| 研究生: |
黃柏霖 Huang, Berlin |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
雙衝擊噴流混合機制之實驗研究 An Experimental Study of the Mixing Mechanism of Doublet Impinging Jet Spray |
| 指導教授: |
袁曉峰
Yuan, Hsiao-Feng |
| 學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 航空太空工程學系 Department of Aeronautics & Astronautics |
| 論文出版年: | 2012 |
| 畢業學年度: | 101 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 116 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 平面雷射激發螢光技術 、同質雙衝擊噴流 、完全發展模式 、動量通量 、混合 、穿透百分率 、軸對稱曲張波 、非對稱螺旋波 、歪斜碰撞 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | PLIF, mixing, equal-momentum, like-doublet, impinging jet spray, fully developed, penetration percentage, momentum flux, varicose wave, helical wave, skew impingement |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:107 下載:12 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究主要使用非侵入式、高解析度之平面雷射激發螢光技術(PLIF technique)觀察同質雙衝擊噴流之二維霧化液滴質量與混合分布;實驗使用內徑為0.3mm之噴孔(L/D=5)產生兩股高速液柱以60° (+30°/-30°)為衝擊角相互撞擊,且以液柱衝擊動量比等於1為設定前提,於完全發展模式(Fully developed state)下探討總動量通量改變對衝擊噴流混合特性之影響;本研究主要使用純水、10vol%丙酮水溶液與20wt%甘油水溶液為工作流體進行實驗觀察。於分析方面以穿透百分率(Penetration percentage, P.P.) 作為噴流混合狀態之參考指標;以實驗設定條件而言,理想上噴流之穿透百分率應為50%,但實驗結果顯示於不同之動量通量操作狀態下,穿透百分率皆大於50%。此外隨動量通量增加,穿透百分率則呈現一先上升、後下降,而再緩緩上升之三階段特徵趨勢變化;且當穿透百分率接近50%時,衝擊噴流則具有最佳的混合狀態。為了解此特殊三階段穿透百分率之形成原因,本研究進一步以高速攝影機進行實驗觀察,結果顯示衝擊噴流之液柱表面具有不穩定之波動產生,主要可區分為葫蘆狀之軸對稱曲張波(Axisymmetric varicose wave)與非對稱螺旋波(Asymmetric helical wave)。而不穩定表面波的形成使得液柱於撞擊瞬間會引起噴流的不穩定擾動,而其擾動強度與擾動模式會直接影響噴流穿透百分率(混合)的大小;軸對稱曲張波易因表面波本身之相位角差異使得液柱碰撞瞬間引起不穩定之動量通量擾動(Momentum flux fluctuation),而非對稱螺旋波易使得衝擊噴流於衝擊點產生歪斜碰撞(Skew impingement)現象。此外,本研究亦使用具不同物理性質之丙酮水與甘油水進行衝擊噴流混合現象的觀察;結果顯示丙酮水與甘油水之衝擊噴流隨動量通量的增加,其穿透百分率亦有相似之三階段特徵趨勢變化;但其進入完全發展模式狀態的起始點與其穿透百分率變化的強度會有個別之差異;此結果證明流體物理性質的不同會改變衝擊噴流完全發展模式的時機與液柱不穩定表面波之擾動振幅與波形發展,亦進一步影響整體衝擊噴流的混合狀態。
This research utilizes the planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF) technique and high-speed photography to determine the mixing characteristics of equal-momentum like-doublet impinging jet sprays in fully developed conditions of three test liquids (water, 10 vol% acetone-water, and 20 wt% glycerol-water) with different physical properties. The injector composes of two 0.3mm diameter orifices at 60° (+30°/-30°) impinging angle. The penetration percentage (P.P.) of droplets passing through the center plane of the sprays from either jet is identified to characterize the mixing phenomena. In this experimental setup, the mixing ideally occurs at P.P. of 50%, indicating that the effects of convection and diffusion on liquid mixing are fully relaxed. However, all the penetration percentages (P.P.) observed in this study are over 50%. The analyses show that the state of the jets at the impinging point has crucial effects on P.P. The high-speed photography shows that the growth and the propagation of the instability waves on the surface of liquid jets are the controlling factors. The three-stage P.P. variations with momentum flux in fully developed conditions are induced by jet momentum flux fluctuation at impingement resulted from the onset of axisymmetric varicose waves on the free jets, and by the skew impingement resulted from the growth of asymmetric helical waves on the jets at impinging point. Besides water, both acetone-water solution and glycerol-water solution of different physical properties are also used to verify the three-stage P.P. variation observed in water spray. The similar three-stage P.P. variations are also observed in the acetone-water and glycerol-water sprays; however, the onset of the fully developed state and the points where the stages change occur at different momentum fluxes, and their corresponding P.P. values in each stage also vary. The results show that changes in physical properties of liquids influence the development of spray pattern for impinging jet spray and the fluctuation intensity and development of the instability surface waves of free liquid jet, which significantly influence the state of mixing in impinging jet sprays.
