成功大學博碩士論文系統

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表

研究生：	溫是瑋 Wen, Shih-Wei
論文名稱：	兼具意喩與功能之創新產品造型法 Meaningful-function Forming Method for Innovative Product Design
指導教授：	陸定邦 Luh, Din-Ban 孔憲法 Kung, Shiann-Far
學位類別：	碩士 Master
系所名稱：	規劃與設計學院 - 創意產業設計研究所 Institute of Creative Industries Design
論文出版年：	2011
畢業學年度：	99
語文別：	英文
論文頁數：	120
中文關鍵詞：	TRIZ 、產品語意、創新、設計方法
外文關鍵詞：	TRIZ, Product Semantics, innovative product, design method
相關次數：	點閱：153 下載：6
分享至:	分享至facebook 分享至twitter

查詢本校圖書館目錄查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統勘誤回報

發展產品創新是企業維持競爭力的重要策略，除了傳統的產品工具性價值創新設計，近年來產品象徵性價值創新設計亦成為顯學。
本研究嘗試將工具性與象徵性價值創新設計領域中的兩大方法─TRIZ法與產品語意學─相結合，提出一套系統化創新產品設計流程：兼具意喻與功能之創新產品造型法(Meaningful-function forming method for innovative product，以下稱MFF法)，並以現有產品案例與對照實驗驗證MFF法的實用性以及相對於萃思法之優異性。

Innovative product development is an important strategy of competiveness keeping for enterprises. Beside of the classical way of innovative product development, functional innovative product design, the symbolic innovative product design becomes a hot issue in the resent years.
This research tries to combine TRIZ and Product Semantics, the powerful method for functional innovative product design and the key theory for symbolic innovative product design, then proposed a systematical process of innovative product design- Meaningful-function forming method for innovative product (MFF). Exited product and compare experiments were used to show the usability of MFF and the performances between MFF and original TRIZ.

Acknowledgments…………………………………………………………………..i
Chinese abstract…………………………………………………………………….ii
Abstract	……………………………………………………………………………..iii
Table of contents…………………………………………………………………….iv
List of tables	………………………………………………………………………..vi
List of figures	………………………………………………………………………..vii
I. Introduction………………………………………………………………….....…01
1.1 Research Background and Motivation……..…………01
1.2 Research Purpose……………………………………………………….......02
1.3 Research Framework………………………………………………………. 02
II. Literature Review…………………………………………………………..……03
2.1 Product Design Process and Methods…….……………03
2.1.1 Product Design Process…….………………………….03
2.1.2 Product Design methods………..…..…………..….05
2.2 Product Semantics............................06
2.2.1 Introduction of Product Semantics............06
2.2.2 Symbolic Semantic, Indicative Semantic and Semantic Expression.10
2.3 TRIZ……..………………....…....13
2.3.1 Introduction of TRIZ........................13
2.3.2 Contradiction Matrix, 39 Engineering Parameters and 
40 Inventive Principles .………………………..………………….14
2.3.3 Researches of TRIZ in Industrial Design Discipline..17
III. Meaningful-function Forming Method for Innovative Product Design…19
3.1 The Development of Meaningful-function Forming Method…19
3.2 The Structure and Steps of Meaningful-function Forming Method….20
3.3 Case Study：OHSO’s pocket toothbrush……………………………..21
IV.Methodology……………….............. ……………………..25
4.1 Research Hypothesis and Design………....…...25
4.2Experiment Materials Preparation…………………………………………...26
4.2.1 Design Topic Explanation…………………………………….........26
4.2.2 Assisting Reference………………………………………………...26
4.2.3 Innovative Product Concept Analysis Matrix……………………27
4.3 Pre-tests……………………………………………………………………..29
4.4 Adjustment………………………………………………………………….31
3.4.1 Teaching Materials Adjustment…………………………………….31
3.4.2 Design Topic Adjustment…………………………………………..31
3.4.2 Feedback Questionnaire Adjustment………………………………32
4.4 Formal Experiment………………………………………………………...32
4.5 Data Analysis ……………………………………………………………...34
V. Research results and discussion…………………………………35
5.1 Formal Experiment Results………..…………….35
5.2 Experiment Results Discussion…………….……..…………42
VI. Conclusion and suggestion………………………………………………….....45
6.1 Conclusion……………………………………..…………………………...45
6.2 Suggestion……………………………………..…………………………...46
Reference………………………………...…………...................47
Appendix .1 Contradiction Matrix…………………………………………………..50
Appendix .2 TRIZ 39 Engineering Parameters……………………………….52
Appendix .3 Design Topic Explanation Used in Formal Experiment 54
Appendix .4 TRIZ References Used in Formal Experiment……………55
Appendix .5 Product Semantics Application Guidance Used in Formal Experiment.64
Appendix .6 Lifestyle Board Applied in Experiment……………………67
Appendix .7 Target Users' Needs Questionnaire and Results…68
Appendix .8 TRIZ Teaching PPT Slides Used in Pre-test…………80
Appendix .9 MFF Teaching PPT Slides Used in Pre-test……………84
Appendix .10 Feedback Questionnaires Used in Pre-test……………92
Appendix .11 Design Topic Explanation Used in Pre-test…………95
Appendix .12 TRIZ 40 Principles with product examples…………96
Appendix .13 The Data of Design Results obtained from Pre-test 107
Appendix .14 Feedback Questionnaires Used in Formal Experiment…113
Appendix .15 The Data of Design Results obtained from Formal Experiment.……115

