簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 林室均
Lin, Shih-Chun
論文名稱: 嚴重腦損傷病童之父母參與醫療決策心路歷程初探
Psychological process of parents’ participation in decision making for children with severe brain injury
指導教授: 黃美智
Huang, Mei-Chih
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 醫學院 - 護理學系
Department of Nursing
論文出版年: 2017
畢業學年度: 105
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 101
中文關鍵詞: 嚴重腦損傷父母醫療決策心路歷程現象學
外文關鍵詞: Severe brain injury, Parents, Decision making, Psychological process, Phenomenology
相關次數: 點閱:126下載:26
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 背景:嚴重腦損傷病童需接受多種侵入性治療,甚至面臨維生醫療的抉擇。父母參與病童醫療決策承受多重壓力與挫折,然目前卻沒有研究探討其決策心路歷程的本質。

    目的:探討嚴重腦損傷病童之父母參與醫療決策心路歷程的本質結構。

    方法:採「立意取樣」,自 2015 年至 2017 年間於南部某醫學中心兒童加護病房,選出研究者曾參與照護之 2 位嚴重腦損傷病童,徵得其父母的同意後,共有 3 位父母參與此研究。採用「描述現象學」研究法,以半結構式的訪談大綱作為指引,進行深度訪談。所得的文本依據 Colaizzi(1978)現象學分析步驟進行分析歸納。

    結果:父母參與醫療決策之心路歷程則包含八個主題組型,分別為四種正向經驗:(一)不棄的愛、(二)為孩子發聲、(七)永生福氣、(八)轉化和諧,及四種負向經驗:(一)非我所願;(二)不解命運;(三)悔恨罪惡;(四)埋葬希望的心路歷程轉折。研究結果發現父母決策心路歷程的本質為「轉化希望」,突顯希望感對父母因應孩子嚴重腦損傷之過渡的重要性。

    結論/建議:本研究發現父母經歷正負向經驗轉換的心路歷程,其中信仰帶給父母的希望感為面對孩子嚴重腦損傷時之醫療決策有重大影響。臨床醫護人員應建立信任與良善健康溝通互動的環境,提供文化融合性照護,再賦權給父母參與困難的醫療決策。未來研究可持續探討文化融合性照護幫助父母評估孩子醫療的利弊得失與面對喪子之慟的短期和長期成效。本研究結果可增進醫護人員對嚴重腦損傷病童之父母參與醫療決策經驗的整體性瞭解。期能成為臨床醫護人員協助家屬面對困難醫療抉擇時,尋找著力點之重要參考資料,落實以家庭為中心之照護,達成「參與式醫療決策」的目的。

    Parents who have a child diagnosed with severe brain injury participate in making difficult medical decisions for their child. The present study aimed to explore the psychological process of parents’ participation in decision making for children with severe brain injury. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with three parents of two children with severe brain injury at a medical center in southern Taiwan between 2015 and 2017. Data were collected and analyzed using Colaizzi’s (1978) phenomenological approach. Eight themes were conducted, including four positive experiences: (1) not giving up on love, (2) speaking for the child, (3) forever blessed, (4) transforming to harmony, and four negative experiences: (1) not doing on my will, (2) not understanding fate, (3) being regret and guilty, (4) burying the hope. Finally, “transforming hope” emerged as the essence of the parents’ experience. Practice implications and recommendations include establishing an environment that builds trust and good health communication, providing culturally congruent care and support before empowering parents to make difficult decisions.

