過去的研究表明，機率與報酬是個體評估風險程度的重要因素，且對個體的知覺決策處理策略有顯著的影響。儘管已有研究表明，反饋對於個體在決策過程中的資訊整合扮演著重要的角色，但關於反饋在不同風險程度下對策略選擇影響的討論卻相對有限，且缺乏實徵研究證據。因此，本研究將建立在先前的研究基礎之上，探討在不同風險情境下，反饋訊息如何影響個體的知覺處理策略，研究採用冗餘目標作業，並透過有無反饋的兩種實驗設計，以及操弄不同位置目標出現機率與報酬的差距，創造出不同風險程度的實驗情境：風險較低的低比率情境（不同位置的機率與報酬差距小）和風險較高的高比率情境（不同位置的機率與報酬差距大）。結果顯示，在高比率條件下，頂部組參與者（目標出現在上方位置的頻率較低，但獎勵較高）的處理策略會因爲反饋的引入從平行處理轉變為共同激發處理，而來自底部組的參與者則表現出從平行處理到序列處理的轉變。綜合本研究結果發現，在知覺決策過程中，個體的策略選擇會因接收到反饋訊息而改變。這一結果不僅支持了相對顯著性假說（楊政達等人，2011），同時也強調了反饋對於處理策略採用的重要性。

Previous research indicates that probability and reward are significant factors in individual risk assessment and have a notable impact on the strategies adopted during perceptual decision-making. Despite existing research indicating the significant role of feedback in the information integration process during decision-making, the impact of feedback on processing strategy adoption under risk remains unclear. Therefore, building on prior research, this study aims to explore how feedback influences individual perceptual processing strategies under different risk levels. The research employed a redundant target task, manipulating the presence of feedback and varying the probability and reward differences for stimuli in different locations, creating low-risk, low-ratio condition (small differences of probability and reward across locations) and high-risk, high-ratio condition (large differences of probability and reward across locations). The results demonstrate a shift in the high-ratio condition when involved feedback, from parallel to coactive processing in participants from the top group (targets appearing less frequently at the top but with higher rewards), while those from the bottom group showed a shift from parallel to serial processing. In summary, this study found that feedback indeed affects individuals' attention and triggers a change in strategy adoption. This outcome not only supports the hypothesis of relative saliency hypothesis (Yang et al., 2011) but also emphasizes the importance of feedback in the adoption of processing strategies.

Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2011). Value-driven attentional capture. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 108(25), 10367-10371. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1104047108
Barron, G., Leider, S., & Stack, J. (2008). The effect of safe experience on a warnings’ impact: Sex, drugs, and rock-n-roll. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106(2), 125-142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.11.002
Belopolsky, A. V., Zwaan, L., Theeuwes, J., & Kramer, A. F. (2007). The size of an attentional window modulates attentional capture by color singletons. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 934-938. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194124
Blunden, A. G., Wang, T., Griffiths, D. W., & Little, D. R. (2015). Logical-rules and the classification of integral dimensions: individual differences in the processing of arbitrary dimensions [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01531
Burke, J. L., Prewett, M. S., Gray, A. A., Yang, L., Stilson, F. R. B., Coovert, M. D., Elliot, L. R., & Redden, E. (2006). Comparing the Effects of Visual-Auditory and Visual-Tactile Feedback on User Performance: A Meta-analysis.
Camerer, C., & Weber, M. (1992). Recent Developments in Modelin.
Chang, T.-Y., Yu, J.-C., Little, D. R., & Yang, C.-T. (2015). Exogenous and endogenous cues differentially influence the processing architecture during perceptual decision making. (Paper presented at the 48th annual meeting of the society for mathematical psychology, Newport Beach, California.).
Chang, T. Y., Little, D. R., & Yang, C. T. (2016). Selective attention modulates the effect of target location probability on redundant signal processing [Article]. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 78(6), 1603-1624. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1127-2
Cho, S. A., & Cho, Y. S. (2021). Uncertainty modulates value-driven attentional capture [Article]. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 83(1), 142-155. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02171-3
Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36(1), 28-71. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0681
Chung, C., Fu, H.-L., & Yang, C.-T. (2022). The effects of value and probability on the utilization of the perceptual decision strategy. ([Paper presentation]. Virtual MathPsych/ICCM 2022. [mathpsych.org/presentation/863](http://mathpsych.org/presentation/863)).
