簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表
研究生： 黃國基
Huang, Kuo-Chi
論文名稱： 反循環基樁於軸向載重試驗承載力詮釋法之研究
The Study on the Interpretation of Reversed Circulation Pile Loading Test
指導教授： 倪勝火
Ni, Sheng-Huoo
學位類別： 碩士
Master
系所名稱： 工學院 - 土木工程學系碩士在職專班
Department of Civil Engineering (on the job class)
論文出版年： 2013
畢業學年度： 101
語文別： 中文
論文頁數： 160
中文關鍵詞： 基樁 、基樁載重試驗 、支承力 、極限承載力 、支承力詮釋
外文關鍵詞： pile, pile loading test, bearing capacity, ultimate bearing capacity, bearing capacity interpretation.
相關次數： 點閱：140  下載：9 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報

    • 本研究使用十組現地反循環基樁載重試驗資料，利用不同之支承力詮釋法詮釋及評估反循環基樁之極限承載力，並經由與兩倍設計載重之比較，以評估各種詮釋法於反循環基樁支承力之適用性。文中共使用15種詮釋法，經各試驗案例之研究分析結果顯示，Terzaghi 10% 法、Mazurkiewicz 法、Chin 法、Brinch Hansen 80% 法、及Vander Veen 法所詮釋之極限承載力為所有詮釋法之上限，而AASHTO 法與De Beer 法所詮釋之極限承載力為所有詮釋法之下限。

    The purpose of this study is to evaluate the applicability of various bearing capacity interpretation methods for reversed circulation pile. In this study, ten existing reversed circulation piles loading test data were used to evaluate the ultimate bearing capacity from pile loading test with fifteen interpretation methods. The interpretation methods are assessed by comparing the interpreted bearing capacities with the double of design load. The results show that Terzaghi’s 10% diameter , Mazurkiewicz’s, Chin’s , Brinch Hansen's 80% , and Vander Veen’s method are located at the upper limit of all interpretation methods while the AASHTO’s and De Beer’s method are located the lower limit of all interpretation methods.

    中文摘要....................................................I Abstract .................................................II 誌謝.....................................................III 目錄......................................................IV 表目錄...................................................VII 圖目錄..................................................VIII 符號說明................................................XVIII 第一章 緒論.................................................1 1.1 研究目的................................................1 1.2 研究方法................................................3 1.3 研究內容................................................3 第二章 相關文獻回顧及反循環基樁施工法...........................4 2.1 相關文獻回顧............................................4 2.2 反循環基樁施工法及施工說明................................6 2.2.1 反循環基樁施工法.......................................6 2.2.2 反循環基樁施工說明.....................................8 第三章 基樁軸向載重試驗及詮釋法則.............................14 3.1 基樁軸向載重試驗配置方式.................................14 3.1.1 試驗目的及試驗規範....................................14 3.1.2 呆重配置方式.........................................15 3.1.3 錨樁反力配置方式......................................17 3.1.4 基樁載重試驗內容......................................18 3.2 基樁軸向載重試驗方法及程序...............................19 3.2.1 標準載重法...........................................20 3.2.2 循環載重法...........................................21 3.2.3 等時間距加載法........................................22 3.2.4 等速率貫入法.........................................23 3.2.5 快速載重法...........................................23 3.2.6 沉陷量控制法.........................................24 3.3 垂直支承力評估之詮釋法...................................25 3.3.1 單樁支承力公式理論....................................25 3.3.2 靜力學公式推估方式....................................26 3.3.3 以貫入試驗公式推估基樁極限支承力........................28 3.3.4 基樁垂直載重試驗支承力詮釋法............................29 第四章 試驗案例結果分析與討論.................................43 4.1 基樁載重試驗案例概述.....................................43 4.2 試驗方法及詮釋法........................................45 4.3 試驗案例分析說明........................................46 4.3.1 試驗案例-位移限制法詮釋結果............................51 4.3.2 試驗案例-圖解法詮釋結果................................54 4.3.3 試驗案例-數學模式法詮釋結果............................59 4.4 小結..................................................62 第五章 結論與建議...........................................69 5.1 結論..................................................69 5.2 建議..................................................71 參考文獻...................................................72 附錄 A 案例地質調查資料......................................78 附錄 B 載重-時間-沉陷關係總合圖..............................81 附錄 C 位移限制法...........................................91 附錄 D 圖解法.............................................106 附錄 E 數學模式法..........................................146

