| 研究生: |
黃勝隆 Huang, Sheng-Lung |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
金控成立後銀行員工滿意度之研究-
以高雄市金控公司為例 A Study on the Satisfaction of Bank Employee in the Financial Holding Company |
| 指導教授: |
溫敏杰
Wen, Min-Jye 吳宗正 Wu, Chung-Cheng |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 高階管理碩士在職專班(EMBA) Executive Master of Business Administration (EMBA) |
| 論文出版年: | 2003 |
| 畢業學年度: | 91 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 81 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 工作特性 、組織文化 、員工滿意度 、金融控股公司 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Organization culture, work characteristics, employee satisfaction, financial holding company |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:104 下載:11 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
二十一世紀影響台灣金融最重要的事,莫過於許多金融法案的通過,並提供誘因使銀行自願合併,希望藉著合併可以舒緩因銀行家數過多,競爭過於激烈的情況;2001年6月28日立法院三讀通過金融控股公司法,金融控股公司法的成立,鼓勵成員內的子公司進行交叉行銷,提高手續費收入,金控法實施後,對台灣金融版圖產生不小的震撼,政府希望藉金控法的推動鼓勵金融業者合併。而金控公司為降低人事成本,預計未來會大幅精簡人力,本研究期望能由下而上,從銀行員工的角度探討金控成立後對工作之滿意程度,提供予管理者作為參考。
本研究從人力資源面,來探討金控公司成立後,員工對其銀行之滿意度。而研究對象及研究範圍,主要從高雄市已成立金控之銀行為主要研究對象,針對銀行員工以隨機抽樣方式進行員工滿意度研究。本研究採用問卷調查法,問卷之設計、問卷之建構,除引用相關文獻的探討外,並參酌相關產業界之意見及各銀行的組織氣候調查表,歸納及選擇衡量指標,信度分析檢定採用Cronbach's α係數,來檢定量表內部一致性程度及其穩定性。研擬初步評量構面與量表題目,經因素分析後得到正式問卷。並以典型相關分析,驗證量表的相關性,運用統計分析方法交叉表作差異分析。透過上述驗證結果確認量表信度,再以二階段之集群分析,進一步分析金融控股公司成立後,其銀行員工滿意度差異之原因。
針對金控公司所屬之銀行員工之滿意度研究發現,目前銀行組織文化以支持進取式文化為主,創新式文化為次,少有官僚式文化;而工作特性部份為當銀行員工對自己的工作愈具有自主能力,其對於本身能力與同事友誼之工作滿意程度愈高。
The most important impact on Taiwan Financial Industry of the 21st century is the legislation of many new financial acts to induce consequential merge of the banks. Hopefully, this merge may be able to diminish an over competitive situation from too many banks in Taiwan. On June 28, 2001, the Legislative Yuan of Taiwan passed the Financial Holding Company Law. This law encourages the subsidiaries of a holding company to do cross sales and to increase income from service charges. What the government promoted was bank merge, while after this Financial Holding Company Law being enacted; the original financial territory was deeply shacked. To cut down employment costs, these financial holding companies are expected to layoff many workers in the near future. This thesis is trying bottom up from the bank employee’s point of view to research their work satisfaction after the financial bolding companies being incorporated and to provide the company executives a good reference.
This research takes the human resource issues to study the employee satisfaction towards his/her employ banks after the financial holding companies incorporated. The targeted sample and area are banks under financial holding companies in Kaohsiung city. A random sampling survey was held among these banks’ employee. This research used questionnaire survey. This questionnaire was generalized and the evaluation index was chosen from volumes of reference papers and the comments of the experts in bank industry and also referred to different bank organization atmosphere checklists. The validity analysis was qualified by Cronbach’s α to check the unity and stability of the related factors. After a draft questionnaire was pre-tested and experimented, the formal one was confirmed and distributed. The collected effective answers was analyzed by canonical correlation to testify the relationship of the scales, then, a statistical method was used to do differentiation analysis. Through the above probation, the validity of the scale was confirmed and two stages of cluster analysis was then executed to find out the reason of the bank employee satisfaction difference before and after the financial holding companies’ incorporation.
The result of this research supports that current bank organization culture is mostly aggressive, then renovate while few bureaucratic. About work characteristics, when a bank employee has more self-determine power, he is more satisfied with his own capability and the friendship of his colleagues.