[1] Lefebvre, H., “Atomization and Sprays,” Hemisphere Publishing, Washington, DC, 1989.
[2] Rayleigh, L., “On the Instability of Jets,” Proc. London Math. Soc., Vol. 10, 1878, pp. 4-13.
[3] Weber, C. and Angew, Z., “Disintegration of Liquid Jets,” Math. Mech., Vol. 11, No. 2, 1931, pp. 136-159.
[4] Haenlein, A., “Disintegration of a Liquid Jet,” NACA TN 659, 1932.
[5] Ohnesorge, W. and Angew, Z., “Formation of Drops by Nozzles and Breakup of Liquid Jets”, Math. Mech., Vol. 16, 1936, pp. 355-358.
[6] Castleman, R. A., “The Mechanism of the Atomization of Liquids”, J. Res. Natl. Bru. Stand., Vol. 6, No. 281, 1931, pp. 369-376.
[7] Sauter, J., “Determining Size of Drops in Fuel Mixture of Internal Combustion Engines,” NACA TM 390, 1926.
[8] Scheubel, F. N., “On Atomization in Carburetors,” NACA TM 644, 1931.
[9] Reitz, R. D., “Atomization and Other Breakup Regimes of a Liquid Jet,” Ph D. thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 1987.
[10] Reitz, R. D. and Bracco, F. V., “Mechanisms of Atomization of a Liquid Jet,” Phys Fluids, 25, 1982, pp. 1730-1742.
[11] Hoyt, J. W. and Taylor, J. J, “Turbulence Structure in a Water Jet Discharging in Air,” J. Fluid Mech., Phys. Fluids, 20(10), 1977, pp. S253-257.
[12] Hoyt, J. W. and Taylor, J. J, “Waves on Water Jets,” J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 83, Part 1, 1977, pp 119-127.
[13] Mayer, W. O. H., “Coaxial Atomization of a Round Liquid Jet in a High Speed Gas Stream: A Phenomenological Study,” Experiments in Fluids, Vol. 16, 1994, pp. 401-410.
[14] Yoon, S. S. and Heister, S. D., “A Fully Non-Linear Model for Atomization of High-Speed Jets,” Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, Vol. 28, 2003, pp. 345-357.
[15] Pan, Y. and Suga, K., “A Numerical Study on the Breakup Process of Laminar Liquid Jets into a Gas,” Phys. Fluids, 18(052101), 2006.
[16] Rupe, J. H., “On the Dynamic Characteristics of Free Liquid Jets and a Partial Correlation with Orifice Geometry,” NASA Technical Report No. 32-207, 1962.
[17] Heidmann, M. F., Priem, R. J., and Humphrey, J. C., “A Study of Sprays Formed by Two Iminging Jets,” NACA-TN-3835, March, 1957.
[18] Lai, W. H., Huang, W. and Jiang, T. L., “Effects of Orifice Size and Impinging Angle on the Characteristics of a Like-Doublet Impinging-Jet,” International Journal of Turbo and Jet Engines, Vol. 15, 1998, pp. 155-164.
[19] Stehling, K. R., “Injector Spray and Hydraulic Factor in Rocket Motor Analysis,” J. Amer. Rocket Soc., Vol. 22, 1952, pp. 132-138.
[20] Dombrowski, N., and Hopper, P. C., “A Study of the Sprays Formed by Impinging Jets in Laminar and Turbulent Flow,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 18, part 3, 1963, pp.392-400.
[21] Heidmann, M. F. and Humphrey, J. C., “Fluctuations in a Spray Formed by Two Impinging Jets,” NACA-TN-2349,1951.
[22] Ma, D. J., Chen, X. D., Khare, P., and Yang, V., “Atomization Patterns and Breakup Characteristics of Liquid Sheets Formed by Two Impinging Jets,” the 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA-2011-97, Jan. 4-7, 2011.
[23] Huang, W., “Studies on the Characteristics of Like-Doublet Impinging Jets,” Ph. D Thesis, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, R.O.C., 1998.
[24] Yuan, T., Chen, C., and Huang, B., “The Effects of Physical Properties on the Impinging Spray,” 2006 AASRC/CCAS Joint Conference, 27-25, Jhongli City, Taoyuan County, Taiwan, 2006.
[25] Lai, W. H., Huang, W., and Jiang, T. L., ”Characteristic Study on the Like-doublet Impinging Jets Atomization,” Atomization and Sprays, Vol. 9., 1999, pp. 277-289.
