簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳育寬
Chen, Yu-Kuan
論文名稱: 瓊脂糖/明膠孔洞支架的製備於大鼠脂肪幹細胞(rASCs)增殖與分化之評估
Preparation and characterization of agarose/gelatin porous scaffold for rat Adipose Stem Cells (rASCs) proliferation and differentiation
指導教授: 林睿哲
Lin, Jui-Che
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 化學工程學系
Department of Chemical Engineering
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 68
中文關鍵詞: 瓊脂糖明膠N,N'-羰基二咪唑三維孔洞支架細胞貼附細胞分化細胞增殖TGF-β1週期性壓縮細胞培養系統
外文關鍵詞: agarose, gelatin, N, N'-carbonyldiimidazole, three-dimensional porous scaffold, cell attachment, cell differentiation, cell proliferation, TGF-β1, cyclic physical stimulation cell culturing system
相關次數: 點閱:165下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 近幾年來,三維細胞培養已漸漸成為世界上細胞培養技術的主流概念,與傳統二維空間培養相較之下,三維的空間可以提供細胞類似生物組織的空間環境,且可以允許氧氣和養分在支架裡的孔洞間進行流通與傳遞,本實驗以天然瓊脂糖(Agarose)為材料主體,製備具有高度生物相容性的天然三維孔洞支架。天然高分子中,瓊脂糖(Agarose)具有良好機械性質且快速成膠的特性,因此常應用於組織工程相關領域研究中,但由於分子結構具剛性,所以有不易降解及細胞不易貼附等限制,本實驗會透過添加同樣為天然高分子的明膠(Gelatin)來改善材料與細胞的親和性,除了調控膠體結構的機械強度外,同時也賦予膠體具有可降解的特性,也大幅提升材料親水性、延展性及生物可應用性。
    本實驗利用交聯劑N,N'-羰基二咪唑(N,N'-carbonyldiimidazole, CDI),進行瓊脂糖(Agarose)與明膠(Gelatin)交聯反應,來彌補天然高分子機械性質不佳的缺點,並提升兩種高分子之間的作用力,來達到支架結構的穩定性。孔洞支架製備過程中,先將高分子在去離子水中加熱溶解並倒入模具,冷卻後轉變成膠態,透過簡易的凍乾法形成三維孔洞支架(300-500 μm)。
    實驗結果可發現,製備的三維孔洞支架具有高孔隙率及足夠的孔洞大小,且交聯劑確實能提高支架的機械性質並穩定支架的結構,而細胞毒性測試也證明交聯反應後的支架不具有細胞毒性,說明支架可提供良好的環境供細胞生長、貼附、遷移、分化。將支架結合週期性壓縮細胞培養系統,由軟骨黏多醣蛋白染色與細胞分化基因分析可發現,說明添加TGF-β1能夠誘導支架內的脂肪幹細胞分化成軟骨細胞,且三維空間並搭配週期性壓縮培養的結果較二維平面(tissue culture plate)所培養的基因表現量佳。實驗證實製備的支架有利於大鼠脂肪幹細胞分化。

    In recent years, three-dimensional cell culture has gradually become the popular concept of cell culture technology in the world. Compared with traditional two-dimensional culture, three-dimensional culture not only can provide an environment similar to biological tissues for cells but also can allow oxygen and nutrients to transfer in the pores of the scaffold. The goal of this study is to use natural agarose as the main material to prepare a natural three-dimensional porous scaffold with excellent biocompatibility. Among the natural polymers, agarose has good mechanical properties and short gelation time, which is often applied to research in tissue engineering. However, due to the rigid molecular structure, the materials are less degradable and have low attachment capacity for cells.
    The study will improve the affinity of materials and cells by adding gelatin, which is also a natural polymer. The application of gelatin not only can regulate the mechanical strength of the colloid structure but also improves the degradability, hydrophilicity, malleability, and bio-applicability of the material.
    In order to compensate for the poor mechanical properties of natural polymers, the project used N, N'- carbonyldiimidazole (CDI) as the cross-linking agent to carry out the cross-linking reaction between agarose and gelatin. The progress also increased the interaction between agarose and gelatin to get a stable structure. In the preparation of the porous scaffold, the polymer was dissolved in deionized water by heating and poured into the mold, and then the solution turned into a colloidal state after cooling, and a three-dimensional porous scaffold (pore size: 300-500μm) was formed through a simple freeze-drying method.
