簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 吳定謙
Wu, Ting-Chien
論文名稱: 本體論為基之經驗知識表達與推理方法研究
Development of a Method for Ontology-Based Empirical Knowledge Representation and Reasoning
指導教授: 陳裕民
Chen, Yuh-Min
陳育仁
Chen, Yuh-Jen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 電機資訊學院 - 製造工程研究所
Institute of Manufacturing Engineering
論文出版年: 2009
畢業學年度: 97
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 95
中文關鍵詞: 本體論知識表達知識推理經驗知識OWL本體推論
外文關鍵詞: OWL, Ontology, Knowledge Reasoning, Knowledge Representation, Empirical Knowledge, Ontology reasoning
相關次數: 點閱:156下載:2
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 二十一世紀為「知識經濟」時代,企業競爭優勢已從過去有形的設備、資本與勞力轉換成現今無形的知識。隱性知識往往象徵企業價值所在,係為難以文件化的經驗知識,且常隱藏於個人心智模式中,若無法有效轉化為組織知識,則將隨著人員的離開而消失,造成公司重要智慧資產的流失。因此,將企業內個人的經驗知識,透過系統化方式轉化成組織層面的外顯知識,以有效管理與分享這些寶貴的個人經驗知識,實為企業創造更高知識價值的重要課題之一。
    有鑑於此,本研究目的為發展一「本體論為基之經驗知識表達與推理方法」,針對經驗知識予以結構化的表達模式,協助知識需求者明確地了解經驗知識,以幫助未來問題解決及決策制定,且利用本體推論的技術,使經驗知識能有效的分享與再利用。
    本研究之主要研究項目包括:(1)設計一本體論為基之多層次經驗知識表達模式,(2)建立一OWL為基之經驗知識本體,(3)發展一本體論為基之單層次經驗知識推理方法,及(4)發展一本體論為基之跨層次經驗知識推理方法。

    With the advent of knowledge economy, knowledge has become the most important asset of enterprises in the 21st century. There are also two types of knowledge: tacit and explicit. Tacit knowledge is personal knowledge that is often difficult to articulate and communicate. It has been characterized as being unarticulated and context specific. As compared to explicit knowledge, tacit knowledge is difficult to codify. But, articulating tacit knowledge is important for any organization so it does not lose that knowledge if the individual who owns it leaves the organization.
    A empirical knowledge is a kind of tacit knowledge, which is the knowledge or understanding by experience. However, empirical knowledge is ill-structured, and therefore difficult to formalize. Since empirical knowledge is not easily represented or stored, empirical knowledge sharing is ineffective. Some examples of empirical knowledge include heuristics, skills, and special know-how.
    The objective of this research is to develop a method to convert empirical knowledge into formatted representation, assist knowledge demanders to efficiently and accurately understand the useful meaning from empirical knowledge, to facilitate empirical knowledge sharing and reusing by ontology reasoning rule, and help problem-solving and decision-making in the future. The objective can be achieved through (1) design of a model for Ontology-Based Multi-Layers empirical knowledge representation, (2) develop of OWL-Based empirical knowledge ontology, (3) develop of a method for Ontology-Based Single-Layers empirical knowledge reasoning, and (4) develop of a method for Ontology-Based Cross-Layers empirical knowledge reasoning.