    第一章 緒論..........................................................................................1 第一節 研究背景...................................................................................2 第二節 研究動機與重要性....................................................................3 第三節 研究問題...................................................................................4 第四節 名詞定義...................................................................................4 一、嚴重腦損傷....................................................................................4 二、參與醫療決策................................................................................5 三、維生醫療.......................................................................................5 第二章 文獻探討...................................................................................6 第一節 父母參與醫療決策之內在限制...................................................6 一、決策責任的內在限制.....................................................................6 二、關懷責任的內在限制.....................................................................7 三、照顧責任的內在限制.....................................................................8 四、信仰責任的內在限制.....................................................................9 第二節 父母參與醫療決策之外在限制.................................................10 一、社會文化因素..............................................................................10 二、疾病軌跡因素..............................................................................11 (一)突發非預期性末期的病況..............................................................11 (二)慢性威脅生命的病況.....................................................................12 三、醫療照護者與環境因素................................................................14 四、溝通互動因素..............................................................................14 第三節 父母面對孩子罹病之過渡........................................................15 第三章 方法論與研究方法..................................................................17 第一節 研究方法的選擇......................................................................17 第二節 現象學方法論..........................................................................18 一、現象學的定義..............................................................................18 二、現象學的內涵..............................................................................18 (一)意識、意向性與認識的真諦..........................................................19 (二)語言..............................................................................................20 (三)生活經驗的基本結構與本質...........................................................20 三、現象學於研究方法上之應用.........................................................20 (一)置入括弧.......................................................................................21 (二)存而不論.......................................................................................21 第三節 研究設計與實施......................................................................21 一、資料收集.....................................................................................22 (一)與研究參與者建立關係..................................................................22 (二)資料收集方式................................................................................23 二、研究參與者與研究場域的選定.....................................................25 (一)參與者的選擇................................................................................25 (二)研究場域.......................................................................................25 三、資料整理與分析...........................................................................26 (一)資料整理.......................................................................................26 (二)資料分析.......................................................................................26 1. 敘說文本的抄騰與整體閱讀............................................................27 2. 形成有意義的語句..........................................................................28 3. 將有意義語句中萃取出意義............................................................29 4. 統整意義集合成主題.......................................................................31 5. 整合出調查現象後的結果,並詳盡地描述.........................................31 6. 詳盡地描述現象本質的架構............................................................32 7. 將主題結果交給研究參與者確認.....................................................32 第四節 敏感性議題研究......................................................................33 第五節 研究嚴謹性之確保..................................................................36 一、確實性.........................................................................................36 二、可轉換性.....................................................................................37 三、可信賴性.....................................................................................38 四、可確認性.....................................................................................38 五、真實性.........................................................................................39 第六節 研究者的背景..........................................................................39 第七節 研究者的主觀性檢視...............................................................41 一、個人透鏡.....................................................................................42 