| 研究生: |
盧逸舒 Lu, Yi-Shu |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
彈性貼紮對產後婦女之妊娠相關骨盆帶疼痛的影響 Effects of Kinesio Taping in Postpartum Women with Pregnancy-related Pelvic Girdle Pain |
| 指導教授: |
蔡一如
Tsai, Yi-Ju |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
醫學院 - 物理治療學系 Department of Physical Therapy |
| 論文出版年: | 2021 |
| 畢業學年度: | 109 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 89 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 彈性貼紮 、妊娠相關骨盆疼痛 、產後婦女 、失能 、日常身體功能 、生活品質 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Kinesio taping, Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain, Postpartum women, Disability, Physical functions, Quality of life |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:201 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
研究背景與目的:無論懷孕或是產後有妊娠相關之骨盆帶疼痛問題的婦女很多,疼痛會嚴重影響婦女之身心健康、日常活動、與生活品質。然而至今相關治療介入型實證研究仍很缺乏,且研究結果常呈現不一致。妊娠相關骨盆帶疼痛產生的原因目前仍不明確,普遍認為可能與雌激素的分泌及人體生物力學改變,造成骨盆不穩定有關係。因此,藉由提高骨盆帶穩定而減緩疼痛成為治療目標。彈性貼紮目前被廣泛應用在肌肉骨骼問題之相關物理治療當中,是一種輕便、快捷、安全性高的介入方式。近年來部分學者發現,彈性貼紮對懷孕期間的妊娠相關下背痛與骨盆帶疼痛有改善疼痛及失能的效果。然而,目前並沒有針對產後仍患有骨盆帶疼痛的婦女之相關研究。因此,本研究欲探討彈性貼紮對改善妊娠相關骨盆帶疼痛產後婦女的疼痛、失能程度、日常身體功能、生活品質、骨盆底肌功能、及自覺改善程度之即時效應及兩週介入後的效應。
研究方法:本研究為單盲隨機控制實驗,共招募33位產後一個月以上且仍患有妊娠相關骨盆帶疼痛的婦女,其中彈性貼紮組16名,及控制組17名。所有婦女接受兩週貼紮介入,每四天更換一次貼布。彈性貼紮組使用兩條15-25%張力的I型貼布,貼紮於兩側臀大肌、闊背肌、胸腰筋膜,以促進肌肉收縮;並使用兩條50%張力的I型貼布,橫向貼紮於雙側薦髂關節,以穩定關節。控制組則使用一條不拉任何張力的I型貼布橫向貼紮在雙側薦髂關節,作為對照效應組別。所有評估項目在介入前、第一次貼紮後及兩週介入後執行。介入前與兩週介入後之評估,包含疼痛程度(視覺類比量表)、失能程度(骨盆帶疼痛問卷量表、歐式下背痛失能量表及患者特定功能量表)、健康相關生活品質(SF-36生活品質量表總表及生理和心理健康分數)、日常身體功能(左腳與右腳自主性直膝抬腿疲勞測試、三公尺起立行走測試和十公尺快走測試)、骨盆底肌功能(牛津肌力測試、骨盆底肌收縮陰道壓力值)、與整體自覺改善程度。第一次貼紮後之評估只包含疼痛(視覺類比量表)、日常身體功能(左腳與右腳自主性直膝抬腿疲勞測試、三公尺起立行走測試、十公尺快走測試)、骨盆底肌功能(牛津肌力測試)、及整體自覺改善程度。資料統計使用二因子變異數重複測量,比較介入前與第一次貼紮後、及介入前與兩週介入後,不同貼紮方法之組別及時間對妊娠相關骨盆帶疼痛之產後婦女的影響。當有顯著組別及時間的交互作用出現時,則採用適當的事後比較檢定。
結果:所有婦女在第一次貼紮後的疼痛均有明顯改善,但兩組間並無差異存在。在日常身體功能中,所有婦女之三公尺起立行走測試皆有改善,但左腳自主性直膝抬腿疲勞測試的時間有下降。其餘日常身體功能測試、骨盆底肌功能、自覺改善程度分數皆無改變。在兩週介入後,彈性貼紮組相較於控制組在疼痛、失能、三公尺起立行走測試時間、SF-36生活品質之生理健康分數、與整體自覺改善程度上皆有更顯著地改善(P<0.05),且效應量都有達到中度或高度效應以上(ES=0.745至1.403)。僅在骨盆底肌肌力與部分日常身體功能測試無顯著變化(P>0.05)。
結論:兩週的彈性貼紮介入可以明顯改善妊娠相關骨盆帶疼痛產後婦女的疼痛、失能、日常身體功能、與生活品質之生理健康。婦女們的整體自覺改善程度上也有顯著大幅度進步。但在生活品質之心理健康及骨盆底肌功能方面則無顯著改變。本研究提供了彈性貼紮對改善妊娠相關骨盆帶疼痛與相關問題之實證結果。建議未來臨床可以利用彈性貼紮的方便、快捷、價格適宜、副作用極小之特色,針對妊娠相關之產後骨盆帶疼痛提供一種即時的輔助治療,幫助產後婦女減緩疼痛,進而促進日常生活之恢復。
Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPGP) is a common problem during pregnancy and postpartum, which significantly affect the physical and mental health, daily functions, and quality of life of the women. The underlying pathomechanism for PPGP are still uncertain, but it is generally believed that the secretion of relaxin and biomechanical changes of the body may result in the pelvic instability and contribute to the PPGP. To date only few researches tried to investigate the interventions for the PPGP on pain and disability, such as education, massage, modality, and exercise. Pelvic belt has been demonstrated to have positive effects on PPGP, but it is inconvenient and not