| 研究生: |
陳昱崴 Chen, Yu-Wei |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
雙通路模型下結合零工經濟的定價與補貼策略 Pricing and Subsidy Strategy under Dual Channel Model with Gig Economy |
| 指導教授: |
王泰裕
Wang, Tai-Yu |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 工業與資訊管理學系 Department of Industrial and Information Management |
| 論文出版年: | 2022 |
| 畢業學年度: | 110 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 80 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 平臺經濟 、零工經濟 、雙通路供應鏈 、定價策略 、補貼 、外送平臺 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | e-platform, gig economy, gigs, dual-channel supply chain, pricing, subsidy |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:110 下載:11 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
網路技術的成熟,改變了人們的購物習慣,驅使許多企業開始發展不同以往的銷售通路,例如網路平臺通路。在網路平臺的普及下,零工經濟得以蓬勃發展,平臺成了零工與消費者之間的仲介,負責媒合雙方供需。然而,零工經濟的特色為自主排班、彈性工時,這使得在突發狀況(例如:下雨天、寒流、疫情)發生時,零工業者的接案意願下降,消費者對平臺需求增加,進而導致供需失衡。因此,本研究以「結合零工經濟」之平臺為主要探討對象,建立一具有「實體店面直售通路」與「網路平臺零售通路」的雙通路模型,探討不同模型之雙通路定價、相關費用制定以及補貼機制的建立。
本研究有三個模型,分別為模型N模型ES、模型MS。模型N中有一個製造商、一個平臺與消費者和零工業者,負責探討在不同的平臺抽成比例下,製造商根據利潤最大化所制定的雙通路均衡價格,以及平臺所制定的運費和服務費。模型ES和模型MS則討論了「突發狀況」下,應由誰負責啟動補貼機制,並探討均衡補貼額度的制定。
本研究發現調整抽成比例並不會影響雙方利潤,而消費者對平臺通路的偏好提升對製造商的利潤有先降後升的影響,對平臺利潤則是有正向影響;若是提高零工業者的接案意願,大部分時候可以提高雙方的利潤;最後,突發狀況的發生並不全然造成利潤下降,只要正確協商補貼機制由誰負責,反而可以提高雙方利潤。
With the increasing popularity of the Internet, consumers are becoming accustomed to using e-platforms for shopping. Which then leads to manufacturers selling their products through both offline and online channels, forming a dual-channel supply chain. However, with the rise of the gig economy in recent years, new forms of e-commerce platforms have been emerging, including platforms for food delivery, C2C on-demand delivery, and car-sharin. One feature that they share is the involvement of gig workers. The joining of gig workers has led to the need for both manufacturers and e-platforms to redefine pricing strategies or set related fees, and even to design mechanisms of subsidies for the gig workers.
This study develops three models to capture the relationship among manufacturers, platforms, retailers, and consumers. The objective of Model N is to know how to set dual-channel prices and related fees without considering contingencies. Model ES and Model MS, on the other hand, study the amount of subsidy in case of contingencies. The last two models differs in “the party in charge of subsidies”.
The results show that (1) the commission rate does not affect the profits of the manufacturer and the e-platform. (2) Increasing consumer preference for online platforms doesn’t always harm manufacturers. (3) Increasing the willingness of the gig workers to accept orders can grow both the manufacturer's and the e-platform's profits. (4) Contingencies are not always unsatisfactory. On the contrary, profits would rise for both manufacturer and e-platform if subsidies are offered by the more suitable party.