Colonius, H., & Vorberg, D. (1994). Distribution inequalities for parallel models with unlimited capacity. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 38(1), 35-58. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmps.1994.1002
Corballis, M. C. (2002). From hand to mouth: The origins of language. Princeton University Press.
Diederich, A., & Colonius, H. (1987). Intersensory facilitation in the motor component? A reaction time analysis. Psychological Research, 49(1), 23-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309199
Donkin, C., Little, D. R., & Houpt, J. W. (2014). Assessing the speed--accuracy trade-off effect on the capacity of information processing. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 40(3), 1183-1202. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035947
Dzhafarov, E. N. (1999). Conditionally selective dependence of random variables on external factors. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 43, 123-157. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmps.1998.1231
Eidels, A., Donkin, C., Brown, S. D., & Heathcote, A. (2010). Converging measures of workload capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(6), 763-771. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.6.763
Eidels, A., Houpt, J. W., Altieri, N., Pei, L., & Townsend, J. T. (2011). Nice guys finish fast and bad guys finish last: Facilitatory vs. inhibitory interaction in parallel systems. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55(2), 176-190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2010.11.003
Eidels, A., Townsend, J. T., & Algom, D. (2010). Comparing perception of Stroop stimuli in focused versus divided attention paradigms: evidence for dramatic processing differences. Cognition, 114(2), 129-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.008
Evans, L., Rhodes, A., Alhazzani, W., Antonelli, M., Coopersmith, C. M., French, C., Machado, F. R., McIntyre, L., Ostermann, M., Prescott, H. C., Schorr, C., Simpson, S., Wiersinga, W. J., Alshamsi, F., Angus, D. C., Arabi, Y., Azevedo, L., Beale, R., Beilman, G., . . . Levy, M. (2021). Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med, 47(11), 1181-1247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y
Fetsch, C. R., DeAngelis, G. C., & Angelaki, D. E. (2013). Bridging the gap between theories of sensory cue integration and the physiology of multisensory neurons. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(6), 429-442. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3503
Fific, M., Little, D. R., & Nosofsky, R. M. (2010). Logical-rule models of classification response times: a synthesis of mental-architecture, random-walk, and decision-bound approaches. Psychol Rev, 117(2), 309-348. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018526
Fific, M., Nosofsky, R. M., & Townsend, J. T. (2008). Information-processing architectures in multidimensional classification: a validation test of the systems factorial technology. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 34(2), 356-375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.356
Fitousi, D., & Wenger, M. J. (2011). Processing capacity under perceptual and cognitive load: A closer look at load theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(3), 781-798. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020675
Fox, E. L., & Houpt, J. W. (2016). The perceptual processing of fused multi-spectral imagery. Cogn Res Princ Implic, 1(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0030-7
Geng, J. J., & Behrmann, M. (2002). Probability cuing of target location facilitates visual search implicitly in normal participants and patients with hemispatial neglect. Psychological Science, 13(6), 520-525. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00491
Geng, J. J., & Behrmann, M. (2005). Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 67(7), 1252-1268. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193557
Gielen, S. C. A. M., Schmidt, R. A., & Van Den Heuvel, P. J. M. (1983). On the nature of intersensory facilitation of reaction time [Article]. Perception & Psychophysics, 34(2), 161-168. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211343
Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. M. (1999). Fast and frugal heuristics: The adaptive toolbox. In Simple heuristics that make us smart. (pp. 3-34). Oxford University Press.
