| 研究生: |
蘇家陞 Su, Chia-Sheng |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
對己二腈電合成反應具高活性與選擇性之電極材料開發 Development of electrode material with high activity and selectivity towards electrosynthesis of adiponitrile |
| 指導教授: |
林家裕
Lin, Chia-Yu |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 化學工程學系 Department of Chemical Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2021 |
| 畢業學年度: | 109 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 78 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 丙烯腈 、己二腈 、電催化加氫二聚合 、電觸媒 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Acrylonitrile, Adiponitrile, Electro-hydrodimerization, Electro-catalyst |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:116 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
己二腈係為製備尼龍66的單體之一,因工業需求量大,因此開發一具高效能與具環境友善之生產程序方法極為重要。相較傳統須使用氫化氰有毒氣體的丁二烯氫氰化反應生產己二腈製程,丙烯腈電化學加氫二聚化反應生成己二腈因具可在常溫常壓進行,且僅利用水作為丙烯腈氫化的質子來源等優點,其近年的研究開發日益受到矚目。
本研究利用定電流電化學沉積法製備鉍基電觸媒修飾電極,並且將其應用於電催化丙烯腈加氫二聚化合成己二腈。藉由修飾電極之電鍍條件(如電鍍電量、電鍍液組成)與丙烯腈電解條件(如四級銨鹽濃度、丙烯腈濃度效應、電解液之酸鹼值)之探討與優化,我們所製備的鉍基電觸媒修飾電極其性能可與目前商用的鉛修飾電極匹敵。例如,在施加電位為-1.60 V (vs. NHE)下,所製備之鉍基電觸媒修飾電極其法拉第效率、己二腈產生速率以及轉換頻率分別可達84.17 ± 1.11 %、0.48 ± 0.01 mmol cm-2 h-1與88.65 ± 2.47 h-1,而鉛修飾電極則為78.25 ± 1.88 %、0.61 ± 0.04 mmol cm-2 h-1與104.66 ± 7.16 h-1。為了進一步提高鉍基電觸媒之電催化活性,我們也利用製備具奈米片狀結構之碘氧化鉍並透過還原前處理來製備具奈米片狀結構之鉍基電觸媒。結果顯示,奈米結構化可進一步提高其電催化活性;所得法拉第效率、己二腈產生速率以及轉換頻率分別可高達79.80 ± 2.27 %、1.28 ± 0.20 mmol cm-2 h-1及546.47 ± 86.30 h-1。本研究成功開發出一種對環境友善、低毒性,且對丙烯腈電催化加氫二聚化生成己二腈之反應具有高的選擇率與高的法拉第效率的電觸媒材料。
Adiponitrile (ADN) is one of the monomeric precursor for the synthesis of nylon 66. However, the traditional ADN synthesis mostly relies on the hydrocyanation process of 1,3-butadiene with hazardous hydrogen cyanide1-3. The electrohydrodimerization (EDH) of acrylonitrile into ADN serves a less energy-intensive and green synthetic alternative route to produce ADN4-7.
In this work, we present the detailed studies on the effects of electrode materials and electrolysis conditions (e.g., applied potential, electrolyte composition, and electrolyte pH) on the electrohydrodimerization of acrylonitrile into adiponitrile at near neutral pH. Under optimal condition, the nanostructured bismuth modified electrode exhibited a turnover frequency of 546.47 ± 86.30 h-1, which is about 5.2 times higher than the nanostructured lead modified electrode (104.66 ± 7.16 h-1). In addition, the nanostructured bismuth modified electrode showed comparable selectivity, in terms of Faradaic efficiency, towards adiponitrile production with the lead modified one (79.80 ± 2.27 % vs 78.25 ± 1.88 %). These results suggest that bismuth can be a promising non-toxic alternative to lead that is commonly used in commercial EDH process for ADN production.
1. N. L. Morrow, Environ Health Perspect, 1990, 86, 7-8.
2. L. Bini, C. Muller and D. Vogt, Chemical communications (Cambridge, England), 2010, 46, 8325-8334.
3. Y. Zhu, L. Gao, B. Zong and L. Wen, Chinese Science Bulletin, 2015, 60, 1488-1501.
4. P. Suwanvaipattana, S. Limtrakul, T. Vatanatham and P. A. Ramachandran, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 142, 1296-1308.