中文部份
1.王文宇(2001),控股公司與金融控股公司法,元照圖書出版公司。
2.白景文(2002),知識管理的重要性與對企業的影響。民91年9月11日,取自:http://www. Asia-learning.com/steven/article/19658092/
3.吳保進(1999),視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究,心理出版社。
4.吳萬益、林清河(2001),企業研究方法。台北,華泰文化事業股份有限公司。
5.吳萬益、蔡明田、汪昭芬、王世偉(2000),國內主要集團企業領導風格、企業文化及組織運作特色之研究,商管科技季刊,第一卷,第一期。
6.吳統雄(1990),電話調查:理論與方法(第二版),聯經出版社。
7.吳顯宗(2000),金融控股公司與綜合銀行制度之研究,財稅研究第29卷第期,頁186-200。
8.李清潭、姜智逸(2000),自由化併購風潮下,對於企業組織的再省思:兼論中小企業的處境。「2000 年金融危機下的併購風潮:中小企業與從業人員的因應之道」學術研討會論文,南區中小企業研訓中心、中山大學企業管理學系主辦。
9.李誠(2002),人力資源管理的12堂課,天下文化書坊。
10.邱振崑(1987)譯,銀行業務自由化與金融服務業的新競爭,幼獅出版社,台北。
11.沈文恕(1978),「工作特性與工作滿足之關係一我國實驗銀行與非實驗銀行之比較」,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
12.商業周刊(2001),732期。
13.張瑞春(1998),組織變革中組織氣候對工作投入、組織承諾及工作滿足影響之研究─以中國石油公司高雄營業處為例,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
14.張潤書教授榮退紀念論文集 / 新世紀的行政理論與實務,張潤書教授榮退紀念論文集編輯委員會編,台北市,三民書局,(2001)。
15.許士軍(2000),管理學。台北,台灣東華書局股份有限公司。
16.許紋瑛著「金融控股公司之法制建構-以美日比較法觀點評析我國相關立法」,中原大學財經法律研究所碩士論文,民國90年1月。
17.陳順宇(2000),多變量分析,(第二版),華泰書局。
18.陳麗芳(2002),領導型態、工作壓力、組織承諾與工作滿意度相關之研究-以台灣和中國大陸護理人員為例,國立成功大學,第二屈兩岸產業發展與經營管理學術研討會論文集上冊。
19.黃世鑫(2001),金融業的總體發展環境之變遷:金融業的過去、現在和未來,台北:銀行員全聯會。
20.黃麗華(1996),「大學職員工作滿足之研究」,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
21.楊牧青(2000),工作特性,人格特質與工作滿意度關係之研究:以高雄港務局員工為例,國立成功大學交通管理科學研究所碩士論文。
22.楊澤泉(1992),金融自由化中高雄市銀行競爭策略之研究,高雄市政府研考會。
23.經濟日報社(2002),金融證券年鑑2001年。
24.詹益裕(2001),金融機構合併對經營利益及員工權益的影響研究—以台銀、土銀、中信局為例,中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
25.銀行員工會全國聯合會(2000),民營銀行行員「工作與生活」問卷調查報告。
26.萬瑩屏(1997),「從組織生態理論觀點探討組織生死與組織轉變」國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
27.蔡林亮(1993),勞工工作價值觀、組織氣候與工作滿意度之關係研究以嘉義地區製造業勞工為例,國立中正大學勞工研究所碩士論文。
28.蔡俊良(1994),「組織文化、員工生涯定位與其生涯發展需求、工作滿意度之相關研究」國立彰化師範大學輔導學系碩士論文。
29.鍾燕宜(1986),我國工作滿足研究的整合分析,東海大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
英文部份
1.Akhavein, Jalai D., Allen N. Berger, and David Humphrey (1997), "The Effects of Megamergers on Efficiency and Prices: Evidence from a Bank Profit Function," Review of Industrial Organization 12, pp.124.
2.Berger, N.Allen (1998),"The Efficiency Effects of Bank Mergers and Acquisition: A Preliminary Look at the 1990s Data," In Bank Mergers & Acquisitions, eds.Y. Amihud and G. Miller. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
3.Cameron, K. S. (1985), Culture Congruence Strength and Type: Relationships to Effective, Working Paper, Business School, and University of Michigan.
4.Campbell, John Angus (1970), “Darwin and the Origin of Species,” in Speech Monographs. Vol. 38, pp.1- pp. 11.
