| 研究生: |
陳氏碧庄 Trang, Tran Thi Bich |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
以聯合分析法探討行動電話屬性之最佳產品組合 An Application of Conjoint Analysis to the Optimal Combination of the Product Attributes of Mobile Phone Product |
| 指導教授: |
蔡燿全
Tsai, Yao-Chuan |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 企業管理學系 Department of Business Administration |
| 論文出版年: | 2017 |
| 畢業學年度: | 105 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 88 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | conjoint analysis, mobile phone, market segmentation |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:98 下載:3 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
Mobile phones have gradually become essential part of people’s everyday life. With the launch of a wide and varied range of products, consumers always want to choose the most suitable ones bringing the highest value. Today, in the face of fierce competition in the smartphone market, the key to the success of a manufacturer is how to make a difference and a competitive advantage. For this reason, this paper chooses a conjoint analysis methodology to access the evaluations Vietnamese consumers living and working in Taiwan on the combinations of product attributes; through the different demographic variables, statistics is used to find out which attributes consumers are most interested in in order to provide useful information to suppliers in the progress of developing products which are suitable for Vietnamese in Taiwan.
Research results show that the attributes appealling to consumers are the battery (talk time), brand (operating system), internal memory, price, and camera. All respondents rated the battery (talk time) as the most important attribute of a mobile phone. Although consumers generally prefer low-priced and feature-rich phones, creating a strong brand image, and goood-quality phones at competitive prices will improve customer satisfaction which is one of the keys to business success.
REFERENCES
[1]https://www.statista.com/statistics/237505/global-revenue-from-smartphones-since- 2008/
[2]http://www.idc.com/promo/smartphone-market-share/vendor [3]http://focustaiwan.tw/news/aeco/201603020018.aspx
[4] Işıklar, Gülfem & Gülçin, Büyüközkan. (2007). Using a multi-criteria decision
making approach to evaluate mobile phone alternatives. Computer Standards
& Interfaces, 29(0), 265–274.
[5] Zoë Mack & Sarah Sharples. (2009). The importance of usability in product choice:
A mobile phone case study. Ergonomics, 52(12), 1514-1528.
[6] John M. Malasi. (2012). Influence of Product Attributes on Mobile Phone
preference among university students: A Case of Undergraduate students.
International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management
Sciences, 1(6), 2226-3624.
[7] Mokhlis, Safiek & Azizul, Yadi Yaakop. (2012). Consumer Choice Criteria in
Mobile Phone Selection: An Investigation of Malaysian University Students.
International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(2), 203-212. [8] Sung H. Han; Kwang J. Kim; Myung H. Yun; Sang W. Hong & Jongseo Kim .
(2004). Identifying Mobile Phone Design Features Critical to User
Satisfaction. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 14(1), 15-29. [9] Myung Hwan Yun; Sung H Han; Sang W Hong & Jongseo Kim. (2003).
Incorporating user satisfaction into the look-and-feel of mobile phone design.
Ergonomics, 46(13-14), 1423-1440.
[10] Yang-Cheng Lin; Hsin-Hsi Lai & Chung-Hsing Yeh. (2007). Consumer-oriented
product form design based on fuzzy logic: A case study of mobile phones.
International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37(0), 531-543.
[11] Anastasios A. Economides & Amalia Grousopoulou. (2009). Students’ thoughts
about the importance and costs of their mobile devices’ features and services.
Telematics and Informatics, 26(0), 57-84.
[12] Peter W. Turnbull; Sheena Leek & Grace Ying. (2000). Customer Confusion: The
Mobile Phone Market. Journal of Marketing Management, 16(1-3), 143-163. [12] Heikki Karjaluoto; Jari Karvonen; Manne Kesti; Timo Koivumaki; Marjukka
Manninen; Jukka Pakola; Annu Ristola & Jari Salo. (2008). Factors affecting consumer choice of mobile phones: Two studies from Finland. Journal of Euromarketing, 59-82.
[13] Carol F Gwin; Carl R Gwin. (2003). Product attributes model: A tool for evaluating brand positioning. Journal of Markeing Theory and Practice, 11(2), 30.
[14] Oghojafor Ben Akpoyomare; Ladipo Patrick Kunle Adeosun & Rahim Ajao Ganiyu. (2012). The influence of Product Attributes on Consumer Purchase Decision in the Nigerian Food and Beverages Industry: A Study of Lagod Metropolis. American Journal of Business and Management, 1(4), 196-201.
[15] Mohd Rizaimy Shaharudin; Anita Abu Hassan; Suhardi Wan Mansor; Shamjul
Jamel Elias; Etty Harniza Harun & Nurazila Abdul Aziz. (2010). The Relationship Between Extrinsic Attributes of Product Quality with Brand Loyalty on Malaysia National Brand Motorcycle/Scooter. Canadian Social Science, 6(3), 165-175.
[16] Kevin Lane Keller. (1993). Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-22.
[17] Bhimrao M. Ghodeswar. (2008). Building brand identity in competitive markets: a conceptual model. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 17(1), 4-12.
[18] Paul E. Green and V. Srinivasan. (1990). Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 3-19.
[19] Philippe Cattin & Dick R. Wittink. (1982). Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: A Survey. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 44-53.
[20] Chin Feng Lin. (2002). Segmenting customer brand preference: demographic or psychographic. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 11(4), 249-268.