本研究的研究目的是以模擬更接近真實狀況下，飛行員操控飛機之補償追蹤行為進行測試，並期望由此補償追蹤實驗所定義的參數：精確度、敏捷度與敏捷極限，作為飛行員甄選之動作技能測試之新輔助工具。基於本實驗室數年來之研究成果，本研究選取五十五位空軍官校學生，其中包含四十五位完訓及十位停訓學生，透過手控搖桿來進行補償追蹤實驗，量測其基本飛航操作能力之相關參數。初步結果顯示，完訓學生與結訓學生在補償追蹤行為的參數：精確度、敏捷度與敏捷極限，經由t檢定結果皆為顯著差異，表示完訓學生與結訓學生在補償追蹤行為是有顯著差異存在；並透過量測的參數，經過統計分析找出誤判率最低的參數：敏捷極限，判斷標準為3.331rad/sec，誤判率為16.36%。期許未來，能與空軍官校或民航業者甚至民航局，再繼續合作，以蒐集到更完整的資料，使本研究這套飛行員動作技能的篩選工具更為完整、更為可靠。

　The objective of this research is to create new tools for psychomotor testing for pilots using parameters: precision, agility, agile limit defined by compensatory tracking experiment. This research chooses fifty-five students from the Air Force Academy including forty-five passed students and ten failed students to run the tests. It was found that the defined parameters between passed and failed students are different significantly by t test. It represented that the parameters defined in this research can statistically discriminate the passed from the failed students. From the results of statistical analysis, it was found that the parameters, agile limit possesses the lowest misjudge rate. The misjudge rate is 16.36% with agile limit to be 3.331 rad/sec. From the results of this research, the parameters defined do provide a possibly reliable tool for psychomotor testing of pilots. It is hoped that with more and more data collected either from the Air Force Academy or civil aviation, useful tools can be created with confidence.

[1] “Aircraft Accident Investigation Report─China Airlines, Airbus Industries A300B4-622R, Nagoya Airport 1994.4.26”, Aircraft Accident Investigation Commission, Ministry of Transport, 1996.

[2] Aviation Safety and Pilot Control─Understanding and Preventing Unfavorable Pilot-Vehicle Interactions, National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C, 1997.

[3] Elkind, J. I.(1956), Characteristics of Simple Manual Control Systems, MIT, Lincoln Laboratory.

[4] Gen, M. and Cheng, R.(1997). Genetic Algorithms and Engineering Design. New York: John Wiley.

[5] Goodyear Aircraft Corporation Rept(1952). GER-4750, “Human Dynamic Study”.

[6] Hess, R.(1996). “Feedback Control Models─Manual Control and Tracking”. Chapter 38, Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonmics. In G.Salvendy, N.T., John Wiley and Sons, New York.

[7] Hirch, D. L., McCormick, R.L.(1965). Experimental Investigation of Pilot Dynamics in a Pilot-Induced Oscillation Situation. Washington, DC. AIAA.

[8] Holland, J. H.(1962). Concerning Efficient Adaptive Systems. In M. C. Yovits, G. T. Jacobi, and G. D. Goldstein (Eds.), Self-Organizing System. Washington: Spartan Books, 215-230.

[9] J. M. DeLeo and S. J. Rosenfeld(2001), “Essential roles for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology in classifier neural network applications,” in Proc. Int. Joint Conf. Neural Networks, vol. 4, 2730-2731.

[10] K. Woods and K. W. Bowyer(1997), “Generating ROC curves for artificial neural networks,” IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, vol. 16, no. 3, 329-337.

[11] Koivo, A. T., Repperger, D. W., Kovio, A. J.(1999). Detection of Aircraft Pilot Coupling Caused Oscillation. Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation. 1999. CIRA’99. Proceedings. 1999 IEEE International Symposium on. 1999, 220-225.