suitable for hot weather. Kinesio taping (KT) has been widely used for musculoskeletal disorders and showed the effects on pain reduction and functional improvement. The KT is a safe, non-invasive, and convenient intervention which is possible to be an alternative treatment for postpartum women with PPGP. The main purposes for this study are to investigate the immediate effect and post-intervention effect of KT on pain, disability, physical functions, and quality of life, as well as pelvic floor muscle (PFM) functions in postpartum women with PPGP. A total of 37 women with PPGP were randomized into the KT group and control group, and both groups received assigned intervention for 2 weeks. For the KT group, two I-shaped elastic tapes with 15-25% tension were applied from the gluteus maximus muscle to the thoracolumbar fascia and the contralateral latissimus dorsi, and then two I-shaped elastic tapes with 50% tension were applied onto the bilateral sacroiliac joints. For the control group, one I-shaped elastic tape without tension was applied onto the bilateral sacroiliac joints. The outcomes were evaluated at the baseline, immediately after first taping session, and after 2-week intervention. The outcome measures included pain, disability, physical functions, quality of life, PFM functions and global rating of change score. Pain was significantly reduced after first taping session for all postpartum women although there were no group differences in other outcomes. After 2-week intervention, the KT group had significant more improvements in pan, disability, on the performance of timed up and go test, physical component score of SF-36 than the control group. Global rating of change score in the KT group was also larger than that in the control group. But no differences were observed in PFM functions, some physical functions, and mental component score of SF-36. The KT could be an effective and possible alternative treatment for the postpartum women with PPGP.
1. Wu, W.; Meijer, O.; Uegaki, K.; Mens, J.; van Dieën, J.; Wuisman, P.; Ostgaard, H., Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPP), I: Terminology, clinical presentation, and prevalence. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 2004, 13 (7), 575-89.
2. Pool-Goudzwaard, A.; Vleeming, A.; Stoeckart, R.; Snijders, C.; Mens, J. M., Insufficient lumbopelvic stability: a clinical, anatomical and biomechanical approach to ‘a-specific’low back pain. Manual therapy 1998, 3 (1), 12-20.
3. Chamnankrom, M.; Manimmanakorn, N.; Manimmanakorn, A.; Kongwattanakul, K.; Hamlin, M. J., Effects of elastic tape in pregnant women with low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 2020, (Preprint), 1-9.
4. Kuciel, N.; Sutkowska, E.; Cienska, A.; Markowska, D.; Wrzosek, Z., Impact of Kinesio Taping application on pregnant women suffering from pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain—preliminary study. Ginekologia polska 2017, 88 (11), 620-625.