Gondan, M., Niederhaus, B., Rösler, F., & Röder, B. (2005). Multisensory processing in the redundant-target effect: A behavioral and event-related potential study. Perception & Psychophysics, 67(4), 713-726. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193527
Grable, J., & Lytton, R. H. (1999). Financial risk tolerance revisited: the development of a risk assessment instrument☆. Financial Services Review, 8(3), 163-181. [https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-0810(99)00041-4](https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-0810(99)00041-4)
Haffke, P., & Hübner, R. (2015). Effects of different feedback types on information integration in repeated monetary gambles. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01597
Hall, J. K., Daneke, G. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2010). Sustainable development and entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future directions. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 439-448. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.01.002
Honey, C., Kirchner, H., & VanRullen, R. (2008). Faces in the cloud: Fourier power spectrum biases ultrarapid face detection. Journal of Vision, 8(12), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1167/8.12.9
Houpt, J. W., Blaha, L. M., McIntire, J. P., Havig, P. R., & Townsend, J. T. (2014). Systems factorial technology with R [Article]. Behavior Research Methods, 46(2), 307-330. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0377-3
Houpt, J. W., & Townsend, J. T. (2012). Statistical measures for workload capacity analysis. J Math Psychol, 56(5), 341-355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2012.05.004
Hsieh, C. J., Fifić, M., & Yang, C. T. (2020). A new measure of group decision-making efficiency [Article]. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1), Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00244-3
Huettel, S. A., Song, A. W., & McCarthy, G. (2005). Decisions under Uncertainty: Probabilistic Context Influences Activation of Prefrontal and Parietal Cortices. The Journal of Neuroscience, 25(13), 3304-3311. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.5070-04.2005
Hughes, H. C., Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., Nozawa, G., & Fendrich, R. (1994). Visual-auditory interactions in sensorimotor processing: saccades versus manual responses. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 20(1), 131-153. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.20.1.131
Jessup, R. K., Bishara, A. J., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2008). Feedback produces divergence from prospect theory in descriptive choice [Article]. Psychological Science, 19(10), 1015-1022. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02193.x
Johansson, P., Hall, L., Sikström, S., & Olsson, A. (2005). Failure to detect mismatches between intention and outcome in a simple decision task. Science, 310(5745), 116-119. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111709
Johansson, P., Hall, L., Sikström, S., Tärning, B., & Lind, A. (2006). How something can be said about telling more than we can know: on choice blindness and introspection. Conscious Cogn, 15(4), 673-692; discussion 693-679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2006.09.004
Jones, J. L., & Kaschak, M. P. (2012). Global statistical learning in a visual search task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(1), 152-160. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026233
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.
Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. 682-290.
Kujala, J. V., & Dzhafarov, E. N. (2008). Testing for selectivity in the dependence of random variables on external factors. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 52, 128-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2008.01.008
Kusev, P., Purser, H., Heilman, R., Cooke, A., Schaik, P., Baranova, V., Martin, R., & Ayton, P. (2017). Understanding Risky Behavior: The Influence of Cognitive, Emotional and Hormonal Factors on Decision-Making under Risk. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00102
Kusev, P., & van Schaik, P. (2011). Preferences under risk: Content-dependent behavior and psychological processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00269
Kusev, P., van Schaik, P., Ayton, P., Dent, J., & Chater, N. (2009). Exaggerated risk: Prospect theory and probability weighting in risky choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(6), 1487-1505. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017039
Kusev, P., van Schaik, P., Martin, R., Hall, L., & Johansson, P. (2020). Preference reversals during risk elicitation. J Exp Psychol Gen, 149(3), 585-589. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000655
Kusev, P., van Schaik, P., Teal, J., Martin, R., Hall, L., & Johansson, P. (2022). How false feedback influences decision‐makers' risk preferences. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 35(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2278
Lambert, D., & Lines, D. (2000). Understanding Assessment: Purposes, Perceptions, Practice (1st ed.). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203133231

Laurence, R., & Dominic, C. (2009). An introduction to E-Prime. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.05.2.p068
Lejarraga, T., & Gonzalez, C. (2011). Effects of feedback and complexity on repeated decisions from description. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(2), 286-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.05.001
Libera, C. D., & Chelazzi, L. (2006). Visual Selective Attention and the Effects of Monetary Rewards.
