| 研究生: |
張勤昌 Chang, Chin-Chan |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
聯合分析應用於金控後銀行顧客知覺與偏好之研究 The Study of Conjoint Analysis on Perception and Preference in the Bank Consumer of Newly - Established Financial Holding Companies |
| 指導教授: |
吳宗正
Wu, Chung-Cheng |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 統計學系 Department of Statistics |
| 論文出版年: | 2004 |
| 畢業學年度: | 92 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 84 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 銀行 、聯合分析混合模式 、自顯性偏好 、知覺與偏好 、成份效用值 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | banking, Conjoint analysis hybrid model, Part-Worth Utility, perception and preference, Self-Explicated utilities |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:123 下載:4 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
隨著金融環境的改變,銀行服務業已從以往公營銀行及大型商業銀行寡佔演變成各銀行百家爭鳴。近年來雖然金融控股公司不斷成立,在整合保險、證券、銀行及各種金融業務公司的金控中,銀行仍扮演著相當重要角色,而瞭解台南市民眾對金控後銀行的知覺與偏好即成為本研究所欲探討。
本研究係利用聯合分析混合模式進行探討;資料蒐集與分析分為兩階段,第一階段目的在於從眾多銀行屬性中,篩選出台南市民眾相對重視之屬性,其為1、作業速度;2、存款利率;3、櫃台人員服務態度;第二階段目的在於蒐集受訪者之自顯性偏好及對受測體之偏好程度,前者為分群之依據,後者為估計成份效用值所需應變數;根據自顯性成份效用值結果可將民眾分為三群並利用屬性相對重要性進行區隔命名,分別為:1、注重服務群;2、注重利率群;3、效率/利率並重群,各佔整體的15.3%、45.7%及39%,其中教育程度在各區隔之分佈有顯著不同,並列出成份效用值總和在各群前五大之銀行作為參考。
Along with the changes of the finance environment, the banking turns into only and greatly from the government operated bank and large commercial banks already the situation that compete very much. In recent years, although the financial holding company establishes continuously, have the insurance, stock certificate and bankings in the funds, and the bankings still play the very important role. This study exploits the Conjoint analysis hybrid model to understand the perception and preference of townspeople whose live in Tainan to the banks after financial holding company establish.
The data collects to be divided into two stages with analysis, the purpose of first stage is to select final attributes, which are: 1, operations speed; 2, deposit rate; 3, counter personnel service attitude; the purposes of second stage are to collect the Self-Explicated utilities and the favored degree of the stimulus, the former is used to the cluster analysis, and the latter is for estimating the Part-Worth Utility. According to the Self-Explicated utilities can get three segmentations which are: 1, emphasizing service segmentation; 2, emphasizing deposit rate segmentation; 3, emphasizing efficiency/deposit rate segmentation, each have whole 15.3%, 45.7% and 39%. Among these segmentations, the level of education in each distributes differently. Finally, list the top five banks of each segmentation for banking.
一、中文部份
1.王昭傑(2000),「消費者對水果醋屬性偏好之研究—聯合分析法之應用」,屏東科技大學農企業管理研究所碩士論文
2.吳宗正編著(1995),「迴歸分析–理論與應用」,復文書局
3.李佩珍(1985),「聯合分析法在銀行業競爭策略上之應用研究」,東海大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
4.李詩琦(2000),「統計方法應用於銀行顧客滿意度模式之研究」,國立成功大學統計學研究所碩士論文
5.周文賢、張欽富著(2000),「聯合分析在產品設計之運用」,初版,華泰書局
6.周添城(1998),「風火台前話銀行」,中華徵信
7.周逸衡編譯(1999),Lovelock, C. H., 「Services Marketing」, 華泰書局
8.林建山(1992),「現代服務業行銷學」,環球經濟社
9.林婷鈴(1994),「銀行業的行銷組合策略之探討」,台北銀行月刊,第二十五卷第八期
10.張鈞(1989),「Q&A銀行往來」修訂版,商周文化
11.張裕淵(2001),以生活型態觀點探討台灣地區銀行網路金融服務市場區隔之研究,國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文
12.張麗娟(1993),「銀行業的行銷環境與策略」,臺灣經濟金融月刊,第二十九卷第三期
13.淺井慶三郎、清水滋著,鄒水仁等譯(1999),「服務業行銷–理論與實務」,日之昇
14.許書華(1997),「台灣未來熱門行業.銀行業」,永汀文化
15.陳順宇、鄭碧娥(2002),「實驗設計」,華泰書局
16.楊秀真(1989),「聯合分析在商業銀行顧客知覺與偏好之應用研究」,國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文
17.楊秀真(1989),「聯合分析法在商業銀行顧客知覺與偏好之應用分析」,國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文
18.盧淵源編譯(1986),杉本辰夫原著,「事務、營業、服務的品質管制」,中興管理顧問公司
19.賴秀如(1991),「如何和銀行打交道」,遠流出版社
20.謝文崔編譯,許士軍校訂(1998),Kotler, P., Leong, S. M., Ang, S. H., and Tan, C. T., 「Marketing Management–An Asian Perspective」,華泰書局
21.謝森展(1996),「服務行銷管理」,創意力文化
22.簡芃榛(2003),「統計方法應用於消費性業務銀行顧客關係管理系統之研究」,國立成功大學統計學研究所碩士論文
二、英文部份
1.Boyle, K. J., Holmes, T. P., Teisl, M. F., and Brian, R. "A comparison of conjoint analysis response formats", American Journal of Agricultural Economics. Vol.83, May 2001, p.441-454
2.Carmone, F. J., Green, P. E. and Jain, A. K., “Robustness of Conjoint Analysis: Some Monte Carlo Results”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 15, 1978, pp.300-303
3.Cattin, P. and Wittink, D. R., “Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: A Survey”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 46, 1982, pp.44-53
4.Cochran, W. G.(1977),「Sampling Techniques」,3rd ed, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
5.Green, P. E. & Srinivasan, V.,“ Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issue and Outlook”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 5, Sep. 1978, pp.103-123
6.Green, P. E. and Rao, V. R., “Conjoint Measurement for Quantifying Judgmental Data”, Journal of Marketing Research, Aug. 1971, pp.355-363
7.Green, P. E., “Hybrid Models for Conjoint Analysis: An Expository Review”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 21, 1984, pp.155-169
8.Green, P. E., and Krieger, A. M., "What's right with conjoint analysis?", Marketing Research, Vol.14, Spring 2002, pp.24-27
9.Kotler, P.(1994), 「Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control」, 8th ed., Englewood Cliffs, N.J. : Prentice Hall
10.Luce, R. D. and Tukey, J. W., “Simultaneous Conjoint Measurement: A New Type of Fundamental Measurement”, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 1, 1964, pp.1-27
11.Smith, W. R., “Product Differentiation and Market Segmentation as Alternative Marketing Strategies”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 19, July 1956 pp.3-8
12.Stanton, W. J.(1981), 「Fundamentals of Marketing」, NY: McGraw-Hill, New York, p.441
13.Wind, Y., “Issues and Advances in Segmentation Research”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.15, Aug. 1978, pp.317-337
14.Wind, Y., Grashof, J. F., and Goldhar, J. D., “Market-based Guidelines for Design of Industrial Products”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.42, July 1978, pp.27-37