二、正義透鏡.....................................................................................42 三、關懷透鏡.....................................................................................42 第八節 前瞭解自我省察之反思報告....................................................43 第九節 倫理相關議題..........................................................................45 一、尊重個人的意願...........................................................................45 二、不危害參與者的身心...................................................................45 三、確保個人隱私..............................................................................46 四、建立誠信互惠的關係...................................................................46 第四章 研究結果.................................................................................47 第一節 研究參與者基本資料描述........................................................47 第二節 父母參與醫療決策之心路歷程.................................................48 一、非我所願.....................................................................................50 二、不棄的愛.....................................................................................51 三、不解命運.....................................................................................51 四、悔恨罪惡.....................................................................................52 五、埋葬希望.....................................................................................53 六、為孩子發聲..................................................................................54 七、永生福氣.....................................................................................54 八、轉化和諧.....................................................................................55 第三節 嚴重腦損傷病童之父母參與醫療決策心路歷程之本質結構......55 第五章 討論........................................................................................57 第一節 父母個人特質..........................................................................57 第二節 父母與神明的依附關係...........................................................58 第三節 醫療照護者與父母互動...........................................................60 一、醫療照護者與父母溝通不良.........................................................60 (一)過於簡短的醫療選擇解釋..............................................................61 (二)延遲告知的醫療訊息.....................................................................61 (三)孩子預後的解釋不足.....................................................................62 (四)醫療照護者的用詞造成的錯誤期待................................................62 (五)片段性的病情解釋.........................................................................63 二、醫療照護者與父母對腦死概念的差異...........................................63 第四節 臨床情境.................................................................................65 一、病情變化.....................................................................................65 二、醫療複雜度.................................................................................66 三、加護病房情境............,.................................................................66 第六章 結論與建議.............................................................................68 第一節 研究優勢與限制......................................................................68 一、研究優勢.....................................................................................68 二、研究限制.....................................................................................69 第二節 結論........................................................................................69 第三節 研究結果之應用與建議...........................................................71 一、臨床實務方面..............................................................................71 (一)與父母之希望相伴.........................................................................71 (二)促進父母參與醫療決策的轉換.......................................................72 (三)促進與父母間良善溝通..................................................................72 (四)文化融合性照護............................................................................73 二、護理教育方面..............................................................................74 三、未來研究設計..............................................................................75 參考文獻............................................................................................77 附件一 人體研究倫理審查委員會審查通過證明...................................90 附件二 訪談大綱.................................................................................92 附件三 主題命名與編碼群聚表...........................................................94 附件四 研究參與者回饋表..................................................................96

    內政部戶政司統計處(2017,7 月)‧105 年度死因統計‧2017 年 8 月 21 日取自: https://goo.gl/jSdfR3。
    石朝穎(2012)‧現象學與古典哲學的詮釋問題.臺北市:台灣商務。
    列小慧(2009).敘事從家庭開始—敘事治療的實踐歷程(二版).香港:突破出版社。
    余玉眉(1991).方法論.載於余玉眉、田聖芳、蔣欣欣主編,質性研究:田野研究法於護理學之應用(15-154 頁).臺北市:巨流。
    吳汝鈞(2001).胡塞爾現象學解析.臺北市:臺灣商務。
    吳秀瑾(2010).關懷倫理學的規範性,生命教育研究,2(1),109-134。
    呂季紋、黃棣棟、穆佩芬(2011).護理人員照顧癌症病童臨終時的經驗.護理雜誌, 58(4),37-46。
    法務部全國法規資料庫工作小組(2012,12 月).腦死判定準則,2017 年 8 月 21 日取自 https://goo.gl/5yr6cN。
    法務部全國法規資料庫工作小組(2013,1 月).安寧緩和醫療條例,2017 年 8 月 21日取自 https://goo.gl/HhKyej。
    邱浩彰、洪祖培(2006).腦死判定道德醫學倫理層面的探討.於洪祖培編著,腦死(73-78 頁).臺北市:合記。
    柴熙(2002).認識論.臺北市:臺灣商務。
    高淑清(2001).在美華人留學生太太的生活世界:詮釋與反思.本土心理學研究,(16), 225-285。