5. D. E. Blanco, A. Z. Dookhith and M. A. Modestino, Reaction Chemistry & Engineering, 2019, 4, 8-16.
6. D. E. Blanco, B. Lee and M. A. Modestino, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019, 116, 17683-17689.
7. B.-Y. Li, W.-F. Huang and M.-C. Yang, Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2020, 115, 13-19.
8. 陈建文, 己二腈:100%依赖进口,国产化提速利好尼龙 66, Available from: https://pdf.dfcfw.com/pdf/H3_AP201912181371929535_1.pdf?1576690405000.pdf.
9. 新材料在線, 一文看懂尼龍新材料產業發展現狀, Available from: http://www.xincailiao.com/fuwu/xinpin_detail.aspx?id=574509.
10. 屠庆华, 化学工业, 2012, 30, 26-30.
11. A. Fuessl, M. Yamamoto and A. Schneller, in Polymer Science: A Comprehensive Reference, eds. K. Matyjaszewski and M. Möller, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2012, pp. 49-70.
12. 華經產業研究院, 2020年中國己二腈行業消費現狀分析,短期內行業壟斷較難改變, Available from: http://caifuhao.eastmoney.com/news/20201211111109357076310#comment.
13. C. A. Tolman, R. J. McKinney, W. C. Seidel, J. D. Druliner and W. R. Stevens, Advances in Catalysis, 1985, 33, 1-46.
14. A. Chaumonnot, F. Lamy, S. Sabo-Etienne, B. Donnadieu, B. Chaudret, J.-C. Barthelat and J.-C. Galland, Organometallics, 2004, 23, 3363-3365.
15. H. W. Sun Hongfei, Du Caixia, Huang Changyong, Pang Jinqiang, Yan Yingjie, Li Shimin, Long Xiaoqin, 2015, CN105130845A.
16. G. F. C. N. N. Ling, Chemical Reaction Engineering and Technology, 1991, 2, 128-135.
17. Y. Knunyants and N. Vyazankin, Bulletin of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR Division of chemical science, 1957, 6, 253-256.
18. M. M. Baizer, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 1964, 111, 215-222.
19. R. H. McKee, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry, 1946, 38, 382-384.
20. N. M. Bikales, A. H. Gruber and L. Rapoport, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry, 1958, 50, 87-90.
21. M. M. Baizer, C. R. Campbell, R. H. Fariss and J. Robert, 1965, US3529011A.
22. F. BECK, Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 1972, 2, 59-69.
23. F. Beck, Angewandte Chemie International Edition in English, 1972, 11, 760-781.
24. S. YOSHIZAWA, Z. TAKEHARA, Z. OGUMI, M. MATSUBARA and T. TSUJI, Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 1976, 6, 403-409.
25. D. E. Danly, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 1984, 131, 435C-442C.
26. G. Piccardi, L. Nucci, F. Pergola and R. Guidelli, Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry, 1984, 164, 145-166.
27. S. Thangavelu, P. Subbiah and K. S. Udupa, Bulletin of Electrochemistry, 1985, 01, 137-140.
28. K. SCOTT, I. F. McCONVEY and J. HENDERSON, Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 1987, 17, 329-339.
29. A. M. COUPER, D. PLETCHER and F. C. WALSH, Chemical Reviews, 1990, 90, 837-865.
30. K. Scott, B. Hayati, A. N. Haines and I. F. McConvey, Chemical Engineering & Technology - CET, 1990, 13, 376-383.
31. M. R. Moncelli, R. Guidelli and M. Cariá, Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry, 1991, 313, 313-322.
32. K. Scott and B. Hayati, Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification, 1993, 32, 253-260.
33. D. Pletcher and F. C. Walsh, Industrial electrochemistry, Springer Science & Business Media, 2 edn., 2012.
34. D. E. Blanco, R. Atwi, S. Sethuraman, A. Lasri, J. Morales, N. N. Rajput and M. A. Modestino, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2020, 167, 155526.
35. S. Diaz-Tendero, M. Alcami and F. Martin, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2013, 15, 1288-1295.
36. B. H. Loo and T. Kato, Surface Science, 1993, 284, 167-174.
37. X. Huang, L. Tan, L. Zhang, C. Li and Z. Wei, Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020, 382, 123006.
38. A. R. Zeradjanin, J. P. Grote, G. Polymeros and K. J. Mayrhofer, Electroanalysis, 2016, 28, 2256-2269.
39. M. Watson, D. Pletcher and D. W. Sopher, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2000, 147, 3751-3758.
40. F. Karimi, F. Mohammadi and S. N. Ashrafizadeh, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2011, 158, E129-E135.
