由於市場上對於環保產品的相關資訊，無法提供足夠資訊予企業做市場研究及設計師進行環保產品市調，甚至消費者面對市場上琳瑯滿目的環保產品時感到無所適從，因此本文應用分析網路程序法(Analytic Network Process,ANP)做簡易產品之生態效益(Eco-efficiency) 評估，作為設計師與企業在評估產品時的參考指標，而量化後的指標值亦可協助消費者選購環保、優秀的產品。

　　研究中，將以20 吋薄膜電晶體液晶電視(Thin Film Transistor-Liquid Crystal Display Television,TFT LCD TV) 為研究對象。由於液晶面版與控制晶片技術的進步，促成了市場液晶顯示器的快速成長，也讓液晶電視成為家庭消費性電子娛樂產品不再是一個夢想。在市場急速成長的過程中，企業、設計師與消費者在面對顯示器產品時，除了顯示器產品本身功能考量外，身為二十一世紀的人們；更需要思考的是產品與環境的關連性。因此，本文將整合ANP法於液晶電視生態效益之評估，並介紹運算ANP法之軟體Super Decision 協助決策者進行決策。生態效益評估指標值的運算，將以設計師及消費者之需求為主要依歸，整合消費者之需求於指標中，期望提供企業及設計師更為貼切市場的環保產品評估方法。

　　Due to lack of information about environmental products in the current market, it is hard to investigate the trend of commercial market and to process questionnaires about relative products for enterprises and product designers. In addition, consumers do not even have a standard guide while facing a variety of products. In this research, the ANP (Analytic Network Process, ANP) was introduced to evaluate Eco-Efficiency of environmental products and further to provide enterprises and designers a reference index guiding consumers in the purchase by these quantitative data.

　　In this study, TFT LCD TV (Thin Film Transistor-Liquid Crystal Display Television, TFT LCD TV) with 20-inch was the object to be concerned. Due to technical developments in LCD-interface and chip-control, market of LCD monitor grew up quickly and even achieved the goal that LCD TV was part of electrical entertainment products for each family. Although TFT LCD TV is prevalent in the world, however, modern people have to consider the relationship between product and environment beside function of product itself when evaluating those products. In this research, the Eco-Efficiency of environmental products was evaluated by ANP and introduced how the Super Decision, software of ANP calculation, functioned for executors. Moreover, the Index of Eco-Efficiency Evaluation was calculated according to the requests from product designers and consumers and expected to provide an evaluating method that is much close to the marketing trend.