    The results showed that the prepared three-dimensional pore scaffold had high porosity and sufficient pore size, and the cross-linking agent could improve the mechanical properties of the scaffold and stabilize the structure of the scaffold, and the cytotoxicity test also proved that the scaffold after cross-linking reaction didn’t have cytotoxicity, indicating that the scaffold can provide a good environment for cell growth, attachment, migration, and differentiation. According to proteoglycan staining and gene expression analysis, the addition of TGF-β1 could induce the adipose stem cells to differentiate into chondrocytes in the scaffold combining with a cyclic physical stimulation system. Also, the results of incubation in three three-dimensional pore scaffolds combining with a cyclic physical stimulation system had more gene expression than the incubation in a tissue culture plate. The experiment showed the developed scaffolds had the benefits to the differentiation of rat adipose stem cells.

    摘要 I Extended Abstract II 致謝 XIII 目錄 XIV 圖目錄 XVI 表目錄 XVIII 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 前言 1 1.2 研究動機及目的 2 第二章 文獻回顧 4 2.1 幹細胞在臨床上的發展及應用 4 2.2 關節軟骨細胞的修復及TGF-β1 8 2.3 二維及三維環境對細胞生理之影響 10 2.4 機械仿生動態系統在生醫上的應用 12 2.5 天然孔洞支架之材料、製備及交聯反應 15 2.5.1 瓊脂糖(agarose)簡介 15 2.5.2 瓊脂糖(agarose)於細胞培養之應用 17 2.5.3 瓊脂糖支架三維孔洞的製備 24 2.5.4 交聯反應 26 第三章 實驗藥品與儀器簡介 27 3.1 實驗藥品 27 3.1.1 瓊脂糖/明膠交聯反應與三維孔洞支架製備 27 3.1.2 體外細胞培養相關實驗 27 3.2 實驗設備與儀器 30 3.3 儀器原理介紹 31 3.3.1 超高解析度冷場發射掃描式電子顯微鏡 (Ultra-high resolution cold field scanning electron microscope, SEM) [48] 31 3.3.2 鍍金機(Auto fine coater) 32 3.3.3 聚合酶鏈鎖反應(Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, RT-PCR) 33 第四章 實驗方法 34 4.1 瓊脂糖與明膠交聯反應及孔洞支架的製備: 34 4.2 材料特性及檢測 35 4.2.1 支架孔洞與結構分析 35 4.2.2 支架物理性質分析 37 4.3 體外細胞實驗 38 4.3.1 支架細胞毒性測試 (Cytotoxicity test-iso 10993-5, iso 10993-12) 38 4.3.2 幹細胞於支架之增殖分析 ( Cell proliferation ) 40 4.3.3 細胞於支架分佈分析 ( Cell nuclei staining ) 41 4.3.4 細胞分化-靜態培養 ( Static culture ) 43 4.3.5 細胞分化-動態培養 ( Dynamic culture ) 45 4.3.6 軟骨黏多醣蛋白染色( Proteoglycan staining ) 47 4.3.7 細胞分化基因分析(Gene expression, Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction ) 47 第五章 結果與討論 50 5.1 支架孔洞結構分析 50 5.1.1 掃描式電子顯微鏡(Scanning electron microscope, SEM)分析 50 5.1.2 瓊脂糖/明膠支架孔隙率分析(Porosity analysis) 52 5.2 支架物理性質分析 52 5.2.1 支架機械性質測試 ( Mechanical property test ) 52 5.2.2 支架吸水性測試(Swelling ratio test) 54 5.3 體外細胞實驗 56 5.3.1 支架細胞毒性測試 (Cytotoxicity test-iso 10993-5, iso 10993-12) 56 5.3.2 幹細胞於支架增殖分析(Cell proliferation) 58 5.3.3 細胞於支架分佈分析(Cell nuclei staining) 58 5.3.4 軟骨黏多醣蛋白染色(Alcian blue 8GX staining) 59 5.3.5 細胞分化基因分析( Gene expression ) 61 第六章 結論 63 參考文獻 64

    [1] K. Yan, F.Y. Xu, S.H. Li, Y.Y. Li, Y.L. Chen, D. Wang, Ice-templating of chitosan/agarose porous composite hydrogel with adjustable water-sensitive shape memory property and multi-staged degradation performance, Colloid Surf. B-Biointerfaces 190 (2020) 8.
    [2] M. Witzler, P.F. Ottensmeyer, M. Gericke, T. Heinze, E. Tobiasch, M. Schulze, Non-Cytotoxic Agarose/Hydroxyapatite Composite Scaffolds for Drug Release, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20(14) (2019) 19.