5.Chami, R., and Fullenkamp, Connel(2002)”, Trust and efficiency,” Journal of Banking and Finance Volume: 26, Issue: 9, pp .1785-1809.
6.Deal, T. E., & Kennedy(1982), A. A., Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
7.Du Boff, Richard B. and Edwards Herman,(2001 )”Mergers, Concentration, and the Erosion of Democracy,” Monthly Review(May),pp.14-29.
8.Dymski, Gary A.(1999), The Bank Merger Wave: The Economic Causes and Social Consequences of Financial Consolidation, M. E. Sharpe, Inc.
9.Furlong, Fred(1998). Economic Letters, Federal Reserve Bank of San Fransisco. [http://www.frbsf.org].
10.Hackman, J.R. and Lawler, E.E.(1971):“Employee reactions to job characteristics”, Journal of Applied Psychology 55:259-286.
11.Hackman, J.R.&Oldham, G.R.(1975): “ Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60:159-170. Satisfaction," American Sociological Review, 42,124-145.
12.Hahnel, Robin(1999), Panic Rules! : Everything You Need to Know About the Global Economy, South End Press Cambrige, MA.
13.Herzberg (1968), Work and the nature of man, London: Granada.
14.Hoppock, R. (1935), Job Satisfaction, Happer & Row, New York
15.International Labor Organization (2001), The Impact of Mergers and Acquisitions in the Banking and Insurance Sector.
16.Kalleberg, A. (1977), Work Values and Work Rewards.
17.Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. P. (1996), and The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action, Harvard Business School Press.
18.Kawamoto, Yuko, (2000), M&A Won’t Save Japanese Banks. McKinsey Quarterly, Number 4,110-112.
19.Kwan, S. (2002),"Operating Performance of Banks Among Asian Economies: An International and Time Series Comparison," FRBSF Working Paper, 2002.
20.Kwan, S, Mark Flannery and M. Nimalendran. (1999),"Market Evidence on the Opaqueness of Banking Firms' Assets," FRBSF Working Paper, pp. 99-110.
21.Kwan, S. (1999),"Mergers of Publicly Traded Banking Organizations Revisited," Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Economic Review, 84(4), pp. 26-37.3
22.Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2001), “Organizational behavior,” McGraw-Hill. New York, U.S.A.
23.Leyshon, Andrew,(2001),” Financial Services Mergers and Acquisitions,” Consumer Impacts.
24.Porter, L.W. & Lawler, E.E. (1968), "Managerial attitudes and performance," Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
25.Price J. (1972), “Handbook of Organizational Measurement. Lexington,” MA: Heath.
26.Robbins, Stephen P. (1989), Organizational Behavior- concept, controversies, and applications, Prentice-Hall International editions.
27.Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational Culture and Leadership. Sand-Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28.Seashore, S. E. & Taber, T.D. (1975), Job satisfaction and their correlates: American Behavior & Scientists.
29.Shaw, Jason D. Duffy, Michelle K. Hussain Ali Abdulla, Mohamed, Singh, Romila(2000) The moderating role of positive affectivity: empirical evidence from bank employees in the United Arab Emirates,” Journal of Management, Vol. 26, Issue1, 2000, pp. 139- pp.154.
30.Smith P.C. Kendall L.M. & Hulin C.L. (1969), “The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement,” Rand McNally., Chicago.
31.Soper, John C. (2001), “What’s Next for Consolidation in Banking ?,”Business Economics(April):pp.39- pp.43.
32.Spiegel J. W., & Gart A. (1996), “What lies behind the bank merger and acquisition frenzy? ” Business Economics, 31, pp.47- pp.52.
33.Turner A.N.&Lawrance P.R. (1965),“Industrial jobs and the worker”, Boston: Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration.
34.Vroom Victor. (1973), “A New Look at Managerial Decision-Making,” Organizational Behavior, Spring Verlay, pp. 66- pp.80.
35.Wallace, Charles P. (1999), “The Takeover Cowboys,” Times(April 1999).
36.Weiss D. J., Dawis R. V., England G. W., and Lofquist L.H. (1967),” Minnesota satisfaction questionnaire [MSQ],”pp.154- pp.158.
37.Wallach E. J. (1983), Individuals and organizations: The cultural match: Training and Development Journal 37(2), pp.29- pp.36.
38.Weiss, Howard M.(2002), “Deconstructing job satisfaction: Separating evaluations, beliefs and affective experiences,” Human Resource Management Review Volume 12, Issue 2, pp. 173- pp.194.