| 研究生: |
賴郁萱 Lai, Yu-Hsuan |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
以群聚觀點建構未登記工廠合法化之評估架構-以嘉義縣為例 A Study of Cluster-Based Evaluation Framework for the Legalization of Unregistered Factories- An Empirical Study of Chiayi County |
| 指導教授: |
閻永祺
Yen, Yung-Ci |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
規劃與設計學院 - 都市計劃學系 Department of Urban Planning |
| 論文出版年: | 2023 |
| 畢業學年度: | 111 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 92 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 未登記工廠 、產業群聚 、工廠管理輔導法 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Unregistered factories, Industrial clusters, Factory Management Act |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:108 下載:1 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
未登記工廠群聚地區合法化依照《工廠管理輔導法》可優先採新訂都市計畫或開發產業園區規劃處理,以銜接國土計畫劃為城鄉發展地區,然《群聚地區認定原則》僅以空間使用比例作為群聚之認定,目前實務上仍需有更多劃設群聚地區與進行合法化之討論。本研究為劃設具有群聚意義之群聚地區與釐清群聚地區合法化之條件,嘗試以產業、廠商及空間群聚觀點辨識具有群聚之空間,並探討合法化可行性以銜接至國土功能分區城鄉發展地區第二之三類劃設。
本研究以嘉義縣未登記工廠與合法工廠為分析資料,結合空間關係與生產關係為研究架構,提出群聚地區劃設方法與合法化評估架構。群聚地區辨識與劃設部分以產業群聚為理論基礎,透過區域空間自相關方法辨識群聚熱點,指認出具有空間關係與生產關係之群聚地區;群聚地區合法化評估以文獻和法規回顧結果提出「土地屬性」、「聚集經濟」和「交通區位」三大類別指標,以層級分析法(AHP法)獲取指標權重,以理想解相似度順序偏好法(TOPSIS法)計算群聚地區可行性分數,求得合法化可行性最高之區域。
本研究將群聚地區分為四種類型,評估結果以納入正式部門且同時具有空間關係與生產關係之群聚類型三為最適宜合法化之類型;其次為納入正式部門具有空間關係之群聚類型一,顯示以群聚觀點納入正式部門和結合生產關係之重要性。因此,群聚地區應從地區產業發展進行整體考量,提出劃設群聚地區應考量生產關係、工廠家數和臨近區位等原則,作為未來立法單位及空間規劃單位之參考。
This study discusses the identification and legalization evaluation of clusters of unregistered factories, proposes a clustering method and a legalization assessment framework, and identifies clusters with spatial and production relationships; evaluates the areas with the highest legalization feasibility based on literature and regulatory review indicators.
The purpose of this study is to explore whether the existing agglomeration area types recognized by the principle of standardization of space use ratio have economic and industrial significance in industrial agglomeration. This study takes the "Agglomeration Area Identification Principles" as the basic threshold for cluster identification, and further combines the space and production relations of industrial clusters to identify agglomeration areas. In order to make the identified agglomeration areas feasible at the legal level, incorporate the indicators of relevant laws and regulations, explore the feasibility of legalization, and finally establish a set of framework and principles.
The research results divide agglomeration areas into four types, among which agglomeration type 3 is the most suitable type for legalization; followed by agglomeration type 1, which shows the importance of incorporating formal departments and combining production relations from the perspective of agglomeration. This study believes that agglomeration areas should be considered from the perspective of regional industrial development, and proposes that the designation of agglomeration areas should consider the principles of production relations, the number of factories, and adjacent locations, as a reference for future legislative units and spatial planning units.