1. 中文部分
Anne Chou(2021年11月5日)。臺灣人外食習慣問卷調查。POLLS。https://www.pollread.com/2021/11/05/%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3%E4%BA%BA%E5%A4%96%E9%A3%9F%E7%BF%92%E6%85%A3%E5%95%8F%E5%8D%B7%E8%AA%BF%E6%9F%A5/。搜尋日期:2022年4月14日。
MIC產業情報研究所(2021年4月14日)。【網購消費者調查】52.9%消費者購物頻率虛實各半 實體零售網購崛起。MIC產業情報研究所。https://mic.iii.org.tw/news.aspx?id=597。搜尋日期:2022年4月14日。
MIC產業情報研究所(2020年8月4日)。11%臺灣網友 疫情期間首度使用美食外送服務。MIC產業情報研究所。https://mic.iii.org.tw/news.aspx?id=573。搜尋日期:2022年4月14日。
上報(2021年11月12日)。阿里巴巴雙11今年銷售額達2.4兆,年增長約8%。上報。https://www.upmedia.mg/news_info.php?SerialNo=129613。搜尋日期:2022年4月14日。
自由時報(2021年6月7日)。不只因下雨!送餐延遲超久 外送員曝店家雨天「拖單手法」。自由時報。https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/3560499。搜尋日期:2022年4月14日。
行政院主計總處(2016)。臺南市普查結果提要分析。行政院主計總處。https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Data/dgbas04/bc2/105census/X00/67%E8%87%BA%E5%8D%97%E5%B8%82.pdf。搜尋日期:2022年4月14號。
李雅雯(2019年10月30日)。外送平臺勞檢 僱傭、承攬認定靠「抽查至少5個案+合理推論」。自由時報。https://ec.ltn.com.tw/article/breakingnews/2962179。搜尋日期:2022年4月14日。
科技新報(2020年8月23日)。外送事故、糾紛頻傳!foodpanda 靠什麼留住 2 萬名外送員,穩坐龍頭?科技新報。https://technews.tw/2020/08/23/foodpanda-retain-talent/。搜尋日期:2022年4月14日。
唐鎮宇(2021年4月15日)。【獨家】外送平臺勞檢出爐 勞動部最新解!外送員沒老闆、出事靠意外險。蘋果新聞網。https://tw.appledaily.com/life/20210415/3ZRZP4VUCRETVIDU7D6GCVSE54/。搜尋日期:2022年4月14日。
楊語芸 & 林怡均(2021年5月24日)。外送平臺比一比》熊貓、Uber Eats、Lalamove、Cutaway,誰對餐飲店家最友善?上下游https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/152614。搜尋日期:2022年4月14日。
楊書瑋 & 邱宇軒(2021年5月13日)。【投書】平臺外送員新制後職災風險更高,當國際規範保障日趨積極,勞動部能行動嗎?報導者。https://www.twreporter.org/a/opinion-delivery-driver-labor-employment-occupational-accident。搜尋日期:2022年4月14日。
關鍵評論(2022年2月8日)。有人為錢兼差多平臺、有人但求生活不留白:固定工時的「僱傭制」真是外送員想要的嗎?關鍵評論。https://www.thenewslens.com/article/160661。搜尋日期:2022年4月14日。
2. 英文部分
Auer, J., & Papies, D. (2020). Cross-price elasticities and their determinants: A meta-analysis and new empirical generalizations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(3), 584-605.
Bart, N., Chernonog, T., & Avinadav, T. (2021). Revenue-sharing contracts in supply chains: a comprehensive literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 59(21), 6633-6658.
Bardey, D., Cremer, H., & Lozachmeur, J. M. (2014). Competition in two-sided markets with common network externalities. Review of Industrial Organization, 44(4), 327-345.
Cachon, G. P. (2003). Supply chain coordination with contracts. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, 11, 227-339.
Cachon, G. P., & Lariviere, M. A. (2005). Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts: strengths and limitations. Management Science, 51(1), 30-44.
Cachon, G. P., Daniels, K. M., & Lobel, R. (2017). The role of surge pricing on a service platform with self-scheduling capacity. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 19(3), 368-384.
Cai, G., Dai, Y., & Zhou, S. X. (2012). Exclusive channels and revenue sharing in a complementary goods market. Marketing Science, 31(1), 172-187.
Cai, W., & Chen, Y. J. (2017). Channel management and product design with consumers’ probabilistic choices. International Journal of Production Research, 55(3), 904-923.
Castillo, J. C., Knoepfle, D., & Weyl, G. (2017). Surge pricing solves the wild goose chase. Association for Computing Machinery, IMC '15, 241-242.
Chen, K. Y., Kaya, M., & Özer, Ö. (2008). Dual sales channel management with service competition. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 10(4), 654-675.
