簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 温賜安
Wen, Si-An
論文名稱: 檢測半導體奈米結構之非破壞性微波掃描探針顯微鏡技術的開發
Development of Non-Destructive Microwave SPM-Based Techniques for Semiconductor Nano-Structure Detection
指導教授: 陳宜君
Chen, Yi-Chun
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 理學院 - 物理學系
Department of Physics
論文出版年: 2024
畢業學年度: 112
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 120
中文關鍵詞: 埋層結構半導體微波振幅調製靜電力顯微鏡(AM-EFM)微波邊帶靜電力顯微鏡(Sideband-EFM)微波阻抗顯微鏡(MIM)有限元素分析法(Finite Element Method, FEM)
外文關鍵詞: Semiconductor Buried Dopants, Amplitude Modulated EFM, Sideband EFM, Microwave Impedance Microscopy (MIM), Finite Element Method (FEM)
相關次數: 點閱:540下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 矽基量子元件與積體電路通常內部具有不同摻雜分佈的半導體。在傳統的掃描探針顯微鏡(SPM)技術中,掃描電容顯微鏡(SCM)是測量半導體載子電容的常用方法,然而,SCM測量對樣品有嚴格的限制,例如樣品表面需要有均勻的薄氧化層。
    為此,我們開發了基於微波系統的振幅調製靜電力顯微鏡(AM-EFM)和邊帶靜電力顯微鏡(Sideband-EFM)。這些技術涉及灌入兩種不同頻率的微波,其中一種是高頻載子頻率(約300 MHz)來驅動半導體的較佳載子移動,另一種是調製頻率(約7 kHz和2 kHz) 作為外接鎖相放大器的偵測參考訊號。在定電壓(0 V)下,對埋層結構特製階梯式樣品(Infineon dopant calibration sample)進行非破壞性電容量測。Sideband-EFM由於只考量探針針尖正下方的微分電容梯度,因此可以增加靈敏度。
    接著,將摻雜濃度取對數與訊號大小歸一量化,結合有限元素分析法(Finite Element Method, FEM)商用模擬軟體COMSOL Multiphysics 6.2和理論修正公式擬合(Fitting),這三者可以互相吻合。一方面可以藉由定量模型推測未知半導體的載子濃度區間;另一方面,這樣可以將微波EFM系統的最佳分辨載子濃度提高至1016~1020 cm-3 。此外,進一步的模擬解釋了不同探針效應或環境因素對電容因子的影響,當掃描過程中探針半徑和樣品氧化層厚度…等尺寸的影響,經過歸一化後處理後,結果都是一致適用的。
    進一步,可以根據Sideband-EFM偵測到微波訊號源的側峰Sideband peak強度和穩定性,建立一個標準判斷是否輸入了高頻微波。通過SMA線阻抗匹配後,成功實現載子頻率可調控性,最高可達7.7 GHz的高頻。同時也可以將高頻微波注入二維半導體WSe2和磁性樣品的應用。
    最後,我們自行開發了基於探針下方量測阻抗(Z),並直接換算成電容與電阻的微波阻抗顯微鏡(MIM)。該技術使用網路分析儀(VNA)來量測S11反射率中的阻抗(Z),並通過電腦上的Labview偵測原子力顯微鏡(AFM)的觸發(Trigger)訊號,進一步操控VNA取得相對應的數據mapping圖。這使得我們能夠在更寬頻的量測,擴展至非半導體材料的導電度性質。

    Silicon-based quantum devices and integrated circuits usually have different doping distributions inside. In traditional Scanning Probe Microscopy (SPM), Scanning Capacitance Microscopy (SCM) is a commonly used method to measure carrier capacitance. However, SCM measurements have strict limitations on the sample, such as requiring a uniform thin oxide layer on the sample surface.
    Therefore, we develop microwave systems Amplitude Modulation Electrostatic Force Microscopy (AM-EFM) and Sideband Electrostatic Force Microscopy (Sideband-EFM), and Sideband-EFM can enhance sensitivity. These techniques use two different frequency microwaves, one being a high-frequency carrier frequency (about 300 MHz) to drive better carrier mobility, and the other being a modulation frequency (about 7 kHz and 2 kHz) as a reference signal for an external lock-in amplifier. These methods allow for non-destructive capacitance measurements of Infineon dopant calibration sample with buried structures. Next, the normalized signal magnitude with the logarithm of the doping concentration curves are combined with Finite Element Method (FEM) and theoretical formula fitting. Quantitative model can be used to speculate the carrier concentration range of unknown semiconductors. It also allows the best resolvable carrier concentration to be improved to 1016~1020 cm-3.