    摘要 I Abstract II 誌 謝 III 目錄 IV 表目錄 VI 圖目錄 VII 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景 1 1.2 研究動機 1 1.3 研究目的 2 1.4 問題分析 2 1.5 研究項目與方法 3 1.6 研究步驟 3 1.7 論文架構 7 第二章 相關文獻與技術探討 8 2.1 經驗知識 8 2.1.1 經驗知識之定義 8 2.1.2 經驗知識之特性 9 2.2 經驗知識系統 11 2.3 知識表達與推理 12 2.3.1 知識表達法 12 2.3.2 知識推理 15 2.4 知識塑模 16 2.5 本體論(Ontology) 17 2.5.1 本體論定義 17 2.5.2 本體論元素 17 2.6 本體論描述語言 18 2.6.1 本體論描述語言類型 18 2.6.2 OWL類型 19 2.6.3 OWL公理 20 2.6.4 OWL限制 22 2.7 本體論推論 23 2.7.1 推論方法(敘述邏輯) 23 2.7.2 推論工具 24 第三章 本體論為基之經驗知識表達模式設計 26 3.1 經驗知識特性分析 26 3.2 本體論為基之經驗知識表達模式設計 27 3.3 本體論為基之經驗知識概念Schema設計 28 第四章 本體論為基之經驗知識推論方法發展 30 4.1 OWL為基之經驗知識本體建立 30 4.2 本體論為基之單層次經驗知識推論規則設計(Single-Layer Ontology Reasoning Rule) 33 4.3 本體論為基之跨層次經驗知識推論規則設計(Cross-Layers Ontology Reasoning Rule) 38 4.4 本體論為基之經驗知識推論演算法設計 42 4.4.1 本體論為基之單層次經驗知識推論演算流程 42 4.4.2 本體論為基之跨層次經驗知識推論演算流程 46 第五章 本體論為基之經驗知識表達與推理方法實例說明 48 5.1本體論為基之多層次經驗知識表達模式實例 48 5.2 OWL為基之經驗知識本體實例 51 5.3 本體論為基之單層次經驗知識推論規則實例 53 5.4 本體論為基之跨層次經驗知識推論規則實例 62 第六章 系統實作與實例建置 68 6.1 系統實作環境介紹 68 6.2 實例建置 69 6.2.1 經驗知識本體建構 69 6.2.2 單層次經驗知識本體推論實作 75 6.2.3 跨層次經驗知識本體推論實作 82 第七章 結論與未來研究方向 91 7.1 結論 91 7.2 未來研究方向 92 參考文獻 93