    [3] X.L. Qi, T. Su, X.Q. Tong, W. Xiong, Q.K. Zeng, Y.N. Qian, Z.G. Zhou, X. Wu, Z.P. Li, L.L. Shen, X.J. He, C.C. Xu, M.Y. Chen, Y.H. Li, J.L. Shen, Facile formation of salecan/agarose hydrogels with tunable structural properties for cell culture, Carbohydr. Polym. 224 (2019) 8.
    [4] P. Zarrintaj, S. Manouchehri, Z. Ahmadi, M.R. Saeb, A.M. Urbanska, D.L. Kaplan, M. Mozafari, Agarose-based biomaterials for tissue engineering, Carbohydr. Polym. 187 (2018) 66-84.
    [5] S. Sakai, I. Hashimoto, K. Kawakami, Synthesis of an agarose-gelatin conjugate for use as a tissue engineering scaffold, J. Biosci. Bioeng. 103(1) (2007) 22-26.
    [6] V. Verma, P. Verma, S. Kar, P. Ray, A.R. Ray, Fabrication of agar-gelatin hybrid scaffolds using a novel entrapment method for in vitro tissue engineering applications, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 96(2) (2007) 392-400.
    [7] P.V. Pham, Clinical application of stem cells: An update 2015, Biomed. Res. Ther. 3(2) (2016) 483-+.
    [8] D.K. Cheuk, Optimal stem cell source for allogeneic stem cell transplantation for hematological malignancies, World J Transplant 3(4) (2013) 99-112.
    [9] S. Giralt, L. Costa, J. Schriber, J. Dipersio, R. Maziarz, J. McCarty, P. Shaughnessy, E. Snyder, W. Bensinger, E. Copelan, C. Hosing, R. Negrin, F.B. Petersen, D. Rondelli, R. Soiffer, H. Leather, A. Pazzalia, S. Devine, Optimizing autologous stem cell mobilization strategies to improve patient outcomes: consensus guidelines and recommendations, Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation 20(3) (2014) 295-308.
    [10] P. Ramirez, M.P. Rettig, G.L. Uy, E. Deych, M.S. Holt, J.K. Ritchey, J.F. DiPersio, BIO5192, a small molecule inhibitor of VLA-4, mobilizes hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells, Blood 114(7) (2009) 1340-3.
    [11] B.A. Bunnell, M. Flaat, C. Gagliardi, B. Patel, C. Ripoll, Adipose-derived stem cells: isolation, expansion and differentiation, Methods (San Diego, Calif.) 45(2) (2008) 115-20.
    [12] A.J. Sophia Fox, A. Bedi, S.A. Rodeo, The basic science of articular cartilage: structure, composition, and function, Sports health 1(6) (2009) 461-8.
    [13] D.W. Nitzan, U. Nitzan, P. Dan, S. Yedgar, The role of hyaluronic acid in protecting surface-active phospholipids from lysis by exogenous phospholipase A(2), Rheumatology (Oxford, England) 40(3) (2001) 336-40.
    [14] M.L. Vainieri, D. Wahl, M. Alini, G. van Osch, S. Grad, Mechanically stimulated osteochondral organ culture for evaluation of biomaterials in cartilage repair studies, Acta biomaterialia 81 (2018) 256-266.
    [15] J. Massagué, TGF-beta signal transduction, Annual review of biochemistry 67 (1998) 753-91.
    [16] E. Su, X. Han, G. Jiang, The transforming growth factor beta 1/SMAD signaling pathway involved in human chronic myeloid leukemia, Tumori 96(5) (2010) 659-66.
    [17] S.J. Newfeld, R.G. Wisotzkey, S. Kumar, Molecular evolution of a developmental pathway: phylogenetic analyses of transforming growth factor-beta family ligands, receptors and Smad signal transducers, Genetics 152(2) (1999) 783-95.
    [18] S. Nemir, J.L. West, Synthetic materials in the study of cell response to substrate rigidity, Ann Biomed Eng 38(1) (2010) 2-20.
    [19] A.M. Ross, Z. Jiang, M. Bastmeyer, J. Lahann, Physical aspects of cell culture substrates: topography, roughness, and elasticity, Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) 8(3) (2012) 336-55.
    [20] R.G. Flemming, C.J. Murphy, G.A. Abrams, S.L. Goodman, P.F. Nealey, Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on cell behavior, Biomaterials 20(6) (1999) 573-88.
    [21] B. Cao, Y. Peng, X. Liu, J. Ding, Effects of Functional Groups of Materials on Nonspecific Adhesion and Chondrogenic Induction of Mesenchymal Stem Cells on Free and Micropatterned Surfaces, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 9(28) (2017) 23574-23585.