[26] Tate, R. W., “Spray Patternation,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol. 52, No. 10, 1960, pp. 49A-53A.
[27] Rupe, J. H., “The Liquid Phase Mixing of a Pair of Impinging Streams, Jet Propulsion Lab.,” JPL Progress Rept. 20-195, California Inst. of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 1953.
[28] Rupe, J. H., “A Correlation Between the Dynamic Properties of a Pair of Impinging Streams and the Uniformity of Mixture Ratio Distribution in the Resulting Spray,” Jet Propulsion Lab., JPL Progress Rept. 20-209, California Inst. of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 1956
[29] Riebling, R. W., “Effect of Orifice Length-to-Diameter Ratio on Mixing in the Spray from a Pair of Unlike Impinging Jets,” J. Spacecraft, Vol. 7, No. 7, 1970, pp. 894-896.
[30] Hoehn, F. W. and Rupe, J., “Flow Cavitation Effects on the Mixing Characteristics of Bipropellant Doublets,” 8th JANNAF Combution Meeting, Vol. 1, Chemical Propulsion Information Agency, Publ. 220, 1971, pp. 569-582.
[31] Nurick, W. H., ”Orifice Cavitation and Its Effect on Spray Mixing,” Journal of Fluids Engineering, Dec. 1976, pp. 681-687.
[32] Riebling, R. W., “Criteria for Optimum Propellant Mixing in Impinging-Jet Injection Elements,” J. Spacecraft, Vol. 4, No. 4, 1967, pp. 817-819.
[33] McHale, R. M., Nurick, W. H. and S. D. Clapp, “Injector Design Criteria Using Noncircular Orifice Geometry,” J. Spacecraft, Vol. 8, No. 4, 1970, pp. 408-410.
[34] Lee, C. H., Jung, Y. H. and Chung, S. H., “An Experiment on Flow Distribution and Mixing in Impinging Jet Spray,” Atomization and Sprays, Vol. 9, 1999, pp. 193-213.
[35] Cho, Y. H., Lee, S. W. and Yoon, W. S., “Orifice Diameter Ratio Effect on the Mixing Performances for Split Triplet Injectors,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2004, pp. 69-75.
[36] Ashgriz, N., Brocklehurst, W., and Tally, D., “Mixing Mechanism in a Pair of Impinging Jets,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2001, pp. 736-749.
[37] Jung, K., Koh, H., and Yoon, Y., “Assessment of Planar Liquid-Laser-Induced Fluorescence Measurements for Spray Mass Distributions of Like-doublet Injectors,” Measurement Science and Technology, Vol. 14, 2003, pp. 1387-1395.
[38] Jung, K., Yoon, Y., and Hwang, S. S., “Spray Characteristics of Impinging Jet Injectors Using Imaging Techniques,” 36th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA 2000-3396, Huntsville, AL, U.S.A., 2000.
[39] Jung, K., Lim, B. and Yoon, Y, “Comparison of Mixing Characteristics of Unlike Triplet Injectors Using Optical Patternator,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2005, pp. 442-449.
[40] Yuan, T., Chen, C., and Huang, B., “Optical Observation of the Impingements of Nitrogen Tetroxide /Monomethylhydrazine Simulants,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 44, No. 10, 2006, pp. 2259-2266.
[41] Yuan, T., Chen, C., and Huang, B., “Comparison of Hot-Fire and Cold-Flow Observations of Nitrogen Tetroxide/Monomethylhydrazine Impinging Combustion,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 47, No. 10, 2009, pp. 2359-2367.
[42] Talley, D. G., J. F., Verdieck, Lee, S. W., Mcdonell, V. G. and Samuelsen, G. S., “Accounting for Laser Sheet Extinction in Applying PLLIF to Sprays,” AIAA-96-0469, 1996.
[43] Eckbreth, A. C., “Laser Diagnostics for Combustion Temperature and Species,” Gordon and Breach Publisher, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1996, pp. 390.
[44] Chen, W. C., “The Analysis on the Breakup and Mixing of the Impinging Jets,” Ph. D Dissertation, National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan, R.O.C., 2007.
[45] Schweitzer, P. H., “Mechanism of Disintegration of Liquid Jets,” J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 8, 1937, pp. 513-521.
[46] Ashgriz, N., and Poo, J. Y., Coalescence and Separation in Binary Collisions of Liquid Drops, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 221, 1990, pp. 183-204.
[47] Qian, J., and Law, C. K., Regimes of Coalescence and Separation in Droplet Collision, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 331, 1997, pp. 59-80.
[48] Jiang, Y. J., Umemura, A. and Law, C. K., An Experimental Investigation on the Collision Behaviour of Hydrocarbon Droplet, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 234, 1992, pp. 171-190.