    Furthermore, based on the intensity and stability of the sideband peak, a standard can be established to determine whether high-frequency microwaves have been input. This technique can also be applied to 2-D semiconductors like WSe2 and magnetic samples like (Pt/Co)4.
    Finally, we developed a Microwave Impedance Microscopy (MIM), which based on the impedance (Z) directly converts into capacitance (C). This technique uses a vector network analyzer (VNA) to measure the impedance (Z) from reflectivity (S11) reflectance. It is detected by AFM trigger signal through Labview on a computer, further controlling the VNA to obtain corresponding data mapping images. This allows us to measure conductivity properties in a broader frequency range, extending to non-semiconductor materials.

    摘要 I Abstract III 誌謝 XII 目錄 XIV 表目錄 XVI 圖目錄 XVI 第一章 緒論 1 第二章 文獻回顧 4 2.1 金屬氧化物半導體(MIS)結構的電容電壓曲線(C-V curve) 4 2.2 電容顯微鏡的校正分析簡介 9 2.3 微波工程阻抗匹配簡介 12 2.4 磁性材料與斯格明子(Skyrmion)簡介 17 第三章 實驗原理與方法 21 3.1 微波系統下的掃描式探針顯微鏡(SPM) 21 3.1.1 原子力顯微鏡(AFM) 21 3.1.2 微波振幅調製靜電力顯微鏡(AM-EFM) 25 3.1.3 微波邊帶靜電力顯微鏡(Sideband-EFM) 28 3.1.4 掃描電容顯微鏡(SCM) 32 3.1.5 磁力顯微鏡(MFM) 34 3.2 有限元素分析法(FEM)的電容模擬 37 3.3 考量探針效應(TIBB)的理論修正公式 39 第四章 結果與討論 42 4.1 微波Sideband-EFM與AM-EFM的電容定量分析 42 4.1.1 埋層結構半導體的EFM影像 42 4.1.2 數據的電容定量分析 46 4.1.3 理論公式擬合(Fitting)和模擬的電容摻雜濃度曲線(C-n curve) 48 4.1.4 載子濃度可辨別範圍與傳統掃描電容顯微鏡(SCM)的比較 51 4.2 有限元素分析法(FEM)探針效應(TIBB)下的電容影響因子 54 4.2.1 探針效應下的電子濃度圖 54 4.2.2 氧化層厚度、摻雜濃度和介面的影響因子 57 4.3 高頻微波在阻抗匹配(Stub Tuning)下的調控 65 4.3.1 雙株阻抗匹配(Double-Stub Tuning) 65 4.3.2 高頻微波輸入與判讀 66 4.3.3 埋層結構半導體的高頻微波EFM影像與特徵 71 4.3.4 雙層WSe2的高頻微波EFM影像與特徵 73 4.3.5 高頻微波下多層Pt/Co薄膜的磁力訊號與演化 76 4.4 微波阻抗顯微鏡(MIM)的開發 83 4.4.1 網路分析儀(VNA)結合原子力顯微鏡(AFM)與Labview雙向溝通 83 4.4.2 金(Au)電極的MIM影像與阻抗換算等效電容方式 88 4.4.3 埋層結構半導體的MIM影像與電容定量分析 90 第五章 結論 94 參考文獻 96

    [1]R. Fukuzawa et al., Quantitative capacitance measurements in frequency modulation electrostatic force microscopy, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 61, SL1005, (2022).
    [2]Dohyeon Jeon, Yebin Kang, and Taekyeong Lim et al., Observing the Layer-Number-Dependent Local Dielectric Response of WSe2 by Electrostatic Force Microscopy, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 11, (2020), p.6684~6690.
    [3]L Lei et al., Local characterization of mobile charge carriers by two electrical AFM modes: multi-harmonic EFM versus sMIM, J. Phys. Commun., 2, 025013, (2020).
