦棽(2006),管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試和補救,管理學報, 23(1), 77-98。
    劉昱志(2007),即時通訊軟體使用對於組織溝通滿意影響之研究,中原大學資訊管理研究所學位論文。
    蕭文龍(2018),統計分析入門與應用:SPSS中文版+SmartPLS 3 (PLS-SEM)第二版,碁峯資訊股份有限公司。
    嚴竹華(1999),溝通能力與溝通態度對溝通效能影響之研究,中原大學企業管理研究所。

    英文文獻
    Argyris, C. (1965). Explorations in interpersonal competence-I. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1(1), 58-83.
    Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation.
    Beehr, T. A., Walsh, J. T., & Taber, T. D. (1976). Relationships of stress to individually and organizationally valued states: Higher order needs as a moderator. Journal of applied psychology, 61(1), 41.
    Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Personnel Selection in Organizations; San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 71.
    Campbell, J. (1987). Improving the selection, classification, and utilization of Army enlisted personnel: Annual report, 1985 fiscal year (AIR Tech. Rep. 746). Arlington, VA: US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
    Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1).
    Canary, D. J., & Spitzberg, B. H. (1987). Appropriateness and effectiveness perceptions of conflict strategies. Human Communication Research, 14(1), 93-120.
    Crino, M. D., & White, M. C. (1981). Satisfaction in communication: An examination of the Downs-Hazen measure. Psychological reports, 49(3), 831-838.
    Davis, F. D. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
    Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
    Downs, C. W. (1971). Study of satisfaction in a public service company. Unpublished manuscript, Univer. of Kansas, Lawrence.
    Downs, C. W., & Hazen, M. D. (1977). A factor analytic study of communication satisfaction. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 14(3), 63-73.
    Fishbein, M. (1967). Attitude and the prediction of behavior. Readings in attitude theory and measurement.
    Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, Mass.: Addison Wessley.
    Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (1997). Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: An extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS quarterly, 389-400.
    Giri, V. N., & Kumar, B. P. (2010). Assessing the impact of organizational communication on job satisfaction and job performance. Psychological Studies, 55(2), 137-143.
    Gray, J., & Laidlaw, H. (2004). Improving the measurement of communication satisfaction. Management communication quarterly, 17(3), 425-448.
    Grinter, R. E., & Palen, L. (2002). Instant messaging in teen life. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work.
    Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2 ed.): SAGE publications.
    Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Advances in psychology (Vol. 52, pp. 139-183): Elsevier.
    Hazen, M. D., & Quiggins, J. (1971). Communication Satisfaction in a Publishing House. unpublished manuscript, Universe. of Kansas, Lawrence.
    Hecht, M. L. (1978). Hecht. Michael L. MEASURES OF COMMUNICATION SATISFACTION, Human Communication Research, 4: 4 (1978: Summer) p. 350. Human Communication Research, 4(4), 350.
    Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (Vol. 2): Wiley New York.
    Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information systems research, 2(3), 192-222.
    Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of applied psychology, 79(4), 475.
    Parks, M. R. (1977). Issues in the Explication of Communication Competency.
    Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International journal of electronic commerce, 7(3), 101-134.
    Peterson, C., & Park, N. (2006). Character strengths in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 27(8), 1149-1154.
    Quinn, R. P., & Shepard, L. J. (1974). The 1972-73 quality of employment survey: descriptive statistics, with comparison data from the 1969-70 survey of working conditions: report to the Employment Standards Administration, US Department of Labor: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
    Reid, G. B., & Nygren, T. E. (1988). The subjective workload assessment technique: A scaling procedure for measuring mental workload. In Advances in psychology (Vol. 52, pp. 185-218): Elsevier.
    Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (Vol. 5): Simon and Schuster.
    Sales, S. M. (1970). Some effects of role overload and role underload. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 5(6), 592-608.
    Shaw, J. B., & Weekley, J. A. (1985). The effects of objective work-load variations of psychological strain and post-work-load performance. Journal of Management, 11(1), 87-98.
    Spitzberg, B. H., & Canary, D. J. (1985). Loneliness and relationally competent communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2(4), 387-402.
    Spitzberg, B. H., & Phelps, L. A. (1982). Conversational appropriateness and effectiueness:Validation ofa criterion measure of relational competence. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association convention, Denver.
    Terry, D. J., Carey, C. J., & Callan, V. J. (2001). Employee adjustment to an organizational merger: An intergroup perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(3), 267-280.
    Thayer, L. (1968). Communication and communication systems. Homewood, IL: Richard D.Irwin, Inc.
    Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2000). Perspectives on models of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(4), 216-226.
    Weinstein, E. A. (1969). The development of interpersonal competence.: Chicago: Rand McNally.

    下載圖示 校內:2024-06-24公開
    校外:2024-06-24公開
    QR CODE