    [1] Aamodt, M. G. a. A., "A Knowledge-Intensive Method for Conversational CBR " 2005.
    [2] Alavi, M., Leidner, D. E, "Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), pp.107-136," 2001.
    [3] Andrade, J. a. A., J.a; García, R.a; Pazos, J.b; Rodríguez, S.a; Rodríguez-Patón, A.b; Silva, A.b, "Towards a lessons learned system for critical software " Reliability Engineering and System Safety Volume: 92, Issue: 7, July, 2007, pp. 902-913, July, 2007.
    [4] Bradley, J. H., Paul, R., and Seeman, E., "Analyzing the structure of expert knowledge," Information & Management, vol. 43, pp. 77-91, 2006.
    [5] Chandrasekaran, B., Josephson, J. R., and V.R. Benjamins, "What are ontologies, and why do we need them?,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, Vol. 14, No.1, pp. 20-26.," 1999.
    [6] Daconta, M. C., Obrst, L.J. and Smith, K.T., "The Semantic Web: A Guide to the Future of XML, Web Services, and Knowledge Management," Wiley Publishing, Inc., United States of America, 2003.
    [7] Duric, D., "MDA-based Ontology Infrastructure.," Computer Science and Information Systems, 1(1), pp. 91-116., 2004.
    [8] Ejigu, D., Scuturici, M., and Brunie, L., "An Ontology-Based Approach to Context Modeling and Reasoning in Pervasive Computing," in Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, 2007. PerCom Workshops '07. Fifth Annual IEEE International Conference on, 2007, pp. 14-19.
    [9] El-Azhary, E. S., Edrees, A., and Rafea, A., "Diagnostic expert system using non-monotonic reasoning," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 23, pp. 137-144, 2002.
    [10] Evren Sirin ∗, B. P., Bernardo Cuenca Grau, Aditya Kalyanpur, Yarden Katz, "Pellet: A practical OWL-DL reasoner," 2007.
    [11] Grant, R. M., "Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration," Organization Science 7. 4 (1996): 375-388.
    [12] Gruber, T. R., "A Translation Approach to Portable Ontologies," Knowledge Acquisition, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 199-220, 1993.
    [13] Guarino, N., "Formal ontology and information systems.," In Proceedings of Formal Ontology and Information Systems, 1998.
    [14] Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N. and Tierney, T., "What's your strategy for managing knowledge?," Harvard Business Review 77. 2 (1999): 106-116.
    [15] Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P. F., and van Harmelen, F., "From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: the making of a Web Ontology Language," Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, vol. 1, pp. 7-26, 2003.
    [16] Horvath, J. A., "Working With Tacit Knowledge. Knowledge Management Yearbook, edited by James W. Cortada, John A. Woods, Boston.," 2000.
    [17] Kamsu Foguem, B., Coudert, T., Beler, C., and Geneste, L., "Knowledge formalization in experience feedback processes: An ontology-based approach," Computers in Industry, vol. 59, pp. 694-710, 2008.
    [18] Kingston, J., "Multi-perspective ontologies: Resolving common ontology development problems," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 34, pp. 541-550, 2008.
    [19] Kingston, J. and Macintosh, A., "Knowledge management through multi-perspective modelling: representing and distributing organizational memory," Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 13, pp. 121-131, 2000.
    [20] Lai, L. F., "A knowledge engineering approach to knowledge management," 2007.
    [21] Little, E. G. and Rogova, G. L., "Designing ontologies for higher level fusion," Information Fusion, vol. 10, pp. 70-82, 2009.
    [22] McGuinness, N. F. N. a. D. L., "Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology " 2001.
    [23] Minsky, M., "A Framework for Representation Knowledge," Winston, P. (ed) The Psychology of Computer Vision 1975, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp: 211-277., 1975.
    [24] Negnevitsky, M., "Artificial Intelligence A Guide to Intelligent Systems," Addison-Wesley,England,, 2002.
    [25] Nonaka, I., "“A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation,” Organization Science, 5(1), pp.14–37.," 1994.
    [26] Nonaka, I. T., H., , "The Knowledge-Creating Company, Oxford University Press, Inc," 1995.
    [27] O’Hara, K., "Knowledge Representation with Ontologies: The Present and Future," 2008.
    [28] Pan, J. Z., "DESCRIPTION LOGICS:REASONING SUPPORT FOR THE SEMANTIC WEB," 2004.
    [29] Payne, P. R. O. M., Eneida A.; Johnson, Stephen B.; Starren, Justin B. , "Conceptual knowledge acquisition in biomedicine: A methodological review " Journal of Biomedical Informatics vol. 40, Issue: 5, October, 2007, pp. 582-602 2007.
    [30] Polanyi, M., "Personal Knowledge, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.," 1958.
    [31] Polanyi, M., "The Tacit Dimension” (London, Routledge & Keegan Paul)," 1966.
    [32] Quinn, J., Anderson, P., Finkelstein, S., "Managing professional intellect: making the most of the best, Harvard Business Review.," 1996.
    [33] Raj Sharman, R. K., Ram Ramesh, "Ontologies :a handbook of principles, concepts and applications in information systems," 2007.
    [34] Ronald J.Brachman , H. J. L., "Knowledge Representation and Reasoning," Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam ; Boston, 2004.
    [35] Ronald, M., "From Experience: Harnessing tacit knowledge to achieve breakthrough innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17,179-193.," 2000.
    [36] Sattler3, I. H. B. G. U., "FaCT++ description logic reasoner System description," 2006.
    [37] Schulz, S. and Hahn, U., "Part-whole representation and reasoning in formal biomedical ontologies," Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, vol. 34, pp. 179-200, 2005.
    [38] Steen, O., "Practical knowledge and its importance for software product quality," 2007.
    [39] Tacla, C. A. and Barthes, J.-P., "A multi-agent system for acquiring and sharing lessons learned," Computers in Industry, vol. 52, pp. 5-16, 2003.
    [40] Uschold, M. a. G., M.,, "Ontologies: Principles, Methods and Applications,," Knowledge Sharing and Review, vol. 11, no. 2, 1996.
    [41] Wang, X. H., Zhang, D. Q., Gu, T., and Pung, H. K., "Ontology based context modeling and reasoning using OWL," in Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, 2004. Proceedings of the Second IEEE Annual Conference on, 2004, pp. 18-22.
    [42] Weber, R. a. A., D.W.b; Becerra-Fernandez, I.c "Intelligent lessons learned systems," Expert Systems with Applications Volume: 20, Issue: 1, pp. 17-34, 2001
    [43] Weber, R. O. a. A., David W.b "Intelligent delivery of military lessons learned " Decision Support Systems Volume: 34, Issue: 3, February, 2003, pp. 287-304 2003,February.
    [44] Zack, M., "Managing Codified Knowledge, Sloan Management Review, 45-48.," 1999.
    [45] 林東清, "知識管理," 智勝文化公司出版, 2003.
    [46] 游麗珠, "掌握財務診斷," 宏典文化, 2005.
    [47] 關銘, "以OWL DL 及SWRL 為基礎建置推論雛形系統- 以大學排課問題為例," 2004.

    網路資料:
    [48] Tim Berners-Lee,About the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C),First Retrived March 17,2007 form the: http://www.w3.org/Consortium/.
    [49] Racer (2007). RacerPro reasoned, Racer Systems GmbH & Co. KG. http://
    www.racer-systems.com/

    下載圖示
    2014-06-22公開
    QR CODE