    [4]金天慈, 陳宜君, 結合機器學習技術開發分析載子特性的多維半導體檢測技術, 成功大學, 物理所, (2023).
    [5]Georg Gramse et al., Nanoscale imaging of mobile carriers and trapped charges in delta doped silicon p-n junctions, Nature Electronics, Vol 3, (2020), p.531~538.
    [6]Donald A.Neamen, Semiconductor Physics and Devices (Basic Principle) Fourth Edition, McGraw-Hill Companies, New York, (2012), p.106~184, p.371~433.
    [7]劉恩科、朱秉升、羅晉生, 半導體物理學, 新文京開發出版, (2006), p.309~356.
    [8]Scanning Capacitance Microscopy (SCM) High Resolution and High Sensitivity Imaging of Charge Distribution, (2010).
    [9]張茂楠、陳志遠、潘扶民, 掃描電容顯微鏡分析技術及其在矽晶圓表面分析與應用, 科儀新知, 第二十二卷第五期, (2001), p.67~75.
    [10]F. P. Heiman, and G. Warfield et al., The Effects of Oxide Traps on the MOS Capacitance, IEEE Transactions on electron devices, (1965), p.167~178.
    [11]Robert Stephenson, Anne Verhulst, and Peter De Wolf et al., Nonmonotonic behavior of the scanning capacitance microscope for large dynamic range samples, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 18(1), (2000), p.405~408.
    [12]V. V. Zavyalov, J. S. McMurray, and C. C. Williams et al., Noise in scanning capacitance microscopy measurements, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 18(3), (2000), p.1125~1133.
    [13]sMIM Measurement of Planar Doping Calibration Sample, (2018).
    [14]Kurt A. Rubin, Yongliang Yang, and Oskar Amster et al., Electrical Atomic Force Microscopy for Nanoelectronics Chapter: Scanning Microwave Impedance Microscopy (sMIM) in Electronic and Quantum Materials, PrimeNano Inc, Sandia National Laboratories, (2018), p.1~40.
    [15]O. Amster et al., Parctical quantitative scanning microwave impedance microscopy, Microelectronics Reliability 76-77, (2017), p.214~217.
    [16]T. Schweinbock, and S. Hommel et al., Quantitative Scanning Microwave Microscopy: A calibration flow, Microelectronics Reliability 54, (2014), p.2070~2074.
    [17]Enrico Brinciotti et al., Probing resistivity and doping concentration of semiconductors at the nanoscale using scanning microwave microscopy, Nanoscale, (2015).
    [18]Enrico Brinciotti et al., Frequency Analysis of Dopant Profiling and Capacitance Spectroscopy Using Scanning Microwave Microscopy, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology, VOL. 16, NO. 1, (2017), p.75~82.
    [19]S. Hommel et al., Determination of doping type by calibrated capacitance scanning microwave microscopy, Microelectronics Reliability 76-77, (2017), p.218~221.
    [20]Scanning Microwave Impedance Microscopy (sMIM), (2021), https://www.bruker.com/en/products-and-solutions/microscopes/materials-afm/afm-modes/scanning-microwave-impedance-microscopy-smim.html
    [21]黃壯群…等, 掃描微波阻抗顯微鏡:介電常數與電導率的奈米級成像, 科技新知, 209期, (2016), p.14~28.
    [22]Mark E. Barber, Eric Yue Ma, and Zhi-Xun Shen et al., Microwave impedance microscopy and its application to quantum materials, (2021).
    [23]C Gramse et al., Calibrated complex impedance and permittivity measurements with scanning microwave microscopy, Nanotechnology, 25, 145703, (2014).
    [24]David M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., United States of America, (2011), p.48~77, p.228~245.
    [25]電磁學(二)_黃衍介_2.1~4.5, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvEWRPW9PU4&list=PLI6pJZaOCtF3NiFngO8z36DQ79EFMFH-g
    [26]黃彥霖, 朱英豪, 博士論文, 鐵酸鉍薄膜之鐵電工程 (Engineering the Ferroelectricity in BiFeO3 Thin Films), 交通大學, 材料工程暨科學系, (2017), p.51~61, p.107~111.
    [27]Yen-Lin Huang et al., Unexpected Giant Microwave Conductivity in a Nominally Silent BiFeO3 Domain Wall, Adv. Matter. 32, 1905132, (2020).