    [22] B.M. Baker, C.S. Chen, Deconstructing the third dimension: how 3D culture microenvironments alter cellular cues, Journal of cell science 125(Pt 13) (2012) 3015-24.
    [23] E. Knight, S. Przyborski, Advances in 3D cell culture technologies enabling tissue-like structures to be created in vitro, Journal of anatomy 227(6) (2015) 746-56.
    [24] J. Botto, A. danielopol, E. Moser, Relationship between cell shape and type of collagen synthesised as chondrocytes lose their cartilage phenotype in culture, Nature 267 (1977) 531-532.
    [25] M.A. Wozniak, K. Modzelewska, L. Kwong, P.J. Keely, Focal adhesion regulation of cell behavior, Biochimica et biophysica acta 1692(2-3) (2004) 103-19.
    [26] M.I. Rossi, A.P. Barros, L.S. Baptista, L.R. Garzoni, M.N. Meirelles, C.M. Takiya, B.M. Pascarelli, H.S. Dutra, R. Borojevic, Multicellular spheroids of bone marrow stromal cells: a three-dimensional in vitro culture system for the study of hematopoietic cell migration, Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologicas 38(10) (2005) 1455-62.
    [27] Y.Y. Jeong, M.S. Kim, K.E. Lee, O.H. Nam, J.-H. Jang, S.-C. Choi, H.-S. Lee, Comparison of 2- and 3-Dimensional Cultured Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells; a Pilot Study, Applied Sciences 11(3) (2021) 1083.
    [28] F.J. O'Brien, Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering, Materials Today 14(3) (2011) 88-95.
    [29] T.G.B. Deluzio, D. Seifu, K. Mequanint, 3D scaffolds in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: beyond structural templates?, Pharmaceutical bioprocessing 1 (2013) 267-281.
    [30] N. Sawatjui, T. Limpaiboon, K. Schrobback, T. Klein, Biomimetic scaffolds and dynamic compression enhance the properties of chondrocyte- and MSC-based tissue-engineered cartilage, J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 12(5) (2018) 1220-1229.
    [31] S.D. Thorpe, C.T. Buckley, T. Vinardell, F.J. O'Brien, V.A. Campbell, D.J. Kelly, The response of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells to dynamic compression following TGF-beta3 induced chondrogenic differentiation, Ann Biomed Eng 38(9) (2010) 2896-909.
    [32] Y. Hirano, N. Ishiguro, M. Sokabe, M. Takigawa, K. Naruse, Effects of tensile and compressive strains on response of a chondrocytic cell line embedded in type I collagen gel, J Biotechnol 133(2) (2008) 245-52.
    [33] P. Barril, S. Nates, Introduction to Agarose and Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis Matrices with Respect to Their Detection Sensitivities, Gel Electrophoresis - Principles and Basics2012.
    [34] S. Afewerki, A. Sheikhi, S. Kannan, S. Ahadian, A. Khademhosseini, Gelatin-polysaccharide composite scaffolds for 3D cell culture and tissue engineering: Towards natural therapeutics, Bioengineering & translational medicine 4(1) (2019) 96-115.
    [35] P. Zarrintaj, S. Manouchehri, Z. Ahmadi, M.R. Saeb, A.M. Urbanska, D.L. Kaplan, M. Mozafari, Agarose-based biomaterials for tissue engineering, Carbohydr Polym 187 (2018) 66-84.
    [36] H.A. Awad, M.Q. Wickham, H.A. Leddy, J.M. Gimble, F. Guilak, Chondrogenic differentiation of adipose-derived adult stem cells in agarose, alginate, and gelatin scaffolds, Biomaterials 25(16) (2004) 3211-22.
    [37] M.D. Buschmann, Y.A. Gluzband, A.J. Grodzinsky, E.B. Hunziker, Mechanical compression modulates matrix biosynthesis in chondrocyte/agarose culture, Journal of cell science 108(4) (1995) 1497-1508.
    [38] C.Y. Huang, P.M. Reuben, G. D'Ippolito, P.C. Schiller, H.S. Cheung, Chondrogenesis of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in agarose culture, The anatomical record. Part A, Discoveries in molecular, cellular, and evolutionary biology 278(1) (2004) 428-36.
    [39] S. Bhat, A. Kumar, Cell proliferation on three-dimensional chitosan-agarose-gelatin cryogel scaffolds for tissue engineering applications, J Biosci Bioeng 114(6) (2012) 663-70.
    [40] S. Bhat, A. Tripathi, A. Kumar, Supermacroprous chitosan-agarose-gelatin cryogels: in vitro characterization and in vivo assessment for cartilage tissue engineering, Journal of the Royal Society, Interface 8(57) (2011) 540-54.