5. Vleeming, A.; Albert, H.; Ostgaard, H.; Sturesson, B.; Stuge, B., European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle pain. European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society 2008, 17 (6), 794-819.
6. Ostgaard, H.; Andersson, G., Previous back pain and risk of developing back pain in a future pregnancy. Spine 1991, 16 (4), 432-6.
7. 章曉華; 孫冬梅; 陳志剛, 晚期妊娠孕婦骨盆帶疼痛特點及對日常生活的影響. 中國性科學 2020年29卷9期 43-45頁 ISTIC 2020.
8. Östgaard, H. C.; Zetherström, G.; Roos-Hansson, E., Back pain in relation to pregnancy: a 6-year follow-up. Spine 1997, 22 (24), 2945-2950.
9. Vermani, E.; Mittal, R.; Weeks, A., Pelvic girdle pain and low back pain in pregnancy: a review. Pain Practice 2010, 10 (1), 60-71.
10. Hansen, A.; Jensen, D.; Wormslev, M.; Minck, H.; Johansen, S.; Larsen, E.; Wilken-Jensen, C.; Davidsen, M.; Hansen, T., Symptom-giving pelvic girdle relaxation in pregnancy, II: symptoms and clinical signs. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica scandinavica 1999, 78 (2), 111-115.
11. Robinson, H. S.; Eskild, A.; Heiberg, E.; Eberhard-Gran, M., Pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy: the impact on function. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2006, 85 (2), 160-164.
12. Mens, J. M.; Vleeming, A.; Stoeckart, R.; Stam, H. J.; Snijders, C. J., Understanding peripartum pelvic pain: implications of a patient survey. Spine 1996, 21 (11), 1363-1369.
13. Gutke, A.; Josefsson, A.; Öberg, B., Pelvic girdle pain and lumbar pain in relation to postpartum depressive symptoms. Spine 2007, 32 (13), 1430-1436.
14. Engeset, J.; Stuge, B.; Fegran, L., Pelvic girdle pain affects the whole life—a qualitative interview study in Norway on women’s experiences with pelvic girdle pain after delivery. BMC research notes 2014, 7 (1), 1-7.
15. Robinson, P. S.; Balasundaram, A. P.; Vøllestad, N. K.; Robinson, H. S., The association between pregnancy, pelvic girdle pain and health-related quality of life–a comparison of two instruments. Journal of patient-reported outcomes 2018, 2 (1), 1-9.
16. Ritchie, J. R., Orthopedic considerations during pregnancy. Clinical obstetrics and gynecology 2003, 46 (2), 456-466.
17. Biviá-Roig, G.; Lisón, J. F.; Sánchez-Zuriaga, D., Effects of pregnancy on lumbar motion patterns and muscle responses. The Spine Journal 2019, 19 (2), 364-371.
18. Gilleard, W. L.; Brown, J. M. M., Structure and function of the abdominal muscles in primigravid subjects during pregnancy and the immediate postbirth period. Physical therapy 1996, 76 (7), 750-762.
19. Pool-Goudzwaard, A. L.; ten Hove, M. C. S.; Vierhout, M. E.; Mulder, P. H.; Pool, J. J.; Snijders, C. J.; Stoeckart, R., Relations between pregnancy-related low back pain, pelvic floor activity and pelvic floor dysfunction. International Urogynecology Journal 2005, 16 (6), 468-474.
20. Fitzgerald, C. M.; Mallinson, T., The association between pelvic girdle pain and pelvic floor muscle function in pregnancy. International urogynecology journal 2012, 23 (7), 893-898.
21. Sihvonen, T.; Huttunen, M.; Makkonen, M.; Airaksinen, O., Functional changes in back muscle activity correlate with pain intensity and prediction of low back pain during pregnancy. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 1998, 79 (10), 1210-1212.
22. Kuciel, N.; Sutkowska, E.; Cienska, A.; Markowska, D.; Wrzosek, Z., Myoelectrical activity of muscles stabilizing the sacroiliac joints before and after the use of elastic tapes in women suffering from Pregnancy-related Pelvic Girdle Pain. Ginekologia polska 2020, 91 (4), 223-230.
23. Foley, B. S.; Buschbacher, R. M., Sacroiliac joint pain: anatomy, biomechanics, diagnosis, and treatment. American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation 2006, 85 (12), 997-1006.