                                    

1. Altshuller, G., And suddenly the inventor appeared: TRIZ, the theory of inventive problem solving, Technical Innovation Center. MA (1995).
2. Altshuller, G., 40 principles: TRIZ keys to technical innovation, Technical Innovation Center, MA (1998).
3. Besemer, S. P. (1998). Creative product analysis matrix: Testing the model structure and a comparison among products – Three novel chairs. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 333-346.
4. Butter, Reinhart, 1989, “Putting theory into practice: an application of Product Semantics to transportation design”, Design Issues, Vol.2, pp.51-67.
5. Cross, N. (1989).Engineering design methods Strategies for Product Design, John Wiley, Chichester
6. George. D. & Mallery, P., SPSS for Windows step by sEep: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4 th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. (2003)
7. Heufler, Gerhard, 2004, Design Basics: From Ideas to Products, Niggli. Zurich.
8. Krippendorff, Klaus and Butter, Reinhart, 1984, Product Semantics: Exploring the Symbolic Qualities of Form, Innovation, Vol. 3, pp.9-39.
9. Krippendorff, Klaus, 1989, Product Semantics: A Triangulation and Four Design Theories, Product Semantics ‘89, Helsinki, UIAH, pp.a3-a23.
10. Krippendorff, Klaus, 1996, On the Essential Contexts of Artifacts or on the proposition that “design is making sense of things.” in Margolin and Buchanan (eds) The Idea of Design, London, The MIT Press, pp.161-173.
11. Landgraf, M, 1992, User-Centered Design, Innovation, Winter, pp.18-20.
12. Leonard, D., & Sensiper, S, 1998, The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group. Innovation. California Management Review, 40(3), 112-132.
13. Lin, C.C. & Luh, D.B. (2007) A Vision-oriented Approach for Innovative Product Design, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Industrial Design, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
14. McCoy, Michael, 1990, “The post industrial designer: interpreter of Technology”, Product Semantics ’89 Conference: UIHA, pp.e1-e13.
15. Souchkov V., Accelerate Innovation with TRIZ, ICG T&C White Paper (2005)
16. Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. D. (1995). Product Design and Development New York: McGraw-Hill.
17. 朱晏樟(2003)。整合TRIZ 與功能分析之設計方法研究。碩士論文，國立成功大學機械工程學系研博士班，台南。
18. 宋明弘編著(2009)。TRIZ萃智：系統性創新理論與應用。鼎茂圖書出版股份有限公司，台北。
19. 杜瑞澤(2004)。生活型態設計：文化、生活、消費者與產品設計。亞太圖書，台北。
20. 林群超(2009)。感性造型構成初探。明志科技大學技術與教學研討會暨台灣感性學會研討會，台北。
21. 林揚智(2004）。以功能分解為基之造形設計方法研究。碩士論文，樹德科技大學應用設計研究所。
22. 吳明隆編著(2003)。SPSS統計應用學習實務：問卷分析與應用統計。知城數位科技，台北。
23. 韋長華(2000)。以Alessi產品造形設計為例探討符號在情感傳達上的作用。碩士論文，國立台灣科技大學設計研究所，台北。
24. 高天志(2005)。TRIZ法應用於工業設計構想發展之初探。碩士論文，國立台灣科技大學設計研究所，台北。
25. 許哲瑋(2008)。TRIZ法之創新原則於產品造形發想之探討。碩士論文，銘傳大學設計管理研究所碩士班，台北。
26. 許玉珍(2009)。條件限制對產品設計的外觀、功能、創意表現的影響。碩士論文，實踐大學產品與建築設計研究所碩士在職專班，台北。
27. 黃德丹（1995）。工業設計師創意發想方法應用之實證分析與探討。國立成功大學工設所碩士論文，台南。
28. 黃茂益(2007)。工業設計學生學習與運用TRIZ發明原則之研究。碩士論文，朝陽科技大學設計研究所，台中市。
29. 曹建中等編著(2009)。產品語意及表達。合肥工業大學出版社，合肥。
30. 陳文印(1997)。設計解讀，亞太圖書出版社，台北。
31. 陳炬主編(2008)。產品型態語意。北京理工大學出版社，北京。
32. 陳浩，高筠(2009)。語意的傳達-產品設計符號理論與方法(第二版) 。中國建築工業出版社，北京。
33. 楊裕富(2000)。創意活力－產品設計方法論，田園城市文化，台北。
34. 楊筑鈞(2003)。產品創新、品牌形象、價格對知覺價值影響之研究。未出版碩士論文。輔仁大學織品服裝學系，台北。
35. 應放天，楊穎，張艷河(2007)。造型基礎─形式與語意。華中科技大學出版社，武漢。

校內：立即公開
校外：2012-07-25公開

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

相關論文