Alañón-Pardo, Á., & Arauzo-Carod, J.-M. (2013). Agglomeration, accessibility and industrial location: Evidence from Spain. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 25(3–4), 135–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2012.710263
Alañon-Pardo, A., Walsh, P. J., & Myro, R. (2018). Do neighboring municipalities matter in industrial location decisions? Empirical evidence from Spain. Empirical Economics, 55(3), 1145–1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-017-1307-5
Anselin, L. (1995). Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27(2), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x
Arabsheibani, R., Kanani Sadat, Y., & Abedini, A. (2016). Land suitability assessment for locating industrial parks: A hybrid multi criteria decision-making approach using Geographical Information System. Geographical Research, 54(4), 446–460. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12176
Arauzo Carod, J. M. (2005). Determinants of industrial location: An application for Catalan municipalities*. Papers in Regional Science, 84(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2005.00006.x
Belton, V., & Gear, T. (1983). On a short-coming of Saaty’s method of analytic hierarchies. Omega, 11(3), 228–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(83)90047-6
Breschi, S., & Beaudry, C. (2003). Are Firms in Clusters Really More Innovative? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 12, 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590290020197
Carlino, G. A. (1978a). Agglomeration economies: A survey of the literature. In G. A. Carlino (Ed.), Economies of scale in manufacturing location: Theory and measure (pp. 6–29). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4069-0_2
Carlino, G. A. (1978b). Economies of scale in manufacturing location (Vol. 12). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-4069-0
Duranton, G. (2008). Cities. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/28044
Feige, E. L. (1990). Defining and estimating underground and informal economies: The new institutional economics approach. World Development, 18(7), 989–1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(90)90081-8
Getis, A., & Ord, J. K. (1992). The Analysis of Spatial Association by Use of Distance Statistics. Geographical Analysis, 24(3), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x
Hayter, R. (1997). The Dynamics of Industrial Location: The Factory, the Firm and the Production System.
Ho, W., & Ma, X. (2018). The state-of-the-art integrations and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 267(2), 399–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.09.007
Islam, A., Sayeed, M. A., Rahman, M. K., Ferdous, J., Islam, S., & Hassan, M. M. (2021). Geospatial dynamics of COVID-19 clusters and hotspots in Bangladesh. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases, 68(6), 3643–3657. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13973
Kim, H., Ahn, S., & Ulfarsson, G. F. (2018). Transportation infrastructure investment and the location of new manufacturing around South Korea’s West Coast Expressway. Transport Policy, 66, 146–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.02.016
Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing Returns and Economic Geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483–499.
Lin, S.-W., & Ben, T.-M. (2009). Impact of government and industrial agglomeration on industrial land prices: A Taiwanese case study. Habitat International, 33(4), 412–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.01.001
Marshall, A. (2013). Principles of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137375261
Nathan, M., & Overman, H. (2013). Agglomeration, clusters, and industrial policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 29(2), 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grt019
Overman, H., & Venables, A. (2005). Cities in the Developing World.
Ramya, S., & Devadas, V. (2019). Integration of GIS, AHP and TOPSIS in evaluating suitable locations for industrial development: A case of Tehri Garhwal district, Uttarakhand, India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 238, 117872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117872
Roy, A. (2005). Urban Informality: Toward an Epistemology of Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360508976689
Ruiz, M. C., Romero, E., Pérez, M. A., & Fernández, I. (2012). Development and application of a multi-criteria spatial decision support system for planning sustainable industrial areas in Northern Spain. Automation in Construction, 22, 320–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2011.09.009
Saaty, T. L. (1984). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Decision Making in Complex Environments. In R. Avenhaus & R. K. Huber (Eds.), Quantitative Assessment in Arms Control (pp. 285–308). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2805-6_12
Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I
Sun, J., Cherian, J., Deng, D., Yucel, A. G., Sial, M. S., Fu, Q., & Cismas, L. M. (2022). The Relationship Between Rail Transit and Industrial Agglomeration: Mediating Effect of Labor Agglomeration. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.875914
Thulare, M. H., Moyo, I., & Xulu, S. (2021). Systematic Review of Informal Urban Economies. Sustainability, 13(20), Article 20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011414
Viladecans-Marsal, E. (2004). Agglomeration economies and industrial location: City-level evidence. Journal of Economic Geography, 4(5), 565–582. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlecg/lbh040
Yoon, K. P., & Hwang, C.-L. (1995). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction. SAGE Publications.
Yuan, Y., Cave, M., & Zhang, C. (2018). Using Local Moran’s I to identify contamination hotspots of rare earth elements in urban soils of London. Applied Geochemistry, 88, 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2017.07.011
Zhao, K., Zhang, L., Dong, J., Wu, J., Ye, Z., Zhao, W., Ding, L., & Fu, W. (2020). Risk assessment, spatial patterns and source apportionment of soil heavy metals in a typical Chinese hickory plantation region of southeastern China. Geoderma, 360, 114011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.114011
陳姿伶, & 張家瑄. (2019). 初探違章工廠空間群聚/離散暨違章工廠群聚形成因子. 建築與規劃學報, 20(2), 97–113.
董建宏. (2012). 站在台灣農業發展的十字口:1970年代台灣農業政策轉變對農地與農業、農村發展之衝擊. 跨界:大學與社會參與, 2. https://doi.org/10.29921/IUSE.201212.0005
胡學彥, & 葉光毅. (1989). 工廠之工業區選擇模式及其適用上之比較檢討. 都市與計劃, 16, 27–38.