Chen, J. M., Lin, I. C., & Cheng, H. L. (2010). Channel coordination under consignment and vendor-managed inventory in a distribution system. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 46(6), 831-843.
Chen, J., Zhang, H., & Sun, Y. (2012). Implementing coordination contracts in a manufacturer Stackelberg dual-channel supply chain. Omega, 40(5), 571-583.
Chen, L., Mislove, A., & Wilson, C. (2015). Peeking beneath the hood of uber. Association for Computing Machinery, EC '17, 495-508.
Chen, J., Liang, L., Yao, D. Q., & Sun, S. (2017). Price and quality decisions in dual-channel supply chains. European Journal of Operational Research, 259(3), 935-948.
Chiang, W. Y. K., Chhajed, D., & Hess, J. D. (2003). Direct marketing, indirect profits: A strategic analysis of dual-channel supply-chain design. Management science, 49(1), 1-20.
Collier, R. B., Dubal, V. B., & Carter, C. (2017). Labor platforms and gig work: the failure to regulate. IRLE Working Paper, No. 106-17
De Stefano, V. (2015). Crowdsourcing, the Gig-Economy, and the Law. Comp. Lab. L. & Pol'y J., 37, 461.
Dumrongsiri, A., Fan, M., Jain, A., & Moinzadeh, K. (2008). A supply chain model with direct and retail channels. European Journal of Operational Research, 187(3), 691-718.
Dong, T., Xu, Z., Luo, Q., Yin, Y., Wang, J., & Ye, J. (2021). Optimal contract design for ride-sourcing services under dual sourcing. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 146, 289-313.
Fabo, B., Karanovic, J., & Dukova, K. (2017). In search of an adequate European policy response to the platform economy. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(2), 163-175.
Fang, Z., Huang, L., & Wierman, A. (2019). Prices and subsidies in the sharing economy. Performance Evaluation, 136, 102037.
Friedman, G. (2014). Workers without employers: shadow corporations and the rise of the gig economy. Review of Keynesian Economics, 2(2), 171-188.
Florisson, R., & Mandl, I. (2018). Platform work: Types and implications for work and employment-Literature review. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, 2018.
Geng, Q., & Mallik, S. (2007). Inventory competition and allocation in a multi-channel distribution system. European Journal of Operational Research, 182(2), 704-729.
Gerchak, Y., & Wang, Y. (2004). Revenue‐sharing vs. wholesale‐price contracts in assembly systems with random demand. Production and Operations Management, 13(1), 23-33.
Gerchak, Y., Khmelnitsky, E., & Robinson, L. W. (2007). Untruthful probabilistic demand forecasts in vendor‐managed revenue‐sharing contracts: Coordinating the chain. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 54(7), 742-749.
Giannoccaro, I., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2004). Supply chain coordination by revenue sharing contracts. International Journal of Production Economics, 89(2), 131-139.
Gong, D., Liu, S., Tang, M., Ren, L., Liu, J., & Liu, X. (2018). Revenue sharing or profit sharing? An internet production perspective. Advances in Production Engineering & Management, 13(1), 81-92.
Guda, H., & Subramanian, U. (2019). Your uber is arriving: Managing on-demand workers through surge pricing, forecast communication, and worker incentives. Management Science, 65(5), 1995-2014.
Gupta, D., & Weerawat, W. (2006). Supplier–manufacturer coordination in capacitated two-stage supply chains. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(1), 67-89.
Gurley, B. (2014, March 11). A deeper look at Uber’s dynamic pricing model. Above the Crowd. https://abovethecrowd.com/2014/03/11/a-deeper-look-at-ubers-dynamic-pricing-model/. Accessed May 5, 2022.
He, P., He, Y., & Xu, H. (2019). Channel structure and pricing in a dual-channel closed-loop supply chain with government subsidy. International Journal of Production Economics, 213, 108-123.
Horowitz, S. (2011, September 1). The Freelance Surge Is the Industrial Revolution of Our Time. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/09/the-freelance-surge-is-the-industrial-revolution-of-our-time/244229/. Accessed Apirl 14, 2022.