24. Vleeming, A.; Schuenke, M., Form and force closure of the sacroiliac joints. PM&R 2019, 11, S24-S31.
25. Pool-Goudzwaard, A., Biomechanics of the sacroiliac joints and the pelvic floor. 2003.
26. Egund, N.; Olsson, T.; Schmid, H.; Selvik, G., Movements in the sacroiliac joints demonstrated with roentgen stereophotogrammetry. Acta Radiologica. Diagnosis 1978, 19 (5), 833-846.
27. Bogduk, N.; Macintosh, J. E., The applied anatomy of the thoracolumbar fascia. Spine 1984, 9 (2), 164-170.
28. Willard, F.; Vleeming, A.; Schuenke, M.; Danneels, L.; Schleip, R., The thoracolumbar fascia: anatomy, function and clinical considerations. Journal of anatomy 2012, 221 (6), 507-536.
29. Vleeming, A.; Pool-Goudzwaard, A.; Stoeckart, R.; van Wingerden, J.-P.; Snijders, C., The posterior layer of the thoracolumbar fascia. Spine 1995, 20 (7), 753-758.
30. Goodgold, J., Muscles alive, By John Basmajian, 495 pp, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, 1978. $32.95. Wiley Online Library: 1979.
31. Bergmark, A., Stability of the lumbar spine: a study in mechanical engineering. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 1989, 60 (sup230), 1-54.
32. Sapsford, R. R.; Hodges, P. W., Contraction of the pelvic floor muscles during abdominal maneuvers. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2001, 82 (8), 1081-1088.
33. Hodges, P. W.; Eriksson, A. M.; Shirley, D.; Gandevia, S. C., Intra-abdominal pressure increases stiffness of the lumbar spine. Journal of biomechanics 2005, 38 (9), 1873-1880.
34. Oh, Y.-J.; Park, S.-H.; Lee, M.-M., Comparison of effects of abdominal draw-in lumbar stabilization exercises with and without respiratory resistance on women with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Medical science monitor: international medical journal of experimental and clinical research 2020, 26, e921295-1.
35. Park, S.-H.; Lee, M.-M., Effects of a progressive stabilization exercise program using respiratory resistance for patients with lumbar instability: A randomized controlled trial. Medical science monitor: international medical journal of experimental and clinical research 2019, 25, 1740.
36. Gutke, A.; Boissonnault, J.; Brook, G.; Stuge, B., The Severity and Impact of Pelvic Girdle Pain and Low-Back Pain in Pregnancy: A Multinational Study. Journal of women's health (2002) 2018, 27 (4), 510-517.
37. Weiss, M.; Nagelschmidt, M.; Struck, H., Relaxin and collagen metabolism. Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme 1979, 11 (6), 408-10.
38. Borg-Stein, J.; Dugan, S., Musculoskeletal disorders of pregnancy, delivery and postpartum. Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America 2007, 18 (3), 459-76, ix.
39. Björklund, K.; Naessén, T.; Nordström, M.; Bergström, S., Pregnancy-related back and pelvic pain and changes in bone density. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 1999, 78 (8), 681-5.
40. Gutke, A.; Betten, C.; Degerskär, K.; Pousette, S.; Fagevik Olsén, M., Treatments for pregnancy‐related lumbopelvic pain: a systematic review of physiotherapy modalities. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2015, 94 (11), 1156-1167.
41. Homer, C.; Oats, J., Clinical practice guidelines: pregnancy care. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health 2018, 355, 355-57.
42. Haugland, K. S.; Rasmussen, S.; Daltveit, A. K., Group intervention for women with pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy. A randomized controlled trial. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2006, 85 (11), 1320-1326.
43. Keskin, E.; Onur, O.; Keskin, H.; Gumus, I.; Kafali, H.; Turhan, N., Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation improves low back pain during pregnancy. Gynecologic and obstetric investigation 2012, 74 (1), 76-83.
44. Elden, H.; Östgaard, H. C.; Glantz, A.; Marciniak, P.; Linnér, A. C.; Olsén, M. F., Effects of craniosacral therapy as adjunct to standard treatment for pelvic girdle pain in pregnant women: a multicenter, single blind, randomized controlled trial. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2013, 92 (7), 775-782.