    陳玉涓(2016).兒童加護病房死亡病童與不施行心肺復甦術醫療照護之探討(碩士論文). 取自 https://goo.gl/8AUqya
    陳向明(2016).社會科學質的研究.臺北市:五南。
    陳榮華(2006).海德格存有與時間闡釋(二版).臺北市:臺大出版中心。
    趙可式(2006).安寧療護的臨床倫理困境及案例討論.於安寧緩和醫學會及安寧緩和護理學會主辦,安寧緩和醫學及護理年會講義.台北:淡水馬偕醫院。
    蔡甫昌(2007).臨床倫理病案討論.臺北市:橘井文化。
    盧美秀(2005)。護理行政與管理.臺北市:五南。
    盧美秀(2013)。護理倫理與法律(二版).臺北市:華杏。
    穆佩芬(2000).現象學研究法.於陳月枝總校閱,質性護理研究方法(59-86 頁). 臺北市:護望。
    賴維淑(2012)。哀傷的意義與癌末病人死亡前後照顧者哀傷撫慰需求(博士論文). 取自成功大學電子學位論文服務。(系統編號 U0026-1007201208290900)
    鍾玉娟、李智峰、張莉琴(2003).護理質性研究—促進人道主義的權威.臺北市: 五南。
    Heidegger, M. (1993). 走向語言之途(孫周興譯).臺北市:時報文化。(原著出版於1971)
    Husserl, E. (1987).現象學觀念—胡塞爾講稿(倪梁康譯).臺北市:南方叢書。(原著出版於 1907)
    Husserl, E. (1994). 純粹現象學通論(李幼蒸譯).臺北市:桂冠。(原著出版於 1913)
    Moran, D. (2005). 現象學導論(蔡錚雲譯).臺北:桂冠。(原著出版於 1999)
    White, M. (2008a). 敘事治療的工作地圖(黃孟嬌譯).臺北市:張老師文化。(原著出版於 2007)
    White, M. (2008b). 說故事的魔力:兒童與敘事治療(李淑珺譯).臺北市:心靈工坊。(原著出版於 2008)
    Worden, J. W. (2011).悲傷輔導與悲傷治療:心理衛生實務工作者手冊(李開敏、林方皓、張玉仕、葛書倫譯).臺北市:心理。(原著出版於 2008)
    Allen, K. A. (2014). Parental decision-making for medically complex infants and children: An integrated literature review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 51(9), 1289-1304. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.02.003
    American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Bioethics (2016). Informed consent in decision-making in pediatric practice. Pediatrics, 138(2), e20161484. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-1484
    Araki, T., Yokota, H., & Fuse, A. (2016). Brain death in pediatric patients in Japan: Diagnosis and unresolved issues. Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica, 56, 1-8. doi: 10.2176/nmc.ra.2015-0231
    Association for Children with Life-threatening or Terminal Conditions and their Families (2009). A guide to the development of children's palliative care services (3rd ed.). London: Association for Children’s Palliative Care.
    Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2012). Principles of biomedical ethics (7th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Beck, C. T. (2009). The arm: There is no escaping the reality for mothers of children with obstetric brachial plexus injuries. Nursing Research, 58, 237-245. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e3181ac10da
    Berlinger, N., Jennings, B., & Wolf, S. M. (2013). The Hastings Center guidelines for decisions on life-sustaining treatment and care near the end of life (2th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Brain Injury Association of America (2015). About brain injury. Retrieved from http://www.biausa.org/about-brain-injury.htm#Hypoxic Brain Injury
    Brown, E. (2007). The end of life phase of care. In E. Brown, B. Warr, & S. Shribman (Eds.), Supporting the child and the family in paediatric palliative care (pp. 59-66). Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
    Cairns, M., Thompson, M., & Wainwright, W. (2008). Transitions in dying and bereavement: A psychosocial guide for hospice and palliative care. Maryland, MD: Health Professions Press.
    Carroll, K. W., Mollen, C. J., Aldridge, S., Hexem, K. R., & Feudtner, C. (2012). Influences on Decision Making Identified by Parents of Children Receiving Pediatric Palliative Care. AJOB Primary Research, 3(1), 1-7. doi: 10.1080/21507716.2011.638019
    Carter, B., & Craig, F. (2012). Intensive-care units. In A. Goldman, R. Hain, & S. Liben (Eds.), Oxford textbook of palliative care for children (2nd ed., pp. 402-209). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist view it. In R. Valle & M. King (Eds). Existential phenomenological alternatives for psychology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Cranton, P., & Hoggen, C. (2012). Evaluating transformative learning. In E. W. Taylor & P. Cranton (Eds.). The handbook of transformative learning (1st ed., pp. 520-535). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    Davidson, J. E., Aslakson, R. A., Long, A. C., Puntillo, K. A., Kross, E. K., Hart, J., ... & Netzer, G. (2017). Guidelines for family-centered care in the neonatal, pediatric, and adult ICU. Critical Care Medicine, 45(1), 103-128. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002169
    Dickson-Swift, V., James, E. L., & Liamputtong, P. (2008). Undertaking sensitive research in the health and social sciences: Managing boundaries, emotions and risks. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
    Epstein, E. G., & Delgado, S. (2010). Understanding and addressing moral distress. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 15(3). doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol15No03Man01
    Fridriksdottir, N., Sigurdardottir, V., & Gunnarsdottir, S. (2006). Important needs of families in acute and palliative care settings assessed with the family inventory of needs. Palliative Medicine, 20(4), 425-432. doi:10.1191/0269216306pm1148oa
    Giannini, A., Messeri, A., Aprile, A., Casalone, C., Jankovic, M., Scarani, R., & Viafora, C. (2008). End-of-life decisions in pediatric intensive care: Recommendations of the Italian Society of Neonatal and Pediatric Anesthesia and Intensive Care (SARNePI).