Hua, G., Wang, S., & Cheng, T. E. (2010). Price and lead time decisions in dual-channel supply chains. European Journal of Operational Research, 205(1), 113-126.
Kenney, M., & Zysman, J. (2016). The rise of the platform economy. Issues in Science and Technology, 32(3), 61-69.
Kiefer, N. M., Kelly, T. J., & Burdett, K. (1994). Menu pricing: an experimental approach. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 12(3), 329-337.
Law, C., Smith, R., & Cornelsen, L. (2022). Place matters: Out-of-home demand for food and beverages in Great Britain. Food Policy, 107, 102215.
Li, C., Mirosa, M., & Bremer, P. (2020). Review of online food delivery platforms and their impacts on sustainability. Sustainability, 12(14), 5528.
Liu, H., Lei, M., Deng, H., Leong, G. K., & Huang, T. (2016). A dual channel, quality-based price competition model for the WEEE recycling market with government subsidy. Omega, 59, 290-302.
Ma, W. M., Zhao, Z., & Ke, H. (2013). Dual-channel closed-loop supply chain with government consumption-subsidy. European Journal of Operational Research, 226(2), 221-227.
Manyika, J., Lund, S., Bughin, J., Robinson, K., Mischke, J., & Mahajan, D. (2016). Independent-Work-Choice-necessity-and-the-gig-economy. McKinsey Global Institute, Oct. 2016.
Modak, N. M., & Kelle, P. (2019). Managing a dual-channel supply chain under price and delivery-time dependent stochastic demand. European Journal of Operational Research, 272(1), 147-161.
Nica, E., & Potcovaru, A. M. (2015). The social sustainability of the sharing economy. Economics, Management and Financial Markets, 10(4), 69.
O'Farrell, R., & Montagnier, P. (2020). Measuring digital platform‐mediated workers. New Technology, Work and Employment, 35(1), 130-144.
Rofin, T. M., & Mahanty, B. (2018). Optimal dual-channel supply chain configuration for product categories with different customer preference of online channel. Electronic Commerce Research, 18(3), 507-536.
Rosenblat, A., & Stark, L. (2016). Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: A case study of Uber’s drivers. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3758–3784.
Scully-Russ, E., & Torraco, R. (2020). The changing nature and organization of work: An integrative review of the literature. Human Resource Development Review, 19(1), 66-93.
Shen, Y., Willems, S. P., & Dai, Y. (2019). Channel selection and contracting in the presence of a retail platform. Production and Operations Management, 28(5), 1173-1185.
Sutherland, W., & Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 328-341.
Spreitzer, G. M., Cameron, L., & Garrett, L. (2017). Alternative work arrangements: Two images of the new world of work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 473-499.
Tan, Z. M., Aggarwal, N., Cowls, J., Morley, J., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2021). The ethical debate about the gig economy: A review and critical analysis. Technology in Society, 65, 101594.
Tedeschi,B. (2000, March 27). Compressed data; big companies go slowly in devising net strategy. The New York Yimes. https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/library/tech/00/03/biztech/articles/27data.html. Accessed Apirl 14, 2022.
Tranchtenberg, J. (2004). Style & substance: shopper who blend store, catalog, and web spend more. The Wall Street Journal, 9.
Tsay, A. A., & Agrawal, N. (2004). Channel conflict and coordination in the e‐commerce age. Production and Operations Management, 13(1), 93-110.
Wang, Y., Jiang, L., & Shen, Z. J. (2004). Channel performance under consignment contract with revenue sharing. Management Science, 50(1), 34-47.
Yu, Y., Sun, L., & Guo, X. (2020). Dual-channel decision in a shopping complex when considering consumer channel preference. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 71(10), 1638-1656
Zhang, D., De Matta, R., & Lowe, T. J. (2010). Channel coordination in a consignment contract. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(2), 897-905.
Zhang, J., Cao, Q., & He, X. (2019). Contract and product quality in platform selling. European Journal of Operational Research, 272(3), 928-944.
Zhong, Y., Lin, Z., Zhou, Y. W., Cheng, T. C. E., & Lin, X. (2019). Matching supply and demand on ride-sharing platforms with permanent agents and competition. International Journal of Production Economics, 218, 363-374.