45. Fogarty, S.; McInerney, C.; Hay, P., Pregnancy-related Pelvic Girdle Pain and Pregnancy Massage: Findings from a Subgroup Analysis of an Observational Study. International Journal of Therapeutic Massage & Bodywork 2020, 13 (2), 1.
46. Franke, H.; Franke, J.-D.; Belz, S.; Fryer, G., Osteopathic manipulative treatment for low back and pelvic girdle pain during and after pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of bodywork and movement therapies 2017, 21 (4), 752-762.
47. S, B., Effectiveness of Osteopathic Treatment in Women with Persistent Non-
specific Low Back Pain After Childbirth. A Randomized Controlled Trial. Akademie für Osteopathie 2014.
48. Recknagel C, R. J., tudy on the Effectiveness of Osteopathic Treatment for Women with Persistent Post Partum Back Pain. A Randomized Controlled Trial [unpublished D.O. thesis]. Akademie für Osteopathie.
49. Schwerla, F.; Rother, K.; Rother, D.; Ruetz, M.; Resch, K.-L., Osteopathic manipulative therapy in women with postpartum low back pain and disability: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2015, 115 (7), 416-25.
50. Stuge, B.; Lærum, E.; Kirkesola, G.; Vøllestad, N., The efficacy of a treatment program focusing on specific stabilizing exercises for pelvic girdle pain after pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Spine 2004, 29 (4), 351-359.
51. Saleh, M. S. M.; Botla, A. M. M.; Elbehary, N. A. M., Effect of core stability exercises on postpartum lumbopelvic pain: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation 2019, 32 (2), 205-213.
52. Mens, J. M.; Snijders, C. J.; Stam, H. J., Diagonal trunk muscle exercises in peripartum pelvic pain: a randomized clinical trial. Physical therapy 2000, 80 (12), 1164-1173.
53. Almousa, S.; Lamprianidou, E.; Kitsoulis, G., The effectiveness of stabilising exercises in pelvic girdle pain during pregnancy and after delivery: a systematic review. Physiotherapy Research International 2018, 23 (1), e1699.
54. Kordi, R.; Abolhasani, M.; Rostami, M.; Hantoushzadeh, S.; Mansournia, M. A.; Vasheghani-Farahani, F., Comparison between the effect of lumbopelvic belt and home based pelvic stabilizing exercise on pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain; a randomized controlled trial. Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation 2013, 26 (2), 133-139.
55. Kalus, S.; Kornman, L.; Quinlivan, J. A., Managing back pain in pregnancy using a support garment: a randomised trial. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2008, 115 (1), 68-75.
56. Depledge, J.; McNair, P. J.; Keal-Smith, C.; Williams, M., Management of symphysis pubis dysfunction during pregnancy using exercise and pelvic support belts. Physical Therapy 2005, 85 (12), 1290-1300.
57. Halseth, T.; McChesney, J. W.; DeBeliso, M.; Vaughn, R.; Lien, J., The effects of kinesio™ taping on proprioception at the ankle. Journal of sports science & medicine 2004, 3 (1), 1.
58. Tomasek, J. J.; Gabbiani, G.; Hinz, B.; Chaponnier, C.; Brown, R. A., Myofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling. Nature reviews Molecular cell biology 2002, 3 (5), 349-363.
59. Metcalfe, A. B.; Lawes, N., A modern interpretation of the Rood Approach. Physical therapy reviews 1998, 3 (4), 195-212.
60. Balki, S.; Keklik, S.; Ozturk, H.; Elden, H., Does Kinesio taping in addition to exercise therapy improve the outcomes in subacromial impingement syndrome? A randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica 2013, 47 (2), 104-110.
61. Morimoto, T.; Takada, K., The sense of touch in the control of ingestion. In Neurophysiology of Ingestion, Elsevier: 1993; pp 79-97.
62. Kase, K., Clinical therapeutic applications of the Kinesio (! R) taping method. Albuquerque 2003.
63. Sheng, Y.; Duan, Z.; Qu, Q.; Chen, W.; Yu, B., Kinesio taping in treatment of chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of rehabilitation medicine 2019, 51 (10), 734-740.