1. 日本液晶應用技術研究會，陳連春 譯，「最新液晶應用技術」，建興文化事業有限公
司，pp.8-9，2003年5月。
2. 王蓮芬，「網路分析法（ANP）的理論與算法」，系統工程理論與實踐，第3期，pp.44-
50,2001年3月。
3. 成璟編輯群編譯，「平面顯示器及未來趨勢」，臺北縣，成璟文化發行，p.46，2000年。
4. 周榮章，「層級分析法語模糊評估法之比較」，國立成功大學機械工程研究所，1993年。
5. 胡憲倫，鍾啟賢，「生態效益指標之評論」，企業永續發展簡訊，第64期，2002年10月。
6. 胡憲倫，鍾啟賢，「生態效益裡念在永續性產品開發上之應用---以EVR模型為例」，2003
永續性產品與產業管理研討會 論文集，pp.196-209, 2003年3月15日。
7. 孫珮瑜，「應用分析網路程序法建立甄選學生衡量標準之研究」，中華大學科技管理研究
所，2002年。
8. 張登凱，「白話次世代電視機」，數位時代雙週刊，Vol.74-75，2004年2月。
9. 陳嘉荔，「數位電視風潮CRT、PDP及Projection TV各擁市場」，新電子科技雜誌，pp.95-
100，2004年3月。
10. 經濟部工業局，「生態效益-主導21世紀的經營理念」，2001年12月。
11. 經濟部工業局，「產品環境化設計概論」，2002年11月。
12. 劉勝傑，「運用階層分析法之產品生態效益評估—以桌上型顯示器為例」，國立成功大學
資源工程所，2002年。
13. 鄭德珪，「台灣廠商投入FDP TV熱潮」，光連雜誌，Vol.47，pp.18-21，2003年9月。
14. 賴智輝，「腋下柺杖評估模式之建立與應用」，國立成功大學工業設計研究所，1997年。
15. 簡召全，「工業設計方法學」，北京理工大學出版社，1999年12月。
16. 羅輝，葉永峰，「實用產品設計經濟分析—產品設計經濟學」，機械工業出版社，1994年
10月。
17. De-Simone L.D. & Popoff F., “Eco-efficiency: The business link to sustainable development”,
World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), 1997.
18. Diakoulaki D., “Combined use of CBA and MCDA to assess the eco-efficiency of he electricity
Generation Sector”, Presentations from the 2004 Eco-efficiency Conference, 2004 April.
19. Gao M. & Zhou M.C. & Wang F., “Improvement of product sustainable”, Proceedings of the
2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics& Automation, pp.14-19, 2003 September.
20. Grant J., “Planning and designing industrial landscapes for eco-efficiency”, Cleaner Production,
Vol.5 No.1-2, pp.75-78, 1997.
21. Huizingh E.K.R.E. & Vrolijk H.C.J., “Decision support for information systems management:
Applying analytic hierarchy process”, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM, 1995.
22. Jerry W. & Mahajan V., “Issues and opportunities in new product development：An introduction
to special issue”, Journal of Marking Research, Vol. 34, pp.1-13, 1997.
23. Kamal M., “Application of the AHP in project management”, International Journal of Project
Management, Vol.19, pp.19-27, 2001.
24. Keffer C. & Shimp R., “Eco-efficiency indicators & reporting: Report on the status of the project
work in progress and guideline for pilot application”, WBCSD, Geneva, 1999 April 6.
25. Lawrence B., “On teaching the analytic hierarchy process”, Computers & Operation Research,
Vol.30, pp.1487-1497, 2003.
26. Lee W.J. & Kim S.H., “Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent
information system project selection”, Computer and Operation Research, Vol.27, pp.367-382,
2000.
27. Lee Y. M. & Shan C. M., “A preliminary comparison and integration of lifecycle impact
assessment models”, Journal of the Chinese Institute of Environmental Engineering, Vol. 10, No.
4, pp.323- 335, 2000.
28. Lipovetsky S. & Michael C.W., “Robust estimation of priorities in the AHP”, European Journal of
Operational Research, Vol.137, No.1, pp.110-122, 2002.
29. Mead L.M. & Rogers K.J., “Enhancing a manufacturing business process for agility”, Portland
International Conference on Management and Technology, pp.638-641, 1997.
30. Mohammed I., “Selecting the appropriate project delivery method using AHP”, International
Journal of Project Management, Vol.20, pp.469-474, 2002.
31. Newman D., “Evaluation risk of new substance in electronic product: Using an abridged lifecycle
assessment and AHP,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the
Environment, pp.298-303, 1998.
32. Ong S.K., “Assessing the environmental impact of materials processing techniques Using an
analytical hierarchy process method”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 113, No.
1-3, pp.424-431, 2001.
33. Saaty T. L. & Takizawa M., “Dependence and independence: From linear hierarchies to nonlinear
networks”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.26, pp.229-237, 1986.
34. Saaty T. L., “Decision making in complex environments”, Super Decisions, 2003.
35. Saaty T. L., “Decision making with dependence and feedback— The analytic network process”,
RWS Publication, 1996.
36. Saaty T. L., “The analytic hierarchy process”, McGraw-Hill, 1980.
37. Saaty T. L., “The analytic network process”, RWS Publication, 2001.
38. Sarkis J. & Nehman G. & Priest J., “A systematic evaluation model for environmentally conscious
business practices and strategy”, Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Electronics
and the Environment, pp.281-286, 1996 May 6-8.
39. Stevels A.L.N & Huisman J., “Eco-efficiency of take back and recycling, a comprehensive
approach”, Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the
Environment,pp.265-270, 2003.
40. Stevels A.L.N. & Huisman J. & Stobbe I., “Eco-efficiency considerations on the end-of-life of
consumer electronic products”, Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Symposium on
Electronics and the Environment, pp.59-64, 2002.
41. Stevels A.L.N., “Eco-efficiency of take back systems of electronic products”, Proceedings of the
1999 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, Danvers, pp.286-291,
1999 May 11-13.
42. Taeko A., “Case study for calculation of factor X (eco-efficiency)—Comparing CRT TV, PDP TV
and LCD TV”, Eco-Design 2003@ Tokyo Japan, pp.8-11, 2003 Dec.
43. Takayama A., “Mathematical economics”, Cambridge University Press, 1985.
44. WBCSD, “Eco-efficiency—Creating more value with less impact”, WBCSD, 2000.
45. BenQ, http://www.benq.com.tw/
46. BenQ技術支援問題，「如何選購液晶顯示器(LCD)？」,
http://www.benq.com.tw/service/lcd/faq.htm#18
47. Chi Mei, http://www.cmv.com.tw/tw/
48. Deal Time, http://img.shopping.com/cctool/WhatsIs/96252_2457.html
49. Eiden H., & Schroeder U., “TFT guide - part 1 - flat panel displays”,
http://graphics.tomshardware.com/display/19990624/tft1-07.html
50. Flat TV People, “ LCD TV viewing angles”,
http://www.flattvpeople.com/tutorials/viewing-angles.asp
51. Flat TV People, http://www.flattvpeople.com/tutorials/viewing-angles.asp
52. Panasonic, http://www.panasonic.com/static.html
53. Saaty T. L.,” The analytic network process (ANP) for decision making and forecasting with
dependence and feedback”, Thomas Saaty’s ANP PowerPoint Slide Show,2001July,
http://www.creativedecisions.net/papers/query_action1.php3
54. Samsung 's Digital World, http://www.samsungusa.com
55. Samsung, http://www.samsung.com/
56. Sharp, http://sharp-world.com/
57. Sony, http://www.sony.com/
58. Super decisions software for decision making, http://www.superdecisions.com
59. Tom's hardware guide, http://graphics.tomshardware.com/display/index.html
60. Toshiba, http://www.toshiba.com/
61. View Sonic, http://www.viewsonic.com/index.htm
62. 新浪廣東新聞，「液晶、等離子、背投3大主流電視技術大比拼」，
http://news.gd.sina.com.cn/finance/2004-06-24/521248.html
63. 賽迪顧問，「解析中國大陸液晶電視市場規模與發展速度」，http://www.hope.com.tw