Lind, A., Hall, L., Breidegard, B., Balkenius, C., & Johansson, P. (2014). Auditory feedback of one’s own voice is used for high-level semantic monitoring: the “self-comprehension” hypothesis [Hypothesis and Theory]. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00166
Link, S. W., & Heath, R. A. (1975). A sequential theory of psychological discrimination. Psychometrika, 40(1), 77-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291481
Little, D. R., Nosofsky, R. M., & Denton, S. E. (2011). Response-time tests of logical-rule models of categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021330
Little, D. R., Nosofsky, R. M., Donkin, C., & Denton, S. E. (2013). Logical rules and the classification of integral-dimension stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(3), 801-820. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029667
Martijn, L., Jacobs, A., Harmsen, M., Maassen, I., & Wensing, M. (2012). Patient safety in midwifery care for low-risk women: instrument development. J Midwifery Womens Health, 57(4), 386-395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00147.x
Matsuno, K., Diederich, R. J., Go, M. J., Blaumueller, C. M., & Artavanis-Tsakonas, S. (1995). Deltex acts as a positive regulator of Notch signaling through interactions with the Notch ankyrin repeats. Development, 121(8), 2633-2644. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.121.8.2633
Miller, J. (1982). Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: In search of partial output. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8(2), 273-296. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.8.2.273
Miller, J. (1986). Timecourse of coactivation in bimodal divided attention. Percept Psychophys, 40(5), 331-343. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03203025
Miller, J., & Lopes, A. (1991). Bias produced by fast guessing in distribution-based tests of race models. Percept Psychophys, 50(6), 584-590. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03207544
Milstein, D. M., & Dorris, M. C. (2011). The Relationship between Saccadic Choice and Reaction Times with Manipulations of Target Value. Front Neurosci, 5, 122. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2011.00122
Miniussi, C., Girelli, M., & Marzi, C. A. (1998). Neural site of the redundant target effect: Electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(2), 216-230. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892998562663
Mordkoff, J. T., & Yantis, S. (1991). An Interactive Race Model of Divided Attention.
Neufeld, R. W. J., Townsend, J. T., & Jetté, J. (2007). Quantitative Response Time Technology for Measuring Cognitive-Processing Capacity in Clinical Studies. In Advances in clinical cognitive science: Formal modeling of processes and symptoms. (pp. 207-238). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11556-007
Newell, B. R., & Rakow, T. (2007). The role of experience in decisions from description.
Otto, T. U., & Mamassian, P. (2012). Noise and correlations in parallel perceptual decision making. Curr Biol, 22(15), 1391-1396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.05.031
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of Attention.
Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109(2), 160-174. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.109.2.160
Raab, D. H. (1962). Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 24(5), 574-590. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2164-0947.1962.tb01433.x
Ratcliff, R. (1981). A theory of order relations in perceptual matching. Psychological Review, 88(6), 552-572. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.6.552
Raymond, J. E., & O’Brien, J. L. (2009). Selective Visual Attention and Motivation.
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84(1), 1-66. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.1.1
Schröter, H., Fiedler, A., Miller, J., & Ulrich, R. (2011). Fusion prevents the redundant signals effect: Evidence from stereoscopically presented stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(5), 1361-1368. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024280
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19-45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x
Schwarz, S. D., & Tacelli, R. K. (1989). Abortion and some philosophers: A critical examination. Public Affairs Quarterly, 3(2), 81-98.
Smith, E. E., & Egeth, H. (1966). Effects of association value on perceptual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(5), 687-690. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023090
Smith, S. M. (1995). Getting into and out of mental ruts: A theory of fixation, incubation, and insight. In The nature of insight. (pp. 229-251). The MIT Press.
Steenfeldt-Kristensen, C., & Thornton, I. M. (2013). Haptic choice blindness. Iperception, 4(3), 207-210. https://doi.org/10.1068/i0581sas
Stewart, W. F., Ricci, J. A., Chee, E., Hahn, S. R., & Morganstein, D. (2003). Cost of lost productive work time among US workers with depression. Jama, 289(23), 3135-3144. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.23.3135
Theeuwes, J. (1994). Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: Selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(4), 799-806. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.799
Theeuwes, J. (2004). Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture. Psychon Bull Rev, 11(1), 65-70. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03206462
Townsend, D. J., & Bever, T. G. (2001). Sentence comprehension: The integration of habits and rules. The MIT Press.