    Pediatric Anesthesia, 18(11), 1089-1095. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02777.x
    Glesne, C. (2015). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
    Graham, R. J., Levetown, M., & Comeau, M. (2011). Decision making. In B. S. Carter, M. Levetown, & S. E. Friebert (Eds.), Palliative care for infants, children, and adolescents (2nd ed., pp.139-168). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
    Harrison, C. (2010). Truth telling in pediatrics: What they don’t know might hurt them. In G. Miller (Ed.). Pediatric bioethics (pp.73-86). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care. In D. Copp (Ed.). The Oxford handbook of ethical theory (pp. 537-566). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Hill, D. L., Miller, V., Walter, J. K., Carroll, K. W., Morrison, W. E., Munson, D., A., ...Feudtner, C. (2014). Regoaling: A conceptual model of how parents of children with serious illness change medical care goals. BMS Palliative Care,13(1), 1-9. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-13-9
    Hinds, P. S., Drew, D., Oakes, L. L., Fouladi, M., Spunt, S. L., Church, C., & Furman, W. L. (2005). End-of-life care preferences of pediatric patients with cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23(36), 9146-9154. doi:10.1200/jco.2005.10.538
    Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association (2010). Position statement: The nurse's role in advanced care planning. Pittsburgh, PA: Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association.
    Husserl, E. (1970). Logical investigations. (J. N. Findlay, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1901).
    Hynson, J. (2012). The child’s journey: Transition from health to ill health. In A. Goldman, R. Hain, & S. Liben (Eds.), Oxford textbook of palliative care for children (2nd ed., pp. 13-22). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Hynson, J. L., Aroni, R., Bauld, C., & Sawyer, S. M. (2006). Research with bereaved parents: A question of how not why. Palliative Medicine, 20(8), 805-811. doi: 10.1177/0269216306072349
    Institute of Medicine (2003). Pathways to a child’s death. In M. J. Field, & R. E. Behrman (Eds.). When children die: Improving palliative and end-of-life care for children and their families (pp.74). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
    Kaakinen, J. R., Coehlo, D. P., Steele, R., Tabacco, A., & Hanson, S. M. H. (2015). Family health care nursing: Theory, practice, and research. (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis Company.
    Kagawa-Singer, M., & Blackhall, L. J. (2001). Negotiating cross-cultural issues at the end of life: “You got to go where he lives”. Journal of American Medical Association, 286(23), 2993-3001. doi:10.1001/jama.286. 23.2993
    Kearney, J. A., & Byrne, M. W. (2015). Understanding parental behavior in pediatric palliative care: Attachment theory as a paradigm. Palliative Support Care, 13(6), 1559-1568. doi: 10.1017/S147895151300134X
    Koenig, H. G. (2005). Faith and mental health: Religious resources for healing. West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.
    Koenig, H. G. (2013). Spirituality in patient care: Why, how, when, and what (3rd ed.). West Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Foundation Press.