    1.內政部營建署，建築物基礎構造設計規範，建築技術規則建築構造篇，第五章樁基礎，計44頁 (2001)。
    2.交通部，公路工程施工規範，交通技術標準規範公路類公路工程部，第四篇橋梁工程，計190頁 (2013)。
    3.李建中，「試樁加載過程及結果詮釋方法的探討」，地工技術雜誌，第5期，第91-97頁 (1984)。
    4.李建中，「不同加載方式之樁載重試驗行為模擬研究」，中興工程科技，第8-10頁 (1991)。
    5.李咸亨、李慶福，「垂直基樁載重試驗結果詮釋法在臺灣地區之適用性探討」，地工技術雜誌，第24期，第49~59頁 (1988)。
    6.祝錫敏，「大口徑場鑄基樁之施工」，台灣營建研究院，基樁施工與監造，第35-99頁 (2000)。
    7.胡邵敏，「由試樁結果分析談大口徑長樁之設計與施工問題」，財團法人地工技術研究發展基金會地工技術第16次研討會，計16頁 (2001)。
    8.倪勝火，電腦輔助大地工程試驗法與分析，倪勝火，第十六章基樁軸向壓力載重試驗結果之分析程式，第451-488頁 (1994)。
    9.陳逸駿、張吉佐，「基樁樁底承載力及其詮釋法評估」，第七屆大地工程學術研究討論會，第407-408頁 (1997)。
    10.黃俊鴻、楊志文，「基樁載重試驗承載力判釋方法之探討與建議」，地工技術，第80期，第7-8頁 (2000)。
    11.AASHTO, Standard Specification for Highway Bridges, 14th Edition, 420p. (1990) .
    12.ASTM, “Standard Test Methods for Deep Foundations under Static Axial Compressive Load,” Annual Book of ASTM Standard, Designation: D 1143/D 1143M-07. (2007) .
    13.Brinch Hansen, J., “Discussion on Hyperbolic Stress-Strain Response,” American Society of Civil Engineering, ASCE, Journal for Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol. 97, No. SM6, pp. 931-932. (1963) .
    14.Butler, H.D. and Hoy, H.E., User’s Manual for the Texas Quick-Load Method for Foundation Load Testing, Federal Highway Administration Office of Development, Washington, 59p. (1977) .
    15.Chen, M.C., “Axial Behavior of Driven Precast Concrete Piles,” Ph.D Dissertation, Chung Yuan Christian University, Taiwan, pp. 250-257. (2013) .
    16.Chen, Y.J. and Fang, Y.C., “Critical Evaluation of Compression Interpretation Criteria for Drilled Shafts,” Journal of Geoenvironmental Engineering , ASCE, Vol. 135, No. 8, pp. 1056-1069. (2009) .
    17.Chen, Y.J. and Kulhawy, F.H., “Evaluation of Drained Axial Capacity of Drilled Shafts,” Deep Foundations (GSP 116), Edition, O'Neill, M.W. and Townsend, F.C., ASCE, Florida, pp. 1200-1214. (2002) .
    18.Chin, F.K., “Estimation of the Ultimate Load of Piles not Carried to Failure,” Proceeding, 2nd Southeast Asian Conference on Soil Engineering, pp. 81-90. (1970) .
    19.Coyle, H.M. and Reese, L.C., “Load Transfer for Axially Loaded Piles in Clay,” Journal of the Soil Mech and Found Division, ASCE, Vol. 92, pp. 1-26. (1966) .
    20.Davisson, M.T., “High Capacity Piles,” Lecture Series on Innovations in Foundation Construction, ASCE, Illinois Section, Chicago, 52p. (1972) .
    21.Davisson, M.T., “Pile load capacity,” Design Construction and Performance of Deep Foundations, San Francisco, CA, pp. 1-49. (1975) .
    22.Das, B.M., Principles of Foundation Engineering, 3rd Edition, PWS Engineering, Boston, MA. (1995) .
    23.De Beer, E.E., “Different Behavior of Bored and Driven Piles,” Proceeding, 6th Budapest Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Budapest, pp. 307-318. (1984) .
    24.Fellenius, B.H., “The Analysis of Results from Routine Piles Load Tests,” Ground Engineering, Vol. 13, pp. 19-31. (1980) .