    [28]Yoshinori Tokura, and Naoya Kanazawa et al., Magnetic Skyrmion Materials, Chem. Rev., 121, (2021), p.2857~2897.
    [29]K. Everschor-Sitte, J. Masell, R. M. Reeve, and M. Klaui et al., Perspective: Magnetic skyrmions-Overview of recent progress in an active research field, J. Appl. Phys., 124, 240901, (2018).
    [30]Arianna Casiraghi et al., Individual skyrmion manipulation by local magnetic field gradients, Communications Physics, 2, 145, (2019).
    [31]Wenjie Hu et al., Distinguishing artificial spin ice states using magnetoresistance effect for neuromorphic computing, Natures Communications, 14:2562, (2023).
    [32]Weichao Yu, Micromagnetics Module User’s Guide (V 2.02), Fudan University, Shanghai China, Institute for Nanoelectronic devices and Quantum computing, (2022).
    [33]Weiwei Wang, Matijan Beg, Bin Zhang, and Wolfgang Kuch et al., Driving magnetic skyrmions with microwave fields, Physical review B, 92, 020403(R), (2015).
    [34]Martin Lonsky and Axel Hoffmann, Coupled skyrmion breathing modes in synthetic ferri- and antiferromagnets et al., Physics Review B, 102, 104403, (2020).
    [35]曾賢德、果尚志, 奈米電性之掃描探針量測技術, 物理雙月刊, 廿五卷五期, (2003), p.632~648.
    [36]林明彥、張嘉升、黎文龍, 原子力顯微鏡的原理(上)(下), 科技新知, 第二十七卷第二期, (2005), p.46~77.
    [37]Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy Session 1 Amplitude Modulation, (2015), https://vimeo.com/137429761
    [38]C Gramse et al., Theory of amplitude modulated electrostatic force microscopy for dielectric measurements in liquids at MHz frequencies, Nanotechnology 24, 415709, (2013).
    [39]KPFM II Frequency Modulation, (2015), https://vimeo.com/137436396
    [40]Sideband Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy for Advanced Materials Characterization, (2021), https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8l0Xvy05eKE
    [41]Riccardo Borgani et al., Intermodulation electrostatic force microscopy for imaging surface photo-voltage, Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 143113, (2014).
    [42]黃國維, 陳宜君, 基於頻帶激發與機器學習在掃描探針顯微技術上的開發, 成功大學, 物理所, (2020), p.17~20.
    [43]翁詣昕, 陳宜君, 探測表面電位與磁性分布的變頻基礎掃描探針顯微鏡技術開發, 成功大學, 物理所, (2021), p.29~32.
    [44]C B Casper et al., Electrostatic tip effects in scanning probe microscopy of nanostructures, Nanotechnology, 32, 195710, (2021).
    [45]R.Fabregas et al., Three-dimensional modeling of electrical scanning probe microscopy problems. COMSOL Conference, Grenoble (2015).
    [46]Comsol Multiphysics Global Website, Application Gallery(1)MOSCAP 1D: https://www.comsol.com/model/moscap-1d-47551(2)MOSCAP 1D Small Signal: https://www.comsol.com/model/moscap-1d-small-signal-53531(3)Interface Trapping Effects of a MOSCAP: https://www.comsol.com/model/interface-trapping-effects-of-a-moscap-67121(4)Computing Capacitance:https://www.comsol.com/model/computing-capacitance-12689(5)DC Characteristics of a MOS Transistor (MOSFET): https://www.comsol.com/model/dc-characteristics-of-a-mos-transistor-mosfet-14609(6)Small-Signal Analysis of a MOSFET: https://www.comsol.com/model/small-signal-analysis-of-a-mosfet-16381(7)Electrostatically Actuated Cantilever: https://www.comsol.com/model/electrostatically-actuated-cantilever-444
    [47]Peter Reichel, Prof. Dr. Stefan Weber, Prof. Dr. Jure Demsar, Tip-sample capacitance in electrostatic force microscopy, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, department of physics, mathematics and computer science, (2021).
    [48]Mathematica入門, https://www.scribd.com/document/430460341/Mathematica%E8%AC%9B%E7%BE%A9-33-%E6%A0%BC%E5%BC%8F17-pdf

    下載圖示
    2026-07-29公開
    QR CODE