    Kralik, D., Visentin, K., & van Loon, A. (2006). Transition: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 55(3), 320-329. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03899.x
    Kubler-Ross, E. (2010). Hope. In D. E. Meier, S. L. Isaacs, & R. G. Hughes (Eds.). Palliative care: Transforming the care of serious illness (pp.111-124). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    Kvale, S. (1983). The qualitative research interview: A. phenomenological and a hermeneutical mode of understanding. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 14, 171-196. doi: 10.1163/156916283X00090
    Larkin, P. J., Dierckx de Casterle ́, B., & Schotsmans, P. (2007). Transition towards end of life in palliative care: An exploration of its meaning for advanced cancer patients in Europe. Journal of Palliative Care, 23(2), 69–79.
    Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. London, England: Sage Publications Ltd.
    Levetown, M., Meyer, E. C., & Gray, D. (2011). Communication skills and relational abilities. In B. S. Carter, M. Levetown, & S. E. Friebert (Eds.). Palliative care for infants, children, and adolescents (2nd ed., pp.169-201). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
    Liamputtong, P. (2007). Researching the vulnerable: A guide to sensitive research methods. London, England: SAGE Publications Ltd.
    Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
    Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. In D. D. Williams (Ed.), Naturalistic evaluation (pp. 73–84). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 163-188). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
    Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 97-128). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
    Ling, J., Payne, S., Connaire, K., & McCarron, M. (2016). Parental decision-making on utilisation of out-of-home respite in children's palliative care: Findings of qualitative case study research- A proposed new model. Child Care Health and Development, 42(1), 51-59. doi: 10.1111/cch.12300
    Mack, J. W., & Liben, S. (2012). Communication. In A. Goldman, R. Hain, & S. Liben (Eds.), Oxford textbook of palliative care for children (2nd ed., pp. 23-34). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Madrigal, V. N., Carroll, K. W., Faerber, J. A., Walter, J. K., Morrison, W. E., & Feudtner, C. (2016). Parental sources of support and guidance when making difficult decisions in the pediatric intensive care unit. The Journal of Pediatrics, 169, 221-226.e224. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.10.061
    McMurray, R. J., Clarke, O. W., Barrasso, J. A., Clohan, D. B., Epps, C. H., Glasson, J., ...& Halkola, K. A. (1992). Decisions near the end of life. Journal of American Medical Association, 267(16), 2229-2233. doi:10.1001/jama.1992.03480160087040
    Mealer, M., & Moss, M. (2016). Moral distress in ICU nurses. Intensive Care Medicine, 42(10), 1615-1617. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4441-1.
    Meert, K. L., Eggly, S., Pollack, M., Anand, K. J. S., Zimmerman, J., Carcillo, J., ... & Nicholson, C. (2008). Parents’ perspectives on physician-parent communication near the time of a child’s death in the pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatric Critical Care Medicine: A Journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 9(1), 2-7. doi:10.1097/01.PCC.0000298644.13882.88
    Meleis, A. I., Sawyer, L. M., Im, E. O., Hilfinger Messias, D. K., & Schumacher, K. (2000). Experiencing transitions: An emerging middle range theory. Advances in Nursing Science, 23(1), 12–28. doi: 10.1097/00012272-200009000-00006
    Merriam, S. B., Caffarella, R. S., & Baumgartner, L. M. (2006). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
    Mezirow, J. (2012). Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. In E. W. Taylor, P. Cranton, & Associates (Eds.), The handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 73-96). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    Miller, J. F. (1989). Hope-inspiring strategies of the critically III. Applied Nursing Research, 2(1), 23-29.
    Miller, J. F. (2007). Hope: A construct central to nursing. Nursing Forum, 42(1), 12-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6198.2007.00061.x
    Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    Northouse, L. L. (1998). Health communication: Strategies for health professionals (3rd ed.). London: Pearson Education.
    Olson, D. H., & Gorall, D. N. (2005). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. In F. Walsh (Ed.), Normal family processes: Growing diversity and complexity (3rd ed., pp. 514–548). New York: The Guilford Press.