    25.Fuller, F.M. and Hoy, H.E., “Pile Load Tests Including Quick Load Test Method , Conventional Methods, and Interpretations,” Transportation Research Board Record 333, Washington, pp. 74-86. (1970) .
    26.Hirany, A. and Kulhawy, F.H., Conduct and Interpretation of Load Tests on Drilled Shaft Foundations: Detailed Guidelines, Report No. EL-5915(1), Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto. (1988) .
    27.Hirany, A. and Kulhawy, F.H., “Interpretation of Load Tests on Drilled Shafts, Parts 1 : Axial Compression,” Deep Foundations (GSP22), Edition, Kulhawy, F.H, ASCE, New York, pp. 1132-1149. (1989) .
    28.Hirany, A. and Kulhawy, F.H., “On the Interpretation of Drilled Foundation Load Test Results,” Deep Foundations (GSP116), Edition, O’Neill, M.W and Townsend, F.C, ASCE, Florida, pp. 1018-1028. (2002) .
    29.Kondner, R.L., “Hyperbolic Stress-Strain Response in Cohesive Soils,” Journal for Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 89, pp. 115-1493. (1963) .
    30.Mazurkiewicz, B.K., “Test Loading of Piles According to Polish Regulations,” Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences, Commission on Pile Research, Report No. 35, Stockholm, 20p. (1972) .
    31.Meyerhof, G.G., “ Bearing Capacity and Settlement of Piles Foundations,” Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 102, No. GT7, pp. 709-228. (1976) .
    32.O’Neill, M.W. and Reese, L.C., “Behavior of Bored Piles in Beaumont Clay,” Proceeding, ASCE, Vol. 98, No. SM2, pp. 195-213. (1972) .
    33.Reese, L.C. and O’Neill, M.W., Drilled Shafts: Construction Procedures and Design Methods, Report No. FHWA-HI-88-042, Federal Highway Administration, McLean. (1988) .
    34.Terzaghi, K., “Discussion of the Progress Report of the Committee on the Bearing Value of Pile Foundations,” Proceeding, ASCE, Vol. 68, pp. 311-323. (1942) .
    35. Terzaghi, K. and Peck, R.B., Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice, Wiley, New York, 533p. (1967) .
    36. Vander Veen, C., “The Bearing Capacity of A Pile,” Proceeding, 3rd Edition, International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Zurich, Vol. 2, pp. 84-90. (1953) .
    37. Vesic, A.S., “Experiments with Instrumented Pile Groups in Sand. Performance of Deep Foundations,” ASTM, STP 444, pp. 177-222. (1969) .
    38. Vesic, A.S., “Bearing Capacity of Shallow Foundation,” Chap. 3 in Foundation Engineering Handbook, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp. 121-147. (1975) .
    39. Vesic, A.S., “ Design of Pile Foundations,” National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Synthesis of Practice, No. 42, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C, 68p. (1977) .

    下載圖示 校內：2014-07-24公開
    校外：2016-07-24公開
    QR CODE