64. Yoshida, A.; Kahanov, L., The effect of kinesio taping on lower trunk range of motions. Research in sports medicine 2007, 15 (2), 103-112.
65. Buke, M.; Unver, F., Effects of Kinesio tape application to trunk isokinetic strength in female participants. Research in Sports Medicine 2020, 28 (3), 303-313.
66. Álvarez-Álvarez, S.; San José, F.; Rodríguez-Fernández, A.; Güeita-Rodríguez, J.; Waller, B., Effects of Kinesio® Tape in low back muscle fatigue: randomized, controlled, doubled-blinded clinical trial on healthy subjects. Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation 2014, 27 (2), 203-212.
67. Lemos, T. V.; Albino, A. C. G.; Matheus, J. P. C.; de Melo Barbosa, A., The effect of kinesio taping in forward bending of the lumbar spine. Journal of physical therapy science 2014, 26 (9), 1371-1375.
68. Kaplan, S.; Alpayci, M.; Karaman, E.; Cetin, O.; Ozkan, Y.; Ilter, S.; Sah, V.; Sahin, H. G., Short-Term Effects of Kinesio Taping in Women with Pregnancy-Related Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research 2016, 22, 1297-301.
69. Chamnankrom, M.; Manimmanakorn, N.; Manimmanakorn, A.; Kongwattanakul, K.; Hamlin, M. J., Effects of elastic tape in pregnant women with low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation 2020.
70. Mohamed, E. A.; El-Shamy, F. F.; Hamed, H., Efficacy of kinesiotape on functional disability of women with postnatal back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Back & Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 2018, 31 (1), 205-210.
71. Mens, J. M. A.; Vleeming, A.; Snijders, C. J.; Koes, B. W.; Stem, H. J., Reliability and validity of the active straight leg raise test in posterior pelvic pain since pregnancy. Spine 2001, 26 (10), 1167-1171.
72. Vleeming, A.; De Vries, H. J.; Mens, J. M.; Wingerden, J.-P. v., Possible role of the long dorsal sacroiliac ligament in women with peripartum pelvic pain. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2002, 81 (5), 430-436.
73. Vleeming, A.; Pool-Goudzwaard, A. L.; Hammudoghlu, D.; Stoeckart, R.; Snijders, C. J.; Mens, J. M., The function of the long dorsal sacroiliac ligament: its implication for understanding low back pain. Spine 1996, 21 (5), 556-562.
74. Albert, H.; Godskesen, M.; Westergaard, J., Evaluation of clinical tests used in classification procedures in pregnancy-related pelvic joint pain. European Spine Journal 2000, 9 (2), 161-166.
75. Faul, F.; Erdfelder, E.; Lang, A.-G.; Buchner, A., G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior research methods 2007, 39 (2), 175-191.
76. Albert, H.; Godskesen, M.; Westergaard, J., Prognosis in four syndromes of pregnancy-related pelvic pain. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2001, 80 (6), 505-510.
77. Petersen, T.; Olsen, S.; Laslett, M.; Thorsen, H.; Manniche, C.; Ekdahl, C.; Jacobsen, S., Inter-tester reliability of a new diagnostic classification system for patients with non-specific low back pain. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 2004, 50 (2), 85-94.
78. Kaplan, Ş.; Alpayci, M.; Karaman, E.; Çetin, O.; Özkan, Y.; İlter, S.; Şah, V.; Şahin, H. G., Short-term effects of Kinesio taping in women with pregnancy-related low back pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Medical science monitor: international medical journal of experimental and clinical research 2016, 22, 1297.
79. Mohamed, E. A.; El-Shamy, F. F.; Hamed, H., Efficacy of kinesiotape on functional disability of women with postnatal back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation 2018, 31 (1), 205-210.
80. Hägg, O.; Fritzell, P.; Nordwall, A., The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. European Spine Journal 2003, 12 (1), 12-20.
81. Stuge, B.; Garratt, A.; Jenssen, H. K.; Grotle, M., The Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire: A Condition-Specific Instrument for Assessing Activity Limitations and Symptoms in People With Pelvic Girdle Pain. Physical Therapy 2011, 91 (7), 1096-1108.