    Paley, J. (1997). Husserl, phenomenology and nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26(1), 187-193. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997026187.x
    Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Polit, D. F., & Beck, C.T. (2015). Nursing research: Generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (10th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
    Ray, M. A. (1994). The richness of phenomenology: Philisophic, theoretic and methodologic concerns. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp.117-133). Thousand oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    Reiners, G. M. (2012). Understanding the differences between Husserl’s (descriptive) and Heidegger’s (interpretive) phenomenological research. Journal of Nursing and Care 1:119. doi:10.4172/2167-1168.1000119
    Rosenblatt, P. C. (2000). Parent grief: Narratives of loss and relationship. Philadelphia, PA: Routledge.
    Sharpe, J. (2016). Understanding and unlocking transformative learning as a method for enabling behaviour change for adaptation and resilience to disaster threats. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 17, 213-219. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.04.014
    Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2015). Phenomenology and the life sciences: Clarifications and complementarities. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 119, 493-501. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2015.06.011
    Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63-75.
    Stevens, M. M., Lord, B. A., Proctor, M. T., Nagy, S., & O'Riordan, E. (2010). Research with vulnerable families caring for children with life-limiting conditions. Qualitative Health Research, 20(4), 496-505. doi: 10.1177/1049732309356097
    Tang, S. T. (2013). End-of-life decision making in Taiwan: Healthcare practice is rooted in local culture and laws that should be adjusted to patients' best interests. Journal of Medical Ethics, 39(6), 387-388. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100760
    Tang, S. T., Hung, Y. N., Liu, T. W., Lin, D. T., Chen, Y. C., Wu, S. C., & Hsu, T. H. (2011). Pediatric end-of-life care for Taiwanese children who died as a result of cancer from 2001 through 2006. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29(7), 890-894. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.5639
    Thompson, A. (2015). Paediatric palliative care. Paediatrics and Child Health, 25(10), 458-462. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paed.2015.05.003
    Vagle, M. D. (2014). Craft phenomenological research. New York, NY: Routledge.
    Valdez-Martinez, E., Noyes, J., & Bedolla, M. (2014). When to stop? Decision-making when children‘s cancer treatment is no longer curative: A mixed-method systematic review. BMC Pediatrics, 14, 124. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-124
    Walsh, F. (2016). The new normal: Diversity and complexity in 21st
    -century families. In F. Walsh (Ed.). Normal family processes: Growing diversity and complexity (4th ed., pp.3-27). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
    Weise, K., Levetown, M., Tuttle, C., & Liben, S. (2011). Palliative care in the pediatric intensive care setting. In B. S. Carter, M. Levetown, & S. E. Friebert (Eds.). Palliative care for infants, children, and adolescents (2nd ed., pp.387-413). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
    White, M. (2000). Reflections on narrative practice: Essays and interviews. Australia, Adelaide: Dulwich Centre Publications.
    Wiegand, D. L., & Hinderer, K. A. (2016) Advance care planning: Advance directives, medical order sets, and surrogate decision making. In C. Dahlin, P. J. Coyne, & B. R. Ferrell (Ed.). Advanced practice palliative nursing (pp.379-384). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Wijdicks, E. F. (2001). The diagnosis of brain death. New England Journal of Medicine, 344(16), 1215-1221. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200104193441606
    World Health Organization (2008, March 15). WHO definition of palliative care. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/XwyGv8
    Xafis, V., Watkins, A., & Wilkinson, D. (2016). Death talk: Basic linguistic rules and communication in perinatal and paediatric end-of-life discussions. Patient Education and Counseling, 99(4), 555-561. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.10.025
    Xafis, V., Wilkinson, D., & Sullivan, J. (2015). What information do parents need when facing end-of-life decisions for their child? A meta-synthesis of parental feedback, BioMed Central Palliative Care, 14(19), 1-11. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0024-0
    Yang, Q., & Miller, G. (2015). East–west differences in perception of brain death. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 12(2), 211-225. doi: 10.1007/s11673-014-9564-x

    下載圖示 校內:2018-03-01公開
    校外:2018-03-01公開
    QR CODE