    [41] L.P. Merlin Rajesh Lal, G.K. Suraishkumar, P.D. Nair, Chitosan-agarose scaffolds supports chondrogenesis of Human Wharton's Jelly mesenchymal stem cells, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A 105(7) (2017) 1845-1855.
    [42] E. DiFederico, J.C. Shelton, D.L. Bader, Complex mechanical conditioning of cell-seeded agarose constructs can influence chondrocyte biosynthetic activity, Biotechnol Bioeng 114(7) (2017) 1614-1625.
    [43] S. Kar, T. Kaur, A. Thirugnanam, Microwave-assisted synthesis of porous chitosan-modified montmorillonite-hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds, International journal of biological macromolecules 82 (2016) 628-36.
    [44] H.L. Kim, G.Y. Jung, J.H. Yoon, J.S. Han, Y.J. Park, D.G. Kim, M. Zhang, D.J. Kim, Preparation and characterization of nano-sized hydroxyapatite/alginate/chitosan composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications 54 (2015) 20-5.
    [45] P. Kazimierczak, K. Palka, A. Przekora, Development and Optimization of the Novel Fabrication Method of Highly Macroporous Chitosan/Agarose/Nanohydroxyapatite Bone Scaffold for Potential Regenerative Medicine Applications, Biomolecules 9(9) (2019).
    [46] S. Gómez, M.D. Vlad, J. López, E. Fernández, Design and properties of 3D scaffolds for bone tissue engineering, Acta biomaterialia 42 (2016) 341-350.
    [47] R. Augustine, P. Dan, A. Sosnik, N. Kalarikkal, N. Tran, B. Vincent, S. Thomas, P. Menu, D. Rouxel, Electrospun poly(vinylidene fluoride-trifluoroethylene)/zinc oxide nanocomposite tissue engineering scaffolds with enhanced cell adhesion and blood vessel formation, Nano Research 10(10) (2017) 3358-3376.
    [48] J. Whiting, Scanning electron microscope (Training module), AMMRF 1-98.
    [49] W. Li, J. Zhou, Y. Xu, Study of the in vitro cytotoxicity testing of medical devices, Biomed Rep 3(5) (2015) 617-620.
    [50] C. Wiegand, U.-C. Hipler, Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Cytotoxicity Using Keratinocyte and Fibroblast Cultures, Skin pharmacology and physiology 22 (2009) 74-82.
    [51] A. Matsiko, J.P. Gleeson, F.J. O'Brien, Scaffold mean pore size influences mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenic differentiation and matrix deposition, Tissue engineering. Part A 21(3-4) (2015) 486-97.
    [52] Q.L. Loh, C. Choong, Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: role of porosity and pore size, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews 19(6) (2013) 485-502.
    [53] S.J. Hollister, Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering, Nature materials 4(7) (2005) 518-24.
    [54] C.Y. Lin, N. Kikuchi, S.J. Hollister, A novel method for biomaterial scaffold internal architecture design to match bone elastic properties with desired porosity, Journal of biomechanics 37(5) (2004) 623-36.
    [55] Z. Li, H.R. Ramay, K.D. Hauch, D. Xiao, M. Zhang, Chitosan-alginate hybrid scaffolds for bone tissue engineering, Biomaterials 26(18) (2005) 3919-28.
    [56] T.M. Maul, D.W. Chew, A. Nieponice, D.A. Vorp, Mechanical stimuli differentially control stem cell behavior: morphology, proliferation, and differentiation, Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 10(6) (2011) 939-953.
    [57] B. Yu, D.G. Yu, L. Cao, X. Zhao, T. Long, G.W. Liu, T.T. Tang, Z.N. Zhu, Simulated microgravity using a rotary cell culture system promotes chondrogenesis of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells via the p38 MAPK pathway, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 414(2) (2011) 412-418.
    [58] K. Chokalingam, S. Hunter, C. Gooch, C. Frede, J. Florer, R. Wenstrup, D. Butler, Three-Dimensional In Vitro Effects of Compression and Time in Culture on Aggregate Modulus and on Gene Expression and Protein Content of Collagen Type II in Murine Chondrocytes, Tissue Engineering Part A 15(10) (2009) 2807-2816.
    [59] E. Michalopoulos, R.L. Knight, S. Korossis, J.N. Kearney, J. Fisher, E. Ingham, Development of Methods for Studying the Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Under Cyclic Compressive Strain, Tissue Engineering Part C-Methods 18(4) (2012) 252-262.

    下載圖示
    2026-08-22公開
    QR CODE