82. Ogollah, R.; Bishop, A.; Lewis, M.; Grotle, M.; Foster, N. E., Responsiveness and minimal important change for pain and disability outcome measures in pregnancy-related low back and pelvic girdle pain. Physical therapy 2019, 99 (11), 1551-1561.
83. Fairbank, J.; Pynsent, P. B., The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine 25: 2940-2953. Spine 2000, 25 (22), 2940-2953.
84. Wuytack, F.; O’Donovan, M., Outcomes and outcomes measurements used in intervention studies of pelvic girdle pain and lumbopelvic pain: a systematic review. Chiropractic & manual therapies 2019, 27 (1), 1-13.
85. Westaway, M.; Stratford, P. W.; Binkley, J. M., The patient-specific functional scale: validation of its use in persons with neck dysfunction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998, 27 (5), 331.
86. Maughan, E. F.; Lewis, J. S., Outcome measures in chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J 2010, 19 (9), 1484-94.
87. Deering, R. E.; Senefeld, J.; Pashibin, T.; Neumann, D. A.; Cruz, M.; Hunter, S. K., Fatigability of the Lumbopelvic Stabilizing Muscles in Women 8 and 26 Weeks Postpartum. Journal of women's health physical therapy 2018, 42 (3), 128-138.
88. Christensen, L.; Vøllestad, N. K.; Veierød, M. B.; Stuge, B.; Cabri, J.; Robinson, H. S., The Timed Up & Go test in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain compared to asymptomatic pregnant and non-pregnant women. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice 2019, 43, 110-116.
89. Barry, E.; Galvin, R.; Keogh, C.; Horgan, F.; Fahey, T., Is the Timed Up and Go test a useful predictor of risk of falls in community dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Bmc Geriatrics 2014, 14.
90. Evensen, N. M.; Kvåle, A.; Brækken, I. H., Reliability of the timed up and go test and Ten‐Metre timed walk test in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain. Physiotherapy Research International 2015, 20 (3), 158-165.
91. Sherbourne; Ware, J., The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Med Care 1992, 30, 473-83.
92. Grotle, M.; Garratt, A. M.; Krogstad Jenssen, H.; Stuge, B., Reliability and construct validity of self-report questionnaires for patients with pelvic girdle pain. Physical therapy 2012, 92 (1), 111-123.
93. Isherwood, P.; Rane, A., Comparative assessment of pelvic floor strength using a perineometer and digital examination. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2000, 107 (8), 1007-1011.
94. Newman, D. K.; Laycock, J., Clinical Evaluation of the Pelvic Floor Muscles. Pelvic Floor Re-education: 2008.
95. Navarro Brazález, B.; Torres Lacomba, M.; de la Villa, P.; Sanchez Sanchez, B.; Prieto Gómez, V.; Asúnsolo del Barco, Á.; McLean, L., The evaluation of pelvic floor muscle strength in women with pelvic floor dysfunction: a reliability and correlation study. Neurourology and urodynamics 2018, 37 (1), 269-277.
96. Castro-Pardiñas, M.; Torres-Lacomba, M.; Navarro-Brazález, B., Muscle function of the pelvic floor in healthy and puerperal women and with pelvic floor dysfunction. Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition) 2017, 41 (4), 249-257.
97. Kamper, S. J.; Maher, C. G.; Mackay, G., Global Rating of Change Scales: A Review of Strengths and Weaknesses and Considerations for Design. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy (Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy) 2009, 17 (3), 163-170.
98. Kamper, S. J.; Maher, C. G.; Mackay, G., Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy 2009, 17 (3), 163-170.
99. Cohen, J., Statistical power analysis Jbr the behavioral. Sciences. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1988, 18-74.
100. Stuge, B.; Garratt, A.; Krogstad Jenssen, H.; Grotle, M., The pelvic girdle questionnaire: a condition-specific instrument for assessing activity limitations and symptoms in people with pelvic girdle pain. Physical therapy 2011, 91 (7), 1096-1108.