溫在弘, 劉擇昌, & 林民浩. (2010). 犯罪地圖繪製與熱區分析方法及其應用:以1998~2007年臺北市住宅竊盜犯罪為例. 52, 43–63.
鄧振源、曾國雄 (1989) 。層級分析法(AHP) 的內涵特性與應用。中國統計學報,27:7卷,13767-13786。
葉春國, 莊永忠, & 廖學誠. (2013). 水里溪上游集水區檳榔園熱點空間分析之研究. 中華水土保持學報, 44(3). https://doi.org/10.29417/JCSWC.201309_44(3).0002
蘇曉瑞, & 邊泰明. (2022). 國土計畫城鄉發展地區第2-3類如何面對未登記工廠?以臺中市的劃設為例. 土地問題研究季刊, 21(3), 115–129.
夏鑄九. (1988). 空間形式演變中之依賴與發展-台灣彰化平原的個案. 台灣社會研究季刊, 1(2 & 3). https://doi.org/10.29816/TARQSS.198807.0007
顏亮一. (2021). 拼裝塭仔圳:產業群聚與非正式都市化. 台灣社會研究季刊, 118, 1–54.
洪鴻智, & 黃于芳. (2010). 農村工業污染風險知覺的空間特性與決定因素. 臺灣土地研究, 13(2), 31–57. https://doi.org/10.6677/JTLR.201011_13(2).0002
葉春國, 莊永忠, 廖學誠. (2013). 水里溪上游集水區檳榔園熱點空間分析之研究. https://ir.lib.nchu.edu.tw/handle/11455/84768
楊松齡.(1988).我國現行工業區開發策略之剖析--區位選擇與開發規模分析.國立政治大學.
陳建彰. (2021). 以工業發展的角度探討影響未登記工廠分布之區域特徵因素. 國立成功大學.
陳郁芬. (2021). 嘉義地區未登記工廠之區位特性研究.國立成功大學.
洪柳益. (2014). 農地上未登記工廠輔導合法化之研究-以台中市為例 .國立暨南國際大學.
閻永祺. (2012). 產業空間群聚之辨識─以臺灣製造業為例 . 國立成功大學.
詹雅琬. (2007). 地方政府對違章工廠管理之研究-以彰化縣為例 .東海大學.
張家嘉. (2019). 未登記工廠合法化示範計畫之研究–以小型產業園區設置為例 .逢甲大學.https://doi.org/10.6341/fcu.M0622966
吳柏澍. (2019). 「農村長工廠」到「農地種工廠」:台中都會區的延展都市化. 國立臺灣大學.https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU201902381
國土計畫法. Retrieved 12 August 2022, from https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=D0070230&kw=%e5%9c%8b%e5%9c%9f%e8%a8%88%e7%95%ab%e6%b3%95
工廠管理輔導法. Retrieved 12 August 2022, from https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=J0030043&kw=%e5%b7%a5%e5%bb%a0%e7%ae%a1%e7%90%86%e8%bc%94%e5%b0%8e%e6%b3%95
建築技術規則建築設計施工編. Retrieved 12 August 2022, from https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=D0070115&kw=%e5%bb%ba%e7%af%89%e6%8a%80%e8%a1%93%e8%a6%8f%e5%89%87%e5%bb%ba%e7%af%89%e8%a8%ad%e8%a8%88%e6%96%bd%e5%b7%a5%e7%b7%a8
未登記工廠補辦臨時工廠登記辦法. Retrieved 12 August 2022, from https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=J0030105&kw=%e6%9c%aa%e7%99%bb%e8%a8%98%e5%b7%a5%e5%bb%a0%e8%a3%9c%e8%be%a6%e8%87%a8%e6%99%82%e5%b7%a5%e5%bb%a0%e7%99%bb%e8%a8%98%e8%be%a6%e6%b3%95
特定工廠登記辦法. Retrieved 12 August 2022, from https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=J0030152&kw=%e7%89%b9%e5%ae%9a%e5%b7%a5%e5%bb%a0%e7%99%bb%e8%a8%98%e8%be%a6%e6%b3%95
非都市土地使用管制規則. Retrieved 12 August 2022, from https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=D0060013&kw=%e9%9d%9e%e9%83%bd%e5%b8%82%e5%9c%9f%e5%9c%b0%e4%bd%bf%e7%94%a8%e7%ae%a1%e5%88%b6%e8%a6%8f%e5%89%87