[12] Magdaleno, R.E. and McRuer, D.T.(1971). “Experimental Validation and Analytical Elaboration for Models of the Pilots’s Neuromuscular Subsystem in Tracking Tasks”, (NASA CR-1757). Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[13] McRuer, D.(1980). “Human Dynamics in Man-Machine System”. Automatic, Elsevier, vol. 16, 237-253.

[14] McRuer, D. T., and Krendel, E. S.(1957). “Dynamic Response of Human Operators”. WADC-TR-56-524.

[15] McRuer, D., Krendel, E.(1974). “Mathematical Models of Human Pilot Behavior”. (AGARDograph NO. 188). NATO Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development.

[16] McRuer, D. T., and Krendel, E. S.(1957). “Dynamic Response of Human Operators”. WADC-TR-56-524.

[17] Michal, A. D.(1995), “Dramatic Incidents Highlight Mode Problems in Cockpits”, Aviation Week & Space Technology, 57-62.

[18] McRuer, D.(1980). “Human Dynamics in Man-Machine System”. Automatic, Elsevier, vol. 16, 237-253.

[19] Richard, C. Dorf. and Robert, H. Bishop.(2001), Modern Control System. Prentice Hall.

[20] Statistical Summary of Commercial Jet Airplane Accident-Worldwide Operation 1959-1993(1994). Airplane Safety Engineering. Boeing Commercial Airplane Group.

[21] T.J.Downey, D. J. Meyer, R. K. Price and E.L. Spitznagel(1999), “Using the receiver operating characteristic to asses the performance of neural classifiers, ”Int. Joint Conf. Neural Network, vol. 5, 3642-3646.

[22] Tustin, A.(1947), “The Nature of the Operator’s Response in Manual Control and Its Implications for Controller Design.” J.IEEE., Vol. 94, Part IIA, No. 2.

[23] 陸鵬舉, 稽允蟬(1996), “國籍航空器飛安事故模型建立及預設之研究”. 國立成功大學航空太空研究所碩士論文.

[24] 何立己(1998), 黑盒子的秘密-航空安全人為因素剖析, AIRWAY世界民航雜誌.

[25] 中華民國飛行安全基金會(2000). 1990’s 航空飛安回顧. 飛航安全季刊, 22,15-20.

[26] 謝昇蓉(2000). “基因演算法於亂流中飛行軌跡重建之應用”. 國立成功大學航空太空工程研究所碩士論文.

[27] 景鴻鑫, 盧郁文(2002). 人之基本追蹤行為的異向性. 民航季刊, 第四卷, 第一期, 75-88.

[28] 景鴻鑫, 鄭振輝, 盧郁文(2002). 人的補償追蹤行為之異向性. 民航季刊, 第四卷, 第二期, 117-133.

[29] 景鴻鑫, 鄭振輝, 梁永欣(2002). 人的補償追蹤行為之極限探討. 民航季刊, 第四卷, 第四期, 125-137.

[30] 景鴻鑫, 陳宣宇(2002). “人的補償追蹤行為之適應現象”. 國立成功大學航空太空工程研究所碩士論文.

[31] 嚴成文, 陳炳仁(2002). “類神經網路ROC曲線的設計方法”. 國立中央大學機械與機電工程研究所碩士論文.

[32] 景鴻鑫, 鄭振輝, 梁永欣(2002). 人的補償追蹤行為之退化現象. 民航學會航太學會/燃燒學會學術聯合會議. 國立高雄餐旅學院.

[33] 景鴻鑫, 鄭振輝, 梁永欣(2002). 飛行員甄選之動作技能測試的新建議. 第九屆三軍官校基礎學術研討會. 空軍軍官學校.

[34] 景鴻鑫, 鄭振輝, 梁永欣(2002). 人的補償追蹤行為之極限探討. 民航季刊, 第四卷, 第四期, 125-137.

[35] 程千芳, 周麗芳(2003). 從心理測驗談飛行員之心理訓練需求. 空軍軍官雙月刊, 第121期, 61-83.

[36] 陳順宇(2004). 多變量分析. 華泰書局.