101. Grönblad, M.; Hupli, M.; Wennerstrand, P.; Järvinen, E.; Lukinmaa, A.; Kouri, J.-P.; Karaharju, E. O., Intercorrelation and test-retest reliability of the Pain Disability Index (PDI) and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) and their correlation with pain intensity in low back pain patients. The Clinical journal of pain 1993, 9 (3), 189-195.
102. Chatman, A. B.; Hyams, S. P.; Neel, J. M.; Binkley, J. M.; Stratford, P. W.; Schomberg, A.; Stabler, M., The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: measurement properties in patients with knee dysfunction. Physical therapy 1997, 77 (8), 820-829.
103. Sabbour, A., The effect of Kinesiotaping therapy augmented with pelvic tilting exercises on low back pain in primigravidas during the third trimester. Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy 2011, 16 (1).
104. Kalinowski, P.; Krawulska, A., Kinesio taping vs. placebo in reducing pregnancy-related low back pain: a cross-over study. Medical science monitor: international medical journal of experimental and clinical research 2017, 23, 6114.
105. Roland, M.; Fairbank, J., The Roland–Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine 2000, 25 (24), 3115-3124.
106. Kim, J. M.; Je, H. D.; Kim, H.-D., Effects of pelvic compression belts on the kinematics and kinetics of the lower extremities during sit-to-stand maneuvers. Journal of physical therapy science 2017, 29 (8), 1311-1317.
107. Jeng, S.-F.; Schenkman, M.; Riley, P. O.; Lin, S.-J., Reliability of a clinical kinematic assessment of the sit-to-stand movement. Physical Therapy 1990, 70 (8), 511-520.
108. Szkwara, J. M.; Hing, W.; Pope, R.; Rathbone, E., Compression shorts reduce prenatal pelvic and low back pain: a prospective quasi-experimental controlled study. PeerJ 2019, 7, e7080.
109. Stuge, B.; Mørkved, S.; Dahl, H. H.; Vøllestad, N., Abdominal and pelvic floor muscle function in women with and without long lasting pelvic girdle pain. Manual therapy 2006, 11 (4), 287-296.
110. Mørkved, S.; Åsmund Salvesen, K.; Schei, B.; Lydersen, S.; Bø, K., Does group training during pregnancy prevent lumbopelvic pain? A randomized clinical trial. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica 2007, 86 (3), 276-282.
111. Fitzgerald, C. M.; Santos, L. R.; Mallinson, T., The association between pelvic girdle pain and urinary incontinence among pregnant women in the second trimester. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2012, 117 (3), 248-250.
112. Loving, S.; Thomsen, T.; Jaszczak, P.; Nordling, J., Pelvic floor muscle dysfunctions are prevalent in female chronic pelvic pain: A cross‐sectional population‐based study. European Journal of Pain 2014, 18 (9), 1259-1270.
113. Dufour, S.; Vandyken, B.; Forget, M.-J.; Vandyken, C., Association between lumbopelvic pain and pelvic floor dysfunction in women: A cross sectional study. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice 2018, 34, 47-53.
114. Melzack, R.; Wall, P. D., Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science 1965, 150 (3699), 971-979.
115. Lipińska, A.; Śliwiński, Z.; Kiebzak, W.; Senderek, T.; Kirenko, J., Wpływ aplikacji kinesiotapingu na obrzęk limfatyczny kończyny górnej u kobiet po mastektomii. Fizjoter Pol 2007, 7 (3), 258-69.
116. Kurt, E. E.; Büyükturan, Ö.; Erdem, H. R.; Tuncay, F.; Sezgin, H., Short-term effects of kinesio tape on joint position sense, isokinetic measurements, and clinical parameters in patellofemoral pain syndrome. Journal of physical therapy science 2016, 28 (7), 2034-2040.
117. Mukkannavar, P.; Desai, B.; Mohanty, U.; Parvatikar, V.; Karwa, D.; Daiwajna, S., Pelvic girdle pain after childbirth: the impact of mode of delivery. Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation 2013, 26 (3), 281-290.
118. Baytur, Y.; Deveci, A.; Uyar, Y.; Ozcakir, H.; Kizilkaya, S.; Caglar, H., Mode of delivery and pelvic floor muscle strength and sexual function after childbirth. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2005, 88 (3), 276-280.