41. F. Karimi, S. N. Ashrafizadeh and F. Mohammadi, Chemical Engineering Journal, 2012, 183, 402-407.
42. D. E. Blanco, P. A. Prasad, K. Dunningan and M. A. Modestino, Reaction Chemistry & Engineering, 2020, 5, 136-144.
43. O. Brown, E. Gonzalez and A. Wright, Electrochimica Acta, 1973, 18, 555-560.
44. L. H. Long, Pure and Applied Chemistry, 1960, 2, 61.
45. T. Nonaka and K. Sugino, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 1967, 114, 1255-1256.
46. A. Chauvel and G. Lefebvre, Petrochemical Process, Enfield Pub & Distribution Co, Paris, 1989.
47. M. Atobe, M. Sasahira and T. Nonaka, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2000, 7, 103-107.
48. W. Huang, J. Zhu, M. Wang, L. Hu, Y. Tang, Y. Shu, Z. Xie and H. Zhang, Advanced Functional Materials, 2020, 31, 2007584.
49. S. M. Ibn Shamsah, Catalysts, 2021, 11, 429.
50. H. Li and C. Oloman, Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 2006, 36, 1105.
51. Y. Hori, H. Wakebe, T. Tsukamoto and O. Koga, Electrochimica Acta, 1994, 39, 1833-1839.
52. M. Azuma, K. Hashimoto, M. Hiramoto, M. Watanabe and T. Sakata, Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 1990, 137, 1772.
53. A. S. Agarwal, Y. Zhai, D. Hill and N. Sridhar, ChemSusChem, 2011, 4, 1301-1310.
54. F. Zhang, C. Chen, S. Yan, J. Zhong, B. Zhang and Z. Cheng, Applied Catalysis A: General, 2020, 598, 117545.
55. J. Y. Park, S. Kim, D. M. Hong, J. W. Lim, C. J. Yoo, W. J. Dong and J.-L. Lee, Electronic Materials Letters, 2019, 15, 454-461.
56. M. Liu, Y. Pang, B. Zhang, P. De Luna, O. Voznyy, J. Xu, X. Zheng, C. T. Dinh, F. Fan, C. Cao, F. P. de Arquer, T. S. Safaei, A. Mepham, A. Klinkova, E. Kumacheva, T. Filleter, D. Sinton, S. O. Kelley and E. H. Sargent, Nature, 2016, 537, 382-386.
57. S. Kim, W. J. Dong, S. Gim, W. Sohn, J. Y. Park, C. J. Yoo, H. W. Jang and J.-L. Lee, Nano Energy, 2017, 39, 44-52.
58. D. Wu, J. Liu, Y. Liang, K. Xiang, X. Z. Fu and J. L. Luo, ChemSusChem, 2019, 12, 4700-4707.
59. N. Han, Y. Wang, H. Yang, J. Deng, J. Wu, Y. Li and Y. Li, Nature Communications, 2018, 9, 1320.
60. T. Zhang, Y. Qiu, P. Yao, X. Li and H. Zhang, ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2019, 7, 15190-15196.
61. D. A. Lowy, M. Jitaru, B. C. Toma, l. A. Silberg and L. Oniciu, Journal of Chemical Technology, 1997, 4, 18-24.
62. L. Meng, J. Ustarroz, M. E. Newton and J. V. Macpherson, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2017, 121, 6835-6843.
63. J. Cheng, X. Zou, Y. Su, G. Yang and X. Lue, Functional Materials Letters, 2009, 2, 185-191.
64. J. Cheng, X. Zou, W. Song, X. Meng, Y. Su, G. Yang, X. Lü, F. Zhang and M. Cao, CrystEngComm, 2010, 12, 1790-1794.
65. D. Reyter, D. Bélanger and L. Roué, Electrochimica Acta, 2008, 53, 5977-5984.
66. R. Abdallah, F. Geneste, T. Labasque, H. Djelal, F. Fourcade, A. Amrane, S. Taha and D. Floner, Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 2014, 727, 148-153.
67. X. Fu, X. Zhao, X. Hu, K. He, Y. Yu, T. Li, Q. Tu, X. Qian, Q. Yue, M. R. Wasielewski and Y. Kang, Applied Materials Today, 2020, 19, 100620.
68. J. Hopwood, G. Derrick, D. Brown, C. Newman, J. Haley, R. Kershaw and M. Collinge, Journal of Chemistry, 2016, 2016, 1-11.
69. K. J. McDonald and K.-S. Choi, Energy & Environmental Science, 2012, 5, 8553.