Townsend, J., & Fific, M. (2004). Parallel & serial processing and individual differences in high-speed scanning in human memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 953-962. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194987
Townsend, J. M., & Levy, G. D. (1990). Effects of potential partners' costume and physical attractiveness on sexuality and partner selection. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 124(4), 371-389. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1990.10543232
Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1984). Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes. Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=k8uMswEACAAJ
Townsend, J. T., & Colonius, H. (1997). Parallel processing response times and experimental determination of the stopping rule. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41(4), 392-397. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmps.1997.1185
Townsend, J. T., & Eidels, A. (2011). Workload capacity spaces: a unified methodology for response time measures of efficiency as workload is varied. Psychon Bull Rev, 18(4), 659-681. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0106-9
Townsend, J. T., & Nozawa, G. (1995). Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: An investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 321-359. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmps.1995.1033
Townsend, J. T., & Thomas, R. D. (1994). Stochastic dependencies in parallel and serial models: Effects on systems factorial interactions. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 38, 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmps.1994.1001
Townsend, J. T., & Wenger, M. J. (2004). A Theory of Interactive Parallel Processing: New Capacity Measures and Predictions for a Response Time Inequality Series. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1003-1035. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1003
Van Zandt, T. (2002). Analysis of Response Time Distributions. In Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/0471214426.pas0412
Vlaev, I., Kusev, P., Stewart, N., Aldrovandi, S., & Chater, N. (2010). Domain Effects and Financial Risk Attitudes. Risk Analysis, 30(9), 1374-1386. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01433.x
Wang, Z., Gong, S.-Y., Xu, S., & Hu, X.-E. (2019). Elaborated feedback and learning: Examining cognitive and motivational influences. Computers & Education, 136, 130-140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.003
Weber, E. U., & Milliman, R. A. (1997). Perceived Risk Attitudes: Relating Risk Perception to Risky Choice. Management Science, 43(2), 123-144. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.2.123
Wenger, M. J., & Gibson, B. S. (2004). Using Hazard Functions to Assess Changes in Processing Capacity in an Attentional Cuing Paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(4), 708-719. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.30.4.708
Wenger, M. J., & Townsend, J. T. (2000). Spatial frequencies in short-term memory for faces: A test of three frequency-dependent hypotheses. Memory & Cognition, 28(1), 125-142. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211581
Wickens, C., & Hollands, J. (2000). Engineering Psychology and Human Performance / C.D. Wickens, J.G. Hollands.
Wickens, C., Prinet, J., Hutchins, S., Sarter, N., & Sebok, A. (2011). Auditory-Visual Redundancy in Vehicle Control Interruptions: Two Meta-analyses. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 55(1), 1155-1159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181311551241
Yang, C.-T., Altieri, N., & Little, D. R. (2018). An examination of parallel versus coactive processing accounts of redundant-target audiovisual signal processing. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 82, 138-158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2017.09.003
Yang, C.-T., Cousineau, D., & Pfister, R. (2020). The editorial on the special issue `Are sequential sampling models the future gold standard of cognitive psychology?'. The Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 16, 71-72. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.16.2.p071
Yang, C.-T., & Hu, Y. (2012). Examining the effect of payoffs on stimulus detection in a redundant-target detection task. (Paper presented at the 45th annual meeting of the society for mathematical psychology, Columbus, Ohio.).
Yang, C.-T., Wang, C.-H., Chang, T.-Y., Yu, J.-C., & Little, D. R. (2019). Cue-Driven Changes in Detection Strategies Reflect Trade-Offs in Strategic Efficiency. Computational Brain & Behavior, 2(2), 109-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-019-00027-0
Yang, C. T. (2011). Relative Saliency in Change Signals Affects Perceptual Comparison and Decision Processes in Change Detection [Article]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(6), 1708-1728. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024257
Yang, C. T., Chang, T. Y., & Wu, C. J. (2013). Relative change probability affects the decision process of detecting multiple feature changes [Article]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(5), 1365-1385. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030693
Yang, C. T., Hsu, Y. F., Huang, H. Y., & Yeh, Y. Y. (2011). Relative salience affects the process of detecting changes in orientation and luminance [Article]. Acta Psychologica, 138(3), 377-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.09.003
Yang, C. T., Little, D. R., & Hsu, C. C. (2014). The influence of cueing on attentional focus in perceptual decision making [Article]. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 76(8), 2256-2275. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0709-0
Yechiam, E., Barron, G., & Erev, I. (2005). The Role of Personal Experience in Contributing to Different Patterns of Response to Rare Terrorist Attacks. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(3), 430-439. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002704270847
Yu, J. C., Chang, T. Y., & Yang, C. T. (2014). Individual differences in working memory capacity and workload capacity [Article]. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(DEC), Article 1465. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01465
Zhao, J., Al-Aidroos, N., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2013). Attention is spontaneously biased toward regularities. Psychol Sci